skip to main content
10.1145/3613944.3613955acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The New Era of Banking: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT),

Published:22 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Problematic: At this time technology development has influence civilization. Because digital banking is the result of technological developments in the banking sector, therefore digital banking has the potential to be adopted. In addition to all the potential that digital banking has in adoption in Indonesia, digital banking has several problems such as Digital banking transaction risk, Social-physiological barriers, privacy and access barriers, insecure feeling, perceived risk of security and trust among the users which causes the users having a hard time to adopting Digital banking. Purpose: This research was conducted to determine the customer's perspective (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust, social influence) in using digital banking which is the result of technology developments in the banking sector. Theory: Digital Banking is a product resulting from changes in the banking system due to technology developments. The banking system that was use by digital banking is modern method. By using the modern method in banking, the bank's customers can make the transactions and use bank facilities easily. Methodology: This research uses quantitative method and data collection in this research is primary data. Primary data was collected through the questionnaires. Then, the data will be process and analysis by using Smart PLS 4 program. Findings: From the research we found that perceived usefulness and social influence has positive moderate and significant influence to behavioral intention to use Digital Banking. While perceived ease of use, perceived risk and trust has not significant positive moderate influence to behavioral intention to use Digital Banking

References

  1. Goncalves. M. J. A., Silva, A. C. F. da., & Ferreira, C. G. (2022). The Future of Accounting: How Will Digital Transformation Impact the Sector? 9(19). 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Singh, S., Sahni, M. M., & Kovid, R. K. (2020). What Drives FinTech Adoption? A Multi-Method Evaluation Using an Adapted Technology Acceptance Model. 58(8). 1675- 1697. https://www.emerald.com/insight/0025-1747.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alamsjah, F., Yunus, E. N. (2022). Achieving Supply Chain 4.0 and the Importance of Agility, Ambidexterity, and Organizational Culture: A Case of Indonesia. 8(2). 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Susilo, D. (2020) Industri 4.0: Is Indonesia Ready? Management Analysis Journal. 9(3). 262-270. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i3.39695Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Alnemer, H. A. (2022). Determinants of digital banking adoption in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A technology acceptance model approach. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Warganegara, D. L., & Hendijani, R. B. (2022) Factors That Drive Actual Purchasing of Groceries through E-Commerce Platforms during COVID-19 in Indonesia. 14(3235). 1-21.https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14063235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Istiatin. (2021) Increasing The Customer retention Rate With Digital Banking Performance Optimization During The Covid 19 Pandemic (Study at BMT Amanah Ummah In Kartasura, Sukoharjo). International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR). 5(3). 1259-1267. E-ISSN: 2614-1280 P-ISSN 2622-4771. https://jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/IJEBARGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chairita, S. U. N., & Suharnomo. (2022). The Effect of Digital Banking on Banking Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal). 5(2). 13907-13914. e-ISSN: 2615-3076 (Online), p-ISSN: 2615-1715. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.5254Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ganieva, U. A., & Mirzaeva, M. G. K. (2022). Types of Digital Banking Services and Increasing Their Popularity. 9(6) 1-15. ISSN 2364-5369. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v9i6.3854Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Departemen Komunikasi (2022, March). Pandemi Pendorong Digitalisasi. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/cerita-bi/Pages/Pandemi-Pendorong-Digitalisasi.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Amalia, N. (2020, May). The Landscape of the Indonesian Digital Bank. https://finantier.co/blog/the-landscape-of-the-indonesian-digital-bank/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Suharbi, M. A., & Margono, H. (2022). Kebutuhan Transformasi Bank Digital Indonesia di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 4(10). 4749-4759. https://journal.ikopin.ac.id/index.php/fairvalueGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Republika.co.id. (2022, July). Setahun Beroperasi, Transaksi Blu by BCA Capai Rp 36 Triliun. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/rfevkj349/setahun-beroperasi-transaksi-blu-by-bca-capai-rp-36-triliunGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sejarah Seabank. https://www.seabank.co.id/info/historyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. BCA Digital (Pers). (2021, June). BCA Digital Resmi Luncurkan Aplikasi ‘blu’,Lengkap dengan Fitur Keuangan Menarik. https://bcadigital.co.id/documents/press/20210630.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nugroho, A. D. (2020). Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan Pengguna Aplikasi Jenius BTPN Dilihat dari Unsur Produk, Harga dan Promosi Sebagai Pengenalan Ide Baru Digital Banking (Studi Kasus Masyarakat Surabaya). 5(3). 206-218. e-ISSN 2621-881X. p-ISSN 2502-3780. https://jurnalekonomi.unisla.ac.id/index.php/jpimGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutauruk, D. M. (2022). TMRW By UOB Masuk Jajaran 100 Top Bank Digital Global. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/tmrw-by-uob-masuk-jajaran-100-top-bank-digital-globalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sejarah BNC. https://www.bankneocommerce.co.id/about/storyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Otter, V., Deutsch, W. (2023). Did policy lose sight of the wood for the trees? An UTAUT-based partial least squares estimation of farmers acceptance of innovative sustainable land use systems. Land Use Policy. 126. 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106467Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sepurtarkerja.id. (2022, September). Serangan Maut Bank Digital, Inikah Endgame Perbankan? https://seputarkerja.id/bank-digital/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Anggraeni, R., Hapsari, R., & Muslim, N. A. (2021) Examining Factors Influencing Consumers Intention and Usage of Digital Banking: Evidance from Indonesian Digital Banking Customers. University of Brawijaya Malang, Indonesia. 9(3). 193-210. P-ISSN : 2252-8997 E-ISSN: 2615-2010. DOI: 10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.009.03.1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Susilowati, I.H., Kurniawidjaja, L.M., Nugraha, S. (2022). The prevalence of bad posture and musculoskeletal symptoms originating from the use of gadgets as an impact of the work from home program of the university community. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Adhitya Alexander. (2020). The Impacts of Mobil Banking Technology Adoption on The Financial Performance and Stock Performance of Big Banks in Indonesia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 1. 63- 73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Melnychenko, S., Volosovych, S., & Baraniuk, Y. (2020) Dominant Ideas of Financial Technologies in Digital Banking. 6(1). 92-98. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-1-92-99Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Haralayya, B. (2021). How Digital Banking has Brought Innovative Products and Services to India. 2021. Journal of Advanced Research in Quality Control and Management. 6(1). 16-18. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3214-7261Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fab, H. & Zhao, Y. (2022). Identification of systemically important banks in China based on Merton-Shapley Model and a Comparison Between Different Indicators. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Al-Sadi, A. S. M. S, Al-Mamouri, A. M. T. (2022). The impact of asset management on achieving bank profitability(Applied study within Al-Khaleej commercial bank). 10(5). 1-9. ISSN 2303-4521Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lumpkin, S., & Schich, S. (2020). Banks, Digital Banking Initiatives and The Financial Safety Net: Theory and Analytical Framework. Journal of Economic Science Research. 3(1). 24-46. https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v3i1.1113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sari, F. K., Fadly, Y., & Ramadhan, P. R. (2022). The Effect of Changes in the Value of Conventional Interbank Transfers and Digital Banks in Technological Development. Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS). 4(2). 246-257. ISSN: 2685-3868(Online), 2685-1989(Print). https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v4i2.653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Kaur, B., Kiran, S., Grima, S., & Apoga, R. R. (2021). Digital Banking in Northern India: The Risks on Customer Satisfication. 9(209). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9110209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Windasar, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, P. (2022). Digital-Only Banking Experience: Insights From Gen Y and Gen Z. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Rastini, N. M., & Respati, N. N. R. (2021). Public Attitudes and Interests Using Online Transactions (TAM Application and TRA Model). Jurnal Minds: Manajemen Ide dan Inspirasi. 8(1). 175-190. ISSN-E: 2597-6990, ISSN-P: 2442-4951. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/mindsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Camilleri, M. A. (2021). Understanding Motivations to Use Online Streaming Services: Integrating The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and The Uses And Gratifications Theory (UGT). 25(2). 216-236. DOI: 10.1108/SJME-04-2020-0074Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Nguyen, O.T. (2020). Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Digital Banking in Vietnam. 7(3). 303-310. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no3.303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Savitha, B., Hawaldar, I. T., Kumar, N. (2022). Continuance intentions to use FinTech peer-to-peer payments apps in India. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Alkhowaiter, W. A. (2022). Use and behavioural intention of m-payment in GCC countries: Extending meta-UTAUT with trust and Islamic religiosity. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Widyanto, H. A., Kusumawardani, K. A., & Septyawanda, A. (2020). Encouraging Behavioral Intention To Use Mobil Payment: An Extension of UTAUT2. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 4(1). 87-97. ISSN-L 2579-6232 (Versi Elektronik), ISSN 2579-6224 (Versi Cetak). https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v4i1.7584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Rini, G. P., & Khasanah, I. (2021). Intention To Use Online Meeting Appliacations During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. 14(1). 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v14i1.8575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Almulla, M. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) And E-Learning System Use For Education Sustainability. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 20(4). 1-13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Nugraha, D.P., Setiawan, B., Nathan, R. J., & Farkas, M.F. (2022). Fintech Adoption Drivers for Innovation for SMEs in Indonesia. 8, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040208Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Al-Mamary, Y. H. S. (2022). Understanding the use of learning management systems by undergraduate university students using the UTAUT model: Credible evidence from Saudi Arabia. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Taherdoost, Hamed. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. 11(1). 8-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51983/ajms-2022.11.1.3087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Baraba, R. A. A. (2022). Understanding Student Behavior In Using Financial Technology. Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta. 1-63Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Chanal, D., Pera, M.C. (2022). Online Diagnosis of PEM Fuel Cell by Fuzzy C-Means Clustering. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/correlation-coefficientGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Riyanto, S., & Aglis A. H. (2020). Metode riset penelitian kuantitatif penelitian di bidang manajemen teknik, pendidikan dan eksperimen. Yogyakarta: deepublishGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Deilami, S., Abbasi, K., Houshyar, A., Izadneshan, H., Beni, H. M. (2023). Study the effect of temperature variation and intrinsic layer thickness on the linear response of a PIN photodetector: A finite element method approach. Results in Engineering. 1. 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100810Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Andriani and F. H. Rusgowanto, (2021). "Factors Inluence Intention To Use Accounting Information System-Based E-Commerce (A Case Study On MSMEs In DKI Jakarta)," 2021 3rd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS). 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORIS52787.2021.9649634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Usman, H., Mulia, D., Chairy, C. and Widowati, N. (2022). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing. 13(2). 381-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Bustami, E., Situngkir, S., Yacob, S., & Octavia, A. (2021). Customers’ behavioral intention on mobile banking services in Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science. 10(7). 353–362. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Khan, M. S., Rabbani, M. R., Hawaldar, I. T., & Bashar, A. (2022). Determinants of Behavioral Intentions to Use Islamic Financial Technology: An Empirical Assessment Risks. 10. 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10060114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Yoon Joo Park & Sung Joo Yoo. (2022). Empirical Finding on the Determinants of Collective Consumption: Focused on Consumption Values, Trust, and Perceived Risk. 8. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Ni, T. W. (2020). Factors Influencing Behavioural Intention towards Adoption of Digital Banking Services in Malaysia. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 10(8), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2020.108.450.457Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. App Annie. (2022). https://www.data.ai/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Saputra, M. P. A., Sukono, Chaerani, D. (2022). Estimation of Maximum Potential Losses for Digital Banking Transaction Risks Using the Extreme Value-at-Risks Method. 10(10). 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10010010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Dimitrova, I. & Ohman, P. (2021). Barriers to bank customers’ intention to fully adopt digital payment methods. 14(5). 16-36. DOI 10.1108/IJQSS-03-2021-0045Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Deloitte. (2022). Digital Banking Maturity 2022. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/br/Documents/financial-services/Deloitte-DBM%202022-global-report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Bennett, R. & Bennett, K. (2022). Digital banking in 2022: Trends and statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Krisnamurti, P., Ratnawati, A., Widi, A. (2022). Acceptance Analysis of “X Super-app’ Digital Bankign Service Through TAM and TPB Integration. 3(3). 271-279. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17358/brcs.3.3.271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Dash, G., Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sharma, R., Garg, S. (2020). An Ethical Issue in the Banking Sector: A Case Study. 11(1). 84-91. https://doi.org/10.31995/jgv.2020.v11i01.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The New Era of Banking: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT),
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICSLT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 9th International Conference on e-Society, e-Learning and e-Technologies
          June 2023
          114 pages
          ISBN:9798400700415
          DOI:10.1145/3613944

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 December 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format