skip to main content
10.1145/3598469.3598523acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Navigating Information Technology Challenges and Priorities: Expanding Responsibilities, Growing Roles, and Evolving Contexts for City Leaders

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Governments have adopted a range of information communication technologies (ICTs) to transform how they operate, provide services, collaborate with stakeholders, and innovate to create and add value. Some of these efforts are part of digital transformation and are influenced by diverse organizational factors. In this management paper, we focus on one of these factors, namely, the ability of leaders to adequately staff and resource their information technology (IT) departments so they can meet the challenges and priorities within their cities. In addition to a review of both practitioner and academic literature, we conducted a survey and hosted a post-survey discussion session with IT leaders in nine cities in New York State to elicit thoughts on the evolution of IT roles and the implications thereof on their respective digital transformation journeys. Based on the analysis, we propose practical considerations for government leaders to collectively address pressing issues and plan for the future in which the value of technology is maximized.

References

  1. Alexander, A. and Cummings, J. 2016. The Rise of the Chief Information Security Officer. People + Strategy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, O. and Osmanaj, V. 2020. The role of government regulations in the adoption of cloud computing: A case study of local government. Computer Law & Security Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, J.H. 2018. Structuring the Chief Information Security Officer Organization. Software Engineering Institute. (2018), 1–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/6584423.V1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Almazan, R.S. and Gil-Garcia, J.R. 2011. The role of the CIO in a local government IT strategy: The case of Merida, Yucatán, Mexico. Electronic Journal of E-government. 9, 1 (2011), pp1-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen, D.F. and Dawes, S.S. 1991. Government information management: a primer and casebook. Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Announcing the First Federal Chief Information Security Officer: 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2016/09/08/announcing-first-federal-chief-information-security-officer. Accessed: 2022-11-07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Atanassov, V. 2019. Implementation Hierarchy and CIO Organization in Bulgaria's Public Administration. Information & Security. 42, (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Auffret, J.-P. 2010. Developing a GCIO System: Enabling Good Government through e-Leadership. Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Public Administration Online: Challenges and Opportunities (2010), 82–88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Buehler, M. 2000. U.S. federal government CIOs. Journal of Government Information. 27, 1 (Jan. 2000), 29–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-0237(99)00154-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. CIO Council 2020. Future of the Federal IT Workforce Update. CIO Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, D. 2020. Transforming the US government's approach to hiring digital talent. McKinsey & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Computer and Information Technology Occupations: 2022. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/home.htm. Accessed: 2022-11-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook, M. 2022. Cybersecurity Primer for Local Government Leaders. Center for Technology in Government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, M. and Sutherland, M. 2014. The Emerging Role of IT Leadership in Local Government: Challenges, Realities, and Recommendations. 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2014). ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. 2018. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Criado, J.I. 2020. Chief information officers’ perceptions about artificial intelligence. First Monday. (Dec. 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i1.10648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Criado, J.I. and O.de Zarate-Alcarazo, L. 2022. Technological frames, CIOs, and Artificial Intelligence in public administration: A socio-cognitive exploratory study in Spanish local governments. Government Information Quarterly. 39, 3 (Jul. 2022), 101688. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Danziger, J.N. and Andersen, K.V. 2002. The Impacts of Information Technology on Public Administration: An Analysis of Empirical Research from the “Golden Age” of Transformation. International Journal of Public Administration. 25, 5 (Apr. 2002), 591–627. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120003292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dawes, S.S. 2008. The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance. Public Administration Review. 68, (Oct. 2008), S86–S102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00981.x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. De Tuya, M. 2020. The leading role of the government CIO at the local level: Strategic opportunities and challenges. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Death, D. 2021. The CISO Role within US Federal Government Contracting Organizations: A Delphi Study. Doctoral Thesis #2476556484. Capella University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Denford, J. 2017. Exploring IT-Enabled Public Sector Innovation in U.S. States. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunleavy, P. 2005. New Public Management Is Dead–Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 16, 3 (Sep. 2005), 467–494. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Duque, M.F. 2021. Local Government Cybersecurity: How Michigan Counties Cope with Cyber Threats. University of Michigan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Estevez, E. 2011. Establishing government chief information officer systems: readiness assessment. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times - dg.o ’11 (College Park, Maryland, 2011), 292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Feeney, M.K. and Brown, A. 2017. Are small cities online? Content, ranking, and variation of U.S. municipal websites. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Feeny, D.F. 1992. Understanding the CEO/CIO Relationship. MIS Quarterly. 