skip to main content
research-article

Lessons from Homebrewed Hybridity: Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In 2020–2021, under the restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, boardgame players around the world sought out ways to play physical boardgames with each other despite being physically apart. Their creative appropriations of digital technologies and physical tools to allow for hybrid distanced play demonstrate not only the resilience of boardgaming as a hobby, but also provide important insights into the design of novel distanced hybrid digital boardgames (DHDBs). Through a survey of over 1300 respondents, this paper explores the ways distanced players engaged in homebrew practices to make physical boardgame play possible. Through reflexive thematic analysis, we identify three themes that reflect the practical issues players grappled with, including game choice, game mode or setup, and technical implementation. Reflecting on the challenges and opportunities associated with these issues, we consider their implications for DHDB design more generally. In doing so, we present the DHYE (Distanced Hybrid plaY Experience) framework, a practical set of design considerations that emphasises an understanding of distance not simply as an obstacle to enjoyable boardgame play but as an inspiration for novel and meaningful design.

References

  1. Konstantinos Alexandris, T Karagiorgos, A Ntovoli and S Zourladani. 2022. Using the theories of planned behaviour and leisure constraints to study fitness club members' behaviour after Covid-19 lockdown. Leisure Studies, 41 ( 2 ). 247-262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Aloha Hufana Ambe, Alessandro Soro, Daniel Johnson and Margot Brereton. 2022. From Collaborative Habituation to Everyday Togetherness: A Long-Term Study of Use of the Messaging Kettle. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 29 ( 1 ). 1-47. 10.1145/3470973 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Erling Bjögvinsson, Pelle Ehn and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges. Design issues, 28 ( 3 ). 101-116. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. BoardGameGeek. n.d. Distance Gaming Guide | Wiki | BoardGameGeek, https://boardgamegeek.com/wiki/page/Distance_Gaming_Guide. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ian Bogost. 2004. Asynchronous multiplay: Futures for casual multiplayer experience. In Other Players, Center for Computer Games Research, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 6-8 December 2004. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. mr boss. 2020. mr boss' design lair: 10 Board Games to Play Using Video Conferencing., http://mrbossdesign.blogspot.com/ 2020 /03/10-board-games-to-play-using-video.html Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2020. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1080/14780887. 2020.1769238 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 ( 2 ). 77-101. http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Margot Brereton, Min Zhen Chai, Alessandro Soro, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Daniel Johnson, Peta Wyeth, Paul Roe and Yvonne Rogers. 2017. Make and connect: enabling people to connect through their things. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 612-616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Margot Brereton, Alessandro Soro, Kate Vaisutis and Paul Roe. 2015. The messaging kettle: Prototyping connection over a distance between adult children and older parents. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 713-716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oğuz Turan Buruk and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2018. Extracting Design Guidelines for Wearables and Movement in Tabletop Role-Playing Games via a Research rThough Design Process. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Carrie J Cai, Michelle Carney, Nida Zada and Michael Terry. 2021. Breakdowns and Breakthroughs: Observing Musicians' Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rodney P. Carlisle. 2009. Encyclopedia of play in today's society. SAGE, London, UK. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marcus Carter, Mitchell Harrop and Martin Gibbs. 2014. eTh Roll of the Dice in Warhammer 40,000. ToDIGRA: Physical and Digital in Games and Play, 1 ( 3 ). hpt://todigra.org/index.php/todigra/article/view/20/75 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wei-Chi Chien, Marc Hassenzahl and Julika Welge. 2016. Sharing a robotic pet as a maintenance strategy for romantic couples in long-distance relationships. An autobiographical design exploration. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1375-1382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wonock Chung, M Rebecca Genoe, Patara Tavilsup, Samara Stearns and Toni Liechty. 2021. eTh ups and downs of older adults' leisure during the pandemic. World Leisure Journal, 63 ( 3 ). 301-315. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, Gareth Terry and Nikki Hayefild. 2019. eThmatic analysis. In Liamputong, P. ed. Handbook of research methods in health and social sciences, Springer, Singapore, 843-860. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mat Coward-Gibbs. 2020. Why Don't We Play Pandemic? Analog Gaming Communities in Lockdown. Leisure Sciences. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400. 2020.1773986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. crazyrich. 2020. Remote Play Guide, https://www.reddit.com/r/Gloomhaven/comments/fvzj84/remote_play_guide/. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sebastian Deterding and José P Zagal. 2013. Roleplaying Game Studies: A Handbook. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Geofrey Engelstein and Isaac Shalev. 2022. Building blocks of Tabletop Game Design: An Encyclopedia of Mechanisms. CRC Press (Taylor & Francis), Boca Raton, FL. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Timea Farkas, Alena Denisova, Sarah Wiseman and Rebecca Fiebrink. 2022. eTh Eefcts of a Soundtrack on Board Game Player Experience. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502110 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jérémy Frey. 2016. Remote Heart Rate Sensing and Projection to Renew Traditional Board Games and Foster Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, ACM, 1865-1871. hpts://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892391 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Alessandro Gabbiadini, Cristina Baldissarri, Federica Durante, Roberta Rosa Valtorta, Maria De Rosa and Marcello Gallucci. 2020. Together apart: the mitigating role of digital communication technologies on negative afect during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy. Frontiers in psychology, 11. 2763. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sean Gammon and Gregory Ramshaw. 2021. Distancing from the present: Nostalgia and leisure in lockdown. Leisure Sciences, 43 ( 1-2 ). 131-137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jaina Grey. 2020. 6 Best Boardgames You Can Play Over Zoom Wired, hpts://www.wired.com/gallery/board-games-for-remote-play/. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tim Harding. 2010. Correspondence Chess in Britain and Ireland 1824-1987. McFarland & Company, London, UK. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Yasamin Heshmat and Carman Neustaedter. 2021. Family and friend communication over distance in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, 1-14. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Petros Ioannidis and Anders Sundnes Løvlie. 2022. Exploring afordances through design-after-design: the repurposing of an exhibition artefact by museum visitors. In Creativity and Cognition, 125-134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ville Kankainen and Janne Paavilainen. 2019. Hybrid Board Game Design Guidelines DiGRA 2019, Kyoto, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. James C Kaufman and Ronald A Begheto. 2009. Beyond big and lilte: eTh four c model of creativity. Review of general psychology, 13 ( 1 ). 1-12. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Young-Jae Kim, Jeong-Hyung Cho and Yeon-Ji Park. 2020. Leisure sports participants' engagement in preventive health behaviors and their experience of constraints on performing leisure activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 589708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Nurit Kirshenbaum. 2021. Research through Design of Bendable Interactive Playing Cards, University of Hawai'i at Manoa. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Erica Kleinman, Sara Chojnacki and Magy Seif El-Nasr. 2021. eTh gang's all here: How people used games to cope with COVID19 quarantine. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tifany Knearem, Xiying Wang, Jiaan Wan and John M Carroll. 2019. Craiftng in a community of practice: Resource sharing as key in supporting creativity. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition, 83-94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Bret Lashua, Corey W Johnson and Diana C Parry. 2021. Leisure in the time of coronavirus: A rapid response special issue. Leisure Sciences, 43 ( 1-2 ). 6-11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Bernhard Maurer and Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3 ( 4 ). 72. hpts://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040072 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Mikko Meriläinen. 2022. Pandemic rhythms: Adults' gaming in Finland during the spring 2020 COVID-19 restrictions. Convergence. 13548565221077582. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Chelsea Mills, Carman Neustaedter and William Odom. 2021. Distributed Leter Jam: Designing Distributed Board Game Play for Social Connection. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481753 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Florian Mueller, Sophie Stellmach, Saul Greenberg, Andreas Dippon, Susanne Boll, Jayden Garner, Rohit Khot, Amani Naseem and David Altimira. 2014. Proxemics play: understanding proxemics for designing digital play experiences. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems, 533-542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Harold James Ruthven Murray. 1913. A History of Chess. Benjamin Press, Northampton, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jasmin Odenwald, Sven Bertel and Florian Echtler. 2020. Tabletop teleporter: evaluating the immersiveness of remote board gaming. In Proceedings of the 9TH ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays, 79-86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ana Patrícia Oliveira, Micael Sousa, Mário Vairinhos and Nelson Zagalo. 2020. Towards a new hybrid game model: designing tangible experiences. In 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), IEEE, 1-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Patrick Pollok, André Am,ft Kathleen Diener, Dirk Lügtens and Frank T. Piller. 2021. Knowledge diversity and team creativity: How hobbyists beat professional designers in creating novel board games. Research Policy, 50 ( 8 ). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol. 2020.104174 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Nathaniel Poor. 2014. Computer game modders' motivations and sense of community: A mixed-methods approach. New Media & Dociety, 16 ( 8 ). 1249-1267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Hector Postigo. 2007. Of mods and modders: Chasing down the value of fan-based digital game modicfiations. Games and Culture, 2 ( 4 ). 300-313. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Lewis Pulsipher. 2006. eTh Essence of Euro-style Games. eTh Games Journal. http://thegamesjournal.com/articles/Essence.shtml Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Argenis Ramirez Gomez and Katarzyna Stawarz. 2022. Socially distanced games: Exploring the future opportunities of remote play. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 93-102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Johan Redström. 2008. RE: Denfiitions of use. Design studies, 29 ( 4 ). 410-423. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Olivia K. Richards, Gabriela Marcu and Robin N. Brewer. 2021. Hugs, Bible Study, and Speakeasies: Designing for Older Adults' Multimodal Connectedness Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, Association for Computing Machinery, Virtual Event, USA, 815-831. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Tia Rogers-Jarrell, Deanna Vervaecke and Brad A Meisner. 2021. Intergenerational family leisure in the COVID19 pandemic: Some potentials, pitfalls, and paradoxes. World Leisure Journal, 63 ( 3 ). 316-329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2018. Cooperating to Compete: the Mutuality of Cooperation and Competition in Boardgame Play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada, ACM, 1-13. 10.1145/3173574.3173767 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs and Wally Smith. 2016. “I Love All the Bits”: eTh Materiality of Boardgames. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 3956-3969. 10.1145/2858036.2858433 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Sophie O. Freeman. 2023. Escaping the Laboratorium of Dr Moustache: Learning About Distanced Play rThough Game Design. In DiGRA Australia 2023, Sydney, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Sophie O. Freeman. 2022. eTh SMeFT Decks: A Card-Based Ideation Tool for Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI22), Canberra, Australia, ACM.. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572921.3572933 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. More aThn a Gimmick-Digital Tools for Boardgame Play. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5 (CHI PLAY). Article 261. 10.1145/3474688 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Melissa J. Rogerson, Lucy A. Sparrow and Martin R. Gibbs. 2021. Unpacking “Boardgames with Apps”: eTh Hybrid Digital Boardgame Model. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-17. 10.1145/3411764.3445077 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Diane M Samdahl. 2021. Advice for leisure studies: reeflctions on the pandemic from a retired professor. Leisure Sciences, 43 ( 1-2 ). 247-251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Kjeld Schmidt and Liam Bannon. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1 ( 1-2 ). 7-40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Heather Schwedel. 2020. eTh Ingenious Ways People Are Playing Board Games on Zoom: Everyone has a Codenames method. Slate, https://slate.com/human-interest/ 2020 /03/board-games-video-chat-codenames.html. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Paul Scriven. 2021. From Tabletop to Screen: Playing Dungeons and Dragons during COVID-19. Societies, 11 ( 4 ). 125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Xiangyou Shen, Megan MacDonald, Samuel W Logan, Colby Parkinson, Lydia Gorrell and Bridget E Hatefild. 2022. Leisure engagement during COVID-19 and its association with mental health and wellbeing in US adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 ( 3 ). 1081. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, Yee Loong Ooi, Alissa N Antle and Brendan Matkin. 2017. Flex-N-Feel: ehT design and evaluation of emotive gloves for couples to support touch over distance. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 98-110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Olli Sotamaa. 2010. When the game is not enough: Motivations and practices among computer game modding culture. Games and Culture, 5 ( 3 ). 239-255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Philip Tchernavskij, Andrew M Webb, Hayden Gemeinhardt and Wendy E Mackay. 2022. Readymades & Repertoires: Artifact-Mediated Improvisation in Tabletop Role-Playing Games. In Creativity and Cognition, 298-311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Gareth Terry and Nikki Hayefild. 2021. Essentials of eThmatic Analysis. American Psychological Society, Washington, DC. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Anna Vallgårda and Ylva Fernaeus. 2015. Interaction design as a bricolage practice. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, 173-180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Elise van den Hoven and Ali Mazalek. 2007. Tangible play: research and design for tangible and tabletop games. In International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces: Proceedings of the 12 th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, Citeseer, 6-6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Marco van Leeuwen, Yvonne Klerks, Bertine Bargeman, Jasper Heslinga and Marcel Bastiaansen. 2020. Leisure will not be locked down-insights on leisure and COVID-19 from the Netherlands. World Leisure Journal, 62 ( 4 ). 339-343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Dulakshi Wannigamage, Michael Barlow, Erandi Lakshika and Kathryn Kasmarik. 2020. Analysis and prediction of player population changes in digital games during the COVID-19 pandemic. In AI 2020: Advances in Articfiial Intelligence: 33rd Australasian Joint Conference, AI 2020, Canberra, ACT, Australia, November 29-30, 2020, Proceedings 33, Springer, 458-469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. DJ Williams. 2021. From gym rat to rock star! Negotiating constraints to leisure experience via a strengths and substitutability approach. Leisure Sciences, 43 ( 1-2 ). 31-35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Lillian Yang and Carman Neustaedter. 2020. An autobiographical design study of a long distance relationship: When telepresence robots meet smart home tools. