skip to main content
10.1145/3597512.3599704acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagestasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Regulating AI/ML-enabled Medical Devices in the UK

Published:11 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recent achievements of Artificial intelligence (AI) open up opportunities for new tools to assist medical diagnosis and care delivery. However, the optimal process for the development of AI is through repeated cycles of learning and implementation that may pose challenges to our existing system of regulating medical devices. Product developers face the tensions between the benefits of continuous improvement/deployment of algorithms and of keeping products unchanged to collect evidence for safety assurance processes. The challenge is how to balance potential benefits with the need to assure their safety. Governance and assurance requirements that can accommodate the live or near-live machine learning (ML) approach will be needed soon, as it is an approach likely to soon be of high importance in healthcare and in other fields of application.

We have entered a phase of regulatory experimentation with various novel approaches emerging around the world. The process of social learning is not only about the application of AI but also about the institutional arrangements for its safe and dependable deployment, including regulatory experimentation, likely within sandboxes.

This paper will reflect on the discussions from two recent Chatham House workshops on regulating AI in software as a medical device (SaMD), hosted by the UKRI/EPSRC project on ‘Trustworthy Autonomous Systems: Regulation and Governance’ node, with a special focus on the recent regulatory attempts in the UK and internationally.

References

  1. Elisabetta Biasin, Erik Kamenjasevic, and Kaspar Rosager Ludvigsen. 2023. Cybersecurity of AI medical devices: risks, legislation, and challenges. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03140Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Nicola Davis. 2021. AI skin cancer diagnoses risk being less accurate for dark skin – study. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/nov/09/ai-skin-cancer-diagnoses-risk-being-less-accurate-for-dark-skin-studyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. EU. 2016. EUR-Lex - 310401_2 – General data protection regulation (GDPR). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Luciano Floridi. 2020. The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology 33, 3 (Sept. 2020), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Karoline Freeman, Julia Geppert, Chris Stinton, Daniel Todkill, Samantha Johnson, Aileen Clarke, and Sian Taylor-Phillips. 2021. Use of artificial intelligence for image analysis in breast cancer screening programmes: systematic review of test accuracy. BMJ 374 (2021), n1872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1872 arXiv:https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1872.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Marzyeh Ghassemi, Luke Oakden-Rayner, and Andrew L. Beam. 2021. The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health 3, 11 (Nov. 2021), e745–e750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Stephen Gilbert, Stuart Anderson, Martin Daumer, Phoebe Li, Tom Melvin, and Robin Williams. 2023. Learning From Experience and Finding the Right Balance in the Governance of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health Technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research 25 (April 2023), e43682. https://doi.org/10.2196/43682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Stephen Gilbert, Matthew Fenech, Martin Hirsch, Shubhanan Upadhyay, Andrea Biasiucci, and Johannes Starlinger. 2021. Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning–Based Medical Devices. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23, 10 (Oct. 2021), e30545. https://doi.org/10.2196/30545Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. UK Government. 2022. Regulatory Horizons Council: The regulation of Artificial Intelligence as a Medical Device. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-horizons-council-the-regulation-of-artificial-intelligence-as-a-medical-deviceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. UK Government. 2022. Software and AI as a Medical Device Change Programme. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/software-and-ai-as-a-medical-device-change-programmeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 2022. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-deviceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hussein Ibrahim, Xiaoxuan Liu, Nevine Zariffa, Andrew D. Morris, and Alastair K. Denniston. 2021. Health data poverty: an assailable barrier to equitable digital health care. The Lancet. Digital Health 3, 4 (April 2021), e260–e265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30317-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. IEEE Standard. 2021. IEEE Standard for Transparency of Autonomous Systems. https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/7001/6929/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. IMDRF. 2021. Machine Learning-enabled Medical Devices - A subset of Artificial Intelligence-enabled Medical Devices: Key Terms and Definitions. https://www.imdrf.org/consultations/machine-learning-enabled-medical-devices-subset-artificial-intelligence-enabled-medical-devices-key-terms-and-definitionsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. ITU. 2018. Focus Group on "Artificial Intelligence for Health". https://www.itu.int:443/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/ai4h/Pages/default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. PMDA (Japan). 