Work in Progress

From 2D-Screens to VR: Exploring the Effect of Immersion on the Plausibility of Virtual Humans

Authors:

Nina Döllinger,

Carolin Wienrich,

Marc Erich LatoschikAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 167, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650773

Published: 11 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Virtual humans significantly contribute to users’ plausible XR experiences. However, it may be not only the congruent rendering of the virtual human but also the degree of immersion having an impact on virtual humans’ plausibility. In a low-immersive desktop-based and a high-immersive VR condition, participants rated realistic and abstract animated virtual humans regarding plausibility, affective appraisal, and social judgments. First, our results confirmed the factor structure of a preliminary virtual human plausibility questionnaire in VR. Further, the appearance and behavior of realistic virtual humans were overall perceived as more plausible compared to abstract virtual humans, an effect that increased with high immersion. Moreover, only for high immersion, realistic virtual humans were rated as more trustworthy and sympathetic than abstract virtual humans. Interestingly, we observed a potential uncanny valley effect for low but not for high immersion. We discuss the impact of a natural perception of anthropomorphic and realistic cues in VR and highlight the potential of immersive technology to elicit distinct effects in virtual humans.

Supplemental Material

MP4 File - Video Preview

Video Preview

Transcript for: Video Preview

MP4 File

Talk Video

Transcript for: Talk Video

PDF File - Appendix

A Virtual Humans B Procedure C Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Download
12.22 MB

References

[1]

Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Mario Botsch. 2017. Fast generation of realistic virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Gothenburg, Sweden) (VRST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139154

Digital Library

[2]

Jeremy N Bailenson, Nick Yee, Dan Merget, and Ralph Schroeder. 2006. The Effect of Behavioral Realism and Form Realism of Real-Time Avatar Faces on Verbal Disclosure, Nonverbal Disclosure, Emotion Recognition, and Copresence in Dyadic Interaction. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 4 (08 2006), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.15.4.359

Digital Library

[3]

Miguel Barreda-Ángeles and Tilo Hartmann. 2022. Psychological benefits of using social virtual reality platforms during the covid-19 pandemic: The role of social and spatial presence. Computers in Human Behavior 127 (2022), 107047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107047

Digital Library

[4]

Alejandro Beacco, Ramon Oliva, Carlos Cabreira, Jaime Gallego, and Mel Slater. 2021. Disturbance and Plausibility in a Virtual Rock Concert: A Pilot Study. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 538–545. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00078

[5]

Gary Bente, Ralf Schmälzle, Nolan T. Jahn, and Andrea Schaaf. 2023. Measuring the effects of co-location on emotion perception in shared virtual environments: An ecological perspective. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1032510

[6]

P. M. Bentler. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107 (1990), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

[7]

Ilias Bergström, Sérgio Azevedo, Panos Papiotis, Nuno Saldanha, and Mel Slater. 2017. The Plausibility of a String Quartet Performance in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 4 (2017), 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657138

Digital Library

[8]

Henrique Galvan Debarba, Sylvain Chagué, and Caecilia Charbonnier. 2022. On the Plausibility of Virtual Body Animation Features in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 4, 1880–1893. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3025175

[9]

Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Laurie Hughes, Abdullah M. Baabdullah, Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete, Mihalis Giannakis, Mutaz M. Al-Debei, ..., and Samuel Fosso Wamba. 2022. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management 66 (2022), 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542

Digital Library

[10]

Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, Erik Wolf, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2019. ViTraS - Virtual Reality Therapy by Stimulation of Modulated Body Image - Project Outline. Mensch und Computer 2019 - Workshopband. https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2019-ws-633

[11]

Nina Döllinger, Erik Wolf, David Mal, Stephan Wenninger, Mario Botsch, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Resize Me! Exploring the User Experience of Embodied Realistic Modulatable Avatars for Body Image Intervention in Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.935449

[12]

Andy P. Field, Jeremy Miles, and Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. Sage.

Digital Library

[13]

Maia Garau, Mel Slater, Vinoba Vinayagamoorthy, Andrea Brogni, Anthony Steed, and M. Angela Sasse. 2003. The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 529–536. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642703

Digital Library

[14]

Gilles E. Gignac and Eva T. Szodorai. 2016. Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences 102 (2016), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069

[15]

Guilherme Gonçalves, Pedro Monteiro, Hugo Coelho, Miguel Melo, and Maximino Bessa. 2021. Systematic Review on Realism Research Methodologies on Immersive Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Realities. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 89150–89161. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089946

[16]

Manuel Guimarães, Rui Prada, Pedro A. Santos, João Dias, Arnav Jhala, and Samuel Mascarenhas. 2020. The Impact of Virtual Reality in the Social Presence of a Virtual Agent. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (Virtual Event, Scotland, UK) (IVA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383652.3423879

Digital Library

[17]

Negin Hamzeheinejad, Daniel Roth, Samantha Monty, Julian Breuer, Anuschka Rodenberg, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2021. The Impact of Implicit and Explicit Feedback on Performance and Experience during VR-Supported Motor Rehabilitation. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00061

[18]

Carrie Heeter. 1992. Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 2 (05 1992), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262

[19]

Daniel Hepperle, Christian Felix Purps, Jonas Deuchler, and Matthias Wölfel. 2022. Aspects of visual avatar appearance: Self-representation, display type, and uncanny valley. The Visual Computer 38, 4 (2022), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-021-02151-0

Digital Library

[20]

Daniel Hepperle, Hannah Ödell, and Matthias Wölfel. 2020. Differences in the Uncanny Valley between Head-Mounted Displays and Monitors. In 2020 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW49994.2020.00014

[21]

Chin-Chang Ho and Karl F. MacDorman. 2017. Measuring the Uncanny Valley Effect. International Journal of Social Robotics 9, 1 (2017), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0380-9

[22]

HTC Corporation. 2018. Vive Pro. https://www.vive.com/eu/product/vive-pro/.

[23]

Dennis L. Jackson, J. Arthur Gillaspy, and Rebecca Purc-Stephenson. 2009. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations.Psychological Methods 14, 1 (2009), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

[24]

Do Yuon Kim, Ha Kyung Lee, and Kyunghwa Chung. 2023. Avatar-mediated experience in the metaverse: The impact of avatar realism on user-avatar relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 73 (2023), 103382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103382

[25]

Kangsoo Kim, Divine Maloney, Gerd Bruder, Jeremy N. Bailenson, and Gregory F. Welch. 2017. The effects of virtual human’s spatial and behavioral coherence with physical objects on social presence in AR. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 28, 3-4 (2017), e1771. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.1771

[26]

Silvia Erika Kober, Jürgen Kurzmann, and Christa Neuper. 2012. Cortical correlate of spatial presence in 2D and 3D interactive virtual reality: An EEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology 83, 3 (2012), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.003

[27]

Selcuk Korkmaz, Dincer Goksuluk, and Gokmen Zararsiz. 2014. MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality.The R Journal 6, 2 (2014), 151–162. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2014-2/korkmaz-goksuluk-zararsiz.pdf

[28]

Peter Kullmann, Timo Menzel, Mario Botsch, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2023. An Evaluation of Other-Avatar Facial Animation Methods for Social VR. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany,) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 33, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585617

Digital Library

[29]

Marc Erich Latoschik, Daniel Roth, Dominik Gall, Jascha Achenbach, Thomas Waltemate, and Mario Botsch. 2017. The effect of avatar realism in immersive social virtual realities. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Gothenburg, Sweden) (VRST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 39, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139156

Digital Library

[30]

Marc Erich Latoschik and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Congruence and Plausibility, Not Presence: Pivotal Conditions for XR Experiences and Effects, a Novel Approach. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.694433

[31]

Russell V. Lenth. 2023. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans R package version 1.8.7.

[32]

LimeSurvey GmbH. 2020. LimeSurvey: An open source survey tool. https://www.limesurvey.org.

[33]

Jinghuai Lin, Johrine Cronjé, Ivo Käthner, Paul Pauli, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2023. Measuring Interpersonal Trust towards Virtual Humans with a Virtual Maze Paradigm. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2401–2411. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247095

Digital Library

[34]

Jinghuai Lin and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2022. Digital body, identity and privacy in social virtual reality: A systematic review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.974652

[35]

Jean-Luc Lugrin, Marc Erich Latoschik, Michael Habel, Daniel Roth, Christian Seufert, and Silke Grafe. 2016. Breaking Bad Behaviors: A New Tool for Learning Classroom Management Using Virtual Reality. Frontiers in ICT 3 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2016.00026

[36]

Jean-Luc Lugrin, Johanna Latt, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2015. Avatar anthropomorphism and illusion of body ownership in VR. In 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 229–230. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223379

[37]

Elhassan Makled, Florian Weidner, and Wolfgang Broll. 2022. Investigating User Embodiment of Inverse-Kinematic Avatars in Smartphone Augmented Reality. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00084

[38]

David Mal, Erik Wolf, Nina Döllinger, Mario Botsch, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2022. Virtual Human Coherence and Plausibility – Towards a Validated Scale. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). 788–789. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW55335.2022.00245

[39]

David Mal, Erik Wolf, Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2023. The Impact of Avatar and Environment Congruence on Plausibility, Embodiment, Presence, and the Proteus Effect in Virtual Reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2358–2368. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247089

Digital Library

[40]

Samah Mansour, Mostafa El-Said, Carolyn Rude-Parkins, and Jagadeesh Nandigam. 2006. The interactive effect of avatar visual fidelity and behavioral fidelity in the collaborative virtual reality environment on the perception of social interaction. In Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS International Conference on Communications(ICCOM’06). World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), Wisconsin, USA, 387–395.

[41]

Tenko Raykov Marcoulides, George A.2010. Introduction to Psychometric Theory. Routledge, New York. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841624

[42]

Ryan P. McMahan, Chengyuan Lai, and Swaroop K. Pal. 2016. Interaction Fidelity: The Uncanny Valley of Virtual Reality Interactions. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_6

[43]

Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Anya Kolesnichenko, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Shaping Pro-Social Interaction in VR: An Emerging Design Framework. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Glasgow Scotland Uk, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300794

Digital Library

[44]

Masahiro Mori, Karl F. MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

[45]

Kristine L. Nowak and Jesse Fox. 2018. Avatars and computer-mediated communication: a review of the definitions, uses, and effects of digital representations. Review of Communication Research 6 (2018), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2018.06.01.015

[46]

Federica Pallavicini, Alessandro Pepe, and Maria Eleonora Minissi. 2019. Gaming in Virtual Reality: What Changes in Terms of Usability, Emotional Response and Sense of Presence Compared to Non-Immersive Video Games?Simulation & Gaming 50, 2 (2019), 136–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119831420

Digital Library

[47]

Tomislav Pejsa, Michael Gleicher, and Bilge Mutlu. 2017. Who, Me? How Virtual Agents Can Shape Conversational Footing in Virtual Reality. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 347–359.

[48]

José Pinheiro, Douglas Bates, and R Core Team. 2023. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme R package version 3.1-162.

[49]

R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

[50]

Imogen C. Rehm, Emily Foenander, Klaire Wallace, Jo-Anne M. Abbott, Michael Kyrios, and Neil Thomas. 2016. What Role Can Avatars Play in e-Mental Health Interventions? Exploring New Models of Client–Therapist Interaction. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00186

[51]

Gabriela Ripka, Silke Grafe, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2020. Preservice Teachers’ encounter with Social VR – Exploring Virtual Teaching and Learning Processes in Initial Teacher Education. In Proceedings of SITE Interactive Conference 2020. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 549–562.

[52]

Yves Rosseel. 2012. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48, 2 (2012), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

[53]

Daniel Roth and Carolin Wienrich. 2018. Effects of Media Immersiveness on the Perception of Virtual Characters. In Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Reality of the GI Special Interest Group VR/AR.

[54]

Ryan Schulz. 2023. Welcome to the Metaverse: A Comprehensive List of Social VR/AR Platforms and Virtual Worlds. https://ryanschultz.com/list-of-social-vr-virtual-worlds/. Accessed June, 2023.

[55]

Andreas Siess and Matthias Wölfel. 2019. User color temperature preferences in immersive virtual realities. Computers & Graphics 81 (2019), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2019.03.018

Digital Library

[56]

Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, and Mary C. Whitton. 2021. Immersion and Coherence: Research Agenda and Early Results. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 10 (2021), 3839–3850. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2983701

Digital Library

[57]

Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., and Mary C. Whitton. 2017. A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Comput. Surv. 50, 6, Article 96 (nov 2017), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301

Digital Library

[58]

Richard Skarbez, Solène Neyret, Frederick P. Brooks, Mel Slater, and Mary C. Whitton. 2017. A Psychophysical Experiment Regarding Components of the Plausibility Illusion. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 4 (2017), 1369–1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2657158

Digital Library

[59]

Mel Slater. 2009. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1535 (2009), 3549–3557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138

[60]

Mel Slater. 2018. Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. British Journal of Psychology 109, 3 (2018), 431–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12305

[61]

Mel Slater, Domna Banakou, Alejandro Beacco, Jaime Gallego, Francisco Macia-Varela, and Ramon Oliva. 2022. A Separate Reality: An Update on Place Illusion and Plausibility in Virtual Reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.914392

[62]

Sahinya Susindar, Mahnoosh Sadeghi, Lea Huntington, Andrew Singer, and Thomas K. Ferris. 2019. The Feeling is Real: Emotion Elicitation in Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 63, 1 (2019), 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631509

[63]

Unity Technologies. 2019. Unity. https://unity3d.com. version 2019.4.8f1.

[64]

Valve Corporation. 2021. SteamVR. https://store.steampowered.com/app/250820/SteamVR.

[65]

Florian Weidner, Gerd Boettcher, Stephanie Arevalo Arboleda, Chenyao Diao, Luljeta Sinani, Christian Kunert, Christoph Gerhardt, Wolfgang Broll, and Alexander Raake. 2023. A Systematic Review on the Visualization of Avatars and Agents in AR & VR displayed using Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2596–2606. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247072

Digital Library

[66]

William Revelle. 2023. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychR package version 2.3.3.

[67]

Erik Wolf, David Mal, Viktor Frohnapfel, Nina Döllinger, Stephan Wenninger, Mario Botsch, Marc Erich Latoschik, and Carolin Wienrich. 2022. Plausibility and Perception of Personalized Virtual Humans between Virtual and Augmented Reality. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 489–498. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00065

[68]

Ke-Hai Yuan and Peter M Bentler. 2000. 5Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological methodology 30, 1 (2000), 165–200.

[69]

Katja Zibrek, Elena Kokkinara, and Rachel McDonnell. 2017. Don’t stand so close to me: investigating the effect of control on the appeal of virtual humans using immersion and a proximity-based behavioral task. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception (Cottbus, Germany) (SAP ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3119881.3119887

Digital Library

[70]

Katja Zibrek, Sean Martin, and Rachel McDonnell. 2019. Is Photorealism Important for Perception of Expressive Virtual Humans in Virtual Reality?ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 16, 3, Article 14 (sep 2019), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3349609

Digital Library

[71]

Cindy Ziker, Barbara Truman, and Heather Dodds. 2021. Cross Reality (XR): Challenges and Opportunities Across the Spectrum. Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward (2021), 55–77.

Cited By

Fink DSkowronski MZagermann JReinschluessel AReiterer HFeuchtner T(2024)There Is More to Avatars Than Visuals: Investigating Combinations of Visual and Auditory User Representations for Remote Collaboration in Augmented RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981488:ISS(540-568)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698148

Index Terms

From 2D-Screens to VR: Exploring the Effect of Immersion on the Plausibility of Virtual Humans
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Exploring the Kuroko Paradigm: The Effect of Enhancing Virtual Humans with Reality Actuators in Augmented Reality
AHs '24: Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference 2024

This study explores the value of using virtual humans (VHs) to mask real entities within augmented reality (AR) interactive environments. We believe that one ultimate solution to bridge the gap between virtual and real worlds is to enable virtual ...
Social engagement and user immersion in a socially based virtual world

We assess social engagement and spatial exploration in a virtual environment.We examine predictors of user reported immersion in a virtual environment.Social engagement is positively associated with user reported immersion.Spatial exploration is ...
The presence of an avatar can reduce cybersickness in Virtual Reality
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) applications are increasingly being utilized for research, healthcare, and education. Despite their benefits, many VR users report motion sickness-like sensations (cybersickness), such as headache, disorientation, or nausea. ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 2024

4761 pages

ISBN:9798400703317

DOI:10.1145/3613905

Editors:
Florian Floyd Mueller
Monash University
,
Penny Kyburz
The Australian National University
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow
,
Corina Sas
Lancaster University

Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 May 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Work in progress
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Conference

CHI '24

Sponsor:

CHI '24: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

May 11 - 16, 2024

HI, Honolulu, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
456
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)456
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)91

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Fink DSkowronski MZagermann JReinschluessel AReiterer HFeuchtner T(2024)There Is More to Avatars Than Visuals: Investigating Combinations of Visual and Auditory User Representations for Remote Collaboration in Augmented RealityProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981488:ISS(540-568)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3698148

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Conten