skip to main content
10.1145/3600100.3627036acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbuildsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Explainable Occupancy Prediction Using QLattice

Published: 15 November 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Occupant presence and their behaviour in the built environment significantly impact energy consumption in buildings. Currently, building systems are often operated based on assumed occupancy and fixed schedules, or occupants manually adjust them for their comfort, which sometimes leads to energy wastage. Also, the inherent complexity and unpredictability of occupancy patterns can contribute to disparities between simulated and actual energy consumption, underscoring the importance of selecting suitable methods for occupancy prediction. Various methods, such as occupancy cameras, thermal imagers, Passive Infrared Sensors, and Radio-Frequency Identification, can collect occupancy information. However, they often come with limitations including cost, complexity, and invasiveness. Hence, there is a growing interest in creating occupancy prediction models using an indirect approach based on indoor air quality (IAQ) data. However, this indirect approach must be further explored within the building simulation field. In this study, we apply an approach based on the novel QLattice algorithm for occupancy detection, utilizing a minimal sensing strategy with a comprehensive set of IAQ data. Furthermore, we compare the QLattice algorithm’s performance with that of traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Decision Trees (DT), and XGBoost using metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, AUC-ROC values, and computational time. The QLattice algorithm outperforms traditional ML algorithms in all evaluation metrics, achieving over 90% accuracy on the test dataset. Additionally, compared to traditional black-box ML algorithms, QLattice stands out for its explainability and interpretability, providing insights useful in decision-making.

References

[1]
Yuvraj Agarwal, Bharathan Balaji, Seemanta Dutta, Rajesh K Gupta, and Thomas Weng. 2011. Duty-cycling buildings aggressively: The next frontier in HVAC control. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE international conference on information processing in sensor networks. IEEE, 246–257.
[2]
Jawad Ahmad, Hadi Larijani, R Emmanuel, M Mannion, and A Javed. 2021. Occupancy detection in non-residential buildings–A survey and novel privacy preserved occupancy monitoring solution. Applied Computing and Informatics 17, 2 (2021), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2018.12.001
[3]
Prashant Anand, David Cheong, Chandra Sekhar, Mattheos Santamouris, and Sekhar Kondepudi. 2019. Energy saving estimation for plug and lighting load using occupancy analysis. Renewable Energy 143 (2019), 1143–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.089
[4]
Plamen P Angelov, Eduardo A Soares, Richard Jiang, Nicholas I Arnold, and Peter M Atkinson. 2021. Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 11, 5 (2021), e1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1424
[5]
Abhay Arora, Manar Amayri, Venkataramana Badarla, Stéphane Ploix, and Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay. 2015. Occupancy estimation using non intrusive sensors in energy efficient buildings. In 14th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Hyderabad, India, Dec. 7-9, 2015.https://doi.org/10.26868/25222708.2015.2460
[6]
Elie Azar and Carol C Menassa. 2016. Optimizing the performance of energy-intensive commercial buildings: Occupancy-focused data collection and analysis approach. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 30, 5 (2016), C4015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.000052
[7]
Gopi Battineni, Nalini Chintalapudi, and Francesco Amenta. 2019. Machine learning in medicine: Performance calculation of dementia prediction by support vector machines (SVM). Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 16 (2019), 100200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2019.100200
[8]
Kevin René Broløs, Meera Vieira Machado, Chris Cave, Jaan Kasak, Valdemar Stentoft-Hansen, Victor Galindo Batanero, Tom Jelen, and Casper Wilstrup. 2021. An approach to symbolic regression using feyn. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.05417 (2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.15147
[9]
Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
[10]
Ashley Deeks. 2019. The judicial demand for explainable artificial intelligence. Columbia Law Review 119, 7 (2019), 1829–1850. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26810851
[11]
Simona D’Oca, Tianzhen Hong, and Jared Langevin. 2018. The human dimensions of energy use in buildings: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81 (2018), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.019
[12]
Hugo Jair Escalante, Sergio Escalera, Isabelle Guyon, Xavier Baró, Yağmur Güçlütürk, Umut Güçlü, Marcel van Gerven, and Rob van Lier. 2018. Explainable and interpretable models in computer vision and machine learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4
[13]
Mohammad Esrafilian-Najafabadi and Fariborz Haghighat. 2021. Occupancy-based HVAC control systems in buildings: A state-of-the-art review. Building and Environment 197 (2021), 107810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107810
[14]
William J Fisk, David Faulkner, and Douglas P Sullivan. 2006. Accuracy of CO2 sensors in commercial buildings: a pilotstudy. Technical Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.(LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States).
[15]
X Guo, DK Tiller, GP Henze, and CE Waters. 2010. The performance of occupancy-based lighting control systems: A review. Lighting Research & Technology 42, 4 (2010), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153510376225
[16]
IEA. 2023. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023, IEA, Paris. In https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023, License: CC BY 4.0.
[17]
Andy P Jones. 1999. Indoor air quality and health. Atmospheric environment 33, 28 (1999), 4535–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00272-1
[18]
Neil E Klepeis, William C Nelson, Wayne R Ott, John P Robinson, Andy M Tsang, Paul Switzer, Joseph V Behar, Stephen C Hern, and William H Engelmann. 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 11, 3 (2001), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165
[19]
Nan Li, Gulben Calis, and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 2012. Measuring and monitoring occupancy with an RFID based system for demand-driven HVAC operations. Automation in construction 24 (2012), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.02.013
[20]
YuLiang Liu, Xiang Ni, YuanXi Wu, and Wei Zhang. 2017. Study on effect of temperature and humidity on the CO2 concentration measurement. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 81. IOP Publishing, 012083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012083
[21]
Jiakang Lu, Tamim Sookoor, Vijay Srinivasan, Ge Gao, Brian Holben, John Stankovic, Eric Field, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2010. The smart thermostat: using occupancy sensors to save energy in homes. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on embedded networked sensor systems. 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/1869983.1870005
[22]
Ardeshir Mahdavi, Christiane Berger, Hadeer Amin, Eleni Ampatzi, Rune Korsholm Andersen, Elie Azar, Verena M Barthelmes, Matteo Favero, Jakob Hahn, Dolaana Khovalyg, 2021. The role of occupants in buildings’ energy performance gap: myth or reality?Sustainability 13, 6 (2021), 3146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146
[23]
K-R Müller, Alexander J Smola, Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Jens Kohlmorgen, and Vladimir Vapnik. 1997. Predicting time series with support vector machines. In International conference on artificial neural networks. Springer, 999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020283
[24]
Ajith N. Nair, Prashant Anand, Abraham George, and Nilabhra Mondal. 2022. A review of strategies and their effectiveness in reducing indoor airborne transmission and improving indoor air quality. Environmental Research 213 (2022), 113579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113579
[25]
Tuan Anh Nguyen and Marco Aiello. 2013. Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: A survey. Energy and buildings 56 (2013), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.005
[26]
William S Noble. 2006. What is a support vector machine?Nature biotechnology 24, 12 (2006), 1565–1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1206-1565
[27]
Zhihong Pang, Yan Chen, Jian Zhang, Zheng O’Neill, Hwakong Cheng, and Bing Dong. 2020. Nationwide HVAC energy-saving potential quantification for office buildings with occupant-centric controls in various climates. Applied Energy 279 (2020), 115727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115727
[28]
Therese Peffer, Marco Pritoni, Alan Meier, Cecilia Aragon, and Daniel Perry. 2011. How people use thermostats in homes: A review. Building and Environment 46, 12 (2011), 2529–2541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.06.002
[29]
J. Ross Quinlan. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine learning 1 (1986), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251
[30]
Olli A Seppänen and William Fisk. 2006. Some quantitative relations between indoor environmental quality and work performance or health. Hvac&R Research 12, 4 (2006), 957–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2006.10391446
[31]
Weiming Shen, Guy Newsham, and Burak Gunay. 2017. Leveraging existing occupancy-related data for optimal control of commercial office buildings: A review. Advanced Engineering Informatics 33 (2017), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2016.12.008
[32]
Saman Taheri and Ali Razban. 2021. Learning-based CO2 concentration prediction: Application to indoor air quality control using demand-controlled ventilation. Building and Environment 205 (2021), 108164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108164
[33]
Chao Wang, Fan Zhang, Julian Wang, James K Doyle, Peter A Hancock, Cheuk Ming Mak, and Shichao Liu. 2021. How indoor environmental quality affects occupants’ cognitive functions: A systematic review. Building and environment 193 (2021), 107647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107647
[34]
Wei Wang, Jiayu Chen, Gongsheng Huang, and Yujie Lu. 2017. Energy efficient HVAC control for an IPS-enabled large space in commercial buildings through dynamic spatial occupancy distribution. Applied Energy 207 (2017), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.060
[35]
Simon Wenninger, Can Kaymakci, and Christian Wiethe. 2022. Explainable long-term building energy consumption prediction using QLattice. Applied Energy 308 (2022), 118300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118300
[36]
Casper Wilstrup and Jaan Kasak. 2021. Symbolic regression outperforms other models for small data sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15147 (2021).
[37]
Tao Yang, Arkasama Bandyopadhyay, Zheng O’Neill, Jin Wen, and Bing Dong. 2022. From occupants to occupants: A review of the occupant information understanding for building HVAC occupant-centric control. In Building simulation, Vol. 15. Springer, 913–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0861-0
[38]
Zheng Yang, Nan Li, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, and Michael Orosz. 2012. A non-intrusive occupancy monitoring system for demand driven HVAC operations. In Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World. 828–837. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412329.084
[39]
Hiroshi Yoshino, Tianzhen Hong, and Natasa Nord. 2017. IEA EBC annex 53: Total energy use in buildings—Analysis and evaluation methods. Energy and Buildings 152 (2017), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.038

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling and Prediction of Occupancy in Buildings Based on Sensor Data Using Deep Learning MethodsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343258412(102994-103003)Online publication date: 2024

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
BuildSys '23: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
November 2023
567 pages
ISBN:9798400702303
DOI:10.1145/3600100
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 November 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Data-Driven Modelling
  2. Explainable Artificial Intelligence
  3. Indoor Air Quality
  4. Occupancy Prediction
  5. QLattice

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

BuildSys '23

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 148 of 500 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)110
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling and Prediction of Occupancy in Buildings Based on Sensor Data Using Deep Learning MethodsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.343258412(102994-103003)Online publication date: 2024

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media