2017. Subcommittee on AI (Artificial Intelligence) | Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/rs-sb-std/sb/subcommittees-3rd/0024.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Saad M. Khan, Xiaoxuan Liu, Siddharth Nath, Edward Korot, Livia Faes, Siegfried K. Wagner, Pearse A. Keane, Neil J. Sebire, Matthew J. Burton, and Alastair K. Denniston. 2021. A global review of publicly available datasets for ophthalmological imaging: barriers to access, usability, and generalisability. The Lancet Digital Health 3, 1 (Jan. 2021), e51–e66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30240-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Phoebe Li, Alex Faulkner, and Nicholas Medcalf. 2020. 3D bioprinting in a 2D regulatory landscape: gaps, uncertainties, and problems. Law, Innovation and Technology 12, 1 (Jan. 2020), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kaspar Ludvigsen, Shishir Nagaraja, and Angela Daly. 2022. When Is Software a Medical Device? Understanding and Determining the “Intention” and Requirements for Software as a Medical Device in European Union Law. European Journal of Risk Regulation 13, 1 (March 2022), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.45Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Scott Mayer McKinney, Marcin Sieniek, Varun Godbole, Jonathan Godwin, Natasha Antropova, Hutan Ashrafian, Trevor Back, Mary Chesus, Greg S. Corrado, Ara Darzi, Mozziyar Etemadi, Florencia Garcia-Vicente, Fiona J. Gilbert, Mark Halling-Brown, Demis Hassabis, Sunny Jansen, Alan Karthikesalingam, Christopher J. Kelly, Dominic King, Joseph R. Ledsam, David Melnick, Hormuz Mostofi, Lily Peng, Joshua Jay Reicher, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Richard Sidebottom, Mustafa Suleyman, Daniel Tse, Kenneth C. Young, Jeffrey De Fauw, and Shravya Shetty. 2020. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577, 7788 (Jan. 2020), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Timo Minssen, Sara Gerke, Mateo Aboy, Nicholson Price, and Glenn Cohen. 2020. Regulatory responses to medical machine learning. Journal of Law and the Biosciences 7, 1 (July 2020), lsaa002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jessica Morley, Caio C. V. Machado, Christopher Burr, Josh Cowls, Indra Joshi, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2020. The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 260 (Sept. 2020), 113172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jakob Mökander, Prathm Juneja, David S. Watson, and Luciano Floridi. 2022. The US Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2022 vs. The EU Artificial Intelligence Act: what can they learn from each other?Minds and Machines 32, 4 (Dec. 2022), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09612-yGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Council of the European Union. 1990. Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1990/385/oj/engGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Council of the European Union. 2017. Medical devices. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/european-standards/harmonised-standards/medical-devices_enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Council of the European Union. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts - Presidency compromise text. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14278-2021-INIT/en/pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. European Parliament. 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (Text with EEA relevance.). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj/engGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls, Emmie Hine, Francesca Mazzi, Andreas Tsamados, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Luciano Floridi. 2021. Achieving a ‘Good AI Society’: Comparing the Aims and Progress of the EU and the US. Science and Engineering Ethics 27, 6 (Nov. 2021), 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00340-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Graham Spinardi and Robin Williams. 2001. Environmental Innovation in Refining and Chemicals. In Ahead of the Curve: Cases of Innovation in Environmental Management, Ken Green, Peter Groenewegen, and Peter S. Hofman (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 165–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0908-9_10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. UK Office for Product Safety and Standards. 2021. Study on the impact of artificial intelligence on product safety. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/study-on-the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-product-safetyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Effy Vayena, Alessandro Blasimme, and I. Glenn Cohen. 2018. Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLOS Medicine 15, 11 (Nov. 2018), e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Effy Vayena, Alessandro Blasimme, and I. Glenn Cohen. 2018. Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLOS Medicine 15, 11 (Nov. 2018), e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ernst Wellnhofer. 2022. Real-World and Regulatory Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 9 (2022), online. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.890809Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Regulating AI/ML-enabled Medical Devices in the UK

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)100
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format