skip to main content
10.1145/3615522.3615538acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

LOOP Meditation: Enhancing Novice's VR Meditation Experience with Physical Movement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality (VR) and associated technologies have rapidly grew, creating new opportunities for improving mental health. In order to provide an immersive and concentrated meditation experience, this paper offers the idea of VR-assisted meditation, which integrates the advantages of VR technology with mindfulness techniques. The suggested technique, which is known as LOOP Meditation, is mainly aimed toward novice meditators and places a strong emphasis on the value of movement and breath awareness when meditating. Existing VR experiences and meditation applications sometimes ignore the value of including physical movement, which can improve mindful body sensations and maintain interest. By creating a software that incorporates body movement and breath sensing into virtual reality surroundings, LOOP Meditation addresses this gap. The LOOP Meditation design and implementation are examined in this paper along with its possible advantages and consequences for people looking to develop their meditation practice. A pilot research comparing the efficacy of this strategy to conventional meditation techniques is offered. The study’s findings add to the expanding body of knowledge on VR-assisted meditation and demonstrate how it may have a positive effect on mental health.

References

  1. Judith Amores, Robert Richer, Nan Zhao, Pattie Maes, and Bjoern M Eskofier. 2018. Promoting relaxation using virtual reality, olfactory interfaces and wearable EEG. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks. IEEE, 98–101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Thea Andersen, Gintare Anisimovaite, Anders Christiansen, Mohamed Hussein, Carol Lund, Thomas Nielsen, Eoin Rafferty, Niels C Nilsson, Rolf Nordahl, and Stefania Serafin. 2017. A preliminary study of users’ experiences of meditation in virtual reality. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reaility. IEEE, 343–344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Tracy Brandmeyer and Arnaud Delorme. 2018. Reduced mind wandering in experienced meditators and associated EEG correlates. Experimental Brain Research 236 (2018), 2519–2528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cortland J Dahl, Antoine Lutz, and Richard J Davidson. 2015. Reconstructing and deconstructing the self: cognitive mechanisms in meditation practice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19, 9 (2015), 515–523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Andrew T Dilanchian, Ronald Andringa, and Walter R Boot. 2021. A pilot study exploring age differences in presence, workload, and cybersickness in the experience of immersive virtual reality environments. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 736793.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Nina Döllinger, Carolin Wienrich, and Marc Erich Latoschik. 2021. Challenges and opportunities of immersive technologies for mindfulness meditation: a systematic review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality 2 (2021), 644683.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Simo Järvelä, Benjamin Cowley, Mikko Salminen, Giulio Jacucci, Juho Hamari, and Niklas Ravaja. 2021. Augmented virtual reality meditation: Shared dyadic biofeedback increases social presence via respiratory synchrony. ACM Transactions on Social Computing 4, 2 (2021), 1–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Shaun W Jerdan, Mark Grindle, Hugo C Van Woerden, and Maged N Kamel Boulos. 2018. Head-mounted virtual reality and mental health: critical review of current research. JMIR Serious Games 6, 3 (2018), e9226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ilkka Kosunen, Mikko Salminen, Simo Järvelä, Antti Ruonala, Niklas Ravaja, and Giulio Jacucci. 2016. RelaWorld: neuroadaptive and immersive virtual reality meditation system. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 208–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Linda Larkey, Roger Jahnke, Jennifer Etnier, and Julie Gonzalez. 2009. Meditative movement as a category of exercise: implications for research. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 6, 2 (2009), 230–238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tatia M. C. Lee, Mei-Kei Leung, Wai-Kai Hou, Joey C. Y. Tang, Jing Yin, Kwok-Fai So, Chack-Fan Lee, and Chetwyn C. H. Chan. 2012. Distinct Neural Activity Associated with Focused-Attention Meditation and Loving-Kindness Meditation. PLOS ONE 7, 8 (08 2012), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040054Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Daniel B Levinson, Jonathan Smallwood, and Richard J Davidson. 2012. The persistence of thought: Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science 23, 4 (2012), 375–380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dominique P Lippelt, Bernhard Hommel, and Lorenza S Colzato. 2014. Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity - A review. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 1083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01083Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Antoine Lutz, Julie Brefczynski-Lewis, Tom Johnstone, and Richard J Davidson. 2008. Regulation of the neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: effects of meditative expertise. PloS One 3, 3 (2008), e1897.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Antoine Lutz, Heleen A Slagter, John D Dunne, and Richard J Davidson. 2008. Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12, 4 (2008), 163–169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ramesh Manocha. 2000. Why meditation?Australian Family Physician 29, 12 (2000), 1135–1138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Melissa Miller, Divya Mistry, Rakesh Jetly, and Paul Frewen. 2021. Meditating in virtual reality 2: Phenomenology of vividness, egocentricity and absorption-immersion. Mindfulness 12 (2021), 1195–1207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rakesh Patibanda, Florian’Floyd’ Mueller, Matevz Leskovsek, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2017. Life tree: understanding the design of breathing exercise games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 19–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Peter Payne and Mardi A Crane-Godreau. 2013. Meditative movement for depression and anxiety. Frontiers in Psychiatry 4 (2013), 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00071Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mirjana Prpa, Kıvanç Tatar, Jules Françoise, Bernhard Riecke, Thecla Schiphorst, and Philippe Pasquier. 2018. Attending to breath: exploring how the cues in a virtual environment guide the attention to breath and shape the quality of experience to support mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 71–84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ekaterina R Stepanova, John Desnoyers-Stewart, Philippe Pasquier, and Bernhard E Riecke. 2020. JeL: Breathing together to connect with others and nature. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 641–654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mattie Tops, Maarten AS Boksem, Markus Quirin, Hans IJzerman, and Sander L Koole. 2014. Internally directed cognition and mindfulness: An integrative perspective derived from predictive and reactive control systems theory. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Fred Travis and Jonathan Shear. 2010. Focused attention, open monitoring and automatic self-transcending: categories to organize meditations from Vedic, Buddhist and Chinese traditions. Consciousness and Cognition 19, 4 (2010), 1110–1118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Min-Hui Tsai and Wei-Lun Chou. 2016. Attentional orienting and executive control are affected by different types of meditation practice. Consciousness and Cognition 46 (2016), 110–126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. David R Vago and David A Silbersweig. 2012. Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012), 296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Xian Wang, Xiaoyu Mo, Mingming Fan, Lik-Hang Lee, Bertram E Shi, and Pan Hui. 2022. Reducing Stress and Anxiety in the Metaverse: A Systematic Review of Meditation, Mindfulness and Virtual Reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14645 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. LOOP Meditation: Enhancing Novice's VR Meditation Experience with Physical Movement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        VINCI '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
        September 2023
        308 pages
        ISBN:9798400707513
        DOI:10.1145/3615522

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 October 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format