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 129-140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Marié EM Young. 2020. Leisure pursuits in South Africa as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. World leisure journal, 62 ( 4 ). 331-335. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Xuqin Yu, Masa Inakage and Atsuro Ueki. 2021. Aesthetic nostalgia mediated design for long distance relationship. In 10th International Conference on Digital and Interactive Arts, 1-5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Ye Yuan, Jan Cao, Ruotong Wang and Svetlana Yarosh. 2021. Tabletop Games in the Age of Remote Collaboration: Design Opportunities for a Socially Connected Game Experience. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan, Association for Computing Machinery, Article 436. hpts://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445512 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. [G1] Adrian Adamescu and Daryl Andrews. 2017. Sagrada, Floodgate Games, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. [G2] Rob Angel. 1985. Pictionary, Hasbro, Pawtucket, RI, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. [G3] Mr. Bistro, J. Arthur Ellis, and Isaac Vega. 2020. Forgotten Waters, Plaid Hat Games, Ashland, OH, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. [G4] Inka Brand, Markus Brand, and Ralph Querfurth. 2019. Exit: The Game-Theft on the Mississippi, KOSMOS, Stuttgart, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. [G5] Alfred Mosher Butts. 1948. Scrabble, James Brunot, Newtown, CT. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. [G6] Allan B. Calhamer. 1959. Diplomacy, The Avalon Hill Game Co, Renton, WA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. [G7] Isaac Childres. 2017. Gloomhaven, Cephalofair Games, Lafayette, IN, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. [G8] Vlaada Chvátil. 2015. Codenames, Czech Games Edition, Kladno, Czech Republic. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. [G9] David Cicurel. 2018. Chronicles of Crime, Lucky Duck Games, Kraków, Poland. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. [G10] Rob Daviau and Matt Leacock. 2015. Pandemic Legacy: Season 1, Z-Man Games, Mahopac, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. [G11] Cyril Demaegd. 2017. Unlock! The Formula, Space Cowboys, Boulogne, France. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. [G12] Paul Dennen. 2016. Clank! A Deck-Building Adventure, Renegade Game Studios, San Diego, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. [G13] Richard Garfield. 2016. Hive Mind, Calliope Games, Asheville, NC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. [G14] Richard Garfield. 1993. Magic: The Gathering, Wizards of the Coast, Seattle, WA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  90. [G15] Richard Garfield. 1994. RoboRally, Wizards of the Coast, Renton, WA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. [G16] Raymond Edwards, Suzanne Goldberg and Gary Grady. 1982. Sherlock Holmes: Consulting Detective, Sleuth Publications. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. [G17] Gary Gygax and Dave Arneson. 1973. Dungeons and Dragons, TSR, Inc, Lake Geneva, WI. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. [G18] Nathan I. Hajek and Grace Holdinghaus. 2019. The Lord of the Rings: Journeys in Middle-Earth, Fantasy Flight Games, Roseville, MN. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. [G19] Nick Hayes. 2013. Heads Up! Party Game, Spin Master Ltd, Toronto, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. [G20] Reiner Knizia. 2020. My City, Kosmos, Stuttgart, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. [G21] Kevin Lanzing. 2011. Flash Point: Fire Rescue, Indie Boards & Cards, Oakland, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. [G22] Alan R. Moon. 2004. Ticket to Ride, Days of Wonder. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. [G23] Parker Brothers. 1988. Scattergories, Pawtucket, RI, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. [G24] Anthony Ernest Pratt and Elva Pratt. 1944. Cluedo (US title: Clue), Hasbro, Pawtucket, RI, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. [G25] Uwe Rosenberg. 2019. Second Chance, Edition Spielwiese, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. [G26] Ludovic Roudy and Bruno Sautter. 2018. Just One, Repos Production, Brussels, Belgium. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. [G27] Sid Sackson. 1980. Can't Stop, Parker Brothers, Pawtucket, RI, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. [G28] Jun Sasaki. 2020. Ninja Catfoot and the Covert Action, Oink Games, Japan. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. [G29] Andreas Seyfarth. 2002. Puerto Rico, Alea, Bernau am Chiemsee, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. [G30] Ondra Skoupý. 2019. Letter Jam, Czech Games Edition. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. [G31] Benoit Turpin. 2018. Welcome To... Blue Cocker Games, Toulouse, France. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. [G32] Phil Walker-Harding. 2013. Sushi GO !, Adventureland Games, Sydney, Australia. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. [G33] Martin Wallace. 2007. Brass (Brass: Lancashire), Warfrog Games, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. [G34] Wolfgang Warsch. 2018. The Quacks of Quedlinburg (Die Quacksalber von Quedlinburg), Schmidt Spiele, Berlin, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. [G35] Peter Wichmann. 2017. NMBR 9, Abacusspiele, Dreieich, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Lessons from Homebrewed Hybridity: Designing Hybrid Digital Boardgames for Distanced Play

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY
      November 2023
      1360 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3554313
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader