skip to main content
10.1145/3604571.3604581acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasian-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Gamification Behavior in Indonesian’s E-commerce Applications: A Qualitative Study of University Students

Published:03 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

E-commerce in Indonesia is growing rapidly and has become the largest market capitalization in Southeast Asia and has the highest growth rates in the world. This fast growth has also led to foreign direct investment in Indonesia, which has entered various Indonesian e-commerce sites. Gamification strategies have become extremely popular in the e-commerce industry. Although studies have been conducted on how gamification elements impact e-commerce, there needs to be more focus on how Millennials and Z generations play games. We interviewed 16 Indonesian university students to discover game-playing behaviors on e-commerce applications. Transcribed interviews were evaluated thematically using an inductive coding approach. We cluster the thematic analysis into five different headings-frequency of playing games, played gamification models, reward systems, preference of daily login systems, and preference of mission systems. The finding shows that our participants soon became bored and closed the app, even though they played the fixed-reward gamification model daily. Participants prefer special discount vouchers as a reward system because they can cut the total shopping price. The daily login and task/mission systems are popular with our users because they get rewards quickly and in different ways. This study contributes to evaluate the future gamification model and helps organizations in the e-commerce industry.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Presentation Video-Gamification Behavior of University Students in Indonesian?s E-commerce Applications.mp4

mp4

9.1 MB

Presentation Video-Gamification Behavior of University Students in Indonesian?s E-commerce Applications.mp4

mp4

9.1 MB

References

  1. Alessandra Antonaci, Roland Klemke, and Marcus Specht. 2019. The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. In Informatics, Vol. 6. MDPI, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ika Diyah Candra Arifah. 2021. E-Commerce Gamification: The Effect of gameful Experience (Gamex) and Game Design on The Self-brand Connection. In 3rd International Conference on Business and Management of Technology (ICONBMT 2021). Atlantis Press, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211226.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Risca Fitri Ayuni. 2019. The online shopping habits and e-loyalty of Gen Z as natives in the digital era. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 34, 2 (2019), 168. https://doi.org/10.22146/jieb.39848Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lina Fatini Azmi, Norasnita Ahmad, and Noorminshah A. Iahad. 2021. Gamification Elements in E-commerce – A Review. In 2021 International Congress of Advanced Technology and Engineering (ICOTEN). 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOTEN52080.2021.9493475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kaushik Das. 2018. The digital archipelago: How online commerce is driving Indonesia’s economic development. McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/asia-pacific/the-digital-archipelago-how-online-commerce-is-driving-indonesias-economic-developmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Edward L Deci. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of personality and Social Psychology 18, 1 (1971), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Saroja Dhanapal, Deeparechigi Vashu, and Thanam Subramaniam. 2015. Perceptions on the challenges of online purchasing: a study from “baby boomers”, generation “X” and generation “Y” point of views. Contaduría y administración 60 (2015), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2015.08.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ilker Etikan, Sulaiman Abubakar Musa, Rukayya Sunusi Alkassim, 2016. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics 5, 1 (2016), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Seamus F. Forde, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Informational, but Not Intrinsically Motivating Gamification’: Preliminary Findings. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI PLAY Companion ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968120.2987738Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alejandro García-Jurado, Pilar Castro-González, Mercedes Torres-Jiménez, and Antonio L Leal-Rodríguez. 2018. Evaluating the role of gamification and flow in e-consumers: millennials versus generation X. Kybernetes (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2018-0350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Erwin Halim, Desy Sandra, Hendry Hartono, Dyah Wahyu Sukmaningsih, and Marylise HEBRARD. 2022. Impact of Gamification Element Towards Continuance Intention at Indonesia Marketplace. In 2022 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, 693–698. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech55957.2022.9915071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Juho Hamari. 2013. Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic commerce research and applications 12, 4 (2013), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Juho Hamari and Janne Tuunanen. 2014. Player types: a meta-synthesis. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 1, 2 (2014), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mamoona Hamid and Mudiarasan Kuppusamy. 2017. Gamification implementation in service marketing: a literature. Electronic Journal of Business & Management 2, 1 (2017), 38–50. https://ejbm.sites.apiit.edu.my/files/2018/05/Paper4_Gamification_Implementation_Literature_Review.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles F Hofacker, Ko De Ruyter, Nicholas H Lurie, Puneet Manchanda, and Jeff Donaldson. 2016. Gamification and mobile marketing effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing 34, 1 (2016), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Simon Kemp. 2021. Digital 2021 April Global Statshot Report. Hootsuite & We Are Social (2021). https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-april-global-statshotGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2019. The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management 45 (2019), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Merchant Machine. 2019. Saturated Sectors: Finding Gaps In The Ecommerce Market. https://merchantmachine.co.uk/saturated-sectors/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Elisa D. Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Klaus Opwis, and Alexandre N. Tuch. 2013. Disassembling Gamification: The Effects of Points and Meaning on User Motivation and Performance. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2468559Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Elisa D. Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Klaus Opwis, and Alexandre N. Tuch. 2013. Do Points, Levels and Leaderboards Harm Intrinsic Motivation? An Empirical Analysis of Common Gamification Elements. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Gamification ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jessica Müller-Stewens, Tobias Schlager, Gerald Häubl, and Andreas Herrmann. 2017. Gamified information presentation and consumer adoption of product innovations. Journal of Marketing 81, 2 (2017), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yoga Prihastomo, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto, Harjanto Prabowo, 2018. The key success factors in e-marketplace implementation: A systematic literature review. In 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2018.8528189Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Prashant Raman. 2021. Examining the importance of gamification, social interaction and perceived enjoyment among young female online buyers in India. Young Consumers 22, 3 (2021), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-05-2020-1148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gaganpreet Sharma. 2017. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International journal of applied research 3, 7 (2017), 749–752. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/?year=2017&vol=3&issue=7&part=K&ArticleId=4130Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyah Wahyu Sukmaningsih, Wanda Wandoko, and Ignatius Enda Panggati. 2020. Gamification effect between generation x and millennials: Study on e-commerce site. In 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech). IEEE, 812–817. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211217Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Roy Willis and Viany Utami Tjhin. 2021. Effect of interaction with gamification feature on purchase intention: The mediation role of brand engagement. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences 24 (2021), 1–12. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/effect-interaction-with-gamification-feature-on/docview/2574467659/se-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nannan Xi and Juho Hamari. 2019. Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. International Journal of Information Management 46 (2019), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Understanding Gamification Behavior in Indonesian’s E-commerce Applications: A Qualitative Study of University Students

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          Asian CHI '23: Proceedings of the Asian HCI Symposium 2023
          April 2023
          109 pages
          ISBN:9798400707612
          DOI:10.1145/3604571

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 October 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format