skip to main content
10.1145/3610977.3634967acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Towards Collaborative Crash Cart Robots that Support Clinical Teamwork

Published:11 March 2024Publication History

ABSTRACT

Healthcare workers (HCWs) face many challenges during bedside care that impede team collaboration and often lead to poor patient outcomes. Robots have the potential to support medical decision-making, help identify medical errors, and deliver supplies to clinical teams in a timely manner. However, there is a lack of knowledge about using robots to support clinical team dynamics despite being used in surgery, healthcare operations, and other applications. To address this gap, we engaged in a co-design process of robots that support clinical teamwork. We collaboratively explore how robots can support clinical teamwork with HCWs. This collaborative process includes understanding the challenges they face during bedside care and envisioning robots that can help mitigate these issues. Our study shows that robots can act as a shared mental model for clinical teams, help close communication gaps, and provide procedural steps to assist HCWs with limited in-hospital experience. This research highlights new ways HRI researchers can deploy robots in acute care settings, as well as define appropriate levels of autonomy to maintain human control in safety-critical settings.

References

  1. [n. d.]. https://www.omnicell.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n. d.]. Diligent robotics. https://www.diligentrobots.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Al-Sada, P.C. Yang, C. Chieh Chiu, T. Pradhono Tomo, M. Yamen Saraiji, T. Ogata, and T. Nakajima. 2021. From Anime To Reality: Embodying An Anime Character As A Humanoid Robot. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Alkema, J. M. Linton, and R. Davies. 2008. A study of the relationship between self-care, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout among hospice professionals. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care 4, 2 (2008), 101--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Prakash Baskaran, Jamison Heard, and Julie A Adams. 2022. Emergency Clinical Procedure Detection via Wearable Sensors. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 66. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2239--2243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. N.M. Bonalumi, A. Bhattacharya, C. Edwards, A. Fasnacht, L.A. Mazzone, K. Stephens, K. Whiteman, and B. Swanson-Bierman. 2017. Impact of a planned workflowchange: super track improves quality and service for low-acuity patients at an inner-city hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing 43, 2 (2017), 114--125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. Braun and V. Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. American Psychological Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. Bu, I. Mandel, W.Y. Lee, and W. Ju. 2023. Trash barrel robots in the city. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 875--877.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pierre Cahuc and Fabien Postel-Vinay. 2002. Temporary jobs, employment protection and labor market performance. Labour economics 9, 1 (2002), 63--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Carver, V. Gupta, and J.E. Hipskind. 2023. Medical Errors. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tathagata Chakraborti, Sarath Sreedharan, Sachin Grover, and Subbarao Kambhampati. 2019. Plan explanations as model reconciliation--an empirical study. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Ieee, 258--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Vivian Chu, Tesca Fitzgerald, and Andrea L Thomaz. 2016. Learning object affordances by leveraging the combination of human-guidance and self-exploration. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, 221--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Filipa Correia, Joana Campos, Francisco S Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2023. Robotic Gaze Responsiveness in Multiparty Teamwork. International Journal of Social Robotics 15, 1 (2023), 27--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Filipa Correia, Sofia Petisca, Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Tiago Ribeiro, Francisco S Melo, and Ana Paiva. 2019. ?I Choose... YOU!" Membership preferences in human-- robot teams. Autonomous Robots 43 (2019), 359--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Carl F DiSalvo, Francine Gemperle, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sara Kiesler. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marissa D'Souza, Julian Gendreau, Austin Feng, Lily H Kim, Allen L Ho, and Anand Veeravagu. 2019. Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends. Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews (2019), 9--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Andrea E Frank, Alyssa Kubota, and Laurel D Riek. 2019. Wearable activity recognition for robust human-robot teaming in safety-critical environments via hybrid neural networks. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 449--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C.L. Garcia, L.C. Abreu, J. Ramos, C. Castro, F. Smiderle, J. Santos, and I. Bezerra. 2019. Influence of burnout on patient safety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina 55, 9 (2019), 553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Matthew Gombolay, Xi Jessie Yang, Bradley Hayes, Nicole Seo, Zixi Liu, Samir Wadhwania, Tania Yu, Neel Shah, Toni Golen, and Julie Shah. 2018. Robotic assistance in the coordination of patient care. The International Journal of Robotics Research 37, 10 (2018), 1300--1316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Matthew C Gombolay, Ronald J Wilcox, and Julie A Shah. 2018. Fast scheduling of robot teams performing tasks with temporospatial constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 34, 1 (2018), 220--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M.J. Gonzales and L.D. Riek. 2012. Designing an Interface to Support Shared Decision Making in Oncology. In Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare. AMIA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. J. Gonzales, V. C. Cheung, and L. D. Riek. 2015. Designing collaborative healthcare technology for the acute care workflow. In 2015 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth). IEEE, 145--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. J. Gonzales, J. M. Henry, A. W. Calhoun, and L. D. Riek. 2016. Visual task: A collaborative cognitive aid for acute care resuscitation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05224 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. P. Gray, S. Senabe, N. Naicker, S. Kgalamono, A. Yassi, and J.M. Spiegel. 