skip to main content
research-article

If at First You Don’t Succeed: Helping Players Make Progress in Games with Breaks and Checkpoints

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Developing skill and overcoming in-game challenges is of great interest to both players and game designers. Players can improve through repetition, but sometimes practice does not lead to improvement and progress stalls. It would be useful if designers could help players make progress without compromising their long-term skill development. We carried out a study to investigate how two techniques—checkpoints and breaks—affect in-game progress and player skill. Checkpoints allow multiple attempts at a challenge without having to repeat earlier sections; this aids progress, but could potentially hinder skill development. Second, breaks in gameplay have been shown to accelerate skill development, but their effectiveness is unknown when the breaks are integrated into the game's design. Our study evaluated the effects of game-integrated breaks and checkpoints on players' in-game progress (when the techniques were present) as well as two test sessions (with all techniques removed). Our results showed that both checkpoints and breaks aid progress (combining both had the largest effect) and that neither technique reduced performance in the transfer task, suggesting that skill development was not hindered. Our work provides evidence that checkpoints and breaks are valuable techniques that can assist both player progress and skill.

References

  1. Vero Vanden Abeele, Katta Spiel, Lennart Nacke, Daniel Johnson, and Kathrin Gerling. 2020. Development and validation of the player experience inventory: A scale to measure player experiences at the level of functional and psychosocial consequences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 135 (2020), 3, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102370 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Phillip L Ackerman, Ruth Kanfer, Stacey W Shapiro, Sunni Newton, and Margaret E Beier. 2010. Cognitive Fatigue During Testing: An Examination of Trait, Time-on-Task, and Strategy Influences. Human Performance, 23, 5 (2010), 10, 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2010.517720 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. John R. Anderson. 1982. Acquisition of cognitive skill.. Psychological Review, 89, 4 (1982), 369–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Batman: Arkham Wiki. 2021. Game over scenes. https://batmanarkham.fandom.com/wiki/Game_over_scenes Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Aaron S. Benjamin and Jonathan Tullis. 2010. What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61, 3 (2010), nov, 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.05.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2 (2006), jan, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nicholas J. Cepeda, Harold Pashler, Edward Vul, John T. Wixted, and Doug Rohrer. 2006. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 3 (2006), 354–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gifford K. Cheung, Thomas Zimmermann, and Nachiappan Nagappan. 2014. The first hour experience. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658540 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S E Criscimagna-Hemminger and R Shadmehr. 2008. Consolidation Patterns of Human Motor Memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 39 (2008), 9, 9610–9618. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3071-08.2008 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Marjorie Ann M. Cuerdo, Anika Mahajan, and Edward F. Melcer. 2021. Die-r Consequences: Player Experience and the Design of Failure through Respawning Mechanics. In 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/cog52621.2021.9618894 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D Derryberry and M Reed. 2002. Anxiety Related Attentional Biases and Their Regulation by Attentional Control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 2 (2002), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.111.2.225 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. John J. Donovan and David J. Radosevich. 1999. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don’t.. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 5 (1999), 795–805. isbn:0021-9010 issn:0021-9010 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.795 arxiv:00028282. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. DoubleDutch Games. 2016. SpeedRunners. Game [PC]. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, and Albert-Georg Lang. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 4 (2009), nov, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Field. 2018. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications. isbn:9781526419521 lccn:2017954636 https://books.google.ca/books?id=0QTyswEACAAJ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabio E. Fontana, Ovande Furtado, Oldemar Mazzardo, and Jere D. Gallagher. 2009. Whole and Part Practice: A Meta-Analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 2 (2009), oct, 517–530. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.109.2.517-530 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. John R. Frederiksen and Barbara Y. White. 1989. An approach to training based upon principled task decomposition. Acta Psychologica, 71, 1-3 (1989), 89–146. isbn:0001-6918 issn:00016918 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(89)90006-1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. James Paul Gee. 2005. Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines. E-Learning, 2, 1 (2005), 5–16. isbn:0820497037 issn:1741-8887 https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Giant Bomb. 2019. Checkpoints (Concept). https://www.giantbomb.com/checkpoints/3015-292/ Accessed February 5, 2021. