Frida Muñoz Plaza
ABSTRACT
Psychological warfare and hybrid threats are currently one of the greatest risks to the stability of democratic systems, as well as are used to exploit the psychological vulnerability of individuals. Together with the use of disinformation and technologies, cognitive biases of individuals in a population are susceptible to being exploited and manipulated by an external actor in order to alter their behaviour, beliefs and decision-making to achieve their strategic goals. As pointed by NATO, the human mind becomes the battlefield in cognitive warfare, targeting not only individuals but also group behaviours in favor of an adversary’s objectives. The aim of this research is therefore the revision of cognitive warfare and hybrid threats definitions to draw a set of countermeasures intended to mitigate their effects. Even when cognitive warfare has been widely covered by the different miliary doctrines since early times, its implications in modern warfare scenarios are constantly evolving so that requiring a context-aware analysis as the main driver to underpin possible countermeasures from the governmental and political perspectives, as presented in this work. The analysis explores the cognitive impact and scope of psychological warfare on a national scale, as well as at the individual level within a context of proliferating disinformation, technologies, and manipulation.
- Rubén Arcos and Hanna Smith. 2021. Digital communication and hybrid threats. Presentation. ICONO 14, Revista de comunicación y tecnologías emergentes 19, 1 (2021), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Eitvydas Bajarūnas and Vytautas Keršanskas. 2018. Hybrid threats: analysis of content, challenges posed and measures to overcome. Lithuanian annual strategic review 16, 2017-2018 (2018), 123–170.Google Scholar
- Robert B Cialdini and Robert B Cialdini. 2007. Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Vol. 55. Collins New York.Google Scholar
- Centro Conjunto de Desarrollo de Conceptos. 2020. Implicaciones del ámbito cognitivo en las Operaciones Militares. Technical Report. Centro Superior de Estudios de la Defensa Nacional (CESEDEN).Google Scholar
- Inés Hernández San Román, Marco Antonio Sotelo Monge, and Víctor A Villagra. 2022. Design and Validation of a Threat Model Based on Cyber Kill Chain Applied to Human Factors. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Springer, 482–499.Google Scholar
- David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, 2018. The science of fake news. Science 359, 6380 (2018), 1094–1096.Google Scholar
- Juan León Murillo, Marco Antonio Sotelo Monge, and Víctor Villagrá. 2022. Design of a Validation Model of the Cognitive State in Military Operations in Cyberspace. In European Symposium on Research in Computer Security. Springer, 466–481.Google Scholar
- Paul MA Linebarger. 2015. Psychological warfare. Pickle Partners Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pablo Álvarez Llaneza. 2019. Propaganda y manipulación de masas en el siglo XX. bie3: Boletín IEEE14 (2019), 533–545.Google Scholar
- Peter ED Love, Lavagnon A Ika, and Jeff K Pinto. 2023. Fast-and-frugal heuristics for decision-making in uncertain and complex settings in construction. Developments in the Built Environment 14 (2023), 100129.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sean Monaghan, Patrick Cullen, and Nord Wegge. 2019. Countering hybrid warfare. Technical Report. Multinational Capability Development Campaign.Google Scholar
- Department of the Army. 2016. FM3-13. Information Operations. Technical Report. Central Army Registry.Google Scholar
- Guillem Colom Piella. 2019. La amenaza híbrida: mitos, leyendas y realidades. bie3: Boletín IEEE13 (2019), 669–682.Google Scholar
- Eliezer Yudkowsky. 2008. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks. Global catastrophic risks 1, 86 (2008), 13.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Towards the Definition of Cognitive Warfare and Related Countermeasures: A Systematic Review
Recommendations
Cognitive warfare: an ethical analysis
AbstractThis article characterises the nature of cognitive warfare and its use of disinformation and computational propaganda and its political and military purposes in war and in conflict short of war. It discusses both defensive and offensive measures ...
A Review on C3I Systems’ Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks, and Countermeasures
Command, Control, Communication, and Intelligence (C3I) systems are increasingly used in critical civil and military domains for achieving information superiority, operational efficacy, and greater situational awareness. The critical civil and military ...
Ethics behind cyber warfare: a study of arab citizens awareness
ETHICS '14: Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and TechnologyPersisting to ignore the consequences of Cyber Warfare will bring severe concerns to all people. Hackers and governments alike should understand the barriers of which their methods take them. Governments use Cyber Warfare to give them a tactical ...
Comments