skip to main content
10.1145/3610419.3610427acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Swarm-based exploration in unknown environments: A case study of mobile-robots using ROS framework

Published:02 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-robotic systems of varying sizes and levels of complexity can effortlessly address real-world distributed tasks like exploration, catastrophic surveillance, logistics, and industrial manufacturing. To perform such tasks efficiently, individual robots should communicate and collaborate with each other to cooperatively map the area of interest. The primary advantage of multi-robot systems over a single stand-alone robot is the enhanced spatial coverage, significantly reducing the exploration time and energy required for unknown terrain mapping. However, a large number of robots can increase the overall cost as well as the complexity of the operation by introducing additional redundancy. Therefore, the objective of this research is to study the functionality of multi-robot systems by investigating map-merging and nearest-robot navigation using a case study of Turtlebot3. In this study, computational simulations are performed in the ROS framework where multiple robots are deployed to generate individual local maps which are further transformed to create a global world map. This global map is used to compute the Euclidean distance subsequently enabling the nearest member goal navigation. Indoor experimental tests are performed to verify the simulation study, demonstrating that map merging and localised nearest member navigation can cut down operational time. The overall operational time was reduced by 23.43 % with the deployment of two robots and 45.85 % with three robots in the simulation environment, hence verifying the reduction in mission completion time.

References

  1. Zhang, J., Yang, X., Wang, W., Guan, J., Ding, L., & Lee, V. C. (2023). Automated guided vehicles and autonomous mobile robots for recognition and tracking in civil engineering. Automation in Construction, 146, 104699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kuncolienkar, A., Panigrahi, S., & Thondiyath, A. (2022, May). Multibody dynamics framework for performance evaluation of an all-terrain rover. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Panigrahi, S., Maski, P., & Thondiyath, A. (2022, April). Deep learning based real-time biodiversity analysis using aerial vehicles. In Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications 6: Results from the 9th International Conference on Robot Intelligence Technology and Applications (pp. 401-412). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ray, D. N., Das, R., Sebastian, B., Roy, B., & Majumder, S. (2016). Design and analysis towards successful development of a tele-operated mobile robot for underground coal mines. In CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on CARs & FoF 2016 (pp. 589-602). Springer India.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Panigrahi, S., Thondiyath, A., & Rohith, S. K. (2022). Characterisation of the Propulsion System for Submersible Multimedium Robotic Vehicles. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 37(12), 14-32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bader, K., Lussier, B., & Schön, W. (2017). A fault tolerant architecture for data fusion: A real application of Kalman filters for mobile robot localisation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 88, 11-23.Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., & Dorigo, M. (2013). Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intelligence, 7(1), 1-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anand, A., Nithya, M., & Sudarshan, T. S. B. (2014, November). Coordination of mobile robots with master-slave architecture for a service application. In 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) (pp. 539-543). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Agrawal, N. K., Mahapatra, P. S., & Santra, T. S. (2020). Micro-Robots/Microswimmers for Biomedical Applications. Microfluidics and Bio-MEMS, 95-148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Mirjalili, S. (2019). Particle swarm optimisation. In Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks (pp. 15-31). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A., & Fallon, D. (2008). Computer simulation and swarm intelligence organisation into an emergency department: a balancing approach across ant colony optimisation. International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics, 3(2), 142-161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Niroui, F., Zhang, K., Kashino, Z., & Nejat, G. (2019). Deep reinforcement learning robot for search and rescue applications: Exploration in unknown cluttered environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(2), 610-617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. E. Salinas-Avila, J., G. Gonzalez-Hernandez, H., Martinez-Chan, N., M. Bielma-Avendano, C., A. Salinas-Molar, X., & O. Garcia-Garcia, M. (2022, March). Assistant Delivery Robot for Nursing Home using ROS: Robotic prototype for medicine delivery and vital signs registration. In The 2022 5th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control Engineering (pp. 141-148).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Liu, Y., Fan, X., & Zhang, H. (2013). A fast map merging algorithm in the field of multirobot SLAM. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ganesan, S., Natarajan, S. K., & Srinivasan, J. (2022). A Global Path Planning Algorithm for Mobile Robot in Cluttered Environments with an Improved Initial Cost Solution and Convergence Rate. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47(3), 3633-3647.sGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Williams, C., & Schroeder, A. (2020). Utilising ROS 1 and the Turtlebot3 in a Multi-Robot System. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang, B., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2013, August). Amcl based map fusion for multi-robot slam with heterogenous sensors. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA) (pp. 822-827). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Swarm-based exploration in unknown environments: A case study of mobile-robots using ROS framework
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AIR '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Advances in Robotics
          July 2023
          583 pages
          ISBN:9781450399807
          DOI:10.1145/3610419

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 November 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format