skip to main content
10.1145/3598469.3598537acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Taxonomy of Design Decisions for Central Bank Digital Currencies: Student Track Paper

Published:11 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the amount of research on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) by central banks has increased extensively. These can cover a broad range of applications, from the settlement of mass transactions to interbank payments. Depending on the design, different objectives can be pursued when introducing a CBDC, such as financial inclusion or enhancing payment efficiency. Although first attempts to organize the design aspects of CBDCs have been conducted, there seems to be no construct that comprehensively characterizes the essential design decisions. Considering both conceptual and empirical sources, we address this shortcoming by developing a taxonomy that represents and characterizes the fundamental design decisions to be made by central banks when creating a CBDC. The taxonomy enables its users to classify CBDCs and compare existing configurations. Moreover, it supports the derivation and discussion of implications as well as interactions between design decisions. The article thereby contributes to the existing literature by enhancing the understanding of the concept of CBDC, thus strengthening the conceptual foundation for future research. Furthermore, our findings can support the development of further frameworks addressing their design at a more profound level.

References

  1. Sarah Allen, Srđjan Čapkun, Ittay Eyal, Giulia Fanti, Bryan A Ford, James Grimmelmann, Ari Juels, Kari Kostiainen, Sarah Meiklejohn, Andrew Miller, Eswar Prasad, Karl Wüst, and Fan Zhang. 2020. Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations. Working Paper 27634. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Raphael Auer and Rainer Böhme. 2020. The Technology of Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. BIS Quarterly Review (2020), 86–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Raphael Auer and Rainer Böhme. 2021. Central bank digital currency: the quest for minimally invasive technology. Working Paper 948. Bank for International Settlements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Raphael Auer, Giulio Cornelli, and Jon Frost. 2020. Rise of the central bank digital currencies: drivers, approaches and technologies. BIS Working Papers 880. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work880.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David Ballaschk and Jan Paulick. 2021. The public, the private and the secret: Thoughts on privacy in central bank digital currencies. Journal of Payments Strategy and Systems 15, 3 (2021), 277–286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bank of Canada, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Sveriges Riksbank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, Board of Governors Federal Reserve System, and Bank for International Settlements. 2020. Central bank digital currencies: foundational principles and core features. Report 1. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp33.pdf (accessed June 29, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bank of Canada, European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Sveriges Riksbank, Swiss National Bank, Bank of England, Board of Governors Federal Reserve System, and Bank for International Settlements. 2021. Central bank digital currencies: financial stability implications. Report 4. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp42_fin_stab.pdf (accessed June 29, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bank of Canada and Monetary Authority of Singapore. 2019. Jasper-Ubin Design Paper: Enabling Cross-Border High Value Transfer Using Distributed Ledger Technologies. Technical Report. https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/Jasper-Ubin-Design-Paper.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bank of England. 2020. Central Bank Digital Currency - Opportunities, challenges and design. Discussion Paper. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/paper/2020/central-bank-digital-currency-opportunities-challenges-and-design.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bank of Ghana. 2022. Design paper of the digital Cedi (eCedi). Design Paper. https://www.bog.gov.gh/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/eCedi-Design-Paper.pdf (accessed June 17, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bank of Jamaica. 2023. Jamaica’s Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) – JAM-DEX. https://boj.org.jm/core-functions/currency/cbdc/ (accessed April 18, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bank of Thailand and Hong Kong Monetary Authority. 2020. Inthanon-LionRock: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Technology to Increase Efficiency in Cross-Border Payments. Technical Report. https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/doc/key-functions/financial-infrastructure/Report_on_Project_Inthanon-LionRock.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Banque de France. 2021. Wholesale Central Bank Digital Currency experiments with the Banque de France. Technical Report. https://www.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/media/2021/11/09/rapport_mnbc_0.pdf (accessed June 18, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Banque de France, European Central Bank, Banca d’Italia, Banque de Belgique, Banco de España, Bank of Lithuania, Banque Centrale du Luxembourg, and Oesterreichische Nationalbank. 2021. Digital Euro experiment - Combined feasibility - Tiered model. Technical Report. https://www.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/media/2021/08/02/821220_digital_euro_en.pdf (accessed June 16, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Banque de France and Monetary Authority of Singapore. 2021. Liquidity Management in a Multi-Currency Corridor Network. Technical Report. https://www.banque-france.fr/sites/default/files/media/2021/11/15/bdf-mas-onyx_liquidity_management_in_a_multi-currency_corridor_network_vfinal_-_12112021_0.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Morten Bech and Rodney Garratt. 2017. Central bank cryptocurrencies. BIS Quarterly Review (2017), 55–70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nitya Biyani, Niels Graham, William Howlett, Amy Jeon, Reddy Lee, Varsha Shankar, and Stefan De Villiers. 2022. Central Bank Digital Currency Tracker. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/ (accessed June 20, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ole Bjerg. 2017. Designing New Money - The Policy Trilemma of Central Bank Digital Currency. CBS Working Paper June (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2985381Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Peter Bofinger and Thomas Haas. 2021. Central bank digital currencies: Can central banks succeed in the marketplace for digital monies?Technical Report. European Capital Markets Institute, Brussels. 1–50 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Central Bank of Nigeria. 2021. Design Paper for the eNaira. Technical Report. https://enaira.com/download/eNaira_Design_Paper.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Central Bank of The Bahamas. 2019. Project Sand Dollar: A Bahamas Payments System Modernisation Initiative. Technical Report. https://www.centralbankbahamas.com/viewPDF/documents/2019-12-25-02-18-11-Project-Sanddollar.pdf (accessed June 17, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pangyue Cheng. 2022. Decoding the rise of Central Bank Digital Currency in China: designs, problems, and prospects. Journal of Banking Regulation (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00193-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures. 2015. Digital currencies. Report. Bank for International Settlements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulo Rupino Cunha, Paulo Melo, and Helder Sebastião. 2021. From Bitcoin to Central Bank Digital Currencies: Making Sense of the Digital Money Revolution. Future Internet 13, 165 (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13070165Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Deloitte and Monetary Authority of Singapore. 2017. The future is here - Project Ubin: SGD on Distributed Ledger. Report. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/sg/Documents/financial-services/sg-fsi-project-ubin-report.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Deutsche Bundesbank. 2014. Geld und Geldpolitik. Vol. 1. Deutsche Bundesbank. 1–252 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Eastern Caribbean Central Bank. 2021. DCash - The Project. https://www.dcashec.com/faqs/the-project (accessed June 23, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Walter Engert and Ben S C Fung. 2017. Central Bank Digital Currency: Motivations and Implications. Technical Report. Bank of Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. European Central Bank. 2015. What is a central bank?https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/educational/explainers/tell-me/html/what-is-a-central-bank.en.html (accessed July 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. European Central Bank. 2019. Exploring anonymity in central bank digital currencies. Report. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/publications/pdf/ecb.mipinfocus191217.en.pdf (accessed June 23, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. European Central Bank. 2020. Report on a digital euro. Report. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/Report_on_a_digital_euro 4d7268b458.en.pdf (accessed June 16, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. European Central Bank and Bank of Japan. 2020. Project Stella: Balancing confidentiality and auditability in a distributed ledger environment. Report. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/publications/pdf/ecb.miptopical200212.en.pdf (accessed June 30, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Paolo Fegatelli. 2019. Central bank digital currencies: The case of universal central bank reserves. Working Paper 130. Central Bank of Luxembourg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Horst Gischer, Bernhard Herz, and Lukas Menkhoff. 2012. Geld, Kredit und Banken. Springer-Lehrbuch, Vol. 3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1–452 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23257-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Timm Gudehus. 2016. Neue Geldordnung: Notwendigkeit, Konzeption und Einführung (1 ed.). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. 1–55 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13122-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Andreas Hanl and Jochen Michaelis. 2019. Digitales Zentralbankgeld als neues Instrument der Geldpolitik. Wirtschaftsdienst 99, 5 (2019), 340–347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Alan Hevner, Salvatore T March, and Jinsoo Park. 2004. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 80, 1 (2004), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. John Kiff, Jihad Alwazir, Sonja Davidovic, Aquiles Farias, Ashraf Khan, Tanai Khiaonarong, Majid Malaika, Hunter Monroe, Nobu Sugimoto, Hervé Tourpe, and Peter Zhou. 2020. A Survey of Research on Retail Central Bank Digital Currency. IMF Working Paper. International Monetary Fund.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Anneke Kosse and Ilaria Mattei. 2022. Gaining momentum-Results of the 2021 BIS survey on central bank digital currencies. BIS Papers 125. Bank for International Settlements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Michael Kumhof and Clare Noone. 2018. Central bank digital currencies - design principles and balance sheet implications. Staff Working Paper. Bank of England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. David Kuo Chuen Lee, Li Yan, and Yu Wang. 2021. A global perspective on central bank digital currency. China Economic Journal 14, 1 (2021), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2020.1870279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jack Meaning, Ben Dyson, James Barker, and Emily Clayton. 2018. Broadening narrow money: monetary policy with a central bank digital currency. Staff Working Paper 724. Bank of England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Igor Mikhalev, Kaj Burchardi, Igor Struchkov, Bihao Song, and Jonas Gross. 2021. CBDC Tracker. https://cbdctracker.org (accessed May 23, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. National Bank of Kazakhstan. 2021. Report on the Results of the Digital Tenge Pilot Project. White Paper. https://nationalbank.kz/file/download/72203 (accessed June 28, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Robert C. Nickerson, Upkar Varshney, and Jan Muntermann. 2013. A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems 22, 3 (2013), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Peterson K Ozili. 2021. Central bank digital currency in Nigeria: opportunities and risks. MPRA Paper 111376. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/111376/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Peterson K Ozili. 2022. Central bank digital currency research around the World: a review of literature. MPRA Paper 111389. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/111389/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ken Peffers, Tuure Tuunanen, Marcus A. Rothenberger, and Samir Chatterjee. 2007. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 3 (2007), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. People’s Bank of China. 2021. Progress of Research and Developmentof E-CNY in China. Report. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/en/3688110/3688172/4157443/4293696/2021071614584691871.pdf (accessed June 17, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Nadia Pocher and Andreas Veneris. 2021. Privacy and Transparency in CBDCs: A Regulation-by-Design AML/CFT Scheme. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC51069.2021.9461090Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Nadia Pocher and Mirko Zichichi. 2022. Towards CBDC-Based Machine-to-Machine Payments in Consumer IoT. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (Virtual Event) (SAC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 308–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3477314.3507078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Reserve Bank of Australia. 2021. Project Atom: Exploring a Wholesale CBDC for Syndicated Lending. Report. https://www.rba.gov.au/payments-and-infrastructure/central-bank-digital-currency/pdf/project-atom-report_2021-12.pdf (accessed June 16, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Jennifer Rowley. 2012. Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review 35, 3-4 (2012), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211210154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Saudi Central Bank and Central Bank of the U.A.E.2020. Project Aber. Report. https://www.sama.gov.sa/en-US/News/Documents/Project_Aber_report-EN.pdf (accessed June 17, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. South African Reserve Bank. 2018. Project Khokha - Exploring the use of distributed ledger technology for interbank payments settlement in South Africa. Fintech Report. https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/publications/media-releases/2018/8491/SARB_ProjectKhokha-20180605.pdf (accessed June 18, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Sveriges Riksbank. 2022. E-krona report - E-krona pilot Phase 2. Report. https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/e-krona/2022/e-krona-pilot-phase-2.pdf (accessed June 19, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Daniel Szopinski, Thorsten Schoormann, and Dennis Kundisch. 2019. Because Your Taxonomy is Worth It: Towards a Framework for Taxonomy Evaluation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Stockholm-Uppsala, Sweden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Katrin Tinn and Christophe Dubach. 2021. Central bank digital currency with asymmetric privacy. (2021). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3787088Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Eric Wagner, Diederik Bruggink, and Alessia Benevelli. 2021. Preparing euro payments for the future: A blueprint for a digital euro. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems 15, 2 (2021), 165–187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Orla Ward and Sabrina Rochemont. 2019. Understanding Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC). Interim Paper. Institute and Faculty of Actuaries. https://www.actuaries.org.uk/system/files/field/document/Understanding CBDCs Final - disc.pdf (accessed July 3, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Jane Webster and Richard T Watson. 2002. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly 26, 2 (2002), 13–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Peter Wierts and Harro Boven. 2020. Central Bank Digital Currency Objectives, preconditions and design choices. Occasional Studies 20-01. 1–41 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Tao Zhang and Zhigang Huang. 2022. Blockchain and central bank digital currency. ICT Express 8, 2 (2022), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2021.09.014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Taxonomy of Design Decisions for Central Bank Digital Currencies: Student Track Paper

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          DGO '23: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
          July 2023
          711 pages
          ISBN:9798400708374
          DOI:10.1145/3598469

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 July 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format