skip to main content
10.1145/359784.360310acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Inferring calendar event attendance

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

The digital personal calendar has long been established as an effective tool for supporting workgroup coordination. For the new class of ubiquitous computing applications, however, the calendar can also be seen as a sensor, providing both location and availability information to these applications. In most cases, however, the calendar represents a sequence of events that people could (or should) attend, not their actual daily activities. To assist in the accurate determination of user whereabouts and availability, we present Ambush, a calendar system extension that uses a Bayesian model to predict the likelihood of one's attendance at the events listed on his or her schedule. We also present several techniques for the visual display of these likelihoods in a manner intended to be quickly interpreted by users examining the calendar.

References

  1. 1.Beard, D., Palaniappan, M., Humm, A., Banks, D., Nair, A., and Shan, Y. A visual calendar for scheduling group meetings. Proceedings of CSCW 1990, Pages 279 - 290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Birnbaum, L., Horvitz, E., Kurlander, D., Lieberman, H., Marks, J., Roth, S., Compelling intelligent user inter-faces: how much AI? Proceedings of IUI '97, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K., and Druzdzel, M. Online student modeling for coached problem solving using Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Sixth Inter-national Conference on User Modeling, 1997, Pages 231-242.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Druzdzel, M. Qualitative Verbal Explanations in Baye-sian Belief Networks. Artificial Intelligence and Simula-tion of Behavior Quarterly 94, 1996, Pages 43-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Ehrlich, S. Social and psychological factors influencing the design of office communication systems. Proceed ings of the ACM CHI+GI'87 Conference, 1987, Pages 323-329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R. and Rice, R. Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication; Pro-ceedings of CHI'92, 1992, Pages 37 - 48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Goodman, G. and Abel, M. Communication and collabo-ration: Facilitating cooperative work through communi-cation. Office: Technology and People, 3 (2), 1987, Pages 129-146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Harrison, B., Kurtenbach, G., Vicente, K. An experimen-tal evaluation of transparent user interface tools and information content. Proceedings of UIST '95, 1995, Pages 81-90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., and Rommelse, K. The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users. Proceedings of UAI 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., and Hovel, D. Attention-sensi-tive alerting. Proceedings of UAI '99, July 1999, Pages 305-313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Horvitz, E. and Paek, T. A Computational Architecture for Conversation. Proceedings of the Seventh Interna-tional Conference on User Modeling, 1999, Pages 201- 210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Kohonen, T. Self-organization and associate memory. Third Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Kozierok, R. and Maes, P. A learning interface agent for scheduling meetings. Proceedings of IUI '93, 1993, Pages 81-88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., and Chalfonte, B.L. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds), The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychol-ogy, 1990, Pages 145-199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Lin, X. Visualization for the Document Space. In Card, S., MacKinlay, J., and Schniederman, B.(Eds), Readings in Information Visualization, 1999, Pages 432-439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Madigan, D., Mosurski, K., and Almond, R. Graphical Explanation in Belief Networks. Journal of Computa-tional Graphics and Statistics 6(2), 1996, Pages 160-181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Marx, M. and Schmandt, C. CLUES: dynamic personal-ized message filtering. Proceedings of CSCW 1996, Pages 113 - 121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Mitchell, T. M., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J., and Zabowski, D. Experience with a learning personal assistant. Communications of the ACM 37, 7 (Jul. 1994), Pages 80 - 91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Mosier, J. and Tammaro, S. When are group scheduling tools useful? CSCW: The Journal of Collaborative Com-puting, 6, 1997, Pages 53-70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Palen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. Proceedings of CHI '99, 1999, Pages 17 - 24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Salber, D., Dey, A., Abowd, G. The Context Toolkit: aid-ing the development of context-enabled applications. Proceedings of CHI '99, 1999, Pages 434-442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.Suermondt, H.J. and Cooper, G.F. An Evaluation of Explanations of Probabilistic Inference. Computers and Biomedical Research 26, 1993, Pages 242-254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.Yan, H. and Selker, T. Context-aware office assistant. Proceedings of IUI 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inferring calendar event attendance

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                IUI '01: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
                January 2001
                174 pages
                ISBN:1581133251
                DOI:10.1145/359784

                Copyright © 2001 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 January 2001

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader