skip to main content
research-article

EchoSensor: Fine-grained Ultrasonic Sensing for Smart Home Intrusion Detection

Published:19 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article presents the design and implementation of a novel intrusion detection system, called EchoSensor, which leverages speakers and microphones in smart home devices to capture human gait patterns for individual identification. EchoSensor harnesses the speaker to send inaudible acoustic signals (around 20 kHz) and utilizes the microphone to capture the reflected signals. As the reflected signals have unique variations in the Doppler shift respective to the gaits of different people, EchoSensor is able to profile human gait patterns from the generated spectrograms. To mine the gait information, we first propose a two-stage interference cancellation scheme to remove the background noise and environmental interference, followed by a new method to detect the starting point of walking and estimate the gait cycle time. We then perform the fine-grained analysis of the spectrograms to extract a series of features. In the end, machine learning is employed to construct an identifier for individual recognition. We implement the EchoSensor system and deploy it under different household environments to conduct intrusion detection tasks. Extensive experimental results have demonstrated that EchoSensor can achieve the averaged Intruder Gait Detection Rate (IDR) and True Family Member Gait Detection Rate (TFR) of 92.7% and 91.9%, respectively.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Altaf M. Umair Bin, Butko Taras, and Juang Biing-Hwang Fred. 2015. Acoustic gaits: Gait analysis with footstep sounds. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 62, 8 (2015), 20012011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Bouchrika Imed, Goffredo Michaela, Carter John, and Nixon Mark. 2011. On using gait in forensic biometrics. Journal of Forensic Sciences 56, 4 (2011), 882889.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Chang Chih-Chung and Lin Chih-Jen. 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 2, 3 (2011), 27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Chauhan Jagmohan, Hu Yining, Seneviratne Suranga, Misra Archan, Seneviratne Aruna, and Lee Youngki. 2017. BreathPrint: Breathing acoustics-based user authentication. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. ACM, 278291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Degottex Gilles. 2010. Glottal Source and Vocal-tract Separation. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] Gafurov Davrondzhon. 2007. A survey of biometric gait recognition: Approaches, security, and challenges. In Proceedings of the Annual Norwegian Computer Science Conference. Annual Norwegian Computer Science Conference Norway, 1921.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Gafurov Davrondzhon, Helkala Kirsi, and Søndrol Torkjel. 2006. Biometric gait authentication using accelerometer sensor. JCP 1, 7 (2006), 5159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Graham Daniel, Simmons George, Nguyen David T., and Zhou Gang. 2015. A software-based sonar ranging sensor for smart phones. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 2, 6 (2015), 479489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Gupta Sidhant, Morris Daniel, Patel Shwetak, and Tan Desney. 2012. Soundwave: Using the Doppler