2019. Workplace-based organizational interventions promoting mental health and happiness among healthcare workers: A realist review. International journal of environmental research and public health 16, 22 (2019), 4396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. T. Grundgeiger, S. Huber, D. Reinhardt, A. Steinisch, O. Happel, and T. Wurmb. 2019. Cognitive aids in acute care: investigating how cognitive aids affect and support in-hospital emergency teams. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C. Guan, A. Bouzida, R.M. Oncy-Avila, S. Moharana, and L.D. Riek. 2021. Taking an (embodied) cue from community health: Designing dementia caregiver support technology to advance health equity. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Edward T Hall. 1963. A system for the notation of proxemic behavior. American anthropologist 65, 5 (1963), 1003--1026.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. L.H. Hall, J. Johnson, I. Watt, A. Tsipa, and D.B. O'Connor. 2016. Healthcare staff wellbeing, burnout, and patient safety: a systematic review. PloS one 11, 7 (2016), e0159015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Pamela J Hinds, Teresa L Roberts, and Hank Jones. 2004. Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human--Computer Interaction 19, 1--2 (2004), 151--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. K. Honarmand and V. Danesh. 2022. When duty to care causes collective sorrow and shame: assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit clinicians. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 69, 10 (2022), 1191--1195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C. Hooper, J. Craig, D.R. Janvrin, M.A. Wetsel, and E. Reimels. 2010. Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and compassion fatigue among emergency nurses compared with nurses in other selected inpatient specialties. Journal of emergency nursing 36, 5 (2010), 420--427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. L.J. Hsu and L.Y. Hsu. 2023. GratiBot: Enhancing Relationships of Caregivers and Older Adult Care Recipients through Gratitude. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 802--805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanjing Huang, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, and Liang Ma. 2021. Will you listen to a robot? Effects of robot ability, task complexity, and risk on human decisionmaking. Advanced Robotics 35, 19 (2021), 1156--1166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Tariq Iqbal and Laurel D Riek. 2017. Coordination dynamics in multihuman multirobot teams. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2, 3 (2017), 1712--1717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Malte F Jung, Nikolas Martelaro, and Pamela J Hinds. 2015. Using robots to moderate team conflict: the case of repairing violations. In Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 229-- 236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Adam Kendon. 1990. Spatial organization in social encounters: The F-formation system. Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. J.T. Kim, W. Yu, J. Tan, G. Turk, and S. Ha. 2023. How to Train Your Guide Dog: Wayfinding and Safe Navigation with Human-Robot Modeling. In Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 221-- 225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Kubota, R. Pei, E. Sun, D. Cruz-Sandoval, S. Kim, and L.D. Riek. 2023. Get smart: Collaborative goal setting with cognitively assistive robots. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 44--53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. H.R. Lee and L.D. Riek. 2023. Designing Robots for Aging: Wisdom as a Critical Lens. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 12, 1 (2023), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. H.R. Lee, F. Sun, T. Iqbal, and B. Roberts. 2023. Reimagining robots for dementia: From robots for care-receivers/giver to robots for carepartners. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 475-- 484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Hee Rin Lee, EunJeong Cheon, Chaeyun Lim, and Kerstin Fischer. 2022. Configuring humans: What roles humans play in hri research. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 478--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hee Rin Lee and Laurel D Riek. 2018. Reframing assistive robots to promote successful aging. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 7, 1 (2018), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Hee Rin Lee and Selma Sabanović. 2013. Weiser's dream in the Korean home: collaborative study of domestic roles, relationships, and ideal technologies. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 637--646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Hee Rin Lee, Selma Sabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Shinichi Nagata, Jennifer Piatt, Casey Bennett, and David Hakken. 2017. Steps toward participatory design of social robots: mutual learning with older adults with depression. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. 244--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Hee Rin Lee, Selma Sabanović, and Erik Stolterman. 2016. How humanlike should a social robot be: a user-centered exploration. In 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hee Rin Lee, Xiaobo Tan,Wenlong Zhang, Yiming Deng, and Yongming Liu. 2023. Situating Robots in the Organizational Dynamics of the Gas Energy Industry: A Collaborative Design Study. In 2023 32nd IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 1096--1101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Timm Linder and Kai O Arras. 