skip to main content
research-article

Reopening, Repetition and Resetting: HCI and the Method of Hope

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper attempts to (re)theorize the nature and role of hope in collaborative and interventionist CSCW and HCI projects. Building on work in anthropology, STS, CSCW and HCI, and extended reflection on the 3Dprintability project - a multinational collaboration dedicated to the 3D printing of prosthetics in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia - it advocates for a more pluralistic and action-oriented understanding of hope built around moments of collaborative reopening, repetition and resetting. It then argues for a more robust and open-ended HCI method of hope that can change the way interventionist projects are conceived, documented, evaluated, and communicated, both in the HCI literature and in more public-facing accounts.

References

  1. Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 15, 2 (September 2000), 179--203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI15235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Christopher Ali. 2021. Farm Fresh Broadband: The Politics of Rural Connectivity. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Morgan Ames. 2019. The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death and Legacy of One Laptop per Child. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nikhil Anand, Akhil Gupta, and Hannah Appel (Eds.). 2018. The Promise of Infrastructure. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bannon, L. (1992). Perspectives on CSCW: From HCI and CMC to CSCW. Proceedings of EWHCI'92, East -- West International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp.148--158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Howard S. Becker. 1960. Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology 66, (1960), 32--40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/222820Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lauren Berlant. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloch, E. (1995) The Principle of Hope, tr. S. Plaice, P. Knight, and N. Plaice, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L., Thévenot, L. 2006. On Justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowker, G. 2005. Memory Practices in the Sciences, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, A.S. 2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins, H. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. James Clifford and George E. Marcus (Eds.). 2010. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, 25th Anniversary Edition (2nd ed.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John Dewey. 1938. Logic - The Theory of Inquiry. Henry Holt and Company, New York, NY USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carl DiSalvo, Andrew Clement, and V Pipek. 2013. Communities: Participatory Design for, with and by communities. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Anthony Dunne. 2001. Design noir: the secret life of electronic objects. August, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Anthony Dunne. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pelle Ehn. 1993. Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill. In Participatory Design. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC '08), Indiana University, USA, 92--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. William Gaver, Peter Krogh, Andy Boucher, and David Chatting. 2022. Emergence as a Feature of Practice-based Design Research. 517--526. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Daniel Greene. 2021. The promise of access: technology, inequality, and the political economy of hope. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonathan Grudin. 1994. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun. ACM 37, 1 (January 1994), 92--105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/175222.175230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Orit Halpern. 2017. Hopeful resilience. E-Flux Architecture; special issue (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Donna J. Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Christina Harrington, Sheena Erete, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. Deconstructing Community-Based Collaborative Design: Towards More Equitable Participatory Design Engagements. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW (November 2019), 216:1--216:25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3359318Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Faheem Hussain, Abdullah Safir, Dina Sabie, Zulkarin Jahangir, and Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed. 2020. Infrastructuring Hope: Solidarity, Leadership, Negotiation, and ICT among the Rohingya Refugees in Bangladesh. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3392561.3394640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tim Ingold. 2015. The life of lines. Routledge, Abingdon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Steven J. Jackson. 2023. Ordinary Hope. Maddalena Taccheti, Dimitris Papadopoulos, and Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, eds. Ecological Reparation: Repair, Remediation and Resurgence in Social and Environmental Conflict. Bristol University Press: Bristol, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. William James. 1890. The principles of psychology, Vol I. Henry Holt and Co, New York, NY, US. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim (Eds.). 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rob Kling. 1991. Cooperation, coordination and control in computer-supported work. Communications of the ACM 34, 83--88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/125319.125396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Neha Kumar. 2014. Facebook for self-empowerment? A study of Facebook adoption in urban India. New media & society 16, 7 (2014), 1122--1137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814543999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Neha Kumar, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Naveena Karusala, Aditya Vishwanath, Arkadeep Kumar, and Azra Ismail. 2019. Aspirations-based design. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, ICTD '19, Ahmedabad, India, January 4--7, 2019, ACM, 2:1--2:11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Bruno Latour. 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Bruno Latour. 1996. Aramis, or, The love of technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. John Law. 2015. What's wrong with a one-world world? Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16, 1 (January 2015), 126--139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1020066Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. J. Licklider. 1960. Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Trans. Human Factors in Electronics, Mar. 1960, pp. 4--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2016. Reconstituting the Utopian Vision of Making: HCI After Technosolutionism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1390--1402. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858506Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Thomas W. Malone and Kevin Crowston. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surv. 26, 1 (March 1994), 87--119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/174666.174668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Matthew Malpass. 2017. Critical design in context: history, theory, and practices. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, London;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ezio Manzini. 2009. New design knowledge. Design Studies 30, 1 (January 2009), 4--12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Robert K. Merton. 1948. The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review 8, 193--210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hirokazu Miyazaki. 2004. The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy, and Fijian Knowledge. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Michael J. Muller and Sarah Kuhn. 1993. Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 24--28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.255960Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wanda J. Orlikowski. 1992. Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation. In Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW '92), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 362--369. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/143457.143549Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Joyojeet Pal, Meera Lakshmanan, and Kentaro Toyama. 2009. ?My child will be respected": Parental perspectives on computers and education in Rural India. Inf Syst Front 11, 2 (April 2009), 129--144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-009--9172--1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Sebastian Pfotenhauer, Brice Laurent, Kyriaki Papageorgiou, and and Jack Stilgoe. 2022. The politics of scaling. Social studies of science 52, 1 (2022), 3--34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048945Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information society 27, 4 (2011), 252--260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Matt Ratto. 2016. Making at the end of nature. interactions 23, 5 (August 2016), 26--35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2985851Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Matt Ratto. 2021. Designing a digital toolchain for prosthetics: A retrospective. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2021; Volume 4, Issue 2, No.16. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v4i2.36188Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Matt Ratto, Qua Hiansen J., Kaweesa M,, Taremwa J., Heang T., Kheng S., Teap O., Onesmo R., Mchihiyo D., Moshi B., Mwaijande V., Singh D., Gotts K., Southwick D., and Evans, J. 2021. ?An International, Multi-Center Field Trial Comparison Between 3D Printed and ICRC Manufactured Transtibial Prosthetic Devices in Low-Income Countries", Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 33(1):54--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Matt Ratto, Qua Hiansen J., Kaweesa M,, Taremwa J., Heang T., Kheng S., Teap O., Onesmo R., Mchihiyo D., Moshi B., Mwaijande V., Singh D., Gotts K., Southwick D., and Evans, J. 2017. An International Multi-Center Clinical Study: Gauging Patient Experience with Digitally Designing, 3D Trans-tibial Prosthetic Devices Compared to Manually Produced Prosthetic Devices. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics World Congress 2017, Capetown, SA, May 8--11, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryan Schmidt, ginger coons, Vincent Chen, Timotheius Gmeiner, and Matt Ratto. 2015. 3D- printed prosthetics for the developing world. In SIGGRAPH 2015: Studio (SIGGRAPH '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, , Article 21 , 1 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2785585.2792535Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Daniela Rosner. 2018. Critical fabulations: reworking the methods and margins of design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Samar Sabie, Katherine W. Song, Tapan Parikh, Steven J. Jackson, Eric Paulos, Kristina Lindström, Åsa Ståhl, Dina Sabie, Kristina Andersen, and Ron Wakkary. 2022. Unmaking@CHI: Concretizing the Material and Epistemological Practices of Unmaking in HCI. CHI 2022 - Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (April 2022), 105:1--105:6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously. Comput Supported Coop Work 1, 1 (March 1992), 7--40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752449Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 2013. Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century. Short Title: C S C W 22, 4--6 (August 2013), 345--372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-013--9193--7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ?Jofish" Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC '05), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49--58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Christo Sims. 2017. Disruptive Fixation: School Reform and the Pitfalls of Techno-Idealism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J USA. Retrieved August 6, 2023 from https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691163987/disruptive-fixationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Charles Snyder. 2002. Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry 13, (October 2002), 249--275. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Robert Soden, Laura Devendorf, Richmond Wong, Yoko Akama, and Ann Light. 2022. Modes of Uncertainty in HCI. HCI 15, 4 (August 2022), 317--426. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000085Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1994. Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: complex problems in design and access for large-scale collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '94), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 253--264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Lucy Suchman. 2006. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Kentaro Toyama. 2018. From needs to aspirations in information technology for development. Information Technology for Development 24, 1 (January 2018), 15--36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1310713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Ron Wakkary. 2021. Things we could design: for more than human-centered worlds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reopening, Repetition and Resetting: HCI and the Method of Hope

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      October 2023
      4055 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3626953
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CSCW2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)238
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader