skip to main content
10.1145/3596671.3598573acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiworkConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Adapting to Telerehabilitation Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Future is Hybrid

Published:20 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Rehabilitation is vital for individuals to build compensatory strategies for, and recover from, physical and cognitive impairments. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted patients from receiving traditional co-located rehabilitation. Thus, a monumental transition occurred requiring Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (PM&R) clinicians and patients to transition to telerehabilitation. Our interdisciplinary research team of technologists and clinicians performed a case study of PM&R clinicians (physicians, therapists, and psychologists) deploying and transitioning their workflows to telerehabilitation. We found that after clinicians’ constant reflection and workflow changes, they successfully adapted most co-located rehabilitation practices to telerehabilitation. Furthermore, because of their adaptation experience, they all alluded that the future workflows of PM&R care involves continuing to leverage telerehabilitation, but within a hybrid rehabilitation model. In this paper, we share the clinicians’ reflections on the telerehabilitation transition and then present a conceptual design model aimed to inform the design and development of future telerehabilitation systems that support a hybrid rehabilitation workflow.

References

  1. Imad Afyouni, Anas Einea, and Abdullah Murad. 2019. Towards an Adaptive Gaming Framework for TeleRehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (Rhodes, Greece) (PETRA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1145/3316782.3321545Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adegboyega Akinsiku, Ignacio Avellino, Yasmin Graham, and Helena M. Mentis. 2021. It’s Not Just the Movement: Experiential Information Needed for Stroke Telerehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 661, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. David Brennan, Lyn Tindall, Deborah Theodoros, Janet Brown, Michael Campbell, Diana Christiana, David Smith, Jana Cason, and Alan Lee. 2010. A Blueprint for Telerehabilitation Guidelines. International Journal of Telerehabilitation 2, 2 (oct 2010), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.5195/IJT.2010.6063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Juliet Clark and Aisling Kelliher. 2021. Understanding the Needs and Values of Rehabilitation Therapists in Designing and Implementing Telehealth Solutions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 247, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Juliet Clark, Setor Zilevu, Tamim Ahmed, Aisling Kelliher, Sai Krishna Yeshala, Sarah Garrison, Cathleen Garcia, Olivia C. Menezes, Minakshi Seth, and Thanassis Rikakis. 2021. Hybrid Workflow Process for Home Based Rehabilitation Movement Capture. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences (Virtual Event, USA) (IMX ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452918.3465499Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Steven C Cramer, Lucy Dodakian, Vu Le, Jill See, Renee Augsburger, Alison McKenzie, Robert J Zhou, Nina L Chiu, Jutta Heckhausen, Jessica M Cassidy, 2019. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA neurology 76, 9 (2019), 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Veena Jayasree-Krishnan, Shramana Ghosh, Anna Palumbo, Vikram Kapila, and Preeti Raghavan. 2021. Developing a framework for designing and deploying technology-assisted rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 100, 8 (2021), 774–779. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ninad Khargonkar, Kevin Desai, Balakrishnan Prabhakaran, and Thiru Annaswamy. 2022. Virtepex: Virtual Remote Tele-Physical Examination System. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1729–1742. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Soo Yeon Kim, Kelly Daley, April D Pruski, Tariq AlFarra, Alba Azola, Marlis Gonzalez Fernandez, Mary S Keszler, Stacey Friedel, Hayley Haaf, Harrison Segall, 2022. Implementation of a Framework for Telerehabilitation in Clinical Care Across the Continuum During COVID-19 and Beyond. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 101, 1 (2022), 53. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001904Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Peter Langhorne, Julie Bernhardt, and Gert Kwakkel. 2011. Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet 377, 9778 (2011), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Emanuela E Mihai, Marius N Popescu, Cristina Beiu, Luca Gheorghe, and Mihai Berteanu. 2021. Tele-Rehabilitation Strategies for a Patient With Post-stroke Spasticity: A Powerful Tool Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus 13, 11 (2021), 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kim Munck, Mark Hummeluhr Christensen, Alan Tahhan, Birthe I. Dinesen, Helle Spindler, John Hansen, Olav W. Nielsen, and Soren Leth. 2018. Evaluation of Self-Trackers for Use in Telerehabilitation. J. Usability Studies 13, 3 (may 2018), 125–137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Timothy Neate, Vasiliki Kladouchou, Stephanie Wilson, and Shehzmani Shams. 2022. “Just Not Together”: The Experience of Videoconferencing for People with Aphasia during the Covid-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 606, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Paulina Magdalena Ostrowska, Maciej Śliwiński, Rafał Studnicki, and Rita Hansdorfer-Korzon. 2021. Telerehabilitation of Post-Stroke Patients as a Therapeutic Solution in the Era of the Covid-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 9, 6 (may 2021), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9060654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tammy Richmond, Christopher Peterson, Jana Cason, Mike Billings, Evelyn Abrahante Terrell, Alan Chong W Lee, Michael Towey, Bambang Parmanto, Andi Saptono, Ellen R Cohn, 2017. American Telemedicine Association’s principles for delivering telerehabilitation services. International journal of telerehabilitation 9, 2 (2017), 63. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2017.6232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Charles Warlow, Cathie Sudlow, Martin Dennis, Joanna Wardlaw, and Peter Sandercock. 2003. Stroke. The Lancet 362, 9391 (oct 2003), 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14544-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adapting to Telerehabilitation Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Future is Hybrid

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CHIWORK '23: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
      June 2023
      164 pages
      ISBN:9798400708077
      DOI:10.1145/3596671

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 September 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format