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Diane L. Gill and Thomas E. Deeter. 1988. Development of the sport orientation questionnaire. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 3 (1988), 191–202. isbn:0270-1367 issn:21683824 https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1988.10605504 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Daniel Gopher, Maya Weil, and Daniel Siegel. 1989. Practice under changing priorities: An approach to the training of complex skills. Acta Psychologica, 71, 1 (1989), 147–177. issn:0001-6918 https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(89)90007-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Douglas L Hintzman. 1974. Theoretical Implications of the Spacing Effect. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 77–99. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L. Cox, Ara Avakian, and Thomas Knoll. 2014. Player Strategies: Achieving Breakthroughs and Progressing in Single-Player and Cooperative Games. Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play - CHI PLAY ’14, 131–140. isbn:9781450330145 https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658697 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Colby Johanson. 2020. colbyj/bride-of-frankensystem 1.1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3738761 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Colby Johanson, Carl Gutwin, Jason T. Bowey, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2019. Press Pause when you Play. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347195 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jesper Juul. 2009. Fear of failing? the many meanings of difficulty in video games. The video game theory reader, 2, 237-252 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Jesper Juul. 2013. The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Raph Koster. 2013. Theory of fun for game design. O’Reilly Media, Inc.. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ben Kuchera. 2014. The passion of the checkpoint: Why gaming’s most frustrating failure is so hard to fix. Polygon, https://www.polygon.com/2014/2/25/5422328/the-passion-of-the-checkpoint-why-gamings-most-frustrating-failure-is Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Timothy D. Lee and Elizabeth D. Genovese. 1988. Distribution of Practice in Motor Skill Acquisition: Learning and Performance Effects Reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 4 (1988), dec, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1988.10609373 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. R.A. Magill. 2007. Motor Learning and Control: Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill. isbn:9780071106979 lccn:2006048123 https://books.google.ca/books?id=rCPdAAAACAAJ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Spero A Metalis. 1985. Effects of massed versus distributed practice on acquisition of video game skill.. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Vol 61(2), 457–458. issn:0031-5125 https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1985.61.2.457 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Everett Mettler, Christine M. Massey, and Philip J. Kellman. 2016. A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 7 (2016), jul, 897–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000170 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. James C. Naylor and George E. Briggs. 1963. Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 3 (1963), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041060 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Allen Newell and Paul S Rosenbloom. 1981. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cognitive skills and their Acquisition, 6 (1981), 1–55. isbn:0898590930 issn:0262680718 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nintendo. 2021. Wii - Health and Safety Precautions. Nintendo, https://www.nintendo.com/consumer/systems/wii/en_na/health_safety.jsp Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Nintendo EAD. 1990. Super Mario World. Game [SNES]. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Brandon Piller, Colby Johanson, Cody Phillips, Carl Gutwin, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2020. Is a Change as Good as a Rest? Comparing Break Types for Spaced Practice in a Platformer Game. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410404.3414225 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Barbara J. Pollock and Timothy D. Lee. 1992. Effects of the Model’s Skill Level on Observational Motor Learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 1 (1992), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10607553 PMID: 1574658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Andrew K Przybylski, C Scott Rigby, and Richard M Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement.. Review of General Psychology, 14, 2 (2010), 154–166. issn:1939-1552 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Mary A. Pyc and Katherine A. Rawson. 2009. Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 4 (2009), may, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Falko Rheinberg, Regina Vollmeyer, and Bruce D Burns. 2001. QCM: A questionnaire to assess current motivation in learning situations. Diagnostica, 47, 2 (2001), 57–66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Scott Rogers. 2014. Level Up! The guide to great video game design. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Kelly Braun David C Rubin. 