skip to main content
10.1145/3599733.3600255acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Little’s Law in a Single-Server System with Inactive State for Demand-Response in Data Centers with Green SLAs

Published:28 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data centers can participate in demand-response schemes by reducing their demand, however, at the expense of the agreed-upon performance of their IT services defined by the SLAs. The successful application of such schemes necessitates a careful analysis so that the amount of degradation of the SLAs with respect to power savings can be quantified helping the data center operators to set up the optimal configuration. In this paper, we study and analyze a system consisting of a data center, its operator, and IT clients under the consideration of relaxed SLAs. For this purpose, we consider a data center system consisting of two heterogeneous pools of servers, where each server is modeled using the single-server system with a power-saving inactive state, non-zero (random) activation/deactivation times, and hot standby state. Making use of the distributional Little’s Law, derive the steady-state performance (in terms of response time distribution) and average power demand and study the power-performance trade-off in an explicit way. Numerical results illustrate the model’s theoretical properties, under different considerations of low, medium, and high workload utilization rates.

References

  1. Dlzar Al Kez, Aoife Foley, Faraedoon Ahmed, and John Morrow. 2022. Data Center Potential Flexibilities and Challenges for Demand Response to Facilitate 100% Inverter-Based Resources: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal (2022), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4269631Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Dlzar Al Kez, Aoife M Foley, Faraedoon W Ahmed, Mark O’Malley, and SM Muyeen. 2021. Potential of data centers for fast frequency response services in synchronously isolated power systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 151 (2021), 111547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. OpenADR Alliance. 2013. OpenADR 2.0 Profile Specification B Profile. Technical Report 20120912-1. OpenADR Alliance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shahab Bahrami, Vincent WS Wong, and Jianwei Huang. 2018. Data center demand response in deregulated electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 10, 3 (2018), 2820–2832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Robert Basmadjian. 2019. Flexibility-Based Energy and Demand Management in Data Centers: A Case Study for Cloud Computing. Energies 12, 17, Article 3301 (2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12173301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Robert Basmadjian, Juan Felipe Botero, Giovanni Giuliani, Xavier Hesselbach, Sonja Klingert, and Hermann De Meer. 2018. Making Data Centers Fit for Demand Response: Introducing GreenSDA and GreenSLA Contracts. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 9, 4 (July 2018), 3453–3464. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2632526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Robert Basmadjian, Pascal Bouvry, Georges Da Costa, László Gyarmati, Dzmitry Kliazovich, Sébastien Lafond, Laurent Lefèvre, Hermann De Meer, Jean-Marc Pierson, Rastin Pries, Jordi Torres, Tuan Anh Trinh, and Samee Ullah Khan. 2015. Green Data Centers. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, New Jersey, Chapter 6, 159–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118981122.ch6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robert Basmadjian and Hermann de Meer. 2018. Modelling and Analysing Conservative Governor of DVFS-Enabled Processors. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Future Energy Systems (Karlsruhe, Germany) (e-Energy ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1145/3208903.3213778Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert Basmadjian, Florian Niedermeier, and Hermann de Meer. 2016. Modelling Performance and Power Consumption of Utilisation-Based DVFS Using M/M/1 Queues. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Future Energy Systems (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) (e-Energy ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2934328.2934342Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Min Chen, Ciwei Gao, Meng Song, Songsong Chen, Dezhi Li, and Qiang Liu. 2020. Internet data centers participating in demand response: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 117 (2020), 109466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mark Van der Boor, Sem C. Borst, Johan S. H. Van Leeuwaarden, and Debankur Mukherjee. 2022. Scalable Load Balancing in Networked Systems: A Survey of Recent Advances. SIAM Rev. 64, 3 (2022), 554–622. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1323746Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. FERC. 2013. Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering. Technical Report. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/oct-demand-response.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jean-Michel Fourneau. 2020. Modeling Green Data-Centers and Jobs Balancing with Energy Packet Networks and Interrupted Poisson Energy Arrivals. SN Computer Science 1, 1 (Jan. 2020), 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-019-0029-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Anshul Gandhi, Varun Gupta, Mor Harchol-Balter, and Michael A. Kozuch. 2010. Optimality analysis of energy-performance trade-off for server farm management. Performance Evaluation 67, 11 (2010), 1155–1171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2010.08.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Anshul Gandhi, Mor Harchol-Balter, and Ivo Adan. 2010. Server Farms with Setup Costs. Perform. Eval. 67, 11 (Nov. 2010), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2010.07.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anshul Gandhi, Mor Harchol-Balter, Rajarshi Das, Jeffrey O. Kephart, and Charles Lefurgy. 2009. Power capping via forced idleness. In Proceedings of Workshop on Energy Efficient Design. Computer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Pittsburg, Article 868, 6 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. E. Gebrehiwot, S. Aalto, and P. Lassila. 2017. Energy Efficient Load Balancing in Web Server Clusters. In 2017 29th International Teletraffic Congress (ITC 29), Vol. 3. IEEE, Genoa, Italy, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.23919/ITC.2017.8065804Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark W. Gellings and John H. Chamberlin. 1988. Demand-side management: concepts and methods. Fairmont Press, Lilburn, Ga.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Girish Ghatikar, Venkata Ganti, Nance Matson, and Mary Ann Piette. 2012. Demand Response Opportunities and Enabling Technologies for Data Centers: Findings from Field Studies. Technical Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Girish Ghatikar, Mary Ann Piette, Sydny Fujita, Aimee McKane, Junqiao Han Dudley, and Anthony Radspieler. 2010. Demand Response and Open Automated Demand Response Opportunities for Data Centers. Technical Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alexander Golovin and Alexander Rumyantsev. 2022. Energy Efficiency of a Single-Server with Inactive State by Matrix-Analytic Method. In Information Technologies and Mathematical Modelling. Queueing Theory and Applications, Alexander Dudin, Anatoly Nazarov, and Alexander Moiseev (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 172–184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J Keilson and L.D Servi. 1988. A distributional form of Little’s Law. Operations Research Letters 7, 5 (1988), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6377(88)90035-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Paul J. Kuehn and Maggie Mashaly. 2019. DVFS-Power Management and Performance Engineering of Data Center Server Clusters. In 2019 15th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS). IEEE, Wengen, Switzerland, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.23919/WONS.2019.8795470Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Oracle 2020. Oracle’s Power Calculators. Oracle. Retrieved May 5, 2023 from https://www.oracle.com/it-infrastructure/power-calculators/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Riccardo Pinciroli, Ahsan Ali, Feng Yan, and Evgenia Smirni. 2021. CEDULE+: Resource Management for Burstable Cloud Instances Using Predictive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 18, 1 (March 2021), 945–957. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2020.3039942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Alexander Rumyantsev, Robert Basmadjian, Alexander Golovin, and Sergey Astafiev. 2021. A Three-Level Modelling Approach for Asynchronous Speed Scaling in High-Performance Data Centres. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems(e-Energy ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447555.3466580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Alexander Rumyantsev, Polina Zueva, Ksenia Kalinina, and Alexander Golovin. 2018. Evaluating a Single-Server Queue with Asynchronous Speed Scaling. In Measurement, Modelling and Evaluation of Computing Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10740. Springer International Publishing, Springer, Cham, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74947-1_11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Shengquan Wang, Jian-Jia Chen, Jun Liu, and Xue Liu. 2010. Power Saving Design for Servers under Response Time Constraint. In 2010 22nd Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. IEEE, Brussels, Belgium, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECRTS.2010.31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Xi Zheng, Sheng Zhou, Zhiyuan Jiang, and Zhisheng Niu. 2019. Closed-Form Analysis of Non-Linear Age of Information in Status Updates With an Energy Harvesting Transmitter. Ieee Transactions on Wireless Communications 18, 8 (Aug. 2019), 4129–4142. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2019.2921372 Place: Piscataway Publisher: Ieee-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc WOS:000480661000026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Little’s Law in a Single-Server System with Inactive State for Demand-Response in Data Centers with Green SLAs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        e-Energy '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Future Energy Systems
        June 2023
        157 pages
        ISBN:9798400702273
        DOI:10.1145/3599733

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 June 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

        Upcoming Conference

        E-Energy '24
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format