ABSTRACT
Music recommender systems, commonly integrated into streaming services, help listeners find music. Previous research on such systems has focused on providing the best possible recommendations for these services’ consumers, as well as on fairness for artists who release their music on streaming services. While those insights are imperative, another group of stakeholders has been omitted so far: the many other professionals working in the music industry. They, too, are (in)directly affected by music streaming services. Therefore, this work explores the perspective of music industry professionals. We present a study that addresses the role of streaming services and recommender systems in their jobs. Results indicate this role is significant. Furthermore, participants feel that music recommender systems lack transparency and are insufficiently controllable, for both customers and artists. Finally, participants desire that music streaming services take charge of increasing recommendation diversity, and variety in consumers’ listening behavior and taste.
- Himan Abdollahpouri, Gediminas Adomavicius, Robin Burke, Ido Guy, Dietmar Jannach, Toshihiro Kamishima, Jan Krasnodebski, and Luiz Pizzato. 2020. Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 30, 1 (2020), 127–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09256-1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivana Andjelkovic, Denis Parra, and John O’Donovan. 2016. Moodplay: Interactive Mood-Based Music Discovery and Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (UMAP ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930280Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robin Burke. 2002. Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 4 (2002), 331–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021240730564Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robin Burke. 2017. Multisided Fairness for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency in Machine Learning, held at KDD 2017 (Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada) (FAT/ML ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.00093Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oscar Celma and Paul Lamere. 2011. If You Like Radiohead, You Might Like This Article. AI Magazine 32, 3 (Oct. 2011), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v32i3.2363Google ScholarDigital Library
- Theodor Cimpeanu, Alessandro Di Stefano, Cedric Perret, and The Anh Han. 2023. Social diversity reduces the complexity and cost of fostering fairness. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 167, Article 113051 (2023), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.113051Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henriette Cramer, Jean Garcia-Gathright, Aaron Springer, and Sravana Reddy. 2018. Assessing and Addressing Algorithmic Bias in Practice. Interactions 25, 6 (oct 2018), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278156Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alvise De Biasio, Andrea Montagna, Fabio Aiolli, and Nicolò Navarin. 2023. A systematic review of value-aware recommender systems. Expert Systems with Applications 226 (2023), 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120131Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernando Diaz, Bhaskar Mitra, Michael D. Ekstrand, Asia J. Biega, and Ben Carterette. 2020. Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposure. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (Virtual Event, Ireland) (CIKM ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3411962Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karlijn Dinnissen and Christine Bauer. 2023. Amplifying Artists’ Voices: Item Provider Perspectives on Influence and Fairness of Music Streaming Platforms. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Limassol, Cyprus) (UMAP ’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565472.3592960Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karlijn Dinnissen and Christine Bauer. 2023. Questionnaire: Music Industry Professionals’ View on Music Streaming Services and Recommender Systems. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8121152Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karlijn Dinnissen, Isabella Saccardi, Marloes Vredenborg, and Christine Bauer. 2023. Dataset: Music Industry Professionals’ Perspectives on Music Streaming Services and Recommendation. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8185736Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael D Ekstrand, Anubrata Das, Robin Burke, and Fernando Diaz. 2022. Fairness in Information Access Systems. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval 16, 1–2 (2022), 177 pages. https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000079Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrés Ferraro, Xavier Serra, and Christine Bauer. 2021. What Is Fair? Exploring the Artists’ Perspective on the Fairness of Music Streaming Platforms. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021: 18th IFIP TC 13 International Conference (Bari, Italy) (INTERACT ’21, Vol. 12933), C. Ardito, R. Lanzilotti, A. Malizia, H. Petrie, A. Piccinno, G. Desolda, and K. Inkpen (Eds.). Springer, Cham, Germany, 562–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85616-8_33Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, Alan Borning, and Alina Huldtgren. 2013. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 55–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, Loren G. Terveen, and John T. Riedl. 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transaction on Information Systems 22, 1 (Jan. 2004), 5–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/963770.963772Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietmar Jannach and Christine Bauer. 2020. Escaping the McNamara Fallacy: Towards more Impactful Recommender Systems Research. AI Magazine 41, 4 (Dec 2020), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v41i4.5312Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olena Khlystova, Yelena Kalyuzhnova, and Maksim Belitski. 2022. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research 139 (feb 2022), 1192–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.062Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sungchan Kim and Soyoung Park. 2017. Diversity Management and Fairness in Public Organizations. Public Organization Review 17, 2 (2017), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0334-yGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Yu Liang and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2021. The Role of Preference Consistency, Defaults and Musical Expertise in Users’ Exploration Behavior in a Genre Exploration Recommender. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (RecSys ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460231.3474253Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yu Liang and Martijn C. Willemsen. 2022. Exploring the Longitudinal Effects of Nudging on Users’ Music Genre Exploration Behavior and Listening Preferences. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Seattle, WA, USA) (RecSys ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3523227.3546772Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cataldo Musto, Marco de Gemmis, Pasquale Lops, Fedelucio Narducci, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2022. Semantics and Content-Based Recommendations. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.), Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer US, New York, NY, USA, 251–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ricardo S Oliveira, Caio Nóbrega, Leandro Balby Marinho, and Nazareno Andrade. 2017. A Multiobjective Music Recommendation Approach for Aspect-Based Diversification. In Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (Suzhou, China) (ISMIR ’17). 414–420. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1416999Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savvas Petridis, Nediyana Daskalova, Sarah Mennicken, Samuel F Way, Paul Lamere, and Jennifer Thom. 2022. TastePaths: Enabling Deeper Exploration and Understanding of Personal Preferences in Recommender Systems. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Helsinki, Finland) (IUI ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511156Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evaggelia Pitoura. 2020. Social-Minded Measures of Data Quality: Fairness, Diversity, and Lack of Bias. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 12, 3, Article 12 (jul 2020), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404193Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lorenzo Porcaro, Emilia Gómez, and Carlos Castillo. 2022. Diversity in the Music Listening Experience: Insights from Focus Group Interviews. In ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (Regensburg, Germany) (CHIIR ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505778Google ScholarDigital Library
- Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira. 2022. Recommender Systems: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.). Springer US, New York, NY, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kyle Robinson, Dan Brown, and Markus Schedl. 2020. User Insights on Diversity in Music Recommendation Lists. In Proceedings of the 21st International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (Montreal, Canada, October 11–16) (ISMIR ’20). ISMIR, 446–453. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4245464Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markus Schedl, Peter Knees, Brian McFee, and Dmitry Bogdanov. 2022. Music Recommendation Systems: Techniques, Use Cases, and Challenges. In Recommender Systems Handbook (3rd ed.), Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, and Bracha Shapira (Eds.). Springer US, New York, NY, USA, 927–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2197-4_24Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ignacio Siles, Amy Ross Arguedas, Mónica Sancho, and Ricardo Solís-Quesada. 2022. Playing Spotify’s game: artists’ approaches to playlisting in Latin America. Journal of Cultural Economy 15, 5 (2022), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2022.2058061Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rashmi Sinha and Kirsten Swearingen. 2002. The Role of Transparency in Recommender Systems. In CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MA, USA) (CHI EA ’02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 830–831. https://doi.org/10.1145/506443.506619Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nasim Sonboli, Jessie J. Smith, Florencia Cabral Berenfus, Robin Burke, and Casey Fiesler. 2021. Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users’ Perspective. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Utrecht, The Netherlands) (UMAP ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450613.3456835Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Stray, Alon Y. Halevy, Parisa Assar, Dylan Hadfield-Menell, Craig Boutilier, Amar Ashar, Lex Beattie, Michael D. Ekstrand, Claire Leibowicz, Connie Moon Sehat, Sara Johansen, Lianne Kerlin, David Vickrey, Spandana Singh, Sanne Vrijenhoek, Amy X. Zhang, McKane Andrus, Natali Helberger, Polina Proutskova, Tanushree Mitra, and Nina Vasan. 2022. Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis. CoRR abs/2207.10192 (2022), 64. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.10192 arXiv:2207.10192Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino da Silva Santos, and Philip E et al. Bourne. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3, 1 (2016), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva Zangerle and Christine Bauer. 2022. Evaluating recommender systems: survey and framework. Comput. Surveys 55, 8, Article 170 (2022), 38 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3556536Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Looking at the FAccTs: Exploring Music Industry Professionals' Perspectives on Music Streaming Services and Recommendations
Recommendations
Amplifying Artists’ Voices: Item Provider Perspectives on Influence and Fairness of Music Streaming Platforms
UMAP '23: Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationThe majority of music consumption nowadays takes place on music streaming platforms. Whichever artists, albums, or songs are exposed to consumers on these platforms therefore greatly influences what music is ultimately consumed. As a result, the impact ...
Personality Correlates of Music Audio Preferences for Modelling Music Listeners
UMAP '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationPast studies have shown that personality has a significant association with user behaviour and preferences, not least towards music. This makes personality information a promising aspect for user modelling in personalised recommender systems and similar ...
Introducing Global and Regional Mainstreaminess for Improving Personalized Music Recommendation
MoMM2017: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & MultimediaThe music mainstreaminess of a user reflects how strong a user's listening preferences correspond to those of the larger population. Considering that music mainstream may be defined from different perspectives and on various levels, e.g., geographical (...
Comments