Joshua Krook
ABSTRACT
Recommender systems form the backbone of modern e-commerce, suggesting items to users based on the collection of algorithmic data of a user's preferences. Companies that use recommender systems claim that they can give users what they want, or more precisely, what they desire. Netflix, for example, gives users recommended movies based on the user's behaviour on the platform, thereby listing new movies that the user may want to watch. This article explores whether there is a difference between what engages us, on the one hand, and what we truly want to want, on the other. This builds on the hierarchical structure of desires, as posed by Harry Frankfurt and Gerald Dworkin. Recommender systems, to use Frankfurt's terminology, may not allow for the formation of second-order desires, or for users to consider what they want to want. Indeed, recommender systems may rely on a narrow form of human engagement, a voyeuristic mode, rather than an active wanting. In bypassing second-order desires, there is a risk that recommender systems can start to control the user, rather than the user controlling the algorithm. This raises important questions concerning human autonomy, trustworthiness, and Byung-Chul Han's conception of an information regime, where the owners of the data make decisions about what users consume online, and ultimately, how they live their lives.
- Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). 2022. Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.) Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Silvia Milano, Mariarosaria Taddeo and Luciano Floridi. 2020. Recommender systems and their ethical challenges. AI & Society 35, 957-967.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walter Benjamin. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, in Hannah Arendt (ed.) Harry Zohn (trans.) 1969. Illuminations. Schocken Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Dimitris Paraschakis. 2016. Recommender systems from an industrial and ethical perspective. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems—RecSys. 16, 463–466.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimitris Paraschakis. 2017. Towards an ethical recommendation framework. In: 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 211–220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dimitris Paraschakis. 2018. ‘Algorithmic and ethical aspects of recommender systems in e-commerce’ Malmö.Google Scholar
- Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, John Riedl. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 241–250.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mireille Hildebrandt. 2022. The Issue of Proxies and Choice Architectures. Why EU Law Matters for Recommender Systems’ Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.789076.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harry G. Frankfurt. 1971. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy 68, 1. 6 - 14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dennis Loughrey. 1998. Second-order Desire Accounts of Autonomy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 6, 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amelia Fletcher, Peter L. Ormosi and Rahul Savani. 2022. Recommender Systems and Supplier Competition on Platforms. SSRN Working Paper. 1-37.Google Scholar
- Markus Schedl, Hamed Zamani, Chang-Wei Chen, Yashar Deldjoo and Mehdi Elahi. 2018. Current challenges and visions in music recommender systems research. Automation in Construction. 95-116.Google Scholar
- Byung-Chul Han. 2022. Infocracy: Digitzation and the Crisis of Democracy. (1st ed.) Polity. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Jenny Holzer. 1982. Protect Me from What I Want. Times Square, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Gerald Dworkin. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Gérald Kembellec, Ghislaine Chartron and Imad Saleh (Eds.). 2014. Recommender Systems. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
- Nathan M Fong. 2017. How Targeting Affects Customer Search: A Field Experiment. Management Science. 63, 7, 2353–64.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Severin Engelmann, Valentin Scheibe, Fiorella Battaglia, and Jens Grossklags. 2022. Social Media Profiling Continues to Partake in the Development of Formalistic Self-Concepts. Social Media Users Think So, Too in Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES) 238 - 252.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Simonite. 2023. An algorithm that predicts deadly infections is often flawed Wired. 21 June 2021 (accessed 23 February 2023). https://www.wired.com/story/algorithm-predicts-deadly-infections-often-flawed/.Google Scholar
- Shoujin Wang, Xiuzhen Zhang, Yan Wang, Huan Liu and Francesco Ricci. 2022. Trustworthy Recommender Systems. ACM Computer Survey, 1, 1.Google Scholar
