skip to main content
10.1145/3615335.3623058acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Coding Twitter Conversations with Communities of True Crime Podcast Listeners: A Methods Comparison

Published:26 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the digital era, data collection and analysis are made more efficient using software. This abstract compares methodology used in a previous study to code online conversations of true crime podcast listeners, specifically by differentiating by-hand analysis from the use of Orange Data Mining software. With the rise in popularity of true crime podcasts and violent crime, this previous study employed tweets scraped from Twitter utilizing common hashtags of popular true crime podcasts, which were coded and analyzed for shared themes. Initially, due to time constraints placed on the study, TAGS, a Twitter hashtag scraping platform, gathered so few tweets that the researcher coded data by-hand. A secondary analysis garnered a larger sample, permitting the use of Orange. For the purpose of this comparative analysis, the researcher focuses on differences between by-hand analysis conducted by Orange, indicating that by-hand methods result in “overlooking the forest” whereas Orange assists in sorting the “trees” [1]. Additionally, by-hand coding is necessary for smaller samples whereas Orange aids in sifting through larger data sets.

References

  1. Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L. M., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. 2011. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York: Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lundström, & Lundström, T. P. 2021. Podcast ethnography. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1778221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Boling, Kelli S. 2019. “True Crime Podcasting: Journalism, Justice or Entertainment?” Radio Journal, 17(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao_00003_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Highfield, Tim, Stephen Harrington, and Axel Bruns. 2013. “Twitter as a Technology for Audiencing and Fandom.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (3): 315–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.756053.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Spinelli, Martin and Dann, Lance. 2019. Podcasting: The Audio Media Revolution, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottomley, Andrew J. 2015. ‘Podcasting: A decade in the life of a “new” audio medium: Introduction’, Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 22:2, pp. 164–69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Boling, Kelli S. and Hull, Kevin. 2018. ‘Undisclosed information – serial is my favorite murder: Examining motivations in the true crime podcast audience’, Journal of Radio and Audio Media, 25:1, pp. 92–108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Vogt, W. Paul, 2014. Selecting the Right Analyses for Your Data : Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods, Guilford Publications,. ProQuest EbookCentral, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucf/detail.action?docID=1683360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. CC-BY4.0 mhawksey. 2023. “Get TAGS.” https://tags.hawksey.info/get-tags/. Creative Commons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Baym, Nancy. 2009. “What Constitutes Quality in Qualitative Internet Research?” Internet Inquiry Conversations About Method, edited by Markham, Annette N., and Nancy K. Baym. London: SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Demšar, Janez, 2013. Orange: Data Mining Toolbox in Python.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Coding Twitter Conversations with Communities of True Crime Podcast Listeners: A Methods Comparison

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '23: Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication
      October 2023
      289 pages
      ISBN:9798400703362
      DOI:10.1145/3615335

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format