skip to main content
10.1145/3605390.3610807acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschitalyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Poster - Noiseboard Project: Using Sensors and Long-Range Wireless Communication For Musical Augmentation of Skateboarding

Published:20 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The article discusses the Noiseboard project, a sensor-equipped skateboard that allows for creating music while skateboarding. Unlike previous projects, the musical augmentation of the board does not limit the movement possibilities of the skater who can do all the usual tricks. The project is designed to be a skateboard augmented with musical feedback primarily but can also be intended as a tangible interface for music performance based on the use of the skateboard. The system was created by embedding sensors and wireless technology in a novel way into a skateboard, and the technical choices and possible scenarios are discussed in detail. The system’s feasibility and functionality were tested during live music performances, and current limitations and possible future improvements are presented.

References

  1. Dan-Radu Berte. 2018. Defining the IoT. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 12, 1 (May 2018), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mela Bettega, Raul Masu, and Maurizio Teli. 2021. “It’s like a GPS Community Tool”: Tactics to Foster Digital Commons through Artifact Ecology. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1710–1725. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Konstantin Butz. 2012. Grinding California: Culture and Corporeality in American Skate Punk. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/transcript.9783839421222Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (Aug. 2015), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nick Collins, Margaret Schedel, and Scott Wilson. 2014. Electronic music (1. publ ed.). University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction (1. mit press paperback ed ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ahmed Elkaseer, Stella Schneider, and Steffen G. Scholz. 2020. Experiment-Based Process Modeling and Optimization for High-Quality and Resource-Efficient FFF 3D Printing. Applied Sciences 10, 8 (April 2020), 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082899Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Matthew C. Frank, Richard A. Wysk, and Sanjay B. Joshi. 2004. Rapid planning for CNC milling—A new approach for rapid prototyping. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 23, 3 (Jan. 2004), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6125(04)80037-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Andreas Förster and Mathias Komesker. 2021. LoopBlocks: Design and Preliminary Evaluation of an Accessible Tangible Musical Step Sequencer. In NIME 2021. PubPub, Shanghai, China. https://doi.org/10.21428/92fbeb44.f45e1cafGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Glowinski, N. Dael, A. Camurri, G. Volpe, M. Mortillaro, and K. Scherer. 2011. Toward a Minimal Representation of Affective Gestures. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 2, 2 (April 2011), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Rolf Inge Godøy and Marc Leman (Eds.). 2010. Musical gestures: sound, movement, and meaning. Routledge, New York. OCLC: ocn298781501.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin H. Groh, Martin Fleckenstein, Thomas Kautz, and Bjoern M. Eskofier. 2017. Classification and visualization of skateboard tricks using wearable sensors. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 40 (Sept. 2017), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.05.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Michael Gurevich and Jeffrey Treviño. 2007. Expression and its discontents: toward an ecology of musical creation. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on New interfaces for musical expression. 106–111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 3131–3142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858583Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Sergi Jordà, Günter Geiger, Marcos Alonso, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2007. The reacTable: exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, Baton Rouge Louisiana, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. RH Kumar, AU Roopa, and DEVI4 P Sathiya. 2015. Arduino ATMEGA-328 microcontroller. Int. J. Innov. Res. Electr. Electron. Instrum. Control Eng 3, 4 (2015), 27–29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wade Marynowsky and Sam Ferguson. 2020. Angelo Fraietta Interactive Media Lab UNSW Art and Design University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Raul Masu, Mela Bettega, Nuno N Correia, and Teresa Romão. 2023. Investigating performance ecologies using screen scores: a case study. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2023), 1–21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Raul Masu, Nuno N. Correia, Stephan Jurgens, Jochen Feitsch, and Teresa Romão. 2020. Designing Interactive Sonic Artefacts for Dance Performance: An Ecological Approach. In Proceedings of the 15th International Audio Mostly Conference (Graz, Austria) (AM ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411109.3412297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Olga Matthiopoulou, Benoit Bardy, Giorgio Gnecco, Denis Mottet, Marcello Sanguineti, and Antonio Camurri. 2020. A Computational Method to Automatically Detect the Perceived Origin of Full-Body Human Movement and its Propagation. In Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, Virtual Event Netherlands, 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395035.3425971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nicolò Merendino, Giacomo Lepri, Antonio Rodà, and Raul Masu. 2023. Redesigning the Chowndolo: a Reflection-on-action Analysis to Identify Sustainable Strategies for NIMEs Design. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicolò Merendino and Antonio Rodà. 2021. Defining an open source CAD workflow for experimental music and media arts. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts. ACM, Aveiro, Portugal Portugal, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3483529.3483715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Fabio Morreale, Raul Masu, Antonella De Angeli, 2019. The influence of coauthorship in the interpretation of multimodal interfaces. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2019 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Thecla Schiphorst. 2011. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Vancouver BC Canada, 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Richard Shusterman. 1999. Somaesthetics: A Disciplinary Proposal. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57, 3 (1999), 299. https://doi.org/10.2307/432196Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Shoji Tanaka and Eiji Kirino. 2019. Increased Functional Connectivity of the Angular Gyrus During Imagined Music Performance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13 (March 2019), 92. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Luca Turchet, Carlo Fischione, Georg Essl, Damian Keller, and Mathieu Barthet. 2018. Internet of Musical Things: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Access 6 (2018), 61994–62017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2872625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Poster - Noiseboard Project: Using Sensors and Long-Range Wireless Communication For Musical Augmentation of Skateboarding

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CHItaly '23: Proceedings of the 15th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter
          September 2023
          416 pages

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 September 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate109of242submissions,45%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format