skip to main content
research-article

Work Hard, Scare Hard? An Investigation of How Mental Workload Impacts Jump Scare Intensity

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Despite the prevalence and relevance of jump scares in horror video games, there is little empirical research on them. While HCI research commonly uses horror games as experimental stimuli, even less scientific research exists on what makes a jump scare in a game more or less scary. The present between-subject study (n=60) addresses this by investigating whether jump scare intensity—measured physiologically and subjectively—scales with task difficulty. We triggered in-game jump scares at increasing levels of mental workload across four counterbalanced conditions, manipulated using N-back tasks of varying difficulty. Results demonstrate a significant linear relationship between mental workload and physiological arousal. However, this is not the case for subjective perception of arousal elicited by the jump scare. These findings have design implications for horror games. They show that the level of physiological arousal caused by a jump scare can be controlled by changing the difficulty of an in-game task that necessitates a substantial amount of mental work at the same time.

References

  1. Marc Malmdorf Andersen, Uffe Schjoedt, Henry Price, Fernando E Rosas, Coltan Scrivner, and Mathias Clasen. 2020. Playing with fear: A field study in recreational horror. Psychological science, 31, 12 (2020), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972116 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bruno J Anthony and Frances K Graham. 1985. Blink reflex modification by selective attention: evidence for the modulation of ‘automatic’processing. Biological psychology, 21, 1 (1985), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(85)90052-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Atari. 1982. Haunted House. Game [Atari 2600]. Atari, Sunnyvale, California, United States. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Alan Baddeley. 1992. Working memory. Science, 255, 5044 (1992), 556–559. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Robert Baird. 2000. The startle effect. Film Quarterly, 53, 3 (2000), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1213732 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Red Barrels. 2014. Outlast. Game [PS4]. Red Barrels, Quebec, Montreal, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryan Bishop. 2012. ’why won’t you die?!’ the art of the jump scare. https://www.theverge.com/2012/10/31/3574592/art-of-the-jump-scare-horror-movies Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Karen L Blackmore, William Coppins, and Keith V Nesbitt. 2016. Using startle reflex to compare playing and watching in a horror game. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2843043.2843482 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative emotion, positive experience? Emotionally moving moments in digital games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2996–3006. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858227 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Julia Ayumi Bopp, Klaus Opwis, and Elisa D Mekler. 2018. “An Odd Kind of Pleasure” Differentiating Emotional Challenge in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173615 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kara L Bopp and Paul Verhaeghen. 2020. Aging and n-back performance: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75, 2 (2020), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby024 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wolfram Boucsein. 2012. Electrodermal activity. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1126-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Margaret M Bradley and Peter J Lang. 1994. Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25, 1 (1994), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jason J Braithwaite, Derrick G Watson, Robert Jones, and Mickey Rowe. 2013. A guide for analysing electrodermal activity (EDA) & skin conductance responses (SCRs) for psychological experiments. Psychophysiology, 49, 1 (2013), 1017–1034. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Anne-Marie Brouwer, Maarten A Hogervorst, Jan BF Van Erp, Tobias Heffelaar, Patrick H Zimmerman, and Robert Oostenveld. 2012. Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task. Journal of neural engineering, 9, 4 (2012), 045008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/045008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Capcom. 2021. Resident Evil: Village. Game [PS4]. Capcom, Chūō-ku, Osaka, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Scott Cawthon. 2014. Five Nights at Freddy’s. Game [PC]. Scott Cawthon, Houston, Texas, United States. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillaume Chanel, Julien Kronegg, Didier Grandjean, and Thierry Pun. 2006. Emotion assessment: Arousal evaluation using EEG’s and peripheral physiological signals. In Multimedia Content Representation, Classification and Security: International Workshop, MRCS 2006, Istanbul, Turkey, September 11-13, 2006. Proceedings. 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/11848035_70 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rebecca L Charles and Jim Nixon. 2019. Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review. Applied ergonomics, 74 (2019), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.028 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Francesco Chiossi, Robin Welsch, Steeven Villa, Lewis Chuang, and Sven Mayer. 2022. Virtual reality adaptation using electrodermal activity to support the user experience. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 6, 2 (2022), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020055 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Mathias Clasen. 2017. Why horror seduces. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190666507.001.0001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mathias Clasen. 2021. A Very Nervous Person’s Guide to Horror Movies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197535899.001.0001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lacey Colligan, Henry WW Potts, Chelsea T Finn, and Robert A Sinkin. 2015. Cognitive workload changes for nurses transitioning from a legacy system with paper documentation to a commercial electronic health record. International journal of medical informatics, 84, 7 (2015), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.03.003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Luana Colloca, Nandini Raghuraman, Yang Wang, Titilola Akintola, Barbara Brawn-Cinani, GianCarlo Colloca, Craig Kier, Amitabh Varshney, and Sarah Murthi. 2020. Virtual reality: physiological and behavioral mechanisms to increase individual pain tolerance limits. Pain, 161, 9 (2020), 2010. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001900 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Bruce N Cuthbert, Margaret M Bradleym, and Peter J Lang. 1996. Probing picture perception: Activation and emotion. Psychophysiology, 33, 2 (1996), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb02114.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Joe Cutting and Sebastian Deterding. 2022. The task-attention theory of game learning: a theory and research agenda. Human-Computer Interaction, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2022.2047971 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Michael E Dawson, Anne M Schell, and Diane L Filion. 2017. The electrodermal system.. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415782.010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6, 3-4 (1992), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Paul Ekman. 2004. Emotions revealed. Bmj, 328, Suppl S5 (2004). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Paul Ekman, Wallace V Friesen, and Ronald C Simons. 1985. Is the startle reaction an emotion? Journal of personality and social psychology, 49, 5 (1985), 1416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1416 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Michael S Fanselow and Laurie S Lester. 2013. A Functional Behavioristic Approach to Aversively Motivated Behavior: Predatory Imminence as a Determinant of the Topography of Defensive Behavior. In Evolution and learning. Psychology Press, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203781647-14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Bryn Farnsworth, Nam Nguyen, Divya Seernani, Pernille Bülow, and Kate Krosschell. 2023. 5 essentials for an optimal galvanic skin response research setup. https://imotions.com/blog/learning/best-practice/essentials-galvanic-skin-response/##a-id-placement-a-1-placement Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zoë Field, Jeremy Miles, and Andy Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. Discovering Statistics Using R, 1–992. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Frictional Games. 2010. Amnesia: The Dark Descent. Game [PC]. Frictional Games, Malmö, Sweden. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Christoph Geiß ler, Maximilian A Friehs, Christian Frings, and Gregor Domes. 2022. Time-dependent effects of acute stress on working memory performance: A systematic review and hypothesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 105998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Chad Phoenix Rose Gowler and Ioanna Iacovides. 2019. " Horror, guilt and shame­-Uncomfortable Experiences in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347179 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Frances K Graham. 1975. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation. Psychophysiology, 12, 3 (1975), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb01284.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Frances K Graham. 2021. Distinguishing among orienting, defense, and startle reflexes. In The orienting reflex in humans. Routledge, 137–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003171409-10 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Andreas Haag, Silke Goronzy, Peter Schaich, and Jason Williams. 2004. Emotion recognition using bio-sensors: First steps towards an automatic system. In Affective Dialogue Systems: Tutorial and Research Workshop, ADS 2004, Kloster Irsee, Germany, June 14-16, 2004. Proceedings. 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24842-2_4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Tim Hagemann, Robert W Levenson, and James J Gross. 2006. Expressive suppression during an acoustic startle. Psychophysiology, 43, 1 (2006), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00382.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Sandra G Hart. 2006. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 50, 9, 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. 52, Elsevier, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Maarten A Hogervorst, Anne-Marie Brouwer, and Jan BF Van Erp. 2014. Combining and comparing EEG, peripheral physiology and eye-related measures for the assessment of mental workload. Frontiers in neuroscience, 8 (2014), 322. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00322 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Amanda Holmes, Karin Mogg, Jan de Fockert, Maria Kragh Nielsen, and Brendan P Bradley. 2014. Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14 (2014), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Gonzalo Iturregui-Gallardo and Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich. 2020. Towards the creation of a tactile version of the Self-Assessment Manikin (T-SAM) for the emotional assessment of visually impaired people. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 67, 6 (2020), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2019.1626007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Susanne M Jaeggi, Martin Buschkuehl, Alex Etienne, Christoph Ozdoba, Walter J Perrig, and Arto C Nirkko. 2007. On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 2 (2007), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.7.2.75 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Michael J Kane, Andrew RA Conway, Timothy K Miura, and Gregory JH Colflesh. 2007. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity.. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 33, 3 (2007), 615. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.615 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Carney Landis and William Hunt. 1939. The startle pattern.. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Peter J Lang, Margaret M Bradley, and Bruce N Cuthbert. 1990. Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex.. Psychological review, 97, 3 (1990), 377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.377 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Nilli Lavie. 1995. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 21, 3 (1995), 451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.451 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Why presence occurs: Evolutionary psychology, media equation, and presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 13, 4 (2004), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1162/1054746041944830 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Enrique Leon, Graham Clarke, Victor Callaghan, and Francisco Sepulveda. 2007. A user-independent real-time emotion recognition system for software agents in domestic environments. Engineering applications of artificial intelligence, 20, 3 (2007), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2006.06.001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin, Dai-Yun Wu, and Chen-Chao Tao. 2018. So scary, yet so fun: The role of self-efficacy in enjoyment of a virtual reality horror game. New Media & Society, 20, 9 (2018), 3223–3242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817744850 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Wolf & Wood Interactive Ltd.. 2016. A Chair in a Room: Greenwater. Game [PC]. Wolf & Wood Interactive Ltd., Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Tiffany Luong and Christian Holz. 2022. Characterizing Physiological Responses to Fear, Frustration, and Insight in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28, 11 (2022), 3917–3927. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2022.3203113 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Teresa Lynch and Nicole Martins. 2015. Nothing to fear? An analysis of college students’ fear experiences with video games. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 2 (2015), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1029128 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Dominique Makowski, Tam Pham, Zen J Lau, Jan C Brammer, François Lespinasse, Hung Pham, Christopher Schölzel, and SH Annabel Chen. 2021. NeuroKit2: A Python toolbox for neurophysiological signal processing. Behavior research methods, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01516-y Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Richard Mayer and Richard E Mayer. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Austen B McGuire, Omri Gillath, and Michael S Vitevitch. 2016. Effects of mental resource availability on looming task performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78 (2016), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1006-2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Bruce Mehler, Bryan Reimer, Joseph F Coughlin, and Jeffery A Dusek. 2009. Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation research record, 2138, 1 (2009), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.3141/2138-02 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. KM Miller, CC Price, MS Okun, H Montijo, and D Bowers. 2009. Is the n-back task a valid neuropsychological measure for assessing working memory? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 7 (2009), 711–717. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp063 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Shinji Miyake. 2001. Multivariate workload evaluation combining physiological and subjective measures. International journal of psychophysiology, 40, 3 (2001), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00191-4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Karl Moder. 2010. Alternatives to F-test in one way ANOVA in case of heterogeneity of variances (a simulation study). Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 4 (2010), 343. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Larissa Müller, Arne Bernin, Sobin Ghose, Wojtek Gozdzielewski, Qi Wang, Christos Grecos, Kai Von Luck, and Florian Vogt. 2016. Physiological data analysis for an emotional provoking exergame. In 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2016.7850042 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Lennart E Nacke. 2018. Introduction to biometric measures for Games User Research. Games user research, 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198794844.003.0016 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Ziad S Nasreddine, Natalie A Phillips, Valérie Bédirian, Simon Charbonneau, Victor Whitehead, Isabelle Collin, Jeffrey L Cummings, and Howard Chertkow. 