Dmytro Khutkyy
ABSTRACT
Abstract
This paper describes and evaluates practical digital government initiatives of online deliberation and internet voting of the Open Government Partnership co-creation processes. In this inquiry, the case studies of e-participation and i-voting for open government policies in the Dominican Republic in 2014 and 2016 as well as in Brazil in 2016 and 2018 are compared. The objective of the study is to assess the impact of the digitally powered co-creation processes on open government in the Dominican Republic and Brazil regarding transparency, accountability, and participation. This inquiry applied manual qualitative content analysis of e-deliberation and i-voting tools, analysis of applied reports, and policy analysis of official documents. It was found that in the Dominican Republic and Brazil the digital co-creation process co-evolved together with the government-civil society collaboration over several policy-making cycles. Citizen e-crowdsourcing and i-voting at earlier stages elaborated at later in-person discussion and drafting by civil society and authorities in Brazil proved to be more empowering and efficient than just online voting for government-defined policy priorities in the Dominican Republic. Government approaches and practices of citizen engagement and process reporting affected the co-creation.
- Trajano Vidal Potentini Adames. 2016. Mecanismo de Revisión Independiente (MRI): República Dominicana Informe de Avance 2014−2015. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/DominicanRepublic14-15_Final_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Mohammed Aladalah, Yen Cheung, Vicent C. S. Lee, and Sultan Alamri. 2018. Public Value Co-Creation via Gov2.0 Complexity Cube. In International E-Government Development, eds. Laura Alcaide Muñoz and Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 239–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63284-1_10Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berenice Barinas. 2014. Co-Elaboración Del 2do Plan de Acción Ante La Alianza Para El Gobierno Abierto! Google Group Red Gobierno Abierto RD. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://groups.google.com/a/digeig.gob.do/g/gobiernoabierto/c/VVxSpyQRQys/m/WDx1mrysTDMJGoogle Scholar
- Brazil. [n.d.] 4o Plano de Ação Brasileiro. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/governo-aberto/a-ogp/planos-de-acao/4o-plano-de-acao-brasileiroGoogle Scholar
- Brazil. [n.d.] Participa.Br. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from http://participa.br/Google Scholar
- Brazil. 2017. Midterm Self-Assessment Report. Brazil's Third Action Plan. Open Government Partnership – OGP. English Version. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Brazil_Midterm-Self-Assessment_2016-2018_EN.docxGoogle Scholar
- Brazil. 2018. Devolutiva Da Consulta Pública Para Definição Dos Temas Da Sociedade Civil – Fases 1 e 2 4o Plano de Ação Nacional. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/governo-aberto/central-de-conteudo/documentos/devolutiva-temas-sociedade.docxGoogle Scholar
- Brazil. 2018. Monitoramento e Execução Do 3o Plano de Ação Brasileiro. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://web.archive.org/web/20181117192152/http://governoaberto.cgu.gov.br/noticias/2017/monitoramento/3o-plano-de-acao-brasileiro/2o-plano-de-acao-brasileiroGoogle Scholar
- Vera Schattan P. Coelho and Laura Trajber Weisbich. 2014. Mecanismo Independente de Avaliação: Relatório de Progresso 2011–2013. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/169361968-IRM-Report-Brazil.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Jerson Del Rosario. 2018. Mecanismo de Revisión Independiente (MRI): Informe de Avances de República Dominicana 2016−2017. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Dominican-Republic_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_For-Public-Comments.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Renzo Falla. 2022. OGP Vital Signs: 10 Years of Data in Review. Executive Summary. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Vital-Signs_Executive-Summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Google Groups. 2014. Red Gobierno Abierto RD. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://groups.google.com/a/digeig.gob.do/g/gobiernoabiertoGoogle Scholar
- Iniciativa de #GobiernoAbierto en República Dominicana y portal http://datos.gob.do. [n.d.] Gobierno Abierto RD. Twitter. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://twitter.com/GobAbierto_RDGoogle Scholar
