skip to main content
10.1145/3605098.3636057acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

On the relevance of value system structure for automated value-aligned decision-making

Published: 21 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Technological advances, especially in the field of artificial intelligence, raise subjects related to the behaviour of autonomous systems. The ability to judge how far some behaviour is ethically correct is inherent to humans, and one of the great challenges is to replicate such ability in artificial systems. Engineering, aware that human values must be considered in the decision-making process, is currently focused on developing mechanisms to embed these values into autonomous systems. This article proposes a decision model that enables autonomous intelligent agents to select actions that are aligned with their value system. It considers not only the relevance that different values have for an agent, and how much an action promotes a certain value, but also models in a rigorous manner the interaction of different values within a value system. An instantiation of the model is put forward, based on Schwartz's basic values theory, non-additive fuzzy measures, and the discrete Choquet integral. Then the performance of the approach is illustrated by determining the value alignment of different decisions using the well-known iterated prisoner's dilemma.

References

[1]
Gleb Beliakov, Ana Pradera, and Tomasa Calvo. 2007. Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol. 221. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1--304 pages.
[2]
Valdiney V. Gouveia, Taciano L. Milfont, and Valeschka M. Guerra. 2014. Functional theory of human values: Testing its content and structure hypotheses. Personality and Individual Differences 60 (4 2014), 41--47.
[3]
Michel Grabisch and Christophe Labreuche. 2016. Fuzzy Measures and Integrals in MCDA. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Salvatore Greco, Matthias Ehrgott, and José Figueira (Eds.). Springer, New York, 553--603.
[4]
William D Guth and Renato Tagiuri. 1965. Personal values and corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review 43, 5 (1965), 123--132.
[5]
Lynn Kahle. 1988. Using the List of Values (LOV) to Understand Consumers. Journal of Services Marketing 2 (1988), 49--56.
[6]
Johannes Kiesel, Milad Alshomary, Nicolas Handke, Xiaoni Cai, Henning Wachsmuth, and Benno Stein. 2022. Identifying the Human Values behind Arguments. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting. Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, 4459--4471.
[7]
Roger Lera-Leri, Filippo Bistaffa, Marc Serramia, Maite Lopez-Sanchez, and Juan Rodriguez-Aguilar. 2022. Towards Pluralistic Value Alignment: Aggregating Value Systems Through lp-Regression. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference AAMAS. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 780--788.
[8]
Q. Vera Liao and Michael Muller. 2019. Enabling Value Sensitive AI Systems through Participatory Design Fictions. arXiv:1912.07381 [cs.HC]
[9]
Steven L Lima. 1989. Iterated prisoner's dilemma: an approach to evolutionarily stable cooperation. The American Naturalist 134, 5 (1989), 828--834.
[10]
Enrico Liscio, Michiel van der Meer, Luciano C. Siebert, Catholijn M. Jonker, and Pradeep K. Murukannaiah. 2022. What values should an agent align with? Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 36 (4 2022), 23. Issue 1.
[11]
Gregory R. Maio. 2010. Mental Representations of Social Values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 42 (2010), 1--43.
[12]
A. H. Maslow. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50 (1943), 370--396.
[13]
Nieves Montes, Nardine Osman, Carles Sierra, and Marija Slavkovik. 2023. Value Engineering for Autonomous Agents. arXiv:2302.08759 [cs.AI]
[14]
Nieves Montes and Carles Sierra. 2021. Value-Guided Synthesis of Parametric Normative Systems. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference AAMAS. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 907--915.
[15]
Nardine Osman and Mark d'Inverno. 2023. A computational framework of human values for ethical AI. arXiv:2305.02748 [cs.AI]
[16]
Alina Pommeranz, Christian Detweiler, Pascal Wiggers, and Catholijn Jonker. 2012. Elicitation of situated values: need for tools to help stakeholders and designers to reflect and communicate. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (12 2012), 285--303. Issue 4.
[17]
Milton Rokeach. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. Free Press, New York.
[18]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 1992. Universals in the Content and Structure of Values. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Mark P. Zanna (Ed.). Vol. 25. Academic Press, Ontario, Canada, 1--65.
[19]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 1994. Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues 50 (1 1994), 19--45. Issue 4.
[20]
Shalom H. Schwartz. 2012. An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (2012), 1--20.
[21]
Shalom H. Schwartz, Gila Melech, Arielle Lehmann, Steven Burgess, Mari Harris, and Vicki Owens. 2001. Extending the Cross-Cultural Validity of the Theory of Basic Human Values with a Different Method of Measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32 (9 2001), 519--542. Issue 5.
[22]
William A. Scott. 1959. Empirical Assessment of Values and Ideologies. American Sociological Review 24, 3 (1959), 299--310.
[23]
Marc Serramia, Maite Lopez-Sanchez, and Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar. 2020. A Qualitative Approach to Composing Value-Aligned Norm Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference AAMAS. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1233--1241.
[24]
Marc Serramia, Maite Lopez-Sanchez, Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, Javier Morales, Michael Wooldridge, and Carlos Ansotegui. 2018. Exploiting Moral Values to Choose the Right Norms. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 264--270.
[25]
Luciano C. Siebert, Enrico Liscio, Pradeep K. Murukannaiah, Lionel Kaptein, Shannon Spruit, Jeroen van den Hoven, and Catholijn Jonker. 2022. Estimating Value Preferences in a Hybrid Participatory System. In HHAI2022, Stefan Schlobach, Maria Perez-Ortiz, and Myrthe Tielman (Eds.). IOS Press, Netherlands, 114--127.
[26]
Carles Sierra, Nardine Osman, Pablo Noriega, Jordi Sabater-Mir, and Antoni Perelló. 2021. Value alignment: a formal approach. arXiv:2110.09240
[27]
Ibo van de Poel. 2020. Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems. Minds and Machines 30 (9 2020), 385--409. Issue 3.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Value-Aligned Decisions in Cooperative EnvironmentsHighlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Digital Twins: The PAAMS Collection10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7(76-87)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2025
  • (2023)Values, Norms and AIValue Engineering in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-58202-8_1(1-7)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SAC '24: Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
April 2024
1898 pages
ISBN:9798400702433
DOI:10.1145/3605098
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. value system
  2. value interaction
  3. decision-making
  4. value-aware engineering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SAC '24
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

SAC '25
The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
March 31 - April 4, 2025
Catania , Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)137
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Value-Aligned Decisions in Cooperative EnvironmentsHighlights in Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Digital Twins: The PAAMS Collection10.1007/978-3-031-73058-0_7(76-87)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2025
  • (2023)Values, Norms and AIValue Engineering in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-58202-8_1(1-7)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2023

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media