skip to main content
10.1145/3614419.3644002acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A Genre-Based Analysis of New Music Streaming at Scale

Published: 21 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The rise of on-demand music streaming platforms and novel recommendation algorithms have brought a transformative shift in music listening, where users have an effectively endless supply of new music to discover. This study aims to understand novel music streaming patterns, operationalizing novel music as new music releases that are new to everyone, from the perspective of genres. Leveraging tracks, users, and streaming data from Spotify, we empirically analyze streaming patterns of 282K new music releases. We find that new releases in genres that often serve functional purposes, such as classical music for relaxation, are consumed less. Surprisingly, new releases in Pop generally do not exhibit high consumption rates despite being characterized as popular music. From examining 1 million users’ historical genre preferences, we observe that users’ new release preferences are distinct from their overall music preferences, although past genre affinities and proclivity for newer content can predict new music consumption. Our findings present important implications for new music recommendation strategies on music streaming platforms and broader contributions to understanding the dynamics of music discovery.

References

[1]
Jean-Julien Aucouturier and Francois Pachet. 2003. Representing Musical Genre: A State of the Art. Journal of New Music Research 32, 1 (2003), 83–93.
[2]
Andy Bennett. 2017. Music, Space and Place: Popular Music and Cultural Identity. Routledge.
[3]
Daniel E Berlyne. 1970. Novelty, Complexity, and Hedonic Value. Perception & Psychophysics 8, 5 (1970), 279–286.
[4]
Dmitry Bogdanov, Herrera Boyer, 2011. How Much Metadata Do We Need in Music Recommendation?: A Subjective Evaluation Using Preference Sets. In 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference. 97–102.
[5]
Stuart Borthwick and Ron Moy. 2020. Popular Music Genres: An Introduction. Routledge.
[6]
Raymond B Cattell and David R Saunders. 1954. Musical Preferences and Personality Diagnosis: I. A Factorization of One Hundred and Twenty Themes. The Journal of Social Psychology 39, 1 (1954), 3–24.
[7]
Christopher Cayari. 2011. The YouTube Effect: How YouTube Has Provided New Ways to Consume, Create, and Share Music.International Journal of Education & the Arts 12, 6 (2011), n6.
[8]
Eric Clarke, Tia DeNora, and Jonna Vuoskoski. 2015. Music, Empathy and Cultural Understanding. Physics of Life Reviews 15 (2015), 61–88.
[9]
Tuomas Eerola. 2011. Are the Emotions Expressed in Music Genre-Specific? An Audio-Based Evaluation of Datasets Spanning Classical, Film, Pop and Mixed genres. Journal of New Music Research 40, 4 (2011), 349–366.
[10]
Simon Frith. 1996. Music and Identity. Questions of Cultural Identity 1, 1 (1996), 108–128.
[11]
Simon Frith, Richard Leppert, and Susan McClary. 2004. Towards an Aesthetic of Popular Music. Popular music: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies 4 (2004), 32–47.
[12]
Jorge E Hirsch. 2005. An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output. PNAS 102, 46 (2005), 16569–16572.
[13]
Brian J Hracs. 2012. A Creative Industry in Transition: The Rise of Digitally Driven Independent Music Production. Growth and Change 43, 3 (2012), 442–461.
[14]
Zhiheng Jiang and Hoai Nguyen Huynh. 2022. Unveiling Music Genre Structure Through Common-Interest Communities. Social Network Analysis and Mining 12, 1 (2022), 35.
[15]
Simon C Jones and Thomas G Schumacher. 1992. Muzak: On Functional Music and Power. Critical Studies in Media Communication 9, 2 (1992), 156–169.
[16]
Jason Joven. 2018. Oldies But Goodies: Streaming Makes Catalogue Records New Again. https://hmc.chartmetric.com/oldies-but-goodies-streaming-makes-catalogue-records-new-again/. Accessed 2023-08-23.
[17]
Komal Kapoor, Vikas Kumar, Loren Terveen, Joseph A Konstan, and Paul Schrater. 2015. “I like to explore sometimes" Adapting to Dynamic User Novelty Preferences. In RecSys ’15. 19–26.
[18]
Ben Lacker and Samuel F. Way. 2024. Socially-Motivated Music Recommendation. In ICWSM 2024. Forthcoming.
[19]
Alexandra Lamont and Rebecca Webb. 2010. Short- and Long-Term Musical Preferences: What Makes a Favourite Piece of Music?Psychology of Music 38, 2 (2010), 222–241.
[20]
Jennifer C Lena. 2012. Banding Together: How Communities Create Genres in Popular Music. Princeton University Press.
[21]
Patrick Litle and Marvin Zuckerman. 1986. Sensation Seeking and Music Preferences. Personality and Individual Differences 7, 4 (1986), 575–578.
[22]
Luminate. 2022. Luminate Releases 2022 U.S. Midyear Report. https://luminatedata.com/reports/luminate-2022-u-s-mid-year-report/. Accessed 15-09-2023.
[23]
Brian Manolovitz and Mitsunori Ogihara. 2020. Practical Evaluation of Repeated Recommendations in Personalized Music Discovery. In ISMIR. 633–639.
[24]
Elizabeth Hellmuth Margulis. 2014. On Repeat: How Music Plays the Mind. Oxford University Press, USA.
[25]
Kembrew McLeod. 2001. Genres, Subgenres, Sub-Subgenres and More: Musical and Social Differentiation Within Electronic/Dance Music Communities. Journal of Popular Music Studies 13, 1 (2001), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-1598.2001.tb00013.x arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1533-1598.2001.tb00013.x
[26]
Lillio Mok, Samuel F Way, Lucas Maystre, and Ashton Anderson. 2022. The Dynamics of Exploration on Spotify. In ICWSM 2022, Vol. 16. 663–674.
[27]
Frank Nagle and Florenta Teodoridis. 2020. Jack of All Trades and Master of Knowledge: The Role of Diversification in New Distant Knowledge Integration. Strategic Management Journal 41, 1 (2020), 55–85.
[28]
Raphael Nowak. 2016. When is a discovery? The affective dimensions of discovery in music consumption. Popular Communication 14, 3 (2016), 137–145.
[29]
Glenn Peoples. 2023. 112,000 New Tracks Are Uploaded to Streaming Services Daily. https://www.billboard.com/pro/music-streaming-services-add-new-tracks-daily-2023/. Accessed 2023-08-23.
[30]
Juan Prieto-Rodríguez and Víctor Fernández-Blanco. 2000. Are Popular and Classical Music Listeners the Same People?Journal of Cultural Economics 24, 2 (2000), 147–164.
[31]
Peter J Rentfrow. 2012. The Role of Music in Everyday Life: Current Directions in the Social Psychology of Music. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6, 5 (2012), 402–416.
[32]
Peter J Rentfrow and Samuel D Gosling. 2006. Message in a Ballad: The Role of Music Preferences in Interpersonal Perception. Psychological Science 17, 3 (2006), 236–242.
[33]
Peter J. Rentfrow and Jennifer A. Mcdonald. 2010. Preference, Personality, and Emotion. In Handbook of Music and Emotion: Theory, Research, Applications. Oxford University Press.
[34]
Markus Schedl. 2019. Deep Learning in Music Recommendation Systems. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics (2019), 44.
[35]
Holger Schramm. 2006. Consumption and Effects of Music in the Media. Communication Research Trends 25, 4 (2006), 3–29.
[36]
John A Sloboda and Susan A O’neill. 2001. Emotions in Everyday Listening to Music. Music and Emotion: Theory and Research 8 (2001), 415–429.
[37]
Jonathan C Smith and Carol A Joyce. 2004. Mozart Versus New Age Music: Relaxation States, Stress, and ABC Relaxation Theory. Journal of Music Therapy 41, 3 (2004), 215–224.
[38]
Aaron Van den Oord, Sander Dieleman, and Benjamin Schrauwen. 2013. Deep Content-Based Music Recommendation. In NIPS 2013, Vol. 26.
[39]
Morgan K Ward, Joseph K Goodman, and Julie R Irwin. 2014. The Same Old Song: The Power of Familiarity in Music Choice. Marketing Letters 25 (2014), 1–11.
[40]
James O Young. 2016. How Classical Music is Better Than Popular Music. Philosophy 91, 4 (2016), 523–540.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WEBSCI '24: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference
May 2024
395 pages
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 May 2024

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

Websci '24
Sponsor:
Websci '24: 16th ACM Web Science Conference
May 21 - 24, 2024
Stuttgart, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

Websci '25
17th ACM Web Science Conference
May 20 - 24, 2025
New Brunswick , NJ , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 1,560
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,560
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)237
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media