skip to main content
10.1145/3604915.3610659acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Towards Health-Aware Fairness in Food Recipe Recommendation

Published:14 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Food recommendation systems play a crucial role in promoting personalized recommendations designed to help users find food and recipes that align with their preferences. However, many existing food recommendation systems have overlooked the important aspect of healthy-food and nutritional value of recommended foods, thereby limiting their effectiveness in generating truly healthy recommendations. Our preliminary analysis indicates that users tend to respond positively to unhealthy food and recipes. As a result, existing food recommender systems that neglect health considerations often assign high scores to popular items, inadvertently encouraging unhealthy choices among users. In this study, we propose the development of a fairness-based model that prioritizes health considerations. Our model incorporates fairness constraints from both the user and item perspectives, integrating them into a joint objective framework. Experimental results conducted on real-world food datasets demonstrate that the proposed system not only maintains the ability of food recommendation systems to suggest users’ favorite foods but also improves the health factor compared to unfair models, with an average enhancement of approximately 35%.

References

  1. Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2017. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. In Proceedings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender systems. 42–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ismail M Ali, Daryl Essam, and Kathryn Kasmarik. 2021. Novel binary differential evolution algorithm for knapsack problems. Information Sciences 542 (2021), 177–194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Asia J Biega, Krishna P Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum. 2018. Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings. In The 41st international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. 405–414.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael D Ekstrand, Mucun Tian, Ion Madrazo Azpiazu, Jennifer D Ekstrand, Oghenemaro Anuyah, David McNeill, and Maria Soledad Pera. 2018. All the cool kids, how do they fit in?: Popularity and demographic biases in recommender evaluation and effectiveness. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 172–186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiaoyan Gao, Fuli Feng, Xiangnan He, Heyan Huang, Xinyu Guan, Chong Feng, Zhaoyan Ming, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Hierarchical attention network for visually-aware food recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 22, 6 (2019), 1647–1659.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173–182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yunqi Li, Hanxiong Chen, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2021. User-oriented fairness in recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 624–632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dawen Liang, Rahul G Krishnan, Matthew D Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational autoencoders for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 689–698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Shuyang Li, Jianmo Ni, and Julian McAuley. 2019. Generating personalized recipes from historical user preferences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00105 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. 2021. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 6 (2021), 1–35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alessandro B Melchiorre, Eva Zangerle, and Markus Schedl. 2020. Personality bias of music recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 533–538.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Hossein A Rahmani, and Yashar Deldjoo. 2022. Cpfair: Personalized consumer and producer fairness re-ranking for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 770–779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Preetam Nandy, Cyrus Diciccio, Divya Venugopalan, Heloise Logan, Kinjal Basu, and Noureddine El Karoui. 2022. Achieving Fairness via Post-Processing in Web-Scale Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 715–725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harikrishna Narasimhan, Andrew Cotter, Maya Gupta, and Serena Wang. 2020. Pairwise fairness for ranking and regression. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 5248–5255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hossein A Rahmani, Mohammadmehdi Naghiaei, Mahdi Dehghan, and Mohammad Aliannejadi. 2022. Experiments on generalizability of user-oriented fairness in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2755–2764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Faisal Rehman, Osman Khalid, Kashif Bilal, Sajjad A Madani, 2017. Diet-right: A smart food recommendation system. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) 11, 6 (2017), 2910–2925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehrdad Rostami, Vahid Farrahi, Sajad Ahmadian, Seyed Mohammad Jafar Jalali, and Mourad Oussalah. 2023. A novel healthy and time-aware food recommender system using attributed community detection. Expert Systems with Applications 221 (2023), 119719.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alain D Starke, Martijn C Willemsen, and Christoph Trattner. 2021. Nudging healthy choices in food search through visual attractiveness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4 (2021), 621743.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Thi Ngoc Trang Tran, Alexander Felfernig, Christoph Trattner, and Andreas Holzinger. 2021. Recommender systems in the healthcare domain: state-of-the-art and research issues. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 57 (2021), 171–201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Christoph Trattner and David Elsweiler. 2017. Investigating the healthiness of internet-sourced recipes: implications for meal planning and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 489–498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Christoph Trattner, David Elsweiler, and Simon Howard. 2017. Estimating the healthiness of internet recipes: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in public health 5 (2017), 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenjie Wang, Ling-Yu Duan, Hao Jiang, Peiguang Jing, Xuemeng Song, and Liqiang Nie. 2021. Market2Dish: health-aware food recommendation. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM) 17, 1 (2021), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Meike Zehlike and Carlos Castillo. 2020. Reducing disparate exposure in ranking: A learning to rank approach. In Proceedings of the web conference 2020. 2849–2855.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Towards Health-Aware Fairness in Food Recipe Recommendation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        RecSys '23: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
        September 2023
        1406 pages

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 September 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

        Upcoming Conference

        RecSys '24
        18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
        October 14 - 18, 2024
        Bari , Italy
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)178
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format