ABSTRACT
Digital Transformation encompasses major changes taking place in society, the economy and governments through the modernization of governance, management and use of digital technologies. In Brazil, where the Federal Government plays a leading role in the innovation agenda, it is also up to the states to develop scientific and technological development initiatives. To glimpse the rumors of this agenda for the next government cycle (2023-2026) at the subnational level, this article analyzed 1,343 proposals from 82 candidates for Economy Governor in the 2022 elections, 619 related to Digital Government, 363 with Digital and 361 for Citizenship Digital. All political parties presented proposals for the theme. "innovation", "technology", "digital", "transparency", "system" and "Digital Transformation" were the most frequent key terms in the proposals. Preliminary analyzes show a favorable environment, especially for the Digital Government theme, which presented the highest number of proposals (46.4%) from candidates for governor and (45.4%) from elected governors. The results point to paths for Digital Transformation and Innovation in the Brazilian states for the next four years, especially with the appropriation of such projects by elected governments and society in general.
- ABEP-TIC. 2022. Índice ABEP de Oferta de Serviços 2022 | Portal ABEP. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.abep-tic.org.br/indice-abep-de-oferta-de-servicos-2022Google Scholar
- João Paulo Albuquerque. 2021. Modelo para o mundo, plataforma GOV.BR é destaque na Semana de Inovação 2021. Enap - Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.enap.gov.br/pt/acontece/noticias/modelo-para-o-mundo-plataforma-gov-br-e-destaque-na-semana-de-inovacao-2021Google Scholar
- Anthony Arundel, Carter Bloch, and Barry Ferguson. 2019. Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy 48, 3 (April 2019), 789–798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thiago Ávila, Beatriz Lanza, and Daniel Valotto. 2022. BASE DE DADOS SOBRE AS PROPOSTAS DOS CANDIDATOS A GOVERNADOR DOS 26 ESTADOS E DO DISTRITO FEDERAL DO BRASIL PARA A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DIGITAL, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2022/26.092022Google ScholarCross Ref
- BID. 2022. Gestão de Governo Digital no Brasil: Configurações Institucionais, Liderança e Marcos Normativos. Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento, Brasília, Brasil.Google Scholar
- BRASIL. 2018. ESTRATÉGIA BRASILEIRA PARA A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DIGITAL - E-Digital. Retrieved January 23, 2023 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/estrategia-de-governanca-digital/eDigital.pdfGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2021. Lei Federal No 14.129 de 29 de Março de 2021 - Dispõe sobre princípios, regras e instrumentos para o Governo Digital e para o aumento da eficiência pública e altera a Lei no 7.116, de 29 de agosto de 1983, a Lei no 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011 (Lei de Acesso à Informação), a Lei no 12.682, de 9 de julho de 2012, e a Lei no 13.460, de 26 de junho de 2017. Retrieved from https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/lei-n-14.129-de-29-de-marco-de-2021-311282132Google Scholar
- BRASIL. 2021. LEI COMPLEMENTAR No 182, DE 1o DE JUNHO DE 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2023 from https://www.in.gov.br/web/douGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2022. Estratégia de Governo Digital 2020-2022. Governo Digital. Retrieved October 2, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/EGD2020/estrategia-de-governo-digital-2020-2022Google Scholar
- BRASIL. 2022. Plataforma Rede.gov.br. Plataforma Rede GOV.BR. Retrieved October 2, 2022 from https://bidtd.validaproj.com.brGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2022. Estratégia Brasileira de Transformação Digital 2023-2026. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Retrieved November 18, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/transformacaodigital/transformacao-digitalGoogle Scholar
- Jen Christensen. 2021. “O impossível não é impossível”: a produção de vacinas Covid-19 em tempo recorde. CNN Brasil. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/o-impossivel-nao-e-impossivel-a-producao-de-vacinas-covid-19-em-tempo-recorde/Google Scholar
- CLP. 2022. Ranking de Competitividade dos Estados e Municípios 2022. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://conteudo.clp.org.br/ranking-de-competitividade-2022-relatoriosGoogle Scholar
- John W. Creswell, J. David Creswell, Dirceu da Silva, and Sandra Maria Mallmann da Rosa. 2021. Penso, Projeto de Pesquisa: Métodos Qualitativo, Quantitativo e Misto (5a edição ed.). Penso.Google Scholar
- Pedro Farias and Miguel Porrúa. 2016. O novo protagonismo do cidadão na gestão pública. In Governos que Servem - Inovações que estão melhorando a prestação de serviços aos cidadãos. Pedro Farias, Washington, D.C, U.S.A., 116.Google Scholar
- J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, Mila Gasco-Hernandez, and Theresa A. Pardo. 2020. Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance & Management Review 43, 3 (May 2020), 483–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guangwei Hu, Jin Shi, Wenwen Pan, and Jie Wang. 2012. A hierarchical model of e-government service capability: An empirical analysis. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4 (October 2012), 564–572. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.04.007Google ScholarCross Ref
- IBGE. 2022. Internet já é acessível em 90,0% dos domicílios do país em 2021 | Agência de Notícias. Agência de Notícias - IBGE. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/34954-internet-ja-e-acessivel-em-90-0-dos-domicilios-do-pais-em-2021Google Scholar
- Arpan Kumar Kar, Vigneswara Ilavarasan, M. P. Gupta, Marijn Janssen, and Ravi Kothari. 2019. Moving beyond Smart Cities: Digital Nations for Social Innovation & Sustainability. Inf Syst Front 21, 3 (June 2019), 495–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09930-0Google ScholarDigital Library
- Letícia Lima. 2021. Brasil é o 2o país que mais passa tempo na Internet e também o 3o que mais usa redes sociais. TudoCelular.com. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.tudocelular.com/seguranca/noticias/n179995/brasil-pais-que-mais-usa-redes-sociais.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Don MacLean and Ryad Titah. 2022. A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82, 1 (January 2022), 23–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13413Google ScholarCross Ref
- OECD. 2018. Digital Government Review of Brazil: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. Retrieved January 30, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-review-of-brazil-9789264307636-en.htmGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Murali Krishna Penmetsa and Sebastián Bruque-Camara. 2021. A framework for building a sustainable digital nation: essential elements and challenges. DPRG 23, 3 (September 2021), 262–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2020-0148Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Mark Sainsbury. 1991. Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2008. Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
- Pedro Soto-Acosta. 2020. COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Digital Transformation to a High-Speed Gear. Information Systems Management 37, 4 (October 2020), 260–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tadao (Org ) Takahashi. 2000. Sociedade da informação no Brasil: livro verde. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (MCT). Retrieved January 19, 2023 from http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/434Google Scholar
- Boufaida M. Tebib A. 2013. A framework based protocol for a better interoperability among services in e-Government. 54, 1 (January 2013).Google Scholar
- United Nations. 2022. UN E-Government Survey 2022. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022Google Scholar
- Gregory Vial. 2019. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28, 2 (June 2019), 118–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- World Bank. 2022. 2022 GovTech Maturity Index Update. World Bank. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/govtech/2022-gtmiGoogle Scholar
- Haluk Demirkan, James Spohrer, and J. Welser. 2016. Digital Innovation and Strategic Transformation. IT Professional 18, 6 (November 2016), 14–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.115Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Digital transformation, technology andinnovation in Brazilian states: the pathways proposed by governors elect 2023-2026
Recommendations
Diagnosis of Brazilian Subnational Government Service Portals
ICEGOV '21: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceDigital Transformation (DT) has been imperative for governments that want to become more efficient and deliver better services to citizens [1]. Recommendations and guidelines on transformative trends in digital government and the new role of governments ...
Digital Decoupling: A Population Study of Digital Transformation Strategies in Swedish Municipalities
dg.o 2022: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchAbstract. Digital transformation is advocated as a strategic imperative for public sector organizations. With the increased permeability of digital technologies in society, i.e., the digitalization of society, public sector organizations need to find ...
An ICT governance analysis for the digital and smart transformation of Brazilian municipalities
DG.O'21: DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchBrazilian municipalities face challenges to provide efficient public services to their local community. One reason is that cities in the country are different in geography, development, economics, education, and technology environments. In the context ...
Comments