- Sinha Swearingen, Kirsten Medhurst and Rashmi Sinha. 2001. Beyond algorithms: an HCI perspective on recommender systems, in Recommender Systems, In papers from the 2001 ACM SIGIR Workshop, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Wenzhuo Yang, Jia Li, Chenxi Li, Latrice Barnett, Markus Anderle, Simo Arajarvi, Harshavardhan Utharavalli, Caiming Xiong, and Steven Hoi. 2021. On the Diversity and Explainability of Recommender Systems: A Practical Framework for Enterprise App Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Int'l Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, 4302–4311.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henriette Cramer, Vanessa Evers, Satyan Ramlal, Maarten van Someren, Lloyd Rutledge, Natalia Stash, Lora Aroyo and Bob Wielinga. 2008. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact 18, 5, 455–496.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohamed Amine Chatti, Mouadh Guesmi, Laura Vorgerd, Thao Ngo, Shoeb Joarder, Qurat Ul Ain and Arham Muslim. 2022. Is more always better? The effects of personal characteristics and level of detail on the perception of explanations in a recommender system. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503252.3531304.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nathalie A Smuha. 2019. The EU approach to ethics guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Computer Law Review International 20, 4, 97–106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wenqi Fan, Xiangyu Zhao, Xiao Chen, Jingran Su, Jingtong Gao, Lin Wang, Qidong Liu, Yiqi Wang, Han Xu, Lei Chen and Qing Li. 2022. A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems. arXiv. 1, 1.Google Scholar
- Taha Hassan and D. Scott McCrickard. 2019. Trust and Trustworthiness in Social Recommender Systems’ In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3317596.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amina Samih, Amina Adadi and Mohammed Berrada. 2019. Towards a knowledge based Explainable Recommender Systems. BDIoT'19, October 23–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3372938.3372959.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen. 2013. The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business. Alfred A Knopf. New York, NY. 29 – 31.Google Scholar
- Byung-Chul Han. 2022. Non-things: Upheaval in the Lifeworld. (1st ed.) Polity. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- Krisztian Balog, Filip Radlinski and Shushan Arakelyan. 2019. Transparent, Scrutable and Explainable User Models for Personalized Recommendation’ SIGIR ’19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331184.3331211.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Reusens, Wilfried Lemahieu, Bart Baesens and Luc Sels. 2017. A note on explicit versus implicit information for job recommendation. Decis. Support Syst. 98, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.04.002.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arno R. Lodder and Jorge Morais Carvalho. 2022. Online Platforms: Towards An Information Tsunami with New Requirements on Moderation, Ranking, and Traceability. European Business Law Review.Google Scholar
- Tihana Krajnovic. 2017. Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age – a provocation on autonomy, algorithms and curiosity. Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom. https://cmpf.eui.eu/freedom-of-expression-in-the-digital-age-a-provocation-on-autonomy-algorithms-and-curiosity/Google Scholar
- TetRRIS: Territorial Responsible Research And Innovation and Smart Specialization. 2020. Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) – what exactly is it? https://tetrris.eu/what-is-responsible-research-and-innovation-rri/.Google Scholar
- James Griffith. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Rowan Cruft. 2010. Two Approaches to Human Rights. The Philosophical Quarterly. 60, 238. 176-182.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Behnoush Abdollahi and Olfa Nasraoui. 2018. Chapter 1: Transparency in Fair Machine Learning: The Case of Explainable Recommender Systems in Human and Machine Learning. Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Andrew Brady and Garry Prentice. 2019. Are Loot Boxes Addictive? Analyzing Participant's Physiological Arousal While Opening a Loot Box. Games and Culture. 16, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019895359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janna Anderson and Lee Rainie. 2023. The Future of Human Agency. Pew Research Centre. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2023/02/24/the-future-of-human-agency/Google Scholar
- The European Science Foundation (ESF). 2022. Responsible and Open Science. https://www.esf.org/responsible-and-open-science/Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Recommender Systems, Autonomy and User Engagement
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Acquiring User Information Needs for Recommender Systems
WI-IAT '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT) - Volume 03Most recommender systems attempt to use collaborative filtering, content-based filtering or hybrid approach to recommend items to new users. Collaborative filtering recommends items to new users based on their similar neighbours, and content-based ...
User Personality and User Satisfaction with Recommender Systems
In this study, we show that individual users' preferences for the level of diversity, popularity, and serendipity in recommendation lists cannot be inferred from their ratings alone. We demonstrate that we can extract strong signals about individual ...
Investigating serendipity in recommender systems based on real user feedback
SAC '18: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied ComputingOver the past several years, research in recommender systems has emphasized the importance of serendipity, but there is still no consensus on the definition of this concept and whether serendipitous items should be recommended is still not a well-...
Comments