skip to main content
10.1145/3613904.3642292acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touching the Moon: Leveraging Passive Haptics, Embodiment and Presence for Operational Assessments in Virtual Reality

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Space agencies are in the process of drawing up carefully thought-out Concepts of Operations (ConOps) for future human missions on the Moon. These are typically assessed and validated through costly and logistically demanding analogue field studies. While interactive simulations in Virtual Reality (VR) offer a comparatively cost-effective alternative, they have faced criticism for lacking the fidelity of real-world deployments. This paper explores the applicability of passive haptic interfaces in bridging the gap between simulated and real-world ConOps assessments. Leveraging passive haptic props (equipment mockup and astronaut gloves), we virtually recreated the Apollo 12 mission procedure and assessed it with experienced astronauts and other space experts. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicate that haptics increased presence and embodiment, thus improving perceived simulation fidelity and validity of user reflections. We conclude by discussing the potential role of passive haptic modalities in facilitating early-stage ConOps assessments for human endeavours on the Moon and beyond.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Video Preview
Video Preview
MP4 File - Video Presentation
Video Presentation
Transcript for: Video Presentation
MP4 File - Video Figure
A video figure show casing the virtual application and hardware used for the experiment.

References

[1]
Andrew F J Abercromby, Michael L Gernhardt, and Jennifer Jadwick. 2013. Evaluation of dual multi-mission space exploration vehicle operations during simulated planetary surface exploration. Acta Astronautica 90, 2 (2013), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.022
[2]
Ferran Argelaguet, Ludovic Hoyet, Michael Trico, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2016. The Role of Interaction in Virtual Embodiment: Effects of the Virtual Hand Representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces(VR’16). IEEE, Greenville, SC, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504682
[3]
Axiom Space. 2023. The Next-Generation Spacesuit. https://www.axiomspace.com/axiom-suit
[4]
Katie Aylward, Joakim Dahlman, Kjetil Nordby, and Monica Lundh. 2021. Using Operational Scenarios in a Virtual Reality Enhanced Design Process. Education Sciences 11, 8 (2021), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080448
[5]
Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic Retargeting: Dynamic Repurposing of Passive Haptics for Enhanced Virtual Reality Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1968–1979. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858226
[6]
Neil T. Banerjee, Alex J. Baughman, Shu Yu Lin, Zoë A. Witte, David M. Klaus, and Allison P. Anderson. 2021. Development of alternative reality environments for spacecraft habitat design evaluation. Virtual Reality 25, 2 (6 2021), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10055-020-00462-6/METRICS
[7]
Aaron Bangor, Philip T. Kortum, and James T. Miller. 2008. An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776 24, 6 (8 2008), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
[8]
K H Beaton, S P Chappell, A F J Abercromby, M J Miller, S E Kobs Nawotniak, A L Brady, A H Stevens, S J Payler, S S Hughes, and D S S Lim. 2019. Assessing the Acceptability of Science Operations Concepts and the Level of Mission Enhancement of Capabilities for Human Mars Exploration Extravehicular Activity. Astrobiology 19, 3 (2019), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1912
[9]
Kara H Beaton, Steven P Chappell, Andrew F J Abercromby, Matthew J Miller, Shannon E Kobs Nawotniak, Allyson L Brady, Adam H Stevens, Samuel J Payler, Scott S Hughes, and Darlene S S Lim. 2019. Using Science-Driven Analog Research to Investigate Extravehicular Activity Science Operations Concepts and Capabilities for Human Planetary Exploration. Astrobiology 19, 3 (2019), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2018.1861
[10]
Kara H Beaton, Steven P Chappell, Alex Menzies, Victor Luo, So Young Kim-Castet, Dava Newman, Jeffrey Hoffman, Johannes Norheim, Eswar Anandapadmanaban, Stewart P Abercrombie, Shannon E Kobs Nawotniak, Andrew F J Abercromby, and Darlene S S Lim. 2020. Mission enhancing capabilities for science-driven exploration extravehicular activity derived from the NASA BASALT research program. Planetary and Space Science 193 (2020), 105003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2020.105003
[11]
L. Bessone, F. Sauro, and H. Stevenin. 2015. Training Safe and Effective Spaceflight Operations Using Terrestrial Analogues. In Space Safety is No Accident. Springer, Cham, Friedrichshafen, Germany, 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15982-9_37
[12]
Olaf Blanke and Thomas Metzinger. 2009. Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 1 (1 2009), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.003
[13]
Matthew Botvinick and Jonathan Cohen. 1998. Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 6669 (1998), 756. https://doi.org/10.1038/35784
[14]
