skip to main content
10.1145/3614321.3614366acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital transformation, technology andinnovation in Brazilian states: the pathways proposed by governors elect 2023-2026

Published:20 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital Transformation encompasses major changes taking place in society, the economy and governments through the modernization of governance, management and use of digital technologies. In Brazil, where the Federal Government plays a leading role in the innovation agenda, it is also up to the states to develop scientific and technological development initiatives. To glimpse the rumors of this agenda for the next government cycle (2023-2026) at the subnational level, this article analyzed 1,343 proposals from 82 candidates for Economy Governor in the 2022 elections, 619 related to Digital Government, 363 with Digital and 361 for Citizenship Digital. All political parties presented proposals for the theme. "innovation", "technology", "digital", "transparency", "system" and "Digital Transformation" were the most frequent key terms in the proposals. Preliminary analyzes show a favorable environment, especially for the Digital Government theme, which presented the highest number of proposals (46.4%) from candidates for governor and (45.4%) from elected governors. The results point to paths for Digital Transformation and Innovation in the Brazilian states for the next four years, especially with the appropriation of such projects by elected governments and society in general.

References

  1. ABEP-TIC. 2022. Índice ABEP de Oferta de Serviços 2022 | Portal ABEP. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.abep-tic.org.br/indice-abep-de-oferta-de-servicos-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. João Paulo Albuquerque. 2021. Modelo para o mundo, plataforma GOV.BR é destaque na Semana de Inovação 2021. Enap - Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.enap.gov.br/pt/acontece/noticias/modelo-para-o-mundo-plataforma-gov-br-e-destaque-na-semana-de-inovacao-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony Arundel, Carter Bloch, and Barry Ferguson. 2019. Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy 48, 3 (April 2019), 789–798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Thiago Ávila, Beatriz Lanza, and Daniel Valotto. 2022. BASE DE DADOS SOBRE AS PROPOSTAS DOS CANDIDATOS A GOVERNADOR DOS 26 ESTADOS E DO DISTRITO FEDERAL DO BRASIL PARA A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DIGITAL, TECNOLOGIA E INOVAÇÃO. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2022/26.092022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. BID. 2022. Gestão de Governo Digital no Brasil: Configurações Institucionais, Liderança e Marcos Normativos. Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento, Brasília, Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. BRASIL. 2018. ESTRATÉGIA BRASILEIRA PARA A TRANSFORMAÇÃO DIGITAL - E-Digital. Retrieved January 23, 2023 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/estrategia-de-governanca-digital/eDigital.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. BRASIL. 2021. Lei Federal No 14.129 de 29 de Março de 2021 - Dispõe sobre princípios, regras e instrumentos para o Governo Digital e para o aumento da eficiência pública e altera a Lei no 7.116, de 29 de agosto de 1983, a Lei no 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011 (Lei de Acesso à Informação), a Lei no 12.682, de 9 de julho de 2012, e a Lei no 13.460, de 26 de junho de 2017. Retrieved from https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/lei-n-14.129-de-29-de-marco-de-2021-311282132Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. BRASIL. 2021. LEI COMPLEMENTAR No 182, DE 1o DE JUNHO DE 2021. Retrieved January 19, 2023 from https://www.in.gov.br/web/douGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. BRASIL. 2022. Estratégia de Governo Digital 2020-2022. Governo Digital. Retrieved October 2, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/EGD2020/estrategia-de-governo-digital-2020-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. BRASIL. 2022. Plataforma Rede.gov.br. Plataforma Rede GOV.BR. Retrieved October 2, 2022 from https://bidtd.validaproj.com.brGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BRASIL. 2022. Estratégia Brasileira de Transformação Digital 2023-2026. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovações. Retrieved November 18, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br/acompanhe-o-mcti/transformacaodigital/transformacao-digitalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jen Christensen. 2021. “O impossível não é impossível”: a produção de vacinas Covid-19 em tempo recorde. CNN Brasil. Retrieved January 20, 2023 from https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/saude/o-impossivel-nao-e-impossivel-a-producao-de-vacinas-covid-19-em-tempo-recorde/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. CLP. 2022. Ranking de Competitividade dos Estados e Municípios 2022. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://conteudo.clp.org.br/ranking-de-competitividade-2022-relatoriosGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John W. Creswell, J. David Creswell, Dirceu da Silva, and Sandra Maria Mallmann da Rosa. 2021. Penso, Projeto de Pesquisa: Métodos Qualitativo, Quantitativo e Misto (5a edição ed.). Penso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pedro Farias and Miguel Porrúa. 2016. O novo protagonismo do cidadão na gestão pública. In Governos que Servem - Inovações que estão melhorando a prestação de serviços aos cidadãos. Pedro Farias, Washington, D.C, U.S.A., 116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Ramon Gil-Garcia, Mila Gasco-Hernandez, and Theresa A. Pardo. 2020. Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government. Public Performance & Management Review 43, 3 (May 2020), 483–502. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Guangwei Hu, Jin Shi, Wenwen Pan, and Jie Wang. 2012. A hierarchical model of e-government service capability: An empirical analysis. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4 (October 2012), 564–572. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.04.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. IBGE. 2022. Internet já é acessível em 90,0% dos domicílios do país em 2021 | Agência de Notícias. Agência de Notícias - IBGE. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/34954-internet-ja-e-acessivel-em-90-0-dos-domicilios-do-pais-em-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Arpan Kumar Kar, Vigneswara Ilavarasan, M. P. Gupta, Marijn Janssen, and Ravi Kothari. 2019. Moving beyond Smart Cities: Digital Nations for Social Innovation & Sustainability. Inf Syst Front 21, 3 (June 2019), 495–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09930-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Letícia Lima. 2021. Brasil é o 2o país que mais passa tempo na Internet e também o 3o que mais usa redes sociais. TudoCelular.com. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.tudocelular.com/seguranca/noticias/n179995/brasil-pais-que-mais-usa-redes-sociais.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Don MacLean and Ryad Titah. 2022. A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research on the Impacts of e‐Government: A Public Value Perspective. Public Administration Review 82, 1 (January 2022), 23–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13413Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. OECD. 2018. Digital Government Review of Brazil: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. Retrieved January 30, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-review-of-brazil-9789264307636-en.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Murali Krishna Penmetsa and Sebastián Bruque-Camara. 2021. A framework for building a sustainable digital nation: essential elements and challenges. DPRG 23, 3 (September 2021), 262–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2020-0148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Richard Mark Sainsbury. 1991. Logical Forms: An Introduction to Philosophical Logic. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2008. Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pedro Soto-Acosta. 2020. COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Digital Transformation to a High-Speed Gear. Information Systems Management 37, 4 (October 2020), 260–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tadao (Org ) Takahashi. 2000. Sociedade da informação no Brasil: livro verde. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia (MCT). Retrieved January 19, 2023 from http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/434Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Boufaida M. Tebib A. 2013. A framework based protocol for a better interoperability among services in e-Government. 54, 1 (January 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. United Nations. 2022. UN E-Government Survey 2022. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gregory Vial. 2019. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28, 2 (June 2019), 118–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. World Bank. 2022. 2022 GovTech Maturity Index Update. World Bank. Retrieved December 14, 2022 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/govtech/2022-gtmiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Haluk Demirkan, James Spohrer, and J. Welser. 2016. Digital Innovation and Strategic Transformation. IT Professional 18, 6 (November 2016), 14–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2016.115Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Digital transformation, technology andinnovation in Brazilian states: the pathways proposed by governors elect 2023-2026
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICEGOV '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
            September 2023
            509 pages
            ISBN:9798400707421
            DOI:10.1145/3614321

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 November 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format