skip to main content
10.1145/3608298.3608311acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmhiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ante- and Post-Hoc Explanations for Prediction Models of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Comparative Study

Published:18 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Whereas cisplatin is considered as an effective anticancer drug, it can cause cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (Cis-AKI) as a side-effect. We trained a prediction model of Cis-AKI to predict the incidence of Cis-AKI using Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) and GAMs plus Interactions (GA2Ms), which can provide us with ante-hoc (or model-based) explanations for their decisions. Furthermore, we trained XGBoost and used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) in order to obtain post-hoc explanations. We then compared these ante-hoc and post-hoc explanation methods in terms of consistency with current medical insights on Cis-AKI.

References

  1. M. O. Abu-Shawiesh, F. M. Al-Athari, and H. F. Kittani. 2009. Confidence Interval for the Mean of a Contaminated Normal Distribution. J. of Applied Sciences 9 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Akiba, S. Sano, T. Yanase, T. Ohta, and M. Koyama. 2019. Optuna: A Next-Generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In Proc. of the 25th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-19).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Boyd, K. H. Eng, and C. D. Page. 2013. Area under the Precision-Recall Curve: Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals. In Proc. of the 2013 Euro. Conf. on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML/PKDD-13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. R. Caruana, Y. Lou, J. Gehrke, P. Koch, M. Sturm, and N. Elhadad. 2015. Intelligible Models for Healthcare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-Day Readmission. In Proc. of the 21th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Chen and C. Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. J. Crona, A. Faso, T. F. Nishijima, K. A. McGraw, M. D. Galsky, and M. I. Milowsky. 2017. A Systematic Review of Strategies to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity. Oncologist 22, 5 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. F. Da Cruz, B. Pfahringer, T. Martensen, F. Schneider, A. Meyer, E. Böttinger, and M. P. Schapranow. 2021. Using Interpretability Approaches to Update Black-Box Clinical Prediction Models: An External Validation Study in Nephrology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 111 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. E. Fischer, L. M. Bachmann, and R. Jaeschke. 2003. A Readers’ Guide to the Interpretation of Diagnostic Test Properties: Clinical Example of Sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine 29, 7 (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. Gong, H. K. Lee, K. Yu, X. Xie, and J. Li. 2021. A Prediction and Interpretation Framework of Acute Kidney Injury in Critical Care. J. of Biomedical Informatics 113 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani. 1987. Generalized Additive Models: Some Applications. J. of the American Statistical Association 82, 398 (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. H. Lee, J. J. Chen, C. T. Cheng, and C. H. Chang. 2021. Does Artificial Intelligence Make Clinical Decision Better? A Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Kidney Injury Prediction. Healthcare 9, 12 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Y. Lou, R. Caruana, J. Gehrke, and G. Hooker. 2013. Accurate Intelligible Models with Pairwise Interactions. In Proc. of the 19th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. M. Lundberg, G. G. Erion, and S. I. Lee. 2018. Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles. arXiv:1802.03888 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. M. Lundberg and S. I. Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Proc. of the 31st Int’l Conf. on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS-17) 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Mizuno, W. Sato, K. Ishikawa, H. Shinjo, Y. Miyagawa, Y. Noda, E. Imai, and K. Yamada. 2012. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) Criteria Could Be a Useful Outcome Predictor of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury. Oncology 82, 6 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. W. J. Murdoch, C. Singh, K. Kumbier, R. Abbasi-Asl, and B. Yu. 2019. Definitions, Methods, and Applications in Interpretable Machine Learning. Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 44 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. Nori, S. Jenkins, P. Koch, and R. Caruana. 2019. InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability. arXiv:1909.09223 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Okawa, T. Mizuno, S. Hanabusa, T. Ikeda, F. Mizokami, T. Koseki, K. Takahashi, Y. Yuzawa, N. Tsuboi, S. Yamada, and Y. Kameya. 2022. Prediction Model of Acute Kidney Injury Induced by Cisplatin in Older Adults Using a Machine Learning Algorithm. PLOS ONE 17, 1 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. 2016. Why Should I Trust You? — Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proc. of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-16).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Rudin. 2019. Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Nature machine intelligence 1, 5 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. X. Song, A. S. Yu, J. A. Kellum, L. R. Waitman, M. E. Matheny, S. Q. Simpson, Y. Hu, and M. Liu. 2020. Cross-Site Transportability of an Explainable Artificial Intelligence Model for Acute Kidney Injury Prediction. Nature communications 11, 1 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ante- and Post-Hoc Explanations for Prediction Models of Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Comparative Study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICMHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics
        May 2023
        386 pages
        ISBN:9798400700712
        DOI:10.1145/3608298

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 October 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format