ABSTRACT
This paper presents a design methodology of Introductory Information Technology offered to non-majors in computer science, such as the major in languages and translation, at the Macao Polytechnic University (MPU). The main objectives of this course are to introduce the fields of computer science for major in languages and translation, keep them engaged in the course and effectively gain their interest in learning information technology. Furthermore, they can apply what they have learned from the course of introductory information technology to their professional learning and future careers. Also, the learning situation of the students in this major, and the results of students’ perceptions and reactions are presented correspondingly.
- MPU Student Engagement Survey (for BSc in Computing): from 2009-2010 till 2021-2022Google Scholar
- MPU Student Engagement Survey (for MSc in Big Data and IoT): from 2019-20 till 2021-22Google Scholar
- MPU Graduate Employment Survey (for BSc in Computing): from 2004-2005 till 2020-2021Google Scholar
- Ngai Cheong, (2022), “Personalized Learning in Science Recommendation System Based on Learners’ Preferences”, The proceedings of 2022 3rd International Conference on Education Development and Studies, pp.22-27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ngai Cheong, (2021), “Knowledge-based Recommender System of Conceptual Learning in Science”, The proceedings of 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning, pp.9-15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ngai Cheong, (2022), “Revitalizing Introductory Computer Courses for Non-CS Majors : A Comparative Study”, The 2022 4th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies, pp.115-119.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeannette M.Wing (2006), Computational thinking. Commun. ACM;49(3):pp. 33-35.Google Scholar
- Daniel D.Garcia, Collcen M. Lewis, John P.Dougherty, and Matthew C.Jadud, (2010), “If you might be a computational thinker!”, In Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGCSE. ACM, New York, USA, pp.263-264.Google Scholar
- Dennis Kafura and Deborah Tatar, (2010), “ Initial experience with a computational thinking course for computer science students” In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM SIGCSE. ACM,New York,USA, pp.251-256.Google Scholar
- Paul Curzon, Computing Without Computers: A Gentle Introduction to Computer Programming, Data Structures and Algorithms. http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/pc/research/education/puzzles/reading.Google Scholar
- A. C. Bart, R. Whitcomb, D. Kafura, C. A. Shaffer and E. Tilevich, (2017), "Computing with corgis: Diverse real-world datasets for introductory computing", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer science Education, pp. 57-62.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Han, Z. Li, J. S. He and X. S. Tian, (2019), "Understand the emerging demands of computing education for non-cs major students", Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer science Education, pp. 1266-1266.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. McKinsey , (2011), Big data: the next frontier for innovation competition and productivity.Google Scholar
- S. Y. Lye and J. H. L. Koh, (2014), "Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for k-12", Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 41, pp. 51-61.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Hoenig, R. Pollak, B. Schulz and V. Stocke, (2016), "Social capital participation in adult education and labor market success: Constructing a new instrument", Methodological issues of longitudinal surveys, pp. 291-312.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Antonis, T. Daradoumis, S. Papadakis and C. Simos, (2010), "Evaluation of the effectiveness of a web-based learning design for adult computer science courses", IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 374-380.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Weintrop, E. Beheshti, M. Horn, K. Orton, K. Jona, L. Trouille, ,(2016), "Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms", Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127-147.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Rich, C. Strickland and D. Franklin, (2017), "A literature review through the lens of computer science learning goals theorized and explored in research", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer science Education, pp. 495-500.Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Van. DeGrift, (2017), "Pogil activities in data structures: What do students value", Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer science Education, pp. 597-602.Google Scholar
- Ngai Cheong, (2014), “Analysis of Multi-rate and Multi-stage Switched-Capacitor Filters Using ISCMRATE”, Journal of Circuits, Systems, and Computers, No. 23(7), pp.1-14.Google Scholar
- Ngai Cheong, (2014), “An Optimization Applied to Design of SC Biquad-Based Circuits”, Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering, No. 7(1), pp.47-56.Google Scholar
- Ngai Cheong, (2012), “Optimizations in Switched Circuits Design Using Constraint Programming”, International Conference on System Science and Engineering, pp.143-146.Google Scholar
- S. Beyer ,(2003), “Gender Differences in Computer science Students,” in Proc. SIGSCE 2003, pp. 49-53.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Forte, M. Guzdial, (2005), “Motivation and Nonmajors in Computer science: Identifying Discrete Audiences for Introductory Courses,” IEEE Transactions On Education, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 248-253.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Herrmann, (2003), “Redesigning Introductory Computer Programming Using Multilevel Online Modules for a Mixed Audience,” in Proc. 34th ACM Special Interest Group Computer science Education (SIGCSE) Tech. Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 196–200.Google Scholar
- D. Joyce, (1998), “The computer as a problem solving tool: a unifying view for a nonmajors course,” in Proc. 29th SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Computer Science Education, pp. 63-67.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Kock, R. Aiken, C. Sandas, (2002), “Using complex IT in specific domains: Developing and assessing a course for nonmajors,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 50–56.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Wilson, S. Shrock,(2001), “Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors,” in Proc. SIGSCE 2001, pp. 184–188.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Design Methodology of Introductory Information Technology for Major in Languages and Translation
Recommendations
Evolving the information technology major by embracing interdisciplinary
The inherent interdisciplinarity, relative youth, and applied nature of the discipline of information technology makes it an ideal domain in which to experiment with curricular innovations designed to attract and retain undergraduate students in the ...
Development of a baccalaureate major in information technology: adding a third dimension to a comprehensive computing program
SIGITE '09: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on SIG-information technology educationThe Information Technology discipline has become increasingly important both to higher education, business and industry. Although there has been a continuous growth of IT technical support jobs, several research studies claim that there are many ...
Stimulating information technology education among underrepresented minorities
CITC5 '04: Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology educationThe focus of this paper is the information technology higher education pipeline, and why so few male and female African American and Latino/a students are studying computer science at the college level. We specifically have researched the experiences, ...
Comments