2014. Multi-model hypothesis tracking of groups of people in RGB-D data. In 17th International conference on information fusion (FUSION). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Noel Maalouf, Abbas Sidaoui, Imad H Elhajj, and Daniel Asmar. 2018. Robotics in nursing: a scoping review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 50, 6 (2018), 590--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Angela Mastrianni, Aleksandra Sarcevic, Lauren Chung, Issa Zakeri, Emily Alberto, Zachary Milestone, Ivan Marsic, and Randall S Burd. 2021. Designing Interactive Alerts to Improve Recognition of Critical Events in Medical Emergencies. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021. 864--878.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. A. Mastrianni, A. Sarcevic, A. Hu, L. Almengor, P. Tempel, S. Gao, and R. S. Burd. 2023. Transitioning Cognitive Aids into Decision Support Platforms: Requirements and Design Guidelines. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. S. Matsumoto, P. Ghosh, R. Jamshad, and L.D. Riek. 2023. Robot, uninterrupted: Telemedical robots to mitigate care disruption. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 495--505.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. S. Matsumoto, S. Moharana, N. Devanagondi, L.C. Oyama, and L.D. Riek. 2021. Iris: A low-cost telemedicine robot to support healthcare safety and equity during a pandemic. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. Springer, 113--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Sachiko Matsumoto and Laurel D Riek. 2022. Shared control in human robot teaming: Toward context-aware communication. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10218 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. M. C. McCullagh, J. Xu, V. V. Dickson, A. Tan, and S. L. Lusk. 2022. Noise exposure and quality of life among nurses. Workplace health & safety 70, 4 (2022), 207--219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. M. Menekse, R. Higashi, C.D. Schunn, and E. Baehr. 2017. The role of robotics teams' collaboration quality on team performance in a robotics tournament. Journal of Engineering Education 106, 4 (2017), 564--584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. S. Moharana, A.E. Panduro, H.R. Lee, and L.D. Riek. 2019. Robots for joy, robots for sorrow: community based robot design for dementia caregivers. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 458--467.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. B.K.J. Mok, S. Yang, D. Sirkin, and W. Ju. 2015. A place for every tool and every tool in its place: Performing collaborative tasks with interactive robotic drawers. In 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 700--706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Muehlhaus, M. Koelle, A. Saberpour, and J. Steimle. 2023. I Need a Third Arm! Eliciting Body-based Interactions with a Wearable Robotic Arm. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. A.M. Okamura, M.J. Matari?, and H.I. Christensen. 2010. Medical and health-care robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 17, 3 (2010), 26--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. A. Patel, P. Sharma, and P. Randhawa. 2021. MedBuddy: the medicine delivery robot. In 2021 9th International conference on reliability, infocom technologies and optimization (Trends and Future Directions)(ICRITO). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. H.R.M. Pelikan, A. Cheatle, M.F. Jung, and S.J. Jackson. 2018. Operating at a distance-how a teleoperated surgical robot reconfigures teamwork in the operating room. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Hannah Pelikan, Frederic Anthony Robinson, Leelo Keevallik, Mari Velonaki, Mathias Broth, and Oliver Bown. 2021. Sound in Human-Robot Interaction. In Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 706--708.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. D. Rakita, B. Mutlu, M. Gleicher, and L.M. Hiatt. 2019. Shared control--based bimanual robot manipulation. Science Robotics 4, 30 (2019), eaaw0955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. S. Ricci, A. Calandrino, G. Borgonovo, M. Chirico, M. Casadio, et al. 2022. Virtual and augmented reality in basic and advanced life support training. JMIR Serious Games 10, 1 (2022), e28595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. L.D. Riek. 2017. Healthcare robotics. Commun. ACM 60, 11 (2017), 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Eduardo Salas, C Shawn Burke, and Janis A Cannon-Bowers. 2000. Teamwork: emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews 2, 4 (2000), 339--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. J.E. Salinas-Avila, H.G. Gonzalez-Hernandez, N. Martinez-Chan, C.M. Bielma- Avendano, X.A. Salinas-Molar, and M.O. Garcia-Garcia. 2022. Assistant Delivery Robot for Nursing Home using ROS: Robotic prototype for medicine delivery and vital signs registration. In The 2022 5th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control Engineering. 141--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. SM Bhagya P Samarakoon, MA Viraj J Muthugala, and AG Buddhika P Jayasekara. 2022. A Review on Human--Robot Proxemics. Electronics 11, 16 (2022), 2490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. L. Shi and D.A. Singh. 2014. Delivering health care in America: A systems approach. Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. T. Shibata and K. Wada. 2011. Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly--a mini-review. Gerontology 57, 4 (2011), 378--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. J. N. Siebert, F. Ehrler, A. Gervaix, Kevin Haddad, Laurence Lacroix, P. Schrurs, A. Sahin, C. Lovis, and S. Manzano. 2017. Adherence to AHA guidelines when adapted for augmented reality glasses for assisted pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research 19, 5 (2017), e7379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. E. Sihite, A. Kalantari, R. Nemovi, A. Ramezani, and M. Gharib. 2023. Multi-Modal Mobility Morphobot (M4) with appendage repurposing for locomotion plasticity enhancement. Nature communications 14, 1 (2023), 3323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Aaron St. Clair and Maja Mataric. 