John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry. CRC Press, London, United Kingdom, 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
[15]
Andrea E.M. Casini, Petra Mittler, Aidan Cowley, Lukas Schlüter, Marthe Faber, Beate Fischer, Melanie von der Wiesche, and Matthias Maurer. 2020. Lunar analogue facilities development at EAC: the LUNA project. Journal of Space Safety Engineering 7, 4 (12 2020), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2020.05.002
[16]
David Coan. 2020. Exploration EVA System Concept of Operations. Technical Report. NASA, Los Altos. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205008200
[17]
Mary Connors, Dean Eppler, and Daniel Morrow. 1994. Interviews with the Apollo lunar surface astronauts in support of planning for EVA systems design. Technical Report. NASA, Los Altos.
[18]
Henrique G. Debarba, Eray Molla, Bruno Herbelin, and Ronan Boulic. 2015. Characterizing embodied interaction in First and Third Person Perspective viewpoints. In 2015 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, Arles, France, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/3DUI.2015.7131728
[19]
Diane Dewez, Ludovic Hoyet, Anatole Lécuyer, and Ferran Argelaguet Sanz. 2021. Towards “Avatar-Friendly” 3D Manipulation Techniques: Bridging the Gap Between Sense of Embodiment and Interaction in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445379
[20]
Dean B Eppler. 1991. Lighting constraints on lunar surface operations. Technical Report. NASA.
[21]
J Eubanks, A G Moore, P A Fishwick, and R P McMahan. 2020. The Effects of Body Tracking Fidelity on Embodiment of an Inverse-Kinematic Avatar for Male Participants. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00025
[22]
Jakob Frohner, Gionata Salvietti, Philipp Beckerle, and Domenico Prattichizzo. 2019. Can Wearable Haptic Devices Foster the Embodiment of Virtual Limbs?IEEE Transactions on Haptics 12, 3 (7 2019), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2889497
[23]
Geoffrey Gorisse, Audrey Brousse, Simon Richir, and Olivier Christmann. 2021. Quantitative and Qualitative Exploration of the Effect of a Wearable Item on Non-Organic Virtual Limb Embodiment and User Behavior in Immersive Environments. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality 30 (12 2021), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00389
[24]
Geoffrey Gorisse, Olivier Christmann, Samory Houzangbe, and Simon Richir. 2019. From robot to virtual doppelganger: Impact of visual fidelity of avatars controlled in third-person perspective on embodiment and behavior in immersive virtual environments. Frontiers Robotics AI 6, FEB (2 2019), 412036. https://doi.org/10.3389/FROBT.2019.00008/BIBTEX
[25]
Thomas G Grubb, W Brent Garry, Dylan Z Baker, Jeffrey C Hosler, Matthew A Brandt, and Troy J Ames. 2020. Using Virtual Reality for Science Missions At The Lunar South Pole. Technical Report. NASA.
[26]
Sandra G. Hart. 2006. Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50, 9 (10 2006), 904–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000909
[27]
Ken Hinckley, Randy Pausch, John C Goble, and Neal F Kassell. 1994. Passive Real-World Interface Props for Neurosurgical Visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191821
[28]
H.G. Hoffman. 1998. Physically touching virtual objects using tactile augmentation enhances the realism of virtual environments. In Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180)(VR’98). IEEE Comput. Soc, Atlanta, GA, USA, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1998.658423
[29]
Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn, Yvonne A.W. De Kort, and Antal Haans. 2006. Is This My Hand I See Before Me? The Rubber Hand Illusion in Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 4 (8 2006), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES.15.4.455
[30]
Brent Edward Insko. 2001. Passive Haptics Significantly Enhances Virtual Environments. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.cs.unc.edu/Research/eve/dissertations/2001-Insko.pdf
[31]
Riitta Jääskeläinen. 2002. Think-aloud protocol studies into translation. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 14, 1 (12 2002), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1075/TARGET.14.1.05JAA
[32]
Jason Jerald. 2015. The VR Book. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2792790
[33]
Camille Jeunet, Louis Albert, Ferran Argelaguet, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2018. "Do You Feel in Control?": Towards Novel Approaches to Characterise, Manipulate and Measure the Sense of Agency in Virtual Environments. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 24, 4 (4 2018), 1486–1495. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2794598
[34]
L. Jones. 2000. Kinesthetic Sensing. In Workshop on Human and Machine Haptics. MIT Press, Pacific Grove, CA, 1–10.
[35]
Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 21, 4 (12 2012), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
[36]
Luv Kohli. 2013. Redirected Touching. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. http://www.cs.unc.edu/techreports/13-002.pdf
[37]
Elena Kokkinara and Mel Slater. 2019. Measuring the Effects through Time of the Influence of Visuomotor and Visuotactile Synchronous Stimulation on a Virtual Body Ownership Illusion. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7545 43, 1 (5 2019), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1068/P7545
[38]
Anatole Lécuyer. 2009. Simulating Haptic Feedback Using Vision: A Survey of Research and Applications of Pseudo-Haptic Feedback. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 18, 1 (2 2009), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.1.39
[39]
Susan J Lederman and Roberta L Klatzky. 2009. Haptic Perception: A Tutorial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 7 (2009), 1439–1459.
[40]
Kwan Min Lee. 2004. Presence, Explicated. Communication Theory 14, 1 (2 2004), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2885.2004.TB00302.X
[41]
Robert William Lindeman. 1999. Bimanual Interaction, Passive-Haptic Feedback, 3D Widget Representation, and Simulated Surface Constraints for Interaction In Immersive Virtual Environments. Ph. D. Dissertation. The George Washington University. https://icg.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs1481/f/lindeman_thesis.pdf
[42]
L D Marrus and Bendix Corporation. Aerospace Systems Division. 1968. ALSEP Configuration C One-man Deployment Task Sequence. Technical Report. Bendix Aerospace. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/ALSEP/pdf/ALSEP%20%23258%20-%20OneManDeployTaskSeq_ATM%20739.pdf
[43]
Daniel Medeiros, Graham Wilson, Mark Mcgill, and Stephen Anthony Brewster. 2023. The Benefits of Passive Haptics and Perceptual Manipulation for Extended Reality Interactions in Constrained Passenger Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581079
[44]
Víctor R Mercado, Maud Marchal, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2021. “Haptics On-Demand”: A Survey on Encountered-Type Haptic Displays. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 14, 3 (7 2021), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2021.3061150
[45]
Matthew J Miller, Austin Claybrook, Suraj Greenlund, Jessica J Marquez, and Karen M Feigh. 2017. Operational Assessment of Apollo Lunar Surface Extravehicular Activity. Technical Report. NASA. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20170007261
[46]
Thomas Muender, Michael Bonfert, Anke Verena Reinschluessel, Rainer Malaka, and Tanja Döring. 2022. Haptic Fidelity Framework: Defining the Factors of Realistic Haptic Feedback for Virtual Reality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). ACM, New Orleans, LA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501953
[47]
Mission Operations Branch Flight Crew Division NASA. 1969. Apollo 12 Technical Crew Debriefing. Technical Report. NASA. https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12tecdbrf.html
[48]
Niels Christian Nilsson, Tabitha Peck, Gerd Bruder, Eri Hodgson, Stefania Serafin, Mary Whitton, Frank Steinicke, and Evan Suma Rosenberg. 2018. 15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38, 2 (3 2018), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.111125628
[49]
Niels Christian Nilsson, Andre Zenner, and Adalberto L. Simeone. 2021. Propping Up Virtual Reality With Haptic Proxies. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 41, 5 (9 2021), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2021.3097671
[50]
Tommy Nilsson, Flavie Rometsch, Leonie Becker, Florian Dufresne, Paul Demedeiros, Enrico Guerra, Andrea Emanuele Maria Casini, Anna Vock, Florian Gaeremynck, and Aidan Cowley. 2023. Using Virtual Reality to Shape Humanity’s Return to the Moon: Key Takeaways from a Design Study. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 16. ACM, Hamburg, Germany, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580718
[51]
Tommy Nilsson, Flavie Rometsch, Andrea Emanuele Maria Casini, Enrico Guerra, Leonie Becker, Andreas Treuer, Paul de Medeiros, Hanjo Schnellbaecher, Anna Vock, and Aidan Cowley. 2022. Using Virtual Reality to Design and Evaluate a Lunar Lander: The EL3 Case Study. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts(CHI EA ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519775
[52]
Jeffrey Osterlund and Brad Lawrence. 2012. Virtual reality: Avatars in human spaceflight training. Acta Astronautica 71 (2012), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.08.011
[53]
Julie Pallant. 2020. SPSS Survival Manual. Routledge, London, UK. 361 pages. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452
[54]
Joseph Piccione, James Collett, and Alexander De Foe. 2019. Virtual skills training: the role of presence and agency. Heliyon 5, 11 (11 2019), e02583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02583
[55]
Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C Whitton. 2001. Redirected Walking. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Conference – Short Presentations(EG’01). Eurographics Association, London, UK, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2312/egs.20011036
[56]
Daniel Roth and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2020. Construction of the Virtual Embodiment Questionnaire (VEQ). IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 12 (12 2020), 3546–3556. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023603
[57]
Majed Samad, Elia Gatti, Anne Hermes, Hrvoje Benko, and Cesare Parise. 2019. Pseudo-Haptic Weight: Changing the Perceived Weight of Virtual Objects By Manipulating Control-Display Ratio. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300550
[58]
Francesco Sauro, Jo De Waele, Samuel J. Payler, Marco Vattano, Francesco Maria Sauro, Leonardo Turchi, and Loredana Bessone. 2021. Speleology as an analogue to space exploration: The ESA CAVES training programme. Acta Astronautica 184 (7 2021), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.04.003
[59]
Harrison H. Schmitt. 2009. From the Moon to Mars. Scientific American 301, 1 (7 2009), 36–43.
[60]
Thomas W. Schubert. 2003. The sense of presence in virtual environments: A three-component scale measuring spatial presence, involvement, and realness. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie 15, 2 (4 2003), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.1026//1617-6383.15.2.69
[61]
Jackelynne Silva-Martinez, Gordon Vos, Jennifer Boyer, Robert Durkin, William Foley, Sarah Margerum, Kritina Holden, Victoria Smith, Leah Beebe, and Chris Van Velson. 2021. Human-in-the-Loop Evaluations: Process and Mockup Fidelity. In 51st International Conference on Environmental Systems. 51st International Conference on Environmental Systems, Saint Paul, Minnesota, US, 1–13. https://hdl.handle.net/2346/89696
[62]
Adalberto L. Simeone, Niels Christian Nilsson, Andre Zenner, Marco Speicher, and Florian Daiber. 2020. The Space Bender: Supporting Natural Walking via Overt Manipulation of the Virtual Environment. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)(VR’20). IEEE, Atlanta, GA, USA, 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00082
[63]
Mel Slater. 1999. Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 8, 5 (10 1999), 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566477
[64]
Mel Slater. 2003. A Note on Presence Terminology.
[65]
Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364 (2009), 3549 – 3557.
[66]
Mel Slater, Daniel Perez-Marcos, H. Henrik Ehrsson, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2009. Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience 3, SEP (9 2009), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.3389/NEURO.01.029.2009/BIBTEX
[67]
Mel Slater and Sylvia Wilbur. 1997. A Framework for Immersive Virtual Environments (FIVE): Speculations on the Role of Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 6 (12 1997), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603
[68]
Mandayam A Srinivasan and Cagatay Basdogan. 1997. Haptics in Virtual Environments: Taxonomy, Research Status, and Challenges. Computers & Graphics 21, 4 (1997), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(97)00030-7
[69]
David Vaniman, Robert Reedy, Grant Heiken, Gary Olhoeft, and Wendell Mendell. 1991. The lunar environment. In Lunar Sourcebook. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 27–60.
[70]
Raquel Viciana-Abad, Arcadio Reyes Lecuona, and Matthieu Poyade. 2010. The Influence of Passive Haptic Feedback and Difference Interaction Metaphors on Presence and Task Performance. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, 3 (6 2010), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES.19.3.197
[71]
D Wang, K Ohnishi, and W Xu. 2020. Multimodal Haptic Display for Virtual Reality: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 67, 1 (1 2020), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2920602
[72]
Chyanna Wee, Kian Meng Yap, and Woan Ning Lim. 2021. Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Reality: Challenges and Research Directions. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 112145–112162. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103598
[73]
Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (6 1998), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686
[74]
André Zenner. 2022. Advancing Proxy-Based Haptic Feedback in Virtual Reality. Ph. D. Dissertation. Saarland University. http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-37879
[75]
Andre Zenner and Antonio Kruger. 2017. Shifty: A Weight-Shifting Dynamic Passive Haptic Proxy to Enhance Object Perception in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 4 (4 2017), 1285–1294. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2656978
[76]
André Zenner and Antonio Krüger. 2019. Drag:On: A Virtual Reality Controller Providing Haptic Feedback Based on Drag and Weight Shift. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300441
[77]
Andre Zenner and Antonio Kruger. 2019. Estimating Detection Thresholds for Desktop-Scale Hand Redirection in Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR)(VR’19). IEEE, Osaka, Japan, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798143
[78]
André Zenner, Kristin Ullmann, and Antonio Krüger. 2021. Combining Dynamic Passive Haptics and Haptic Retargeting for Enhanced Haptic Feedback in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 5 (5 2021), 2627–2637. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3067777

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '24: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2024
18961 pages
ISBN:9798400703300
DOI:10.1145/3613904
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

Author Tags

  1. concepts of operations
  2. embodiment
  3. passive haptic feedback
  4. presence
  5. scenario assessment
  6. space exploration
  7. virtual reality

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '24

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2,065
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)482
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media