2005. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 4 (2005), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. John G Neuhoff. 2001. An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion. Ecological Psychology, 13, 2 (2001), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco1302_2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Nargess Nourbakhsh, Yang Wang, Fang Chen, and Rafael A. Calvo. 2012. Using Galvanic Skin Response for Cognitive Load Measurement in Arithmetic and Reading Tasks. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (OzCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 420–423. isbn:9781450314381 https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414602 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Fred GWC Paas, Jeroen JG Van Merriënboer, and Jos J Adam. 1994. Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and motor skills, 79, 1 (1994), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Bryan Reimer and Bruce Mehler. 2011. The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics, 54, 10 (2011), 932–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.604431 PMID: 21973004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Ian H Robertson, Tom Manly, Jackie Andrade, Bart T Baddeley, and Jenny Yiend. 1997. Oops!’: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 6 (1997), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00015-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Jenefer Robinson. 1995. Startle. The Journal of Philosophy, 92, 2 (1995), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940940 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Johannes Schumm, Marc Bächlin, Cornelia Setz, Bert Arnrich, Daniel Roggen, and Gerhard Tröster. 2008. Effect of movements on the electrodermal response after a startle event. Methods of Information in Medicine, 47, 03 (2008), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1109/pcthealth.2008.4571101 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. David Sharek. 2011. A useable, online NASA-TLX tool. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. 55, 1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551286 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Yu Shi, Natalie Ruiz, Ronnie Taib, Eric Choi, and Fang Chen. 2007. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) as an Index of Cognitive Load. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 2651–2656. isbn:9781595936424 https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1241057 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Robert F Simons and Michael F Zelson. 1985. Engaging visual stimuli and reflex blink modification. Psychophysiology, 22, 1 (1985), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01558.x Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Joan G Snodgrass and June Corwin. 1988. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 117, 1 (1988), 34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Utaka S Springer, Alexandra Rosas, John McGetrick, and Dawn Bowers. 2007. Differences in startle reactivity during the perception of angry and fearful faces.. Emotion, 7, 3 (2007), 516. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.516 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Steam. 2023. Steam Store Search. https://store.steampowered.com/search/?ignore_preferences=1&tags=1667&ndl=1 Accessed: 2023-02-15 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Feng-Tso Sun, Cynthia Kuo, Heng-Tze Cheng, Senaka Buthpitiya, Patricia Collins, and Martin Griss. 2012. Activity-aware mental stress detection using physiological sensors. In Mobile Computing, Applications, and Services: Second International ICST Conference, MobiCASE 2010, Santa Clara, CA, USA, October 25-28, 2010, Revised Selected Papers 2. 282–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29336-8_16 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Supermassive Games and 2K. 2022. The Quarry. Game [PS4]. Supermassive Games, Guildford, Surrey, England. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Biopac Systems. 2015. PHASIC EDA: Methods for computing phasic skin conductance from Tonic: BIOPAC. https://www.biopac.com/knowledge-base/phasic-eda-issue/ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Thomas Terkildsen and Guido Makransky. 2019. Measuring presence in video games: An investigation of the potential use of physiological measures as indicators of presence. International journal of human-computer studies, 126 (2019), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. PH Venables and MI Christie. 2012. Mechanisms, Instrumentation, Recording Techniques, and Quantification of Responses. Electrodermal activity in psychological research, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-565950-5.50006-5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Jeremy Winterrowd. 2004. Scary Maze Game. Game [PC]. Jeremy Winterrowd, San Francisco, California, United States Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Yuliya Y Yurko, Mark W Scerbo, Ajita S Prabhu, Christina E Acker, and Dimitrios Stefanidis. 2010. Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simulation in healthcare, 5, 5 (2010), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0b013e3181e3f329 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Work Hard, Scare Hard? An Investigation of How Mental Workload Impacts Jump Scare Intensity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY
      November 2023
      1360 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3554313
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)213
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)46

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader