skip to main content
10.1145/3607822.3616414acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Forestlight: A Virtual Reality Respiratory Biofeedback System Using Interactive Lighting for Pressure Relief

Published:13 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Light is a common environmental medium that is used to evoke mood and provide an immersive experience. In this paper, we present the design and implementation of Forestlight, a virtual reality (VR) biofeedback System that helps users take deep breath for pressure relief through interactive lighting. We envisioned the breath-based interactive lighting in a virtual forest environment might be effective in stress reduction. With Forestlight, we also wanted to explore the opportunities for the application of virtual reality technology in respiratory biofeedback system. Based on the current stage of the prototype design, we conducted a user study to examine the effectiveness of stress reduction. This study suggests that the biofeedback-driven interactive lighting in VR system can perform as persuasive technology in the domain of health self-management. The interactive lighting that combines decorative and informative aspects in VR system can be pleasant and helpful to the user.

References

  1. Alice Bellazzi, Laura Bellia, Giorgia Chinazzo, Federica Corbisiero, Pierpaolo D'Agostino, Anna Devitofrancesco, Francesca Fragliasso, Matteo Ghellere, Valentino Megale, and Francesco Salamone. 2022. Virtual reality for assessing visual quality and lighting perception: A systematic review. Building and Environment 209, (February 2022), 108674. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Patricia Cornelio, Christopher Dawes, Emanuela Maggioni, Francisco Bernardo, Matti Schwalk, Michaela Mai, Steve Pawlizak, Jingxin Zhang, Gabriele Nelles, Nadejda Krasteva, and Marianna Obrist. 2022. Virtually tasty: An investigation of the effect of ambient lighting and 3D-shaped taste stimuli on taste perception in virtual reality. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science 30, (December 2022), 100626. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100626Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jérémy Frey, May Grabli, Ronit Slyper, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2018. Breeze: Sharing Biofeedback through Wearable Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174219Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jessica A. Grahn. 2012. See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms. Exp Brain Res 220, 1 (July 2012), 51–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3114-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kelly A. Knowles and Bunmi O. Olatunji. 2020. Specificity of trait anxiety in anxiety and depression: Meta-analysis of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Clinical Psychology Review 82, (December 2020), 101928. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Kung Wong Lau and Pui Yuen Lee. 2019. Shopping in virtual reality: a study on consumers’ shopping experience in a stereoscopic virtual reality. Virtual Reality 23, 3 (September 2019), 255–268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0362-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Heather Mason, Matteo Vandoni, Giacomo deBarbieri, Erwan Codrons, Veena Ugargol, and Luciano Bernardi. 2013. Cardiovascular and Respiratory Effect of Yogic Slow Breathing in the Yoga Beginner: What Is the Best Approach? Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013, (April 2013), e743504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/743504Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rachel Masters, Victoria Interrante, Madeline Watts, and Francisco Ortega. 2022. Virtual Nature: Investigating The Effect of Biomass on Immersive Virtual Reality Forest Bathing Applications For Stress Reduction. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2022 (SAP ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3548814.3551459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Massimiliano Masullo, Federico Cioffi, Jian Li, Luigi Maffei, Giovanni Ciampi, Sergio Sibilio, and Michelangelo Scorpio. 2023. Urban Park Lighting Quality Perception: An Immersive Virtual Reality Experiment. Sustainability 15, 3 (January 2023), 2069. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Osmo Mattila, Arto Korhonen, Essi Pöyry, Kaisa Hauru, Jani Holopainen, and Petri Parvinen. 2020. Restoration in a virtual reality forest environment. Computers in Human Behavior 107, (June 2020), 106295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Abele Michela, Jacobien M. van Peer, Jan C. Brammer, Anique Nies, Marieke M. J. W. van Rooij, Robert Oostenveld, Wendy Dorrestijn, Annika S. Smit, Karin Roelofs, Floris Klumpers, and Isabela Granic. 2022. Deep-Breathing Biofeedback Trainability in a Virtual-Reality Action Game: A Single-Case Design Study With Police Trainers. Frontiers in Psychology 13, (2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Christoph Rockstroh, Johannes Blum, and Anja S. Göritz. 2021. A mobile VR-based respiratory biofeedback game to foster diaphragmatic breathing. Virtual Reality 25, 2 (June 2021), 539–552. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00471-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Marieke van Rooij, Adam Lobel, Owen Harris, Niki Smit, and Isabela Granic. 2016. DEEP: A Biofeedback Virtual Reality Game for Children At-risk for Anxiety. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1989–1997. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mark S. Schwartz. 2010. A New Improved Universally Accepted Official Definition of Biofeedback: Where Did It Come From? Why? Who Did It? Who Is It for? What's Next? Biofeedback 38, 3 (September 2010), 88–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5298/1081-5937-38.3.88Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bin Yu, Mathias Funk, Jun Hu, Qi Wang, and Loe Feijs. 2018. Biofeedback for Everyday Stress Management: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in ICT 5, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, and Loe Feijs. 2018. DeLight: biofeedback through ambient light for stress intervention and relaxation assistance. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22, 4 (August 2018), 787–805. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1141-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Bin Yu, Jun Hu, Mathias Funk, Rong-Hao Liang, Mengru Xue, and Loe Feijs. 2018. RESonance: Lightweight, Room-Scale Audio-Visual Biofeedback for Immersive Relaxation Training. IEEE Access 6, (2018), 38336–38347. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2853406Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Chia-Pin Yu, Hsiao-Yun Lee, and Xiang-Yi Luo. 2018. The effect of virtual reality forest and urban environments on physiological and psychological responses. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 35, (October 2018), 106–114. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Forestlight: A Virtual Reality Respiratory Biofeedback System Using Interactive Lighting for Pressure Relief

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SUI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
      October 2023
      505 pages
      ISBN:9798400702815
      DOI:10.1145/3607822

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate86of279submissions,31%

      Upcoming Conference

      SUI '24
      ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction
      October 7 - 8, 2024
      Trier , Germany
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)82
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format