skip to main content
10.1145/3604571.3604572acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasian-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Empathy-Driven Innovation: Analysis of Five User-Centered Design Thinking Case Studies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Design Thinking (DT) is widely used to drive innovation in companies. DT consists of five phases: empathy, define, ideation, prototype, and test. However, companies often skip the empathy process and go directly to the ideation phase. It is because empathy cannot immediately solve problems, is time- and resource-consuming, and is hindered by the cognitive bias that companies believe they already know what users or customers want. This article presents the process of empathy in five cases of Design Thinking (DT) projects in Indonesia carried out by postgraduate students who have worked in the companies for years. The projects discussed are a bank's marketing plan for ultra-micro entrepreneurs, the development of an online community platform by a software development company, the creation of tourist attractions in a forest area by the government tourism agency, the creation of an online ecosystem for the footwear industry by the government, and the development of a digital e-contract by a state-owned enterprise. We conducted a comparative case study analysis to examine the empathy process in meeting user needs and achieving innovation in these projects. This article argues that optimizing the empathic process in DT can lead to innovation. However, this empathic phase should continue through the ideation, prototyping, and testing phases. An individual who works in a company can initiate and carry out this empathy process. Nevertheless, the following phases require the support and involvement of all stakeholders in the company.

References

  1. J. Knapp, J. Zeratsky and B. Kowitz, Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days., Simon & Schuster Audio, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Wrigley, E. Nusem and K. Straker, "Implementing Design Thinking: Understanding Organizational Conditions," California Management Review, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 125-143, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Brown, "Design thinking," Harvard business review, vol. 86, no. 6, p. 84, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. a. O. T. Liedtka, Designing for growth: A design thinking tool kit for managers., Columbia University, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. UK Design Council, "Eleven lessons: managing design in eleven global brands : A study of the design process," UK Design Council, London, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Doorley, S. Holcomb, P. Klebahn, K. Segovia and J. Utley, Design Thinking Bootleg, Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Sari and E. Zulaikha, "Disrupting Tertiary User-Centered Design Course with Design Thinking 2.0," in Asian CHI Symposium, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. Zulaikha and E. Sari, "Keep online design thinking alive: A case study in Indonesia," in In 28th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Walther, S. E. Miller and N. W. Sochacka, "A Model of Empathy In Engineering As A Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 123-148, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. Levy and I. Hadar, "The importance of empathy for analyzing privacy requirements," in In 2018 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Evolving Security & Privacy Requirements Engineering (ESPRE), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. McDonagh and J. Thomas, "Rethinking design thinking: Empathy supporting innovation," Australasian Medical Journal, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 458-464, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Carroll and I. Richardson, "Aligning Healthcare Innova tion and Software Requirements through Design Thinking," in Proc. Int'l Workshop on Software Eng. in Healthcare Systems (SEHS 16), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C. I. Pappa, S. Reinhold, D. Pittich, B. Vogel-Heuser and J. Strobel, "Engineers’ job-related perceptions of empathy in Germany," in In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Sultan and F. Qaed, "Service Design Thinking and Social Innovation Sustainability," in In 2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Svensson, C. I. Eriksson and E. Ebbesson, "User Contribution In Innovation Processes-Reflections From A Living Lab Perspective," in In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Y. Liu, "The application of virtual reality in empathy establishment: Foresee the future," in In 2020 5th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Applications (ICCIA), 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Carroll, "Key success factors for smart and connected health software solutions," Computer, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 22-28, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. R. Puspitasari, "Strategi Peningkatan Literasi Keuangan Perbankan Untuk Pelaku Usaha Di Segmen Ultra Mikro Dengan Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking," Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Dan Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Andiansyah, "Design-Thinking-Based Innovation Strategy For The Parenting Community Platform Development," Program Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. F. Arfa, "Strategi Pengembangan Pariwisata Kayangan Api Bojonegoro Menggunakan Metode Design Thinking," Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Dan Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. H. Sunardi, "Service Design Strategy For Indonesian Footwear Network Platform Development," Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Dan Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. B. Miazaki, "Pengembangan Pengalaman Pengguna Platform Digital “Indonesia Footwear Network” Menggunakan Design Thinking," Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Dan Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. F. Azhar, "Studi Enterprise Contract Menggunakan Design Thinking pada Kasus MyTEnS," Program Studi Magister Manajemen Teknologi, Sekolah Interdisiplin Manajemen Dan Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. Schwaber and J. Sutherland, "The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum : The Rules of the Game," Scrum.Org and Scrum Inc, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://scrumguides.org/docs/scrumguide/v2016/2016-Scrum-Guide-US.pdf#zoom=100. [Accessed 2 4 2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Empathy-Driven Innovation: Analysis of Five User-Centered Design Thinking Case Studies
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        Asian CHI '23: Proceedings of the Asian HCI Symposium 2023
        April 2023
        109 pages
        ISBN:9798400707612
        DOI:10.1145/3604571

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 October 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format