16, 4 (Dec. 1992), 435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/249730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Filzah Mohamad Saodi, N. 2018. The Emerging Roles of Information Management in Government Agencies. International Journal of Engineering & Technology. 7, 3.7 (Jul. 2018), 245. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.16361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Flynn, J. 2019. The Reality of the Local Government Cybersecurity Skill Gap. Government Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fortino, A. 2008. The New CIO: From Technician to Business Strategist and the Implications for E-Commerce. 2008 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (Xian, China, 2008), 139–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Ganapati, S. and Reddick, C.G. 2012. Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Gascó-Hernández, M. 2022. The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance. (Oct. 2022), S2664328622000481. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Gasser, U. and O'Brien, D. 2014. Governments and Cloud Computing: Roles, Approaches, and Policy Considerations. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2410270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Glasscock, A.H. 2022. Privacy Progressing: How the State Chief Privacy Officer Role is Growing and Evolving. National Association of State Chief Information Officers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Glasscock, A.H. 2019. Relationships Matter Most: The Evolving State CIO Role and Growing Focus on Agency Customer Relationships. National Association of State Chief Information Officers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Gong, Y. 2019. Current and Expected Roles and Capabilities of CIOs for the Innovation and Adoption of New Technology. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (Dubai United Arab Emirates, Jun. 2019), 462–467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Gong, Y. 2020. Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Helbig, N. 2009. Enterprise IT governance at the state level: an emerging picture. 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2009). Digital Government Society of North America.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hooper, V. and Bunker, B. 2013. The Role and Requisite Competencies of the Public Sector CIO: a Two-sided Perspective. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation. 16, 3 (2013), pp188-199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Hooper, V. and McKissack, J. 2016. The emerging role of the CISO. Business Horizons. 59, 6 (Nov. 2016), 585–591. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.07.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Hussain, B. 2016. Issues in the Transition to CIO Role in the Public Sector of Developing Countries. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Koloa, HI, USA, Jan. 2016), 3021–3030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. International City/County Management Association 2017. Cybersecurity: Protecting Local Government Digital Resources. ICMA: International City/County Management Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Iwasaki, N. 2009. The role of government CIO for Business Continuity Planning in Knowledge Society. 2009 7th International Conference on ICT and Knowledge Engineering (Bangkok, Thailand, Dec. 2009), 128–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Jones, J.B. 2014. An exploratory study of the issues and problems influencing federal CIO tenure decisions. Doctoral Thesis #1561327337. Capella University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Karanja, E. 2017. The role of the chief information security officer in the management of IT security. Information & Computer Security. 25, 3 (Jul. 2017), 300–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-02-2016-0013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Karanja, E. and Rosso, M.A. 2017. The chief information security officer: An exploratory study. Journal of International Technology and Information Management. 26, 2 (2017), 23–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Katz, E. 2020. Report: Feds Are Increasingly Interested in Leaving for Certain Private Sector Jobs. Government Executive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Katz, E. 2018. The Federal Government Has Gotten Slower at Hiring New Employees for 5 Consecutive Years. Government Executive.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Khallaf, A. and Majdalawieh, M. 2012. Investigating the Impact of CIO Competencies on IT Security Performance of the US Federal Government Agencies. Information Systems Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim, S. 2005. Factors Affecting State Government Information Technology Employee Turnover Intentions. American Review of Public Administration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. King, J.L. and Kraemer, K.L. 1986. The dynamics of change in computing use: A theoretical framework. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 11, 1–2 (Jan. 1986), 5–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-9715(86)90031-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Kitchin, R. 2017. Smart cities, urban technocrats, epistemic communities and advocacy coalitions. SocArXiv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Kraemer, K.L. and King, J.L. 1982. Management science and information technologies in U.S. local governments: A review of use and impact. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 7, 1–2 (Jan. 1982), 7–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-9715(82)90064-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Lerner, M. 2021. The Government Technology Silver Bullet:. Harvard University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Li, M.-H. and Feeney, M.K. 2014. Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U. S. Governments: Distinguishing Between E-Services and Communication Technologies. American Review of Public Administration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Lofland, J. eds. 2006. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Mao, Z. 2021. A CIO-centric local government data-sharing leadership ecosystem in China. Information Development. (Nov. 2021), 026666692110541. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211054176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. McClure, C.R. and Bertot, J.C. 2000. The chief information officer (CIO): assessing its impact. Government Information Quarterly. 