skip to main content
10.1145/3597061.3597258acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobisysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ergonomical assessment using wearable motion capture system in dockworkers during lashing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Work-related injuries involving significant physical loads are of growing concern, as these injuries can negatively impact work productivity, physical health and well-being at work, but also have economic costs due to absenteeism. This observational study aims to quantify the ergonomical assessment of dockworkers using wearable devices to reduce the risk of injuries. Two different gestures are analyzed and observed using a wearable mocap system: Task1A securing the lash bars and Task 1B as lifting and locking process. Additional tests and questionnaire were also requested: FMS, HHD, RAND-36, ODI, and TSK questionnaires. As result, it was found a large spread between the maximum and minimum degrees and the range in which they are working among the different dockworkers. Despite the large heterogeneity, we found for task 1B that the wrist was held in extreme positions, and a significant correlation was found between the time and standard deviation of the low back (R = 0.45, p = 0.045). In addition, all participants reported having complaints; 66% had kinesiophobia, 60% were overweight, and the mean score on the FMS was 15. The occurrence of fatigue, complaints, kinesiophobia, a challenging work environment, or an unhealthy lifestyle may lead to altered movement patterns, which could possibly increase the risk of injury. Based on the results, we recommend implementing a warm-up and an individualized prevention program to reduce the risk of injury.

