skip to main content
10.1145/3614321.3614383acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Ginasio Experimental Tecnologico (GET): promoting pedagogical innovation and the development of student protagonism integrated into the municipal education network of Rio de Janeiro

Published:20 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Municipal Secretary of Education of Rio de Janeiro (SME-Rio), seeking to combat difficulties in the literacy process, school dropout, and learning gap, sought to re-signify the school curriculum of students in the Municipal Education Network with innovative approaches in the process like the maker culture, STEAM, and Education 5.0. In this way, SME-Rio developed the Ginásio Experimental Tecnológico (GET) program, where students carry out hands-on activities in the Colaboratório of GET’s program and develop skills, competencies, and curricular components of Integral Education, articulated with the three pillars of the program: Digital Information and Communication Technologies (DICT), Digital Culture, and Computational Thinking. In 2023, a total of 70 school units are expected, and for 2024 a total of 200 schools are projected.

References

  1. Edward P Clapp, Jessica Ross, Jennifer O Ryan, and Shari Tishman. 2016. Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Erica Rosenfeld Halverson and Kimberly Sheridan. 2014. The maker movement in education. Harvard educational review 84, 4 (2014), 495–504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrés Díaz Lantada. 2022. Engineering education 5.0: Strategies for a successful transformative project-based learning. Insights Into Global Engineering Education After the Birth of Industry 5.0 (2022), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee Martin. 2015. The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) 5, 1 (2015), 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Elaine Perignat and Jen Katz-Buonincontro. 2019. STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking skills and creativity 31 (2019), 31–43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Schad and W Monty Jones. 2020. The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 52, 1 (2020), 65–78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Ginasio Experimental Tecnologico (GET): promoting pedagogical innovation and the development of student protagonism integrated into the municipal education network of Rio de Janeiro

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICEGOV '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
            September 2023
            509 pages
            ISBN:9798400707421
            DOI:10.1145/3614321

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 November 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format