1998. The Spacing Effect Depends on an Encoding Deficit, Retrieval, and Time in Working Memory: Evidence. Memory, 6, 1 (1998), 1, 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/741941599 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 4 (2006), 347–363. isbn:0146-7239 issn:01467239 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Richard A. Schmidt. 1975. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.. Psychological Review, 82, 4 (1975), jul, 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Richard A. Schmidt, Timothy D. Lee, C.J. Winstein, G. Wulf, and H.N. Zelaznik. 2018. Motor Control and Learning, 6E. Langara College. isbn:9781492560340 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Charles H. Shea and Robert M. Kohl. 1990. Specificity and Variability of Practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 2 (1990), jun, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1990.10608671 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Wayne L Shebilske, Barry P Goettl, Kip Corrington, and Eric Anthony Day. 1999. Interlesson spacing and task-related processing during complex skill acquisition.. 413–437 pages. isbn:1939-2192(Electronic),1076-898X(Print) https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.5.4.413 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Nicholas C. Soderstrom and Robert A. Bjork. 2015. Learning Versus Performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 2 (2015), 176–199. isbn:9780262090339 issn:1745-6916 https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Tom Stafford, Sam Delvin, Rafet Sifa, and Anders Drachen. 2017. Exploration and Skill Acquisition in a Major Online Game. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. isbn:0000000277693 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Tom Stafford and Erwin Haasnoot. 2016. Testing Sleep Consolidation in Skill Learning: A Field Study Using an Online Game. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 2 (2016), nov, 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12232 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Team Meat. 2010. Super Meat Boy. Game [PC]. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Caitlin Tenison and John R. Anderson. 2017. The impact of practice frequency on learning and retention. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 1175–1180. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. The Jamovi project. 2022. jamovi (Version 3.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. L Thomsen, F Petersen, A Drachen, and P Babaei. 2016. Identifying Onboarding Heuristics for Free-to- Play Mobile Games : A Mixed Methods Approach Identifying Onboarding Heuristics for Free-to-Play. 1–8. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. P D Tomporowski. 2003. The Psychology of Skill: A Life-span Approach. Praeger Publishers. isbn:9780275975937 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas C. Toppino and Emilie Gerbier. 2014. About Practice. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Elsevier, 113–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00004-4 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. TV Tropes. 2021. Auto-Save - TV Tropes. https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Autosave Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. u/Cosmic Colin. 2014. r/truegaming - Is using save states really cheating? reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/truegaming/comments/24miq7/is_using_save_states_really_cheating/ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. u/imaunitard. 2012. r/gaming - Why not take a break? reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/x6exy/why_not_take_a_break/ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. u/Kizuxtheo. 2018. r/Megaman - Thoughts on save states? reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Megaman/comments/7ij4so/thoughts_on_save_states/ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. F Martijn Verhoeven and Karl M Newell. 2018. Unifying practice schedules in the timescales of motor learning and performance. Human Movement Science, 59 (2018), 153–169. issn:0167-9457 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Regina Vollmeyer and Falko Rheinberg. 2006. Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3 (2006), 239–253. isbn:1040726X issn:1040726X https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9017-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. L.S. Vygotsky. 1978. Interaction between learning and development. 79–91 pages. isbn:9780674576292 issn:00063495 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79572-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Waluigilicious. 2016. Save states on old games. Let’s end this argument for good.. NeoGAF, https://www.neogaf.com/threads/save-states-on-old-games-lets-end-this-argument-for-good.1209168/ Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Brian M. Winn. 2009. The Design, Play, and Experience Framework. In Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. IGI Global, 1010–1024. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781599048086.ch058 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Gabriele Wulf and Charles H. Shea. 2002. Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 2 (2002), jun, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196276 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. If at First You Don’t Succeed: Helping Players Make Progress in Games with Breaks and Checkpoints

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY
      November 2023
      1360 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3554313
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CHI PLAY

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)111
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader