skip to main content
10.1145/3598469.3598567acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enabling Digital Government Through Transformation: Student Track

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital transformation has been on the rise over the past decade with the majority of organisations viewing it as critical to their survival over the next five years [1] However, in spite of the benefits, it also creates a major risk for government organisations with up to 90% of digital transformation projects resulting in failures [2, 3, 4] This research-in-progress article presents the findings of a 168 study systematic literature review (SLR) and 5 qualitative interviews to identify the holistic risks accompanying digital transformation within the government sector. This led to the identification of six major risk domains pertaining to digital transformation in the public sector: (i) Stakeholder, (ii) Culture, (iii) Organisation, (iv) Strategy, (v) Processes and (vi) Technology.

References

  1. Andrew Brosnan. Jack O'Brien. Eimear Manning. Abigail Whelan. Milan Singh. Sumeet Padwalkar. Fergus Jayes. Jason Murphy and Stephen Treacy. 2023. Towards an Understanding of Digital Transformation Risk: A Systematic Literature Review. In 2023 European Conference on Information Systems. Kristiansand, Norway. 23 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Noel Carroll. Nik Rushdi. Iris Junglas. Thomas Hess and Lorraine Morgan. 2021. Call for Papers: European Journal of Information Systems- Managing and Sustaining Digital Transformations. In European Journal of Information Systems. Retrieved August 07, 2022 from https://www.callforpapers.co.uk/managing-sustaining-digital-transformationsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin Munns. Christine van Toorn. Patrick Finnegan. Bradley Kalgovas and Alexander Benlian. 2022. Sustaining Digital Transformation: The imperative to innovate continuously in the Australian financial services sector. In 2022 European Conference on Information Systems. Timisora, Romania, article 1371, 20 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rip/20/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nagesh Ramesh and Dursun Delen. Digital Transformation: How to Beat the 90% Failure Rate? IEEE Engineering Management Review. 49, 3 (September 2021), 22-25. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9408371Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Andrew Brosnan. Fionn Cox. Daryl Hemmingway. Lu Ren and Jeremy Hayes. 2021. Leveraging The Wisdom of Crowds: An Exploration of Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing as Mechanisms To Combat Terrorism-Related Challenges. In 2021 Irish Academy of Management Conference, Waterford, Ireland, 40 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354144592_Leveraging_The_Wisdom_of_Crowds_An_Exploration_of_Open_Innovation_and_Crowdsourcing_as_Mechanisms_To_Combat_Terrorism-Related_ChallengesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lemuria Carter. Kevin Desouza. Gregory Dawdson and Theresa Pardo. 2022. Call for Papers: Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Retrieved November 14, 2022 from https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-journal-of-strategic-information-systems/about/call-for-papersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Milan Singh. Sumeet Padwalkar. Jack O'Brien. Abigail Whelan. Eimear Manning. Fergus Jayes. Jason Murphy. Stephen Treacy and Andrew Brosnan. 2023. Enhancing Organisational Creativity and Innovation through Digital Transformation: Understanding the Risks. 2023 UK Academy for Information Systems. Kent, UK. 14 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368464136_Enhancing_Organisational_Creativity_and_Innovation_through_Digital_Transformation_Understanding_the_RisksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ingo Kregel. Bettina Distel and André Corners. Business process management culture in public administration and its determinants. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 64, 2 (August 2021), 201-221. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12599-021-00713-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrew Brosnan. 2022. Digital Transformation as a Service? A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda. In 2022 Irish Academy of Management Conference. Dublin, Ireland, 52 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363045063_Digital_Transformation_as_a_Service_A_Systematic_Literature_Review_and_Research_Agenda?_sg%5B0%5D=czL9Dq36o-tXY7d31TdUUtb7XNEJCthQI8OM2VXMULDTgc2h9aKffTWEgxFgls-INaijgMYUglsTu-vsdleJar1To-FcgZDgDeswbMXt.OPV7kvJehN4aSwJesNYvKL43eXDRwziMLNkwcf8exIpv8yix5Mmtyl86XRhL2UtThM7RpF-u4Ntbg1LcATX7awGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Din Khoi Nguyen. Thijs Broekhuizen. John Qi Dong and P.C. Verhoef. 2020. When It Takes Three to Tango in the Digital Transformation Age: Synergies between Digital Orientation, Change Commitment and Organizational Agility. In 2020 International Conference on Information Systems, Hyderabad, India, article 1412, 10 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2020/digital_innovation/digital_innovation/3/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Frantz Rowe. Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research. European Journal of Information Systems. 27, 3 (May 2018), 380-393. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1471789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Michael Wade and Jialu Shan. Covid-19 Has Accelerated Digital Transformation, but May Have Made it Harder Not Easier. MIS Quarterly Executive. 19, 3 (August, 2020), 213-220. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol19/iss3/7/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jack O'Brien. Sumeet Padwalkar. Milan Singh. Abigail Whelan. Eimear Manning. Fergus Jayes. Jason Murphy. Stephen Treacy and Andrew Brosnan. 2023. Unpacking Digital Transformation Risk: A Systematic Review On Why Digital Transformations Often Fail To Deliver Value. In 2023 European Academy of Management Conference, Dublin, Ireland. 40 pages. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369301763_Unpacking_Digital_Transformation_Risk_A_Systematic_Review_On_Why_Digital_Transformations_Often_Fail_To_Deliver_ValueGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Andrew Brosnan. Digitalizing Defence: The Potential Role of Digital Transformation in Augmenting European Military Doctrine. European Studies Review. 6, 1 (October 2021), 52-61. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356584775_Digitalizing_Defence_The_Potential_Role_of_Digital_Transformation_in_Augmenting_European_Military_DoctrineGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendrik Scholta. Sebastian Halsbenning and Jörg Becker. 2022. A public value based method to select services for a no-stop shop implementation. In 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, 2523-2532. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/e3f72ab1-768e-4283-a916-f063df0335f3/contentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristin Hafseld. Bassam Hussein and Antoine Rauzy. Government inter-organizational, digital transformation projects: five key lessons learned from a Norwegian case study. Procedia Computer Science. 196 (January 2022), 910-919. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050921023152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mark Rowland, Noel Carroll and Kieran Conboy. 2022. Examining the Adoption of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Transformations. In: 2022 European Conference on Information Systems. Timisora, Romania, article 1773, 14 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2022_rp/140/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chitu Okoli. 2015. A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 37, (November 2015), 879-910. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3908&context=caisGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ulrike Schultze and Michel Avital. Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization. 21, 1 (January 2011), 1-16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471772710000412Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (July 2006), 77-101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Martin Eling. Ruo Jia. Jieyu Lin and Casey Rothschild. Technology heterogeneity and market structure. Journal of Risk and Insurance. 89, 2 (November 2021), 427-448. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jori.12369Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonas Soluk and Nadine Kammerlander. Digital transformation in family-owned Mittelstand firms: A dynamic capabilities perspective. European Journal of Information Systems. 30, 6 (January 2021), 676-711. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1857666Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Abayomi Baiyere. Hannu Salmela and Tommi Tapanainen. Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems. 29, 3 (March 2020), 238-259. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007?journalCode=tjis20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yixin Lu. Alok Gupta. Wolfgang Ketter and Eric van Heck. Designing Hybrid Mechanisms to Overcome Congestion in Sequential Dutch Auctions. MIS Quarterly. 46, 1 (February 2022), 457-490. https://misq.umn.edu/designing-hybrid-mechanisms-to-overcome-congestion-in-sequential-dutch-auctions.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Thomas Niemand. J.P. Rigtering. Andreas Kallmünzer. Sascha Kraus and Adnane Maalaoui. Digitalization in the financial industry: A contingency approach of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic vision on digitalization. European Management Journal. 39, 3 (June 2021), 317-326. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237320300608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Hope Koch. Wallace Chipidza and Timothy Kayworth. Realizing value from shadow analytics: A case study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 30, 2 (June 2021), article 101688, 18 pages. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963868721000159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Henrik Wimelius. Lars Mathiassen, Jonny Holmström and Mark Keil. A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Information Systems Journal. 31, 1 (January 2021), 198-225. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/isj.12307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Martin Carlsson-Wall. Lukas Goretzki. Jesper Hofstedt. Kalle Kraus and Carl-Johan Nilsson. Exploring the implications of cloud-based enterprise resource planning systems for public sector management accountants. Financial Accountability & Management. 38, 2 (May 2022), 177-201. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/faam.12300Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Philipp Barthel. Celine Perrot. Alexander Benlian and Thomas Hess. 2021. Towards a Method for Evaluating Digital Innovation Projects. In 2021 European Conference on Information Systems. Marrakech, Morocco, article 1194, 17 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/31/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheshadri Chatterjee. Ranjan Chaudhuri. Dremetris Vrontis and Fauzia Jabeen. Digital transformation of organization using AI-CRM: From microfoundational perspective with leadership support. Journal of Business Research. 153 (December 2022), 46-58. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322007019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Roberta Bernardi and Mark Exworthy. Clinical managers' identity at the crossroad of multiple institutional logics in it innovation: The case study of a health care organization in England. Information Systems Journal. 30, 3 (May 2020), 566-595. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/isj.12267Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Laidi Surva. Maintaining the Ideals of Co-production During Rapid Digitalisation: A Comparative Case Study of Digital Restorative Services in Estonia, Finland, Ireland and Portugal. Voluntas. Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-022-00502-6#citeasGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jahangir Karimi and Zhiping Walter. The Role of Dynamic Capabilities in Responding to Digital Disruption: A Factor-Based Study of the Newspaper Industry. Journal of Management Information Systems. 31, 1 (July 2015). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380?journalCode=mmis20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Jens Frick, Vincent Fremont, Lars-Johan Åge and Aihie Osarenkhoe. Digitalization efforts in liminal space – inter-organizational challenges. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 35, 1 (January 2020). https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JBIM-12-2018-0392/full/htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Salim Chouaibi. Giuseppe Festa. Roberto Quaglia and Matteo Rossi. The risky impact of digital transformation on organizational performance – evidence from Tunisia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 178 (May 2022), article 121571, 6 pages. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162522001032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Henrik Scholta. Willem Merterns. Marek Kowalkiewicz and Jörg Becker. From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: An e-government stage model. Government Information Quarterly. 36, 1 (January 2019), 11-26. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X17304239Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Patryk Zapadka. André Hanelt and Sebastian Firk. Digital at the edge – antecedents and performance effects of boundary resource deployment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 31, 1 (March 2022), article 101708, 22 pages. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S096386872200004X?token=317FEA0D2D4CDE9EAEEC63B81CD9C371931C30AC793277551792AD803E20E6190F0DED0B82EA76139E932F89876609F4&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20230113124949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Carolin Marx. Danielly de Paula and Falk Ubernickel. 2021. Dynamic Capabilities & Digital Transformation: A quantitative study on how to gain a Competitive Advantage in the Digital Age. In 2021 European Conference on Information Systems. Marrakech, Morocco, article 1287, 18 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1057&context=ecis2021_rpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Johan Sandberg. Jonny Holmström, and Kalle Lyytinen. Digitization and Phase Transitions in Platform Organizing Logics: Evidence from the Process Automation Industry. MIS Quarterly. 44, 1 (March 2020), 129-153. https://misq.umn.edu/digitization-and-phase-transitions-in-platform-organizing-logics-evidence-from-the-process-automation-industry.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Alessandro Creazza. Claudia Colicchia. Salvatore Spiezia and Fabrizio Dallari. Who cares? Supply chain managers’ perceptions regarding cyber supply chain risk management in the digital transformation era. Supply Chain Management, 27, 1 (January 2021), 30-53. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/SCM-02-2020-0073/full/htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ane Grubb. Avoiding Intimacy—An Ethnographic Study of Beneficent Boundaries in Virtual Voluntary Social Work. Voluntas. 33 (April, 2021), 72-82. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-021-00350-wGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Liang Li. Fang Su. Wei Zhang and Ji-Ye Mao. Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal. 28, 6 (November 2018), 1129-1157. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/isj.12153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Karen Osmundsen. Christian Meske and Devinder Thapa. Familiarity with digital twin totality: Exploring the relation and perception of affordances through a Heideggerian perspective. Information Systems Journal. 32, 5 (September 2022), 1064-1091. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/isj.12383Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Heidi Hietala. Pekka Rossi. Elina Annanperä. Tero Päivärinta. 2021. Modes of Collaboration in Digital Transformation of Municipal Wastewater Management. In 2021 European Conference on Information Systems. Marrakech, Morocco, article 1470, 16 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2021_rp/91/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Noel Carroll. Brian McLafferty. Kieran Conboy and Brian Donnellan. 2021. Normalising a Digital Transformation. In 2021 International Conference on Information Systems, Austin, Texas, article 2223, 9 pages. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2021/is_implement/is_implement/12/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Serdar Temiz. Marcus Holgersson. Joakim Björkdahl and Martin Wallin. Open data: Lost opportunity or unrealized potential? Technovation. 114 (June 2022), article 102535, 7 pages. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497222000827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Matteo Rossi. Joe Nandhakumar and Merja Mattila. Balancing fluid and cemented routines in a digital workplace. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 29, 2 (June 2020), article 101616, 14 pages. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096386872030024XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DGO '23: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
    July 2023
    711 pages
    ISBN:9798400708374
    DOI:10.1145/3598469

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 July 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)69
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format