skip to main content
10.1145/3604479.3604508acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deinonychus and The Cow – Enhancing Museum Exhibitions Through the Use of Mixed Reality

Published:08 April 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of technology inside museums is a topic of growing interest. Technology-driven installations not only create new experiences for the regular visitors but also may be enough to attract the interest of new ones. When those experiences happen outside of the museum walls, they can be even stronger in delivering the museum’s message to a new audience. Based on that, the Deinonychus experience and The Cow were created. These Mixed Reality (MR) experiences were first installed in a temporary facility of the Câmara Cascudo Museum during a Science, Culture, and Technology fair at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte’s central campus. This paper describes the development, deployment, and testing of those installations in a real environment, with considerations for those interested in creating something similar. Finally, the paper discusses the solutions used and how they could be replicated for museums around the globe.

References

  1. HTC Vive Arts. 2019. "Mona Lisa beyond the Glass": The Louvre’s first virtual reality experience. https://www.louvre.fr/en/what-s-on/life-at-the-museum/mona-lisa-beyond-the-glass-the-louvre-s-first-virtual-reality-experienceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry G Blundell and Adam J Schwarz. 2002. The classification of volumetric display systems: characteristics and predictability of the image space. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 8, 1 (2002), 66–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frederick P Brooks. 1999. What’s real about virtual reality?IEEE Computer graphics and applications 19, 6 (1999), 16–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Luis A Buatois and M Gabriela Mángano. 2011. Ichnology: Organism-substrate interactions in space and time. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Edward Buckley. 2011. Holographic laser projection. Journal of display technology 7, 3 (2011), 135–140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. GRIGORE Burdea and Frederick P Brooks. 1996. Force and touch feedback for virtual reality, 1996. New York (1996).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grigore C Burdea and Philippe Coiffet. 2003. Virtual reality technology. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marcello Carrozzino and Massimo Bergamasco. 2010. Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of cultural heritage 11, 4 (2010), 452–458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Marcello Carrozzino, Chiara Evangelista, A Scucces, Franco Tecchia, G Tennirelli, and Massimo Bergamasco. 2008. The virtual museum of sculpture. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts. 100–106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lynn D Dierking and John H Falk. 1992. Redefining the museum experience: the interactive experience model. Visitor Studies 4, 1 (1992), 173–176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas B Greenslade Jr. 2011. Pepper’s Ghost. The Physics Teacher 49, 6 (2011), 338–339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lynda Kelly. 2014. The connected museum in the world of social media. In Museum communication and social media. Routledge, 54–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Salvador Dalí Museum. 2016. Dreams of Dalí in Virtual Reality. https://thedali.org/exhibit/dreams-of-dali-in-virtual-reality/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Larissa Neuburger and Roman Egger. 2017. An afternoon at the museum: Through the lens of augmented reality. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2017. Springer, 241–254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dominique Poulot. 2013. Museu e museologia. Autêntica.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Maria V Sanchez-Vives and Mel Slater. 2005. From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 4 (2005), 332–339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Maria Shehade and Theopisti Stylianou-Lambert. 2020. Virtual reality in museums: Exploring the experiences of museum professionals. Applied sciences 10, 11 (2020), 4031.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas B Sheridan. 1996. Further musings on the psychophysics of presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 5, 2 (1996), 241–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Thomas B Sheridan 1992. Musings on telepresence and virtual presence.Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1, 1 (1992), 120–125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Bruno Santana da Silva. 2020. Análise do uso de QRCodes na exposição de icnologia do Museu Câmara Cascudo. Revista Museologia e Patrimônio (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mel Slater, Beau Lotto, Maria Marta Arnold, and María Victoria Sánchez-Vives. 2009. How we experience immersive virtual environments: the concept of presence and its measurement. Anuario de Psicología, 2009, vol. 40, p. 193-210 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniel E Smalley, Sundeep Jolly, Gregg E Favalora, and Michael G Moebius. 2021. Status of Leaky Mode Holography. In Photonics, Vol. 8. MDPI, 292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Natalia Teixeira, Bianca Lahm, Fabiana Frata Furlan Peres, Claudio Roberto Marquetto Mauricio, and Joao Marcelo Xavier Natario Teixeira. 2021. Augmented Reality on Museums: the Ecomuseu Virtual Guide. In Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality. 147–156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Bob G Witmer and Michael J Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence 7, 3 (1998), 225–240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jianghao Xiong, En-Lin Hsiang, Ziqian He, Tao Zhan, and Shin-Tson Wu. 2021. Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light: Science & Applications 10, 1 (2021), 1–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Alexandra Zbuchea. 2013. How Do Young People Visit Museums?Proceedings of Qualitative Research in Communication, L. Ivan, ed (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deinonychus and The Cow – Enhancing Museum Exhibitions Through the Use of Mixed Reality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SVR '22: Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality
          October 2022
          175 pages
          ISBN:9798400700026
          DOI:10.1145/3604479

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 8 April 2024

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format