skip to main content
10.1145/3610978.3640650acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Inclusive Dialogues: WokeBot Engaging Diversity Dilemmas

Published: 11 March 2024 Publication History

Abstract

In today's world, understanding different viewpoints is key for societal cohesion and progress. Robots have the potential to provide aid in discussing tough topics like ethnicity and gender. However, comparably to humans, the appearance of a robot can trigger inherent prejudices. This study delves into the interplay between robot appearance and decision-making in ethical dilemmas. Employing a Furhat robot that can change faces in an instant, we looked at how robot appearance affects decision-making and the perception of the robot itself. Pairs of participants were invited to discuss a dilemma presented by a robot, covering sensitive topics of ethnicity or gender. The robot either adopted a first-person or third-person perspective and altered its appearance accordingly. Following the explanation, participants were encouraged to discuss their choice of action in the dilemma situation. We did not find significant influences of robot appearance or dilemma topic on perceived anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, or intelligence of the robot, partly in line with previous research. However, several participants hearing the dilemma from a first-person perspective changed their opinion because of the robot's appearance. Future work can expand with different measures such as engagement, in order to shed light on the intricate dynamics of human-robot interaction, emphasizing the need for thoughtful consideration in designing robot appearances to promote unbiased engagement in discussions of societal significance.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Arifah Addison, Christoph Bartneck, and Kumar Yogeeswaran. 2019. Robots can be more than black and white: examining racial bias towards robots. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conf. on AI, Ethics, and Society. 493--498.
[2]
Samer Al Moubayed, Jonas Beskow, Gabriel Skantze, and Björn Granström. 2012. Furhat: a back-projected human-like robot head for multiparty human-machine interaction. In Cognitive Behavioural Systems: COST 2102 Int'l Training School, Dresden, Germany, February 21--26, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, 114--130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642--34584--5_9
[3]
Gaye Askin, Imge Saltik, Tugçe Elver Boz, and Burcu A Urgen. 2023. Gendered actions with a genderless robot: Gender attribution to humanoid robots in action. International Journal of Social Robotics (2023), 1--17.
[4]
Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulic, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1 (2009), 71--81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001--3
[5]
Christoph Bartneck, Kumar Yogeeswaran, Qi Min Ser, Graeme Woodward, Robert Sparrow, Siheng Wang, and Friederike Eyssel. 2018. Robots And Racism. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE Int'l Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (Chicago, IL, USA) (HRI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 196--204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3171221.3171260
[6]
Caspar Bok, Linas Cepinskas, Frederike Groothoff, Kim van Hees, Hai Le, Merel Nissen, Zoulikha El Ouakili-Saadi, Lina Senen, Gary Sheikkariem, and Hylko Tas. [n. d.]. Het Dilemmaspel. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion (EDI) Office. https://www.uu.nl/organisatie/equality-diversity-inclusion/edi-voor-jou/activiteiten/dilemmaspel
[7]
Patricia Hill Collins. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge, New York, NY.
[8]
Friederike Eyssel and Dieta Kuchenbrandt. 2012. Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51, 4 (2012), 724--731.
[9]
Friederike Eyssel, Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Simon Bobinger, Laura De Ruiter, and Frank Hegel. 2012. 'If you sound like me, you must be more human' on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE int'l conf. on Human-Robot Interaction. 125--126.
[10]
Donna J. Haraway. 1985. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Routledge.
[11]
Sandra Harding. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
[12]
Jessica K. Barfield. 2021. Discrimination and Stereotypical Responses to Robots as a Function of Robot Colorization. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conf. on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (Utrecht, Netherlands) (UMAP '21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450614.3463411
[13]
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D. R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2020). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:218483077
[14]
Giulia Perugia and Dominika Lisy. 2023. Robot's gendering trouble: a scoping review of gendering humanoid robots and its effects on HRI. International Journal of Social Robotics (2023), 1--29.
[15]
Yolanda A Rankin and Jakita O Thomas. 2019. Straighten up and fly right: Rethinking intersectionality in HCI research. Interactions 26, 6 (2019), 64--68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363033
[16]
Robert Sparrow. 2020. Robotics Has a Race Problem. Science, Technology, & Human Values 45, 3 (2020), 538--560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919862862
[17]
Benedict Tay, Younbo Jung, and Taezoon Park. 2014. When stereotypes meet robots: the double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human--robot interaction. Computers in Human Behavior 38 (2014), 75--84.
[18]
Ellis Van den Hende and Ruth Mugge. 2012. The role of gender congruity for anthropomorphized product perception. ACR North American Advances (2012).

Index Terms

  1. Inclusive Dialogues: WokeBot Engaging Diversity Dilemmas

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HRI '24: Companion of the 2024 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 2024
    1408 pages
    ISBN:9798400703232
    DOI:10.1145/3610978
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 11 March 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. ethnicity
    2. gender
    3. human-robot interaction
    4. inclusive robots

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    HRI '24
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    HRI '25
    ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
    March 4 - 6, 2025
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 55
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media