17, 1 (Jan. 2000), 7–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(99)00021-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. McClure, D.L. 2000. Chief Information Officers: Implementing Effective CIO Organizations. General Accounting Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Mergel, I. 2018. Citizen-oriented digital transformation in the public sector. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (Delft The Netherlands, May 2018), 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Mergel, I. 2019. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Miles, M.B. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Moon, M.J. 2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Musa, S. 2018. Smart Cities-A Road Map for Development. IEEE Potentials. 37, 2 (Mar. 2018), 19–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2016.2566099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Nam, T. and Pardo, T.A. 2011. Smart city as urban innovation: focusing on management, policy, and context. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV ’11 (Tallinn, Estonia, 2011), 185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Nicolescu, C.E. and Berceanu, B. 2014. The leadership role of a local public administration CIO: the case of Bucharest. Theoretical & Applied Economics. 21, 11 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Noonpakdee, W. 2020. CIO Competency in Digital Era: A Comparative Study between Government Organizations and Private Enterprises. 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA) (Bangkok, Thailand, Apr. 2020), 948–952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Norris, D.F. 1984. Computers and Small Local Governments: Uses and Users. Public Administration Review. 44, 1 (Jan. 1984), 70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/975666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Norris, D.F. 2019. Cyberattacks at the Grass Roots: American Local Governments and the Need for High Levels of Cybersecurity. Public Administration Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Norris, D.F. 2022. Cybersecurity and local government. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Norris, D.F. 2021. Managing cybersecurity at the grassroots: Evidence from the first nationwide survey of local government cybersecurity. Journal of Urban Affairs. 43, 8 (Sep. 2021), 1173–1195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2020.1727295.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Pardo, T.A. 2004. Modeling the Social and Technical Processes of Interorganizational Information Integration. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). Computer Societry Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Partnership for Public Service 2020. Tech Talent for 21st Century Government. Partnership for Public Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Perry, J.L. and Kraemer, K.L. 1977. The chief executive in local government information systems: Catalyst or barrier to innovation? Urban Systems. 2, 2–3 (Jan. 1977), 121–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-8001(77)90010-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Pittaway, J.J. and Montazemi, A.R. 2020. Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Proske, N. 2012. Public CIO, figurehead or decision-maker?: the case of Germany. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV ’12 (Albany, New York, 2012), 346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Roberts, D.P. 2009. Recruitment and retention of information technology professionals in Southern California municipal government. Doctoral Thesis #305162309. Capella University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Robinson, D. 2022. The People Imperative: The 2022 State CIO Survey. National Association of State Chief Information Officers and Grant Thornton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Saldaña, J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Statewide Chief Information Security Officers: 2022. https://tinyurl.com/4szuvtjn. Accessed: 2022-11-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. Strickland, S. 2011. How the Role of the Chief Information Officer Contributes to the Organisation. Doctoral Thesis #1775196910. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Strickland, S. and Theodoulidis, B. 2011. Chief Information Officer: A Journey Through Time. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1947997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Subramanian, S. and Ward, M. 2022. 2022 Deloitte-NASCIO Cybersecurity Study. Technical Report #7. Deloitte and National Association of State Chief Information Officers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Swartz, N. 2004. From the mouths of CIOs. Information Management. 38, 5 (2004), 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Thatcher, J.B. 2002. Turnover of Information Technology Workers: Examining Empirically the Influence of Attitudes, Job Characteristics, and External Markets. Journal of Management Information Systems. 19, 3 (Dec. 2002), 231–261. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. The Realities of the IT Skill Gap in Local Government: 2018. https://www.governing.com/archive/The-Realities-of-the-IT-Skill-Gap-in-Local-Government.html. Accessed: 2022-11-08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Trochim, W.M.K. and Donnelly, J.P. 2008. Research methods knowledge base. Cengage Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Uechi, E. 2020. Public service information technology: the definitive manager's guide to harnessing technology for cost-effective operations and services. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. USAJobs: 2210 - Information Technology Management: 2022. https://www.usajobs.gov/Search/Results?j=2210. Accessed: 2022-11-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. Vial, G. 2019. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 28, 2 (Jun. 2019), 118–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Wang, S. and Feeney, M. 2016. Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Municipalities. American Review of Public Administration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Navigating Information Technology Challenges and Priorities: Expanding Responsibilities, Growing Roles, and Evolving Contexts for City Leaders

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DGO '23: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
      July 2023
      711 pages
      ISBN:9798400708374
      DOI:10.1145/3598469

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 July 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format