skip to main content
10.1145/3613372.3613384acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding and Supporting Neurodiverse Software Developers in Agile Teams

Published:25 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The software development industry is gradually fostering diversity within its workforce. Recognizing that diverse teams often produce superior results, companies are increasingly committing to creating more inclusive environments. Diversity encompasses many dimensions such as gender, race/ethnicity, age, nationality, and neurodiversity. While gender has been the most extensively addressed dimension in software engineering research, the focus on neurodiversity has been primarily directed towards users, rather than developers. Developers with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) face unique challenges due to difficulties with executive functions, the cognitive processes essential for behavioral control. These processes include skills such as inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, working memory, and planning, all of which are vital for effective teamwork and job performance. In this pilot study, we attempt to fill the existing knowledge gap about neurodiverse software developers. Using a socio-technical grounded theory approach, we investigate the challenges these developers face and explore how adjustments to agile team practices could enhance their comfort. The emergent results from this study present promising insights and implications for research about neurodiverse software developers, contributing to a more inclusive and productive workplace environment.

References

  1. Hala Annabi and Jill Locke. 2019. A theoretical framework for investigating the context for creating employment success in information technology for individuals with autism. Journal of Management & Organization 25, 4 (2019), 499–515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hala Annabi, Karthika Sundaresan, and Annuska Zolyomi. 2017. It’s not just about attention to details: Redefining the talents autistic software developers bring to software development. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 ed.). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC. 52 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robert D Austin and Gary P Pisano. 2017. Neurodiversity as a competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 95, 3 (2017), 96–103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Edna Dias Canedo, Heloise Acco Tives, Madianita Bogo Marioti, Fabiano Fagundes, and José Antonio Siqueira de Cerqueira. 2019. Barriers faced by women in software development projects. Information 10, 10 (2019), 309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maitraye Das, John Tang, Kathryn E Ringland, and Anne Marie Piper. 2021. Towards accessible remote work: Understanding work-from-home practices of neurodivergent professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Diamond. 2020. Biological and social influences on cognitive control processes dependent on prefrontal cortex. Progress in Brain Research 247 (2020), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.02.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Diamond. 2022. Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology 73 (2022), 431–471. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-052120-123905Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. R. Drechsler, S. Brem, D. Brandeis, E. Grünblatt, G. Berger, and S. Walitza. 2020. ADHD: Current Concepts and Treatments in Children and Adolescents. Neuropediatrics 51, 5 (2020), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701658Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Stephen V Faraone, Tobias Banaschewski, David Coghill, Yi Zheng, Joseph Biederman, Mark A Bellgrove, Jeffrey H Newcorn, Martin Gignac, Nouf M Al Saud, Iris Manor, 2021. The world federation of ADHD international consensus statement: 208 evidence-based conclusions about the disorder. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 128 (2021), 789–818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Temple Grandin. 2022. Visual Thinking: The Hidden Gifts of People Who Think in Pictures, Patterns, and Abstractions. Penguin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rashina Hoda. 2021. Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 10 (2021), 3808–3832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Terrell Holmes and Hala Annabi. 2020. The dark side of software development: job stress amongst autistic software developers. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Martine Hoogman, Marije Stolte, Matthijs Baas, and Evelyn Kroesbergen. 2020. Creativity and ADHD: A review of behavioral studies, the effect of psychostimulants and neural underpinnings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 119 (2020), 66–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. KT. Hovik, J. Egeland, PK. Isquith, G. Gioia, EW. Skogli, PN. Andersen, and M. Øie. 2017. Distinct Patterns of Everyday Executive Function Problems Distinguish Children With Tourette Syndrome From Children With ADHD or Autism Spectrum Disorders. J Atten Disord 21, 10 (2017), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714550336Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kathleen E Hupfeld, Tessa R Abagis, and Priti Shah. 2019. Living “in the zone”: hyperfocus in adult ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders 11 (2019), 191–208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Maria Kozhevnikov. 2007. Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: toward an integrated framework of cognitive style.Psychological bulletin 133, 3 (2007), 464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. D. Lezak, D. B. Mowieson, and D. W. Loring. 2004. Neuropshychological assessment. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Meredith Ringel Morris, Andrew Begel, and Ben Wiedermann. 2015. Understanding the challenges faced by neurodiverse software engineering employees: Towards a more inclusive and productive technical workforce. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on computers & accessibility. 173–184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Parhoon, A. Moradi, H. Alizadeh, H. Parhoon, DP. Sadaphal, and FL. Coolidge. 2022. Psychometric properties of the behavior rating inventory of executive function, second edition (BRIEF2) in a sample of children with ADHD in Iran. Child Neuropsychol 28, 4 (2022), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2021.1975669Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Igor Poncell and Kiev Gama. 2022. Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives in Brazilian Software Development Companies: Comparing the Perspectives of Managers and Developers. In Proceedings of the XXXVI Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. 41–46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Judy Robertson, Stuart Gray, Martin Toye, and Josephine Booth. 2020. The relationship between executive functions and computational thinking. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools 3, 4 (2020), 35–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Gema Rodríguez-Pérez, Reza Nadri, and Meiyappan Nagappan. 2021. Perceived diversity in software engineering: a systematic literature review. Empirical Software Engineering 26, 5 (2021), 1–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Karina Kohl Silveira and Rafael Prikladnicki. 2019. A systematic mapping study of diversity in software engineering: a perspective from the agile methodologies. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 12th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). IEEE, 7–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. Sonuga-Barke and A. Thapar. 2021. The neurodiversity concept: is it helpful for clinicians and scientists?Lancet Psychiatry 8, 7 (2021), 559–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00167-XGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. StackOverflow. 2022. Developer Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Tamm, PA. Nakonezny, and CW. Hughes. 2014. An open trial of a metacognitive executive function training for young children with ADHD. J Atten Disord 18, 6 (2014), 551–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712445782Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Understanding and Supporting Neurodiverse Software Developers in Agile Teams

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBES '23: Proceedings of the XXXVII Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering
      September 2023
      570 pages
      ISBN:9798400707872
      DOI:10.1145/3613372

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 September 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate147of427submissions,34%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)221
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)29

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format