Yue Gao
Chunjie Zhao
ABSTRACT
Information as a governance instrument has received increasing attention from e-government research on sustainable development. The implementation of advanced digital technology, such as smart meters, along with environmental regulations, plays an important role in curbing carbon emissions and creating a more sustainable future. In this paper, by combining decision tree and linear spline regression methods, we find a positive connection between smart meter adoption and reduced carbon emissions, and a negative relationship between state environmental regulatory stringency and carbon emissions. Our findings further indicate the impact of smart meter adoption on carbon emissions varies over different smart meter adoptions rate. The impact is stronger when the adoption rate reaches a certain threshold, and it becomes weaker when market saturation happens. These findings have important implications for the development and execution of environmental regulations and public policies for the adoption of smart meters in the United States.
- W. C. Clark, and A. G. Harley, “Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 331-386, 2020/10/17, 2020.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- M. U. Rehman, and M. Rashid, “Energy consumption to environmental degradation, the growth appetite in SAARC nations,” Renewable Energy, vol. 111, pp. 284-294, 2017/10/01/, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hussain, G. M. Mir, M. Usman, C. Ye, and S. Mansoor, “Analysing the role of environment-related technologies and carbon emissions in emerging economies: a step towards sustainable development,” Environmental Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 367-375, 2022/01/28, 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- EIA, “How much of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions are associated with electricity generation?,” 2022.Google Scholar
- Y. Pei, Y. Zhu, S. Liu, X. Wang, and J. Cao, “Environmental regulation and carbon emission: The mediation effect of technical efficiency,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 236, pp. 117599, 2019/11/01/, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Danish, R. Ulucak, S. U.-D. Khan, M. A. Baloch, and N. Li, “Mitigation pathways toward sustainable development: Is there any trade-off between environmental regulation and carbon emissions reduction?,” Sustainable Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 813-822, 2020/07/01, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Kennedy, “Public support for environmental regulations varies by state,” 2016.Google Scholar
- R. Eyres. "Why Smart Meters are the key to going Net Zero by 2050," https://expleo.com/global/en/insights/blog/why-smart-meters-are-the-key-to-going-net-zero-by-2050/.Google Scholar
- drax. "How can smart meters contribute to decarbonisation?," https://energy.drax.com/insights/smart-meters-and-decarbonisation/.Google Scholar
- R. J. Lazarus, “Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future,” Cornell L. Rev., vol. 94, pp. 1153, 2008.Google Scholar
- S. Solomon, G.-K. Plattner, R. Knutti, and P. Friedlingstein, “Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1704-1709, 2009/02/10, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- EPA, “Economic Incentives,” 2021.Google Scholar
- D. A. Vallero, and T. M. Letcher, "Chapter 3 - Regulation of Wastes," Waste, T. M. Letcher and D. A. Vallero, eds., pp. 23-59, Boston: Academic Press, 2011.Google Scholar
- S. Jiusto, “An indicator framework for assessing US state carbon emissions reduction efforts (with baseline trends from 1990 to 2001),” Energy Policy, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 2234-2252, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Farber, "State Governmental Leadership in U.S. Climate Policy," 2021.Google Scholar
- R. C. Sam Ricketts, Lola Oduyeru, Bill Holland, States Are Laying a Road Map for Climate Leadership, 2020.Google Scholar
- S. Marcacci, “NEW NEVADA MODELING SHOWS ACHIEVING STATE CLIMATE GOALS AND,” 2021.Google Scholar
- N. Dakota, S. Carolina, S. Dakota, W. Virginia, N. M. Islands, P. Rico, U. V. Islands, and E. Indicators, “Wisconsin Wisconsin Profile.”Google Scholar
- M. Prasad, and S. Munch, “State-level renewable electricity policies and reductions in carbon emissions,” Energy Policy, vol. 45, pp. 237-242, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Muñoz, S. Olzak, and S. A. Soule, "Going green: Environmental protest, policy, and CO2 emissions in US states, 1990–2007." pp. 403-421.Google Scholar
- W. Zhang, G. Li, M. K. Uddin, and S. Guo, “Environmental regulation, Foreign investment behavior, and carbon emissions for 30 provinces in China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 248, pp. 119208, 2020/03/01/, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Wang, “How Does Environmental Regulation Affect Carbon Emissions?—Evidence from China,” Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 160-178, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- “Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency, “SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,” 2015.Google Scholar
- W. M. Sage, “Regulating through information: disclosure laws and American health care,” Colum. L. Rev., vol. 99, pp. 1701, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. P. J. Mol, “Environment and Modernity in Transitional China: Frontiers of Ecological Modernization,” Development and Change, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 29-56, 2006/01/01, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. R. Sunstein, “Is the clean air act unconstitutional,” Mich. L. Rev., vol. 98, pp. 303, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Estevez, and T. Janowski, “Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development — Conceptual framework and state of research,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 30, pp. S94-S109, 2013/01/01/, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Puron-Cid, “Smart Cities, Smart Governments and Smart Citizens: A Brief Introduction,” International Journal of E-Planning Research, vol. 4, pp. iv-vii, 04/01, 2015.Google Scholar
- S. Berger, F. Ebeling, C. Feldhaus, A. Löschel, and A. M. Wyss, “What motivates smart meter adoption? Evidence from an experimental advertising campaign in Germany,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 85, pp. 102357, 2022/03/01/, 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Li, W. Qiao, H. Sun, H. Wan, J. Wang, Y. Xia, Z. Xu, and P. Zhang, “Smart Transmission Grid: Vision and Framework,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 168-177, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DOE, “HOW THE SMART GRID PROMOTES A GREENER FUTURE,” 2011.Google Scholar
- Y. Gao, and J. Zhang, “Studying the Impacts of Federal Funding on Residential Smart Meter Adoption and Utilities’ Performance in the U.S.: A Simultaneous Equation Approach,” in DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Omaha, NE, USA, 2021, pp. 416–423.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. G. Pratt, P. J. Balducci, C. Gerkensmeyer, S. Katipamula, M. C. W. Kintner-Meyer, T. F. Sanquist, K. P. Schneider, and T. J. Secrest, The Smart Grid: An Estimation of the Energy and CO2 Benefits, United States, 2010.Google Scholar
- S. Zhou, “The effect of smart meter penetration on dynamic electricity pricing: Evidence from the United States,” The Electricity Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 106919, 2021/04/01/, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Gilbraith, and S. E. Powers, “Residential demand response reduces air pollutant emissions on peak electricity demand days in New York City,” Energy Policy, vol. 59, pp. 459-469, 2013/08/01/, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Rae, “Here's Why New Appliances Use Less Energy,” 2019.Google Scholar
- SECC, “DO SMART METERS HELP THE ENVIRONMENT?,” 2020.Google Scholar
- J. Corbett, “Using information systems to improve energy efficiency: Do smart meters make a difference?,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 747-760, 2013/11/01, 2013.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Goncalves. "Smart Meters Supporting CO2 Reduction Targets," https://www.iskraemeco.com/blog/smart-meters-supporting-co2-reduction-targets/.Google Scholar
- A. Grübler, "Diffusion: long-term patterns and discontinuities." pp. 451-482.Google Scholar
- S. A. Salim, D. Sedera, S. Sawang, and A. Alarifi, "Technology adoption as a multi-stage process: Differing levels of significant."Google Scholar
- A. R. Del Aguila‐Obra, and A. Padilla‐Meléndez, “Organizational factors affecting Internet technology adoption,” Internet research, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 94-110, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Bastian, “Why do customers still mistrust smart meters?,” 2021.Google Scholar
- Y. Chawla, and A. Kowalska-Pyzalska, “Public Awareness and Consumer Acceptance of Smart Meters among Polish Social Media Users,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 14, 2019.Google Scholar
- S. S. K.T. Weaver, “Consumers and Environment Unlikely to Benefit from Smart Meters, Confirms Latest Research,” 2015.Google Scholar
- E. Dogan, and F. Seker, “An investigation on the determinants of carbon emissions for OECD countries: empirical evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 23, no. 14, pp. 14646-14655, 2016/07/01, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. S. Sharma, “Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: Empirical evidence from 69 countries,” Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 376-382, 2011/01/01/, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Jorgenson, J. Schor, and X. Huang, “Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States: a state-level analysis, 1997–2012,” Ecological Economics, vol. 134, pp. 40-48, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. R. Chary, and A. K. Bohara, “Carbon emissions, energy consumption and income in SAARC countries,” South Asia Economic Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21-30, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Bano, Y. Zhao, A. Ahmad, S. Wang, and Y. Liu, “Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 183, pp. 1082-1092, 2018/05/10/, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sarwar, D. Streimikiene, R. Waheed, and Z. Mighri, “Revisiting the empirical relationship among the main targets of sustainable development: Growth, education, health and carbon emissions,” Sustainable Development, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 419-440, 2021/03/01, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Zhu, Q. Qi, L. Chen, and X. Wu, “The spatial-temporal patterns and multiple driving mechanisms of carbon emissions in the process of urbanization: A case study in Zhejiang, China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 358, pp. 131954, 2022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Nilsson, P. Stoll, and N. Brandt, “Assessing the impact of real-time price visualization on residential electricity consumption, costs, and carbon emissions,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 124, pp. 152-161, 2017/09/01/, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Athey, and G. Imbens, “Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 27, pp. 7353-7360, 2016/07/05, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. E. Brand, J. Xu, B. Koch, and P. Geraldo, “Uncovering Sociological Effect Heterogeneity Using Tree-Based Machine Learning,” Sociological Methodology, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 189-223, 2021/08/01, 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Brathwaite, A. Vij, and J. L. Walker, “Machine learning meets microeconomics: The case of decision trees and discrete choice,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04826, 2017.Google Scholar
- A. J. Myles, R. N. Feudale, Y. Liu, N. A. Woody, and S. D. Brown, “An introduction to decision tree modeling,” Journal of Chemometrics: A Journal of the Chemometrics Society, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 275-285, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Y. Song, and Y. Lu, “Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction,” Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 130-5, Apr 25, 2015.Google Scholar
- V. Kotu, and B. Deshpande, "Chapter 7 - Clustering," Data Science (Second Edition), V. Kotu and B. Deshpande, eds., pp. 221-261: Morgan Kaufmann, 2019.Google Scholar
- EIA, “State Energy Data System (SEDS) ”, 2020.Google Scholar
- LCV, “League of Conservation Voters,” 2021.Google Scholar
- W. B. Gray, "Manufacturing plant location: Does state pollution regulation matter?," National bureau of economic research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1997.Google Scholar
- W. B. Gray, and R. J. Shadbegian, “Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice,” The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 235-256, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. B. Gray, and R. J. Shadbegian, “Multimedia pollution regulation and environmental performance,” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper, pp. 15-26, 2015.Google Scholar
- R. J. Shadbegian, and W. B. Gray, What Determines Environmental Performance at Paper Mills?: The Roles of Abatement Spending, Regulation and Efficiency, US Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Economics, 2003.Google Scholar
- A. Wolverton, R. Shadbegian, and W. B. Gray, The US Manufacturing Sector's Response to Higher Electricity Prices: Evidence from State-Level Renewable Portfolio Standards, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2022.Google Scholar
- N. C. Cosmas, I. Chitedze, and K. A. Mourad, “An econometric analysis of the macroeconomic determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 675, pp. 313-324, 2019/07/20/, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J.-L. Fan, Y.-B. Da, S.-L. Wan, M. Zhang, Z. Cao, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, “Determinants of carbon emissions in ‘Belt and Road initiative’ countries: A production technology perspective,” Applied Energy, vol. 239, pp. 268-279, 2019/04/01/, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Fesmire, “Energy Efficiency in the Power Grid,” Renewable Energy World, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. Metcalfe, “Grid Efficiency: An Opportunity to Reduce Emissions,” Energy Central, 2010.Google Scholar
- M. Breslin, “Utilities Face Consumer Challenges for Smart Meters,” Green Building, 2012.Google Scholar
- P. Ciampoli, “Almost half of all U.S. electricity customers have smart meters: EIA,” 2017.Google Scholar
- J. Pierobon, “If half of U.S. consumers don't know what a 'smart meter' is, how are they supposed to engage?,” 2007.Google Scholar
- U. C. Action, "For a liveable climate: Net-zero commitments must be backed by credible action," 2022.Google Scholar
- C. Figueres, “Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts,” UN Chronicle, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 30-31, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. S. DOE. "Low-Income Community Energy Solutions," 2023; https://www.energy.gov/scep/slsc/low-income-community-energy-solutions.Google Scholar
- J. Schleich, “Energy efficient technology adoption in low-income households in the European Union–What is the evidence?,” Energy Policy, vol. 125, pp. 196-206, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Environmental Regulation, Smart Meter Adoption, and Carbon Emission: An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach
Recommendations
Smart Technologies in Reducing Carbon Emission: Artificial Intelligence and Smart Water Meter
ICMLC '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Machine Learning and ComputingGlobal warming caused by greenhouse gases (GHG) is regarded as one of the biggest threats facing our world. Climate scientists predict that a 1.5°C rise in global temperature may cause the extinction of 25% of the Earth's animals and plants disappear. ...
Reduced carbon emission and optimized power consumption technique using container over virtual machine
AbstractEnvironmental warning is caused by IT industry which critically leads the global pollution with huge amount of toxic carbon emission which is drastically increasing day by day due to demand and usage raised. Due to the environmental warning the ...
Spatial-temporal Monitoring Modeling of EV Carbon Emission Considering End-users?? Behavioral Decisions
PCCNT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Power, Communication, Computing and Networking TechnologiesWith the transformation of energy structure and the promotion of dual-carbon goals, the future still looks bright for electric vehicles. It is essential to study the charging characteristics of electric vehicles, the organized regulation of charging ...
Comments