References

  1. Kleinman, N.L., Brook, R.A., Patel, P.A., et al. 2007. The Impact of Gout on Work Absence and Productivity. Value in Health 10, 231--237. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Marras, W.S., Ferguson, S.A., Burr, D., Schabo, P., and Maronitis, A. 2007. Low Back Pain Recurrence in Occupational Environments. Spine 32, 2387--2397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Miller, R.C. 1969. The Dockworker Subculture and Some Problems in Cross-Cultural and Cross-Time Generalizations. Comparative Studies in Society and History 11, 302--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Almeida, M.C.V. de, Cezar-Vaz, M.R., Soares, J.F. de S., and Silva, M.R.S. da. 2012. The prevalence of musculoskeletal diseases among casual dock workers. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 20, 243--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Anderson, J.A. 1984. Arthrosis and its relation to work. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 10, 429--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Van Gastel, A., Scataglini, S., Zelck, S., Denteneer, L., Bossche, H.V., and Verwulgen, S. 2021. Towards Wearable Technology Assisting in Training and Risk Assessment Against Musculoskeletal Disorders for Maritime Workers. Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling, 368--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zelck, S., Verwulgen, S., Denteneer, L., Vanden Bossche, H., and Scataglini, S. 2021. Combining a Wearable IMU Mocap System with REBA and RULA for Ergonomic Assessment of Container Lashing Teams. Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021), 462--465. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Li, X., Yang, X., Sun, X., Xue, Q., Ma, X., and Liu, J. 2021. Associations of musculoskeletal disorders with occupational stress and mental health among coal miners in Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Marras WS, Lavender SA, Leurgans SE, Fathallah FA, Ferguson SA, Allread WG, et al., Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. Ergonomics 38, 377--410. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Harris-Adamson, C., You, D., Eisen, E.A., Goldberg, R., and Rempel, D. 2013. The Impact of Posture on Wrist Tendinosis Among Blue-Collar Workers. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Roquelaure, Y., Dano, C., Dusolier, G., Fanello, S., and Penneau-Fontbonne, D. 2002. Biomechanical strains on the hand-wrist system during grapevine pruning. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 75, 591--595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Van Gastel, A., Zelck, S., Scataglini, S., & Verwulgen, S. (2022, July). Combining Motion Capture with Vibrotactile Feedback for Real-Time Posture Correction. In Digital Human Modeling and Applied Optimization: proceedings of the 13th AHFE International Conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applied Optimization, New York, USA, 24--28 July, 2022/Scataglini, Sofia [edit.]; et al.[edit.] (pp. 107--114). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Scataglini, S., Verwulgen, S., Roosens, E., Haelterman, R., and Van Tiggelen, D. 2021. Measuring Spatiotemporal Parameters on Treadmill Walking Using Wearable Inertial System. Sensors 21, 4441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Institute of Medicine Committee on H, Behavior: Research P, Policy. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bergman, S. 2007. Public health perspective - how to improve the musculoskeletal health of the population. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 21, 191--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Vargas-Prada, S. and Coggon, D. 2015. Psychological and psychosocial determinants of musculoskeletal pain and associated disability. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 29, 374--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Longo F, Padovano, A., Solina, V., D'Augusta, V., Venzl, S., Calbi, R., Bartuni, M., Anastasi, O., & Diaz, R. Human Ergonomic Simulation to Support the Design of an Exoskeleton for Lashing/De- lashing operations of Containers Cargo. . Procedia Computer Science. 2022;200:1894--902.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zelck, S., Verwulgen, S., Denteneer, L., et al. 2021. Stability Measurements of Overhead Tasks in Combination with Prismatic Glasses Using IMU Mocap System: Presenting an Experiment Protocol. Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling, 377--383.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ibrahim, K., May, C., Patel, H.P., Baxter, M., Sayer, A.A., and Roberts, H. 2016. A feasibility study of implementing grip strength measurement into routine hospital practice (GRImP): study protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Schiffke-Juhász, B., Knobloch, K., Vogt, P.M., and Hoy, L. 2021. Proprioceptive elbow training reduces pain and improves function in painful lateral epicondylitis---a prospective trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(2):62--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006;1(3):132--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Farrell, S.W., Pavlovic, A., Barlow, C.E., et al. 2019. Functional Movement Screening Performance and Association With Key Health Markers in Older Adults. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 35, 3021--3027. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Zhang, J.-T., Novak, A.C., Brouwer, B., and Li, Q. 2013. Concurrent validation of Xsens MVN measurement of lower limb joint angular kinematics. Physiological Measurement 34, N63--N69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Karen van der Zee RS. Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. Research Institute SHARE 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Haywood, K.L., Pearson, N., Morrison, L.J., Castrén, M., Lilja, G., and Perkins, G.D. 2018. Assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Resuscitation 123, 22--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Widanarko, B., Legg, S., Devereux, J., and Stevenson, M. 2014. The combined effect of physical, psychosocial/organisational and/or environmental risk factors on the presence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and its consequences. Applied Ergonomics 45, 1610--1621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Abboud, J., Nougarou, F., Pagé, I., Cantin, V., Massicotte, D., and Descarreaux, M. 2014. Trunk motor variability in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. European Journal of Applied Physiology 114, 2645--2654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sheahan, P.J., Nelson-Wong, E.J., and Fischer, S.L. 2015. A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Disability and Rehabilitation 37, 2367--2374. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Vlaeyen, J.W.S., Kole-Snijders, A.M.J., Rotteveel, A.M., Ruesink, R., and Heuts, P.H.T.G. 1995. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 5, 235--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Goubert, L., Crombez, G., Vlaeyen, J. W., Van Damme, S., Van den Broeck, A., & Van Houdenhove, B. (2000). De Tampa schaal voor kinesiofobie: psychometrische karakteristieken en normering. Gedrag en gezondheid, 28, 54--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lundberg, M., Grimby-Ekman, A., Verbunt, J., and Simmonds, M.J. 2011. Pain-Related Fear: A Critical Review of the Related Measures. Pain Research and Treatment 2011, 1--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Eiger, B., Errebo, M., Straszek, C.L., and Vaegter, H.B. 2022. Less is more: reliability and measurement error for three versions of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11, TSK-13, and TSK-17) in patients with high-impact chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain 23, 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Osumi, M., Sumitani, M., Otake, Y., et al. 2019. Kinesiophobia modulates lumbar movements in people with chronic low back pain: a kinematic analysis of lumbar bending and returning movement. European Spine Journal 28, 1572--1578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Ergonomical assessment using wearable motion capture system in dockworkers during lashing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      BodySys '23: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Body-Centric Computing Systems
      June 2023
      36 pages
      ISBN:9798400702112
      DOI:10.1145/3597061

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      BodySys '23 Paper Acceptance Rate5of6submissions,83%Overall Acceptance Rate9of11submissions,82%

      Upcoming Conference

      MOBISYS '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader