ABSTRACT
Problematic: At this time technology development has influence civilization. Because digital banking is the result of technological developments in the banking sector, therefore digital banking has the potential to be adopted. In addition to all the potential that digital banking has in adoption in Indonesia, digital banking has several problems such as Digital banking transaction risk, Social-physiological barriers, privacy and access barriers, insecure feeling, perceived risk of security and trust among the users which causes the users having a hard time to adopting Digital banking. Purpose: This research was conducted to determine the customer's perspective (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust, social influence) in using digital banking which is the result of technology developments in the banking sector. Theory: Digital Banking is a product resulting from changes in the banking system due to technology developments. The banking system that was use by digital banking is modern method. By using the modern method in banking, the bank's customers can make the transactions and use bank facilities easily. Methodology: This research uses quantitative method and data collection in this research is primary data. Primary data was collected through the questionnaires. Then, the data will be process and analysis by using Smart PLS 4 program. Findings: From the research we found that perceived usefulness and social influence has positive moderate and significant influence to behavioral intention to use Digital Banking. While perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust has not significant positive moderate influence to behavioral intention to use Digital Banking
- Goncalves. M. J. A., Silva, A. C. F. da., & Ferreira, C. G. (2022). The Future of Accounting: How Will Digital Transformation Impact the Sector? 9(19). 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010019Google ScholarCross Ref
- Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020). What Drives FinTech Adoption? A Multi-Method Evaluation Using an Adapted Technology Acceptance Model. 58(8). 1675- 1697. https://www.emerald.com/insight/0025-1747.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Alamsjah, F., Yunus, E. N. (2022). Achieving Supply Chain 4.0 and the Importance of Agility, Ambidexterity, and Organizational Culture: A Case of Indonesia. 8(2). 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020083Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susilo, D. (2020) Industri 4.0: Is Indonesia Ready? Management Analysis Journal. 9(3). 262-270. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i3.39695Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alnemer, H. A. (2022). Determinants of digital banking adoption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A technology acceptance model approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100037Google ScholarCross Ref
- Warganegara, D. L., & Hendijani, R. B. (2022) Factors That Drive Actual Purchasing of Groceries through E-Commerce Platforms during COVID-19 in Indonesia. 14(3235). 1-21.https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14063235Google ScholarCross Ref
- Istiatin. (2021) Increasing The Customer retention Rate With Digital Banking Performance Optimization During The Covid 19 Pandemic (Study at BMT Amanah Ummah In Kartasura, Sukoharjo). International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR). 5(3). 1259-1267. E-ISSN: 2614-1280 P-ISSN 2622-4771. https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBARGoogle Scholar
- Chairita, S. U. N., & Suharnomo. (2022). The Effect of Digital Banking on Banking Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). 5(2). 13907-13914. e-ISSN: 2615-3076 (Online), p-ISSN: 2615-1715. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5254Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ganieva, U. A., & Mirzaeva, M. G. K. (2022). Types of Digital Banking Services and Increasing Their Popularity. 9(6) 1-15. ISSN 2364-5369. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i6.3854Google ScholarCross Ref
- Departemen Komunikasi (2022, March). Pandemi Pendorong Digitalisasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/cerita-bi/Pages/Pandemi-Pendorong-Digitalisasi.aspxGoogle Scholar
- Amalia, N. (2020, May). The Landscape of the Indonesian Digital Bank. https://finantier.co/blog/the-landscape-of-the-indonesian-digital-bank/Google Scholar
- Suharbi, M. A., & Margono, H. (2022). Kebutuhan Transformasi Bank Digital Indonesia di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 4(10). 4749-4759. https://journal.ikopin.ac.id/index.php/fairvalueGoogle Scholar
- Republika.co.id. (2022, July). Setahun Beroperasi, Transaksi Blu by BCA Capai Rp 36 Triliun. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rfevkj349/setahun-beroperasi-transaksi-blu-by-bca-capai-rp-36-triliunGoogle Scholar
- Sejarah Seabank. https://www.seabank.co.id/info/historyGoogle Scholar
- BCA Digital (Pers). (2021, June). BCA Digital Resmi Luncurkan Aplikasi ‘blu’,Lengkap dengan Fitur Keuangan Menarik. https://bcadigital.co.id/documents/press/20210630.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Nugroho, A. D. (2020). Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan Pengguna Aplikasi Jenius BTPN Dilihat dari Unsur Produk, Harga dan Promosi Sebagai Pengenalan Ide Baru Digital Banking (Studi Kasus Masyarakat Surabaya). 5(3). 206-218. e-ISSN 2621-881X. p-ISSN 2502-3780. https://jurnalekonomi.unisla.ac.id/index.php/jpimGoogle Scholar
- Hutauruk, D. M. (2022). TMRW By UOB Masuk Jajaran 100 Top Bank Digital Global. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/tmrw-by-uob-masuk-jajaran-100-top-bank-digital-globalGoogle Scholar
- Sejarah BNC. https://www.bankneocommerce.co.id/about/storyGoogle Scholar
- Otter, V., Deutsch, W. (2023). Did policy lose sight of the wood for the trees? An UTAUT-based partial least squares estimation of farmers acceptance of innovative sustainable land use systems. Land Use Policy. 126. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106467Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sepurtarkerja.id. (2022, September). Serangan Maut Bank Digital, Inikah Endgame Perbankan? https://seputarkerja.id/bank-digital/Google Scholar
- Anggraeni, R., Hapsari, R., & Muslim, N. A. (2021) Examining Factors Influencing Consumers Intention and Usage of Digital Banking: Evidance from Indonesian Digital Banking Customers. University of Brawijaya Malang, Indonesia. 9(3). 193-210. P-ISSN : 2252-8997 E-ISSN: 2615-2010. DOI: 10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.009.03.1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susilowati, I.H., Kurniawidjaja, L.M., Nugraha, S. (2022). The prevalence of bad posture and musculoskeletal symptoms originating from the use of gadgets as an impact of the work from home program of the university community. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11059Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adhitya Alexander. (2020). The Impacts of Mobil Banking Technology Adoption on The Financial Performance and Stock Performance of Big Banks in Indonesia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 1. 63- 73.Google Scholar
- Melnychenko, S., Volosovych, S., & Baraniuk, Y. (2020) Dominant Ideas of Financial Technologies in Digital Banking. 6(1). 92-98. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-92-99Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haralayya, B. (2021). How Digital Banking has Brought Innovative Products and Services to India. 2021. Journal of Advanced Research in Quality Control and Management. 6(1). 16-18. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-7261Google Scholar
- Fab, H. & Zhao, Y. (2022). Identification of systemically important banks in China based on Merton-Shapley Model and a Comparison Between Different Indicators. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12238Google ScholarCross Ref
- Al-Sadi, A. S. M. S, Al-Mamouri, A. M. T. (2022). The impact of asset management on achieving bank profitability(Applied study within Al-Khaleej commercial bank). 10(5). 1-9. ISSN 2303-4521Google Scholar
- Lumpkin, S., & Schich, S. (2020). Banks, Digital Banking Initiatives and The Financial Safety Net: Theory and Analytical Framework. Journal of Economic Science Research. 3(1). 24-46. https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v3i1.1113Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sari, F. K., Fadly, Y., & Ramadhan, P. R. (2022). The Effect of Changes in the Value of Conventional Interbank Transfers and Digital Banks in Technological Development. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS). 4(2). 246-257. ISSN: 2685-3868(Online), 2685-1989(Print). https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v4i2.653Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kaur, B., Kiran, S., Grima, S., & Apoga, R. R. (2021). Digital Banking in Northern India: The Risks on Customer Satisfication. 9(209). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9110209Google ScholarCross Ref
- Windasar, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, P. (2022). Digital-Only Banking Experience: Insights From Gen Y and Gen Z. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rastini, N. M., & Respati, N. N. R. (2021). Public Attitudes and Interests Using Online Transactions (TAM Application and TRA Model). Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi. 8(1). 175-190. ISSN-E: 2597-6990, ISSN-P: 2442-4951. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/mindsGoogle Scholar
- Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Understanding Motivations to Use Online Streaming Services: Integrating The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and The Uses And Gratifications Theory (UGT). 25(2). 216-236. DOI: 10.1108/SJME-04-2020-0074Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nguyen, O.T. (2020). Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Digital Banking in Vietnam. 7(3). 303-310. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savitha, B., Hawaldar, I. T., Kumar, N. (2022). Continuance intentions to use FinTech peer-to-peer payments apps in India. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11654Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2022). Use and behavioural intention of m-payment in GCC countries: Extending meta-UTAUT with trust and Islamic religiosity. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100240Google ScholarCross Ref
- Widyanto, H. A., Kusumawardani, K. A., & Septyawanda, A. (2020). Encouraging Behavioral Intention To Use Mobil Payment: An Extension of UTAUT2. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 4(1). 87-97. ISSN-L 2579-6232 (Versi Elektronik), ISSN 2579-6224 (Versi Cetak). https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v4i1.7584Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rini, G. P., & Khasanah, I. (2021). Intention To Use Online Meeting Appliacations During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. 14(1). 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v14i1.8575Google ScholarCross Ref
- Almulla, M. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) And E-Learning System Use For Education Sustainability. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 20(4). 1-13Google Scholar
- Nugraha, D.P., Setiawan, B., Nathan, R. J., & Farkas, M.F. (2022). Fintech Adoption Drivers for Innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208Google ScholarCross Ref
- Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taherdoost, Hamed. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. 11(1). 8-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baraba, R. A. A. (2022). Understanding Student Behavior In Using Financial Technology. Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta. 1-63Google Scholar
- Chanal, D., Pera, M.C. (2022). Online Diagnosis of PEM Fuel Cell by Fuzzy C-Means Clustering. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/correlation-coefficientGoogle Scholar
- Riyanto, S., & Aglis A. H. (2020). Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang manajemen teknik, pendidikan dan eksperimen. Yogyakarta: deepublishGoogle Scholar
- Deilami, S., Abbasi, K., Houshyar, A., Izadneshan, H., Beni, H. M. (2023). Study the effect of temperature variation and intrinsic layer thickness on the linear response of a PIN photodetector: A finite element method approach. Results in Engineering. 1. 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100810Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andriani and F. H. Rusgowanto, (2021). "Factors Inluence Intention To Use Accounting Information System-Based E-Commerce (A Case Study On MSMEs In DKI Jakarta)," 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS). 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS52787.2021.9649634Google ScholarCross Ref
- Usman, H., Mulia, D., Chairy, C. and Widowati, N. (2022). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing. 13(2). 381-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bustami, E., Situngkir, S., Yacob, S., & Octavia, A. (2021). Customers’ behavioral intention on mobile banking services in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science. 10(7). 353–362. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1403Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khan, M. S., Rabbani, M. R., Hawaldar, I. T., & Bashar, A. (2022). Determinants of Behavioral Intentions to Use Islamic Financial Technology: An Empirical Assessment Risks. 10. 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10060114Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yoon Joo Park & Sung Joo Yoo. (2022). Empirical Finding on the Determinants of Collective Consumption: Focused on Consumption Values, Trust, and Perceived Risk. 8. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040179Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ni, T. W. (2020). Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention towards Adoption of Digital Banking Services in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(8), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.108.450.457Google ScholarCross Ref
- App Annie. (2022). https://www.data.ai/Google Scholar
- Saputra, M. P. A., Sukono, Chaerani, D. (2022). Estimation of Maximum Potential Losses for Digital Banking Transaction Risks Using the Extreme Value-at-Risks Method. 10(10). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10010010Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dimitrova, I. & Ohman, P. (2021). Barriers to bank customers’ intention to fully adopt digital payment methods. 14(5). 16-36. DOI 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2021-0045Google Scholar
- Deloitte. (2022). Digital Banking Maturity 2022. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/br/Documents/financial-services/Deloitte-DBM%202022-global-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Bennett, R. & Bennett, K. (2022). Digital banking in 2022: Trends and statistics.Google Scholar
- Krisnamurti, P., Ratnawati, A., Widi, A. (2022). Acceptance Analysis of “X Super-app’ Digital Bankign Service Through TAM and TPB Integration. 3(3). 271-279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17358/brcs.3.3.271Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dash, G., Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharma, R., Garg, S. (2020). An Ethical Issue in the Banking Sector: A Case Study. 11(1). 84-91. https://doi.org/10.31995/jgv.2020.v11i01.011Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The New Era of Banking: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT),
Recommendations
e-Shopping acceptance
Inconsistencies and contradictions in the way researchers have adapted TAM to e-shopping.An extended TAM for e-shopping is tested meta-analytically.TAM with attitude is better than basic TAM when studying e-shopping acceptance.After attitude, enjoyment ...
Evaluating the boundary conditions of the technology acceptance model: An exploratory investigation
The technology acceptance model (TAM) is very widely used for studying technology acceptance. The model states that an individual's behavioral intention (BI) to use an information system is determined by his perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease ...
Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model
This paper aims to predict consumer acceptance of e-commerce by proposing a set of key drivers for engaging consumers in on-line transactions. The primary constructs for capturing consumer acceptance of e-commerce are intention to transact and on-line ...
Comments