skip to main content
10.1145/3607822.3614536acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Best Paper

Implementation of Interactive Mirror-Transcending Aerial Imaging System

Published:13 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many methods have been proposed for presenting digital information in mirror space. However, most existing methods can only display digital information in mirror space. Therefore, we study the concept of MiTAI (Mirror-Transcending Aerial Imaging), which allows for the continuous movement of digital information between mirrors and physical space. MiTAI provides a novel interactive experience combining mirrors, physical space, and digital information. In this paper, we present the first systemization of MiTAI that users can experience, as well as an initial study toward a concept evaluation of MiTAI. We describe an implementation of the system in detail, including an optical follow-up of the previous study, the design of the control system, the presentation of content, and a method for interacting with the aerial image. The implemented system provided a MiTAI viewing experience for approximately 150 attendees through a hands-on demonstration exhibit and had a strong impact on them. We also report on user feedback from the exhibition and future improvements.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

sui23-24.mp4

Presentation video

mp4

213.2 MB

References

  1. 1991. Beauty and the Beast.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hrvoje Benko and Andrew D. Wilson. 2010. Pinch-the-Sky Dome: Freehand Multi-Point Interactions with Immersive Omni-Directional Data. In CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3045–3050. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753915Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lewis Carroll. 2010. Through the looking glass and what Alice found there. Penguin UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaori Fujinami, Fahim Kawsar, and Tatsuo Nakajima. 2005. AwareMirror: A Personalized Display Using a Mirror. In Pervasive Computing, Hans W. Gellersen, Roy Want, and Albrecht Schmidt (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 315–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacob Grimm and Wilhelm K Grimm. 1991. Snow white. Andrews McMeel Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fatma Ben Guefrech, Florent Berthaut, Patricia Plénacoste, Yvan Peter, and Laurent Grisoni. 2021. Revealable Volume Displays: 3D Exploration of Mixed-Reality Public Exhibitions. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Takayuki Hoshi, Masafumi Takahashi, Kei Nakatsuma, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2009. Touchable Holography. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Emerging Technologies (New Orleans, Louisiana) (SIGGRAPH ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 1 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1597956.1597979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Rachel Jacobs, Holger Schnädelbach, Nils Jäger, Silvia Leal, Robin Shackford, Steve Benford, and Roma Patel. 2019. The Performative Mirror Space. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Norio Kato and Takeshi Naemura. 2006. Mixed Reality Environment with a Mirror. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Research Posters (Boston, Massachusetts) (SIGGRAPH ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179622.1179801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hajime Katsumoto, Hajime Kajita, Naoya Koizumi, and Takeshi Naemura. 2016. HoVerTable PONG: Playing Face-to-Face Game on Horizontal Tabletop with Moving Vertical Mid-Air Image. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Osaka, Japan) (ACE ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 50, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3001773.3001820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hanyuool Kim, Issei Takahashi, Hiroki Yamamoto, Satoshi Maekawa, and Takeshi Naemura. 2014. MARIO: Mid-air Augmented Reality Interaction with Objects. Entertainment Computing 5, 4 (2014), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2014.10.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Makiko Kouchi and Masaaki Mochimaru. 2001. Anthropometric Database of Japanese Head 2001. https://www.airc.aist.go.jp/dhrt/head/ INational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, H16PRO-212..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Makiko Kouchi and Masaaki Mochimaru. 2003. Japanese 3-D body shape and dimensions data 2003. https://www.airc.aist.go.jp/dhrt/fbodydb/index.html Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, H18PRO-503..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gun A. Lee, Hye Sun Park, and Mark Billinghurst. 2019. Optical-Reflection Type 3D Augmented Reality Mirrors. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Parramatta, NSW, Australia) (VRST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 82, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Satoshi Maekawa, Kouichi Nitta, and Osamu Matoba. 2006. Transmissive optical imaging device with micromirror array. In Three-Dimensional TV, Video, and Display V, Bahram Javidi, Fumio Okano, and Jung-Young Son (Eds.). Vol. 6392. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 63920E. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.690574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Motohiro Makiguchi, Daisuke Sakamoto, Hideaki Takada, Kengo Honda, and Tetsuo Ono. 2019. Interactive 360-Degree Glasses-Free Tabletop 3D Display. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 625–637. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347948Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Diego Martinez Plasencia, Florent Berthaut, Abhijit Karnik, and Sriram Subramanian. 2014. Through the Combining Glass. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mark R. Mine. 1995. Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Technical Report. USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yasuaki Monnai, Keisuke Hasegawa, Masahiro Fujiwara, Kazuma Yoshino, Seki Inoue, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2014. HaptoMime: Mid-Air Haptic Interaction with a Floating Virtual Screen. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Honolulu, Hawaii, USA) (UIST ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647407Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M.Otsubo. 2014. Optical imaging method using the same. U.S. Patent No.8,702,252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yui Osato and Naoya Koizumi. 2020. Compact optical system displaying mid-air images movable in depth by rotating light source and mirror. Computers & Graphics 91 (2020), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2020.08.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ivan Poupyrev, Mark Billinghurst, Suzanne Weghorst, and Tadao Ichikawa. 1996. The Go-Go Interaction Technique: Non-Linear Mapping for Direct Manipulation in VR. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Seattle, Washington, USA) (UIST ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/237091.237102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Nina Rajcic and Jon McCormack. 2020. Mirror Ritual: An Affective Interface for Emotional Self-Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Joanne K Rowling. 2015. Harry Potter and the philosopher’s stone. Vol. 1. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ayaka Sano, Motohiro Makiguchi, Takahiro Matsumoto, Hisashi Matsukawa, and Ryuji Yamamoto. 2023. Mirror-Transcending Aerial Imaging (MiTAi): An optical system that freely crosses the boundary between mirrored and real spaces. Journal of the Society for Information Display 31, 5 (2023), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsid.1221 arXiv:https://sid.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jsid.1221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Yutaka Tokuda, Atsushi Hiyama, Michitaka Hirose, and Tim Large. 2014. Comparison of material combinations for bright and clear floating image by retro-reflective re-imaging technique. In Proc. IDW, Vol. 14. 818–819.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiroki Uchida, Tadashi Ebihara, Naoto Wakatsuki, and Keiichi Zempo. 2021. ALiSE: Through the Mirrored Space, and What User Interacts with Avatars Naturally. In Companion Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (Lodz, Poland) (ISS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447932.3490678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hiroki Yamamoto, Hajime Kajita, Naoya Koizumi, and Takeshi Naemura. 2015. EnchanTable: Displaying a Vertically Standing Mid-Air Image on a Table Surface Using Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (Madeira, Portugal) (ITS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 397–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/2817721.2823476Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hirotsugu Yamamoto, Yuka Tomiyama, and Shiro Suyama. 2014. Floating aerial LED signage based on aerial imaging by retro-reflection (AIRR). Opt. Express 22, 22 (Nov 2014), 26919–26924. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.026919Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Qiushi Zhou, Andrew Irlitti, Difeng Yu, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. 2022. Movement Guidance Using a Mixed Reality Mirror. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533466Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Implementation of Interactive Mirror-Transcending Aerial Imaging System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SUI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
        October 2023
        505 pages
        ISBN:9798400702815
        DOI:10.1145/3607822

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 October 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate86of279submissions,31%

        Upcoming Conference

        SUI '24
        ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
        October 7 - 8, 2024
        Trier , Germany
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)92
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format