2015. How robot verbal feedback can improve team performance in human-robot task collaborations. In Proceedings of the tenth annual acm/ieee international conference on human-robot interaction. 213--220.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Hang Su, Andrea Mariani, Salih Ertug Ovur, Arianna Menciassi, Giancarlo Ferrigno, and Elena De Momi. 2021. Toward teaching by demonstration for robotassisted minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 18, 2 (2021), 484--494.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. L.W. Sun and C.K. Yeung. 2007. Port placement and pose selection of the da Vinci surgical system for collision-free intervention based on performance optimization. In 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1951--1956.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Mason Swofford, John Peruzzi, Nathan Tsoi, Sydney Thompson, Roberto Martín- Martín, Silvio Savarese, and Marynel Vázquez. 2020. Improving social awareness through dante: Deep affinity network for clustering conversational interactants. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Mason Swofford, John Peruzzi, and Marynel Vázquez. 2018. Conversational group detection with deep convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04039 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Brian Tang, Dakota Sullivan, Bengisu Cagiltay, Varun Chandrasekaran, Kassem Fawaz, and Bilge Mutlu. 2022. Confidant: A privacy controller for social robots. In 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 205--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Angelique Taylor. 2022. AI Designed with Humans in Mind. https://issues.org/ human-centered-ai-shneiderman-review-taylor/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. A. Taylor, H. R. Lee, and L. D. Kubota, A.and Riek. 2019. Coordinating clinical teams: Using robots to empower nurses to stop the line. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. A. Taylor, S. Matsumoto, and L. D. Riek. 2020. Situating robots in the emergency department. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Applied AI in Healthcare: Safety, Community, and the Environment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. A. Taylor, S. Matsumoto, W. Xiao, and L. D. Riek. 2021. Social navigation for mobile robots in the emergency department. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 3510--3516.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Angelique Taylor, Michele Murakami, Soyon Kim, Ryan Chu, and Laurel D Riek. 2022. Hospitals of the Future: Designing Interactive Robotic Systems for Resilient Emergency Departments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. A. Taylor and L.D. Riek. 2022. REGROUP: A Robot-Centric Group Detection and Tracking System. In 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Angelique Taylor and Laurel D Riek. 2016. Robot perception of human groups in the real world: State of the art. In 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. A. Taylor and L. D. Riek. 2018. Robot-Centric Human Group Detection. In 13th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Social Robots in the Wild Workshop. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Hamish Tennent, Solace Shen, and Malte Jung. 2019. Micbot: A peripheral robotic object to shape conversational dynamics and team performance. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 133--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. The Joint Commission. 2023. Hospital: 2023 National Patient Safety Goals. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safetygoals/ hospital-national-patient-safety-goals/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Rudolph Triebel, Kai Arras, Rachid Alami, Lucas Beyer, Stefan Breuers, Raja Chatila, Mohamed Chetouani, Daniel Cremers, Vanessa Evers, Michelangelo Fiore, et al. 2016. Spencer: A socially aware service robot for passenger guidance and help in busy airports. In Field and Service Robotics: Results of the 10th International Conference. Springer, 607--622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  90. R. Tuna, F.E. Bacaksiz, and B. Kahraman. 2022. Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, burnout, working environments, and musculoskeletal disorders among nurses. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 58, 4 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. Candice Vander Weerdt, Jessica A Peck, and Tracy Porter. 2023. Travel nurses and patient outcomes: A systematic review. Health care management review 48, 4 (2023), 352--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Marynel Vázquez, Alexander Lew, Eden Gorevoy, and Joe Connolly. 2022. Pose Generation for Social Robots in Conversational Group Formations. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2022), 703807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. JayneWallace, John McCarthy, Peter CWright, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Making design probes work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3441--3450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. T.R. Waters and K. Rockefeller. 2010. Safe patient handling for rehabilitation professionals. Rehabilitation Nursing 35, 5 (2010), 216--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  95. S. Yamada, T. Nomura, and T. Kanda. 2019. Healthcare support by a humanoid robot. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. D. Zhang, Z.Wu, J. Chen, R. Zhu, A. Munawar, B. Xiao, Y. Guan, H. Su,W. Hong, Y. Guo, et al. 2022. Human-robot shared control for surgical robot based on contextaware sim-to-real adaptation. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 7694--7700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards Collaborative Crash Cart Robots that Support Clinical Teamwork

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HRI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
        March 2024
        982 pages
        ISBN:9798400703225
        DOI:10.1145/3610977

        Copyright © 2024 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 March 2024

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)147
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)51

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader