skip to main content
10.1145/3615335.3623031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Mixed Methods Approach to Designing a mHealth Application Wireframe Framework for Older Adults

Published:26 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This experience report discusses the process of creating a mHealth application wireframe framework called “mHapps” through a mixed methods approach. I provide preliminary results of a mixed-methods study conducted in order to to create a tool to assist designers with designing better mHealth applications for older adults. Existing research shows that improved mHealth applications for older adults can lead to improving the quality of life or even support independent living. My research uses an exploratory sequential mixed-method research design that uses a content analysis, a survey and a mHealth application prototype tested among older adult participants over the age of 55. Survey results revealed that participants preferred scheduling doctor's appointments via phone or in-person and the user test suggested that older adults would consider using a mHealth application for appointment scheduling if the process was not time consuming. Development of the mHapps Framework is still in process and is estimated for completion Fall 2023.

References

  1. Administration on Aging. 2021. 2020 profile of older americans. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Farzan Parveen Tajudeen, Nurhidayah Bahar, Tan Maw Pin, and Nor Izzati Saedon. 2021. Mobile Technologies and healthy ageing: A bibliometric analysis on publication trends and knowledge structure of mHealth research for older adults. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 38, 2 (2021), 118–130. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brian C. Helsel, Joel E. Williams, Kristen Lawson, Jessica Liang, and Jonathan Markowitz. 2018. Telemedicine and Mobile Health Technology are effective in the management of Digestive Diseases: A systematic review. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 63, 6 (2018), 1392–1408. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ronald S. Weinstein, Ana Maria Lopez, Bellal A. Joseph, Kristine A. Erps, Michael Holcomb, Gail P. Barker, and Elizabeth A. Krupinski. 2014. Telemedicine, Telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: Opportunities and barriers. The American Journal of Medicine. 127, 3, 183–187. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ruth M. Tappen, Mary E. Cooley, Roger Luckmann, and Somi Panday. 2021. Digital health information disparities in older adults: A mixed methods study. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 9, 1, 82–92. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for older adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Francine N. Sutton. 2020. Examining ux design principles and older adults’ preference of online appointment scheduling using a mhealth application. In Proceedings of the 38th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC ’20), October 03, 04, 2020, Denton, TX, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380851.3418624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Walter R. Boot, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Joseph Sharit, Wendy A. Rogers, Arthur D. Fisk, Tracy Mitzner, Chin Chin Lee, and Sankaran Nair. 2015. Computer proficiency questionnaire: Assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt117 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nelson A. Roque and Walter R. Boot. 2016. A new tool for assessing mobile device proficiency in older adults: The mobile device proficiency questionnaire. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 37(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816642582 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bambang Parmanto, Allen Nelson Lewis, Jr., Kristin M. Graham, and Marnie H. Bertolet. 2016. Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (tuq). International Journal of Telerehabilitation 8, 1: 3–10. http://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2016.6196 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell. 2018. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Francine N. Sutton. 2022. A content analysis of existing mHealth applications for potential older adult use. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC ’22),  https://doi.org/10.1145/3513130.3559001 October 6-8, Boston, MA, USA, 3 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Amarasinghe Arachchige Saparamadu, Piyum Fernando, Peizi Zeng, 2021. User-centered design process of an mHealth app for Health Professionals: Case Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 9, 3. http://doi.org/10.2196/18079 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Abraham Sahilemichael Kebede, Lise-Lotte Ozolins, Hanna Holst, and Kathleen Galvin. 2022. Digital engagement of older adults: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 24, 12. http://doi.org/10.2196/40192 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Mixed Methods Approach to Designing a mHealth Application Wireframe Framework for Older Adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '23: Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2023
      289 pages
      ISBN:9798400703362
      DOI:10.1145/3615335

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format