skip to main content
10.1145/3603781.3603883acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescniotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Efficient and Reliable I/O Mapping Protocol for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the advancement of Industry 4.0, industrial cyber-physical systems (ICPS) are expected to realize the digitalization and intelligence in smart factories, and lots of sensors and actuators will be deployed and networked together. However, limited bandwith resource and massive data volume make it difficult to meet the real-time and reliability requirement in the industrial network. To address these problems, an efficient and reliable Input/Output (I/O) mapping protocol is proposed to provide the quality of service. First, we establish an I/O mapping communication model for smart manufacturing and automation scenarios, in which devices communicate with each other by simply writing and reading the output and input area. In order to ensure the reliability of transmission, we introduce an optimized hand-shake mechanism with a small hand-shake overhead. Finally, to realize the real-time transmission with coexistance of large-scale sensor data and control data, a bandwidth reservation method is designed to alleviate interference from each other. Extensive evaluation results show that our proposed protocol performs well in terms of packet-loss rate and transmission delay, and the intuitive I/O communication interface can improve the efficiency of software development.

References

  1. Haibo Zhou A, Yuanming Wu A, Yanqi Hu B, and Guangzhong Xie A. 2010. A novel stable selection and reliable transmission protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks - ScienceDirect. Computer Communications 33, 15 (2010), 1843–1849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammad Aazam and Eui-Nam Huh. [n. d.]. Fog Computing and Smart Gateway Based Communication for Cloud of Things. In 2014 International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (Barcelona, Spain, 2014-08). IEEE, 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2014.83Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Giuseppe Aceto, Valerio Persico, and Antonio Pescape. 2019. A survey on Information and Communication Technologies for Industry 4.0: state of the art, taxonomies, perspectives, and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 21, 99 (2019), 3467–3501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bobbio, S. Bologna, E. Ciancamerla, G. Franceschinis, and L. Portinale. 2001. Comparison of methodologies for the safety and dependability assessment of an industrial programmable logic controller. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fotis Foukalas and Athanasios Tziouvaras. [n. d.]. Edge Artificial Intelligence for Industrial Internet of Things Applications: An Industrial Edge Intelligence Solution. 15, 2 ([n. d.]), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2020.3026837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. B. Huyck, H. J. Ferreau, M. Diehl, J De Brabanter, Jfm Van Impe, B De Moor, and F. Logist. 2012. Towards Online Model Predictive Control on a Programmable Logic Controller: Practical Considerations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering,2012,(2012-11-27) 2012 (2012), 1035–1052.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Kliewer and R. Thobaben. 2002. Combining FEC and optimal soft-input source decoding for the reliable transmission of correlated variable-length encoded signals. In Proceedings DCC 2002. Data Compression Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Lee, K. C. Lee, H. L. Man, and F. Harashima. 2002. Integration of mobile vehicles for automated material handling using profibus and IEEE 802.11 networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics3 (2002), 49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. B. Mishra, B. Mishra, and A. Kertesz. 2021. Stress-Testing MQTT Brokers: A Comparative Analysis of Performance Measurements. Energies 14 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MohammedNabil and S. A. Majed. 2021. Programmable logic controller based lithium-ion battery management system for accurate state of charge estimation. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuhuai Peng, Alireza Jolfaei, Qiaozhi Hua, Wen-Long Shang, and Keping Yu. [n. d.]. Real-Time Transmission Optimization for Edge Computing in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. 18, 12 ([n. d.]), 9292–9301. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3181199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T. Sehlinger and G. Spiegel. 2007. EtherCAT: Implementing Deterministic Control over Ethernet Hardware. Rtc Magazine4 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Emiliano Sisinni, Abusayeed Saifullah, Song Han, Ulf Jennehag, and Mikael Gidlund. [n. d.]. Industrial Internet of Things: Challenges, Opportunities, and Directions. 14, 11 ([n. d.]), 4724–4734. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2852491Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ali Hassan Sodhro, Sandeep Pirbhulal, and Victor Hugo C. de Albuquerque. [n. d.]. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mechanism for Edge Computing-Based Industrial Applications. 15, 7 ([n. d.]), 4235–4243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2019.2902878Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Iof Standardization. 2003. Controller Area Network (CAN)-Part 1 : Data link layer and physical signaling. ISO 11898-1 : 2003 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. F. Wang, Y. Dai, D. H. Liu, and H. W. Kong. 2010. Research and application of reliable data transmission technique based on UDP. Computer Engineering and Applications 46, 3 (2010), 105–108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Quan Xin, Guanlin Wu, Wenqi Fang, Jiang Cao, and Yang Ping. [n. d.]. Opportunities for Reinforcement Learning in Industrial Automation. In 2021 7th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA) (Chongqing, China, 2021-10-29). IEEE, 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigDIA53151.2021.9619637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Xu, W. Jiao, Z. Yin, B. Wu, Y. Peng, X. Chen, F. Chen, and D. Fang. 2018. Enabling robust and reliable transmission in Internet of Things with multiple gateways. Computer networks 146, DEC.9 (2018), 183–199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L. I. Yan-Ling and Y. Jiang. 2005. TCP congestion control:a survey. China Measurement Technology (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wenjin Yu, Tharam Dillon, Fahed Mostafa, Wenny Rahayu, and Yuehua Liu. [n. d.]. Implementation of Industrial Cyber Physical System: Challenges and Solutions. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Cyber Physical Systems (ICPS) (Taipei, Taiwan, 2019-05). IEEE, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPHYS.2019.8780271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yinfen Zhang, Wenfeng Sun, and Yuntao Shi. [n. d.]. Architecture and Implementation of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Gateway. In 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT (Weihai, China, 2020-10-14). IEEE, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCASIT50869.2020.9368773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Efficient and Reliable I/O Mapping Protocol for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CNIOT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things
            May 2023
            1025 pages
            ISBN:9798400700705
            DOI:10.1145/3603781

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 July 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate39of82submissions,48%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format