- Dmytro Khutkyy. 2020. Internet Voting: Challenges and Solutions. Policy Paper. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://europeandigital.org/files/19/Internet_Voting_Challenges_and_Solutions_ENG.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Office of the Comptroller-General of Brazil, Secretariat for Transparency and Prevention of Corruption, Directorate for Transparency and Public Oversight, and Coordination-General for Open Government and Transparency. 2018. Brazil's 4th National Action Plan. English Version. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Brazil_Action-Plan_2018-2020_EN.docxGoogle Scholar
- Open Government Partnership, [n.d.] Approach. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/approach/Google Scholar
- Open Government Partnership. [n.d.] Brazil. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/brazil/Google Scholar
- Open Government Partnership. [n.d.] Dominical Republic. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/members/dominican-republic/Google Scholar
- Open Government Partnership. [n.d.] OGPtoolboxBeta: Digital Solutions to Improve Democracy. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://ogptoolbox.org/en/Google Scholar
- Open Government Partnership, [n.d.] Open Government Declaration. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/process/joining-ogp/open-government-declaration/Google Scholar
- Open Government Partnership. 2022. OGP National Handbook: Rules and Guidance for Participants. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/OGP-National-Handbook-2022.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Carlos F. Pimentel. 2015. Mecanismo de Revisión Independiente: República Dominicana Informe de Avance 2012−2013. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/DR_final_web_2012_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
- República Dominicana. 2014. Plan de Acción. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://web.archive.org/web/20141224075617/http://www.gobiernoabierto.do/ga/PlandeAccion.htmlGoogle Scholar
- República Dominicana. 2014. ¿Qué Es Gobierno Abierto? Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://web.archive.org/web/20141128125941/http://gobiernoabierto.do/gaGoogle Scholar
- República Dominicana. 2016. Gobierno Abierto. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://web.archive.org/web/20160112181144/http://gobiernoabierto.do/wpga/Google Scholar
- República Dominicana Gobierno. 2017. Autoevaluación a Medio Término Del 3er. Plan de Acción Ante La Alianza Para El Gobierno Abierto. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Dominican-Republic_Mid-Term_Self-Assessment_2016-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Athanasia Routzouni, Athanasios P. Deligiannis, Vassilios Peristeras, and Stefanos Gritzalis. 2019. An Intercountry Survey of Participatory Practices Used for Open Government Partnership National Action Plan Development. In Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, eds. Ida Lindgren Cham: Springer International Publishing, 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_7Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabro Steibel. 2015. Mecanismo Independente de Avaliação (IRM) Brasil: Relatório Do Progresso 2013–2014. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Brasil_Relat%C3%B3rio2013-14_Final_0_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Fabro Steibel. 2019. Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Brazil Progress Report 2016−17. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Brazil_Mid-Term_Report_2016-2018_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Fabro Steibel. 2020. Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Brazil Design Report 2018−2020. Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Brazil_Design_Report_2018-2020_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Citizen Engagement and Open Government Co-creation: The Cases of Brazil and the Dominican Republic
Recommendations
E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through e-websites
Highlights Spanish municipalities have embarked upon a wave of e-government initiatives that make use of ICT. With ICT being introduced in organisations, managers could build on an existing culture of awareness of and sensitivity to information and ...
Contrasting perceptions about transparency, citizen participation, and open government between civil society organization and government
The concepts of Transparency, Citizen Participation and Open Government is increasingly being used by politicians, public officials and civil society. Open Government strategies are being assumed by public administration at different levels of ...
Citizen engagement in an open election data initiative: a case study of Indonesian's "Kawal Pemilu"
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgeCitizen engagement is key to the successful and sustainable use of Open Government Data (OGD), involving multiple activities ranging from the retrieval and conversion of raw data to OGD based applications, to the use of these applications to solve ...
Comments