skip to main content
10.1145/3599640.3599651acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicettConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Influence of Quizizz-online Gamification on Vocabulary Learning Effectiveness and Engagement among College EFL Learners in China

Published:13 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Game-based learning is considered to be an effective way to enhance students' learning participation and has been applied to various learning contexts since its birth. Nowadays, it is getting more popular due to the increasingly advanced application technology and the prevalence of COVID-19 requiring more students to study online. In different countries and regions, a lot of researches have been done on game-based learning for different age groups. However, few studies have focused on how game-based learning online affects college EFL learners' learning effectiveness and learning engagement. This study investigated how Quizizz (a game-based learning application online ) affects college EFL learners' learning effectiveness and learning engagement. This study adopts an explanatory design as a mixed approach, involving a college English teacher and 20 EFL learners from a public comprehensive university in Zhejiang Province, China. Students' test grades (before and after intervention) and semi-structured interviews were collected as the data. According to the quantitative and qualitative data, it was found that Quizizz motivated students' higher learning effectiveness and better learning engagement. Therefore, the game-based learning application Quizizz is worth implementing in EFL contexts for better learning participation and effectiveness.

References

  1. CK Lo and KF Hew. 2020. A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: the effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Millis K, Forsyth C, Wallace P, Graesser A. C, and Timmins G. 2017. The impact of game-like features on learning from an intelligent tutoring system. Technology, Knowledge and Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Noroozi O, McAlister S, and Mulder M. 2016. Impacts of a digital dialogue game and epistemic beliefs on argumentative discourse and willingness to argue. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zainuddin Z and Perera C. J. 2019. Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baptista G and Oliveira T. 2019. Gamification and serious games: a literature meta-analysis and integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lopez C. E and Tucker C. S. 2019. The effects of player type on performance: a gamification case study. In Computers in Human Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Orhan Göksün D and Gürsoy G. 2019. Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers and Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark D. B, Nelson B. C, Chang H. Y, Martinez-Garza M, Slack K, and D'Angelo C. M. 2011. Exploring Newtonian mechanics in a conceptuallyintegrated digital game: comparison of learning and affective outcomes for students in Taiwan and the United States. Computers and Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jurgelaitis M, Čeponienė L, Čeponis J, and Drungilas V. 2019. Implementing gamification in a university-level UML modeling course: a case study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuo M. S and Chuang T. Y. 2016. How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination - an empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Metwally A. H. S, Chang M, Wang Y and Yousef A. M. F. 2021. Does gamifying homework influence performance and perceived gameful experience? Sustainability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Metwally A. H. S, Yousef A. M. F and Yining W. 2020. Micro design approach for gamifying students’ assignments. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.‏Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Zainuddin Z, Shujahat M, Haruna H and Chu S. K. W. 2020. The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: an interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers and Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hassan M. A, Habiba U, Majeed F and Shoaib M. 2021. Adaptive gamification in e-learning based on students’ learning styles. Interactive Learning Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Groening C and Binnewies C. 2019. “Achievement unlocked!” - the impact of digital achievements as a gamification element on motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Munday P. 2016. The case for using DUOLINGO as part of the language classroom experience. RIED V.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nahmod D. M. 2017. Vocabulary gamification vs traditional learning instruction in an inclusive high school classroom. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Perry B. 2015. Gamifying French language learning: a case study examining a quest-based, augmented reality mobile learning-tool. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Y. L and Hsu C. C. 2020. Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers and Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cerezo R, Calderón V and Romero C. 2019. A holographic mobile-based application for practicing pronunciation of basic English vocabulary for Spanish speaking children. International Journal of Human Computer Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Topîrceanu A. 2017. Gamified learning: a role-playing approach to increase student in-class motivation. Procedia Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Degirmenci R. 2021. The use of Quizizz in language learning and teaching from the teachers’ and students’ perspectives: a literature review. Language Education and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhao F. 2019. Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Damayanti I. L. 2017. From storytelling to story writing: the implementation of reading to learn (R2L) pedagogy to teach English as a foreign language in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Creswell J. W. 2015. A concise introduction to mixed method research; Thousand Oaks: California, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Qiu X and Lo Y. Y. 2016. Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kizilcec R. F, Pérez-Sanagustín M and Maldonado J. J. 2017. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Guo P. J and Reinecke K. 2014. Demographic differences in how students navigate through MOOCs. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sykes J. M and Reinhardt J. 2012. Language at play: digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning; Pearson: New York, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Reynolds B. L and Kao C. 2019. The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim T. M and Yunus M. M. 2021. Teachers’ perception towards the use of Quizizz in the teaching and learning of English: a systematic review. Sustainability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Belova N and Zowada C. 2020. Innovating higher education via game-based learning on misconceptions. Education Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Prasetyawati O. A and Ardi P. 2020. Integrating Instagram into EFL writing to foster student engagement. Teaching English with Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Morett L. M. 2019. The power of an image: images, not glosses, enhance learning of concrete L2 words in beginning learners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Huang Hc. 2020. Learner autonomy and responsibility: self-learning through a flipped online EFL course. Technology and the Psychology of Second Language Learners and Users.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Suvorov R and Carrillo C. A. 2017. The development of language learner autonomy in adaptive learning systems. In M. Cappellini, T. Lewis, & A. R. Mompean (Eds.), Learner Autonomy and Web 2.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Taopan L. L, Drajati N. A and Sumardi. 2020. TPACK framework: challenges and opportunities in EFL classrooms. Research and Innovation in Language Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lehiste P. 2015. The impact of a professional development program on inservice teachers’ TPACK: a study from Estonia. Problems of Education in the 21st Century.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu S, Liu H, Yu Y, Li Y and Wen T. 2014. TPACK: a new dimension to EFL teachers’ PCK. Journal of Education and Human Development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Influence of Quizizz-online Gamification on Vocabulary Learning Effectiveness and Engagement among College EFL Learners in China

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICETT '23: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies
      April 2023
      216 pages
      ISBN:9781450399593
      DOI:10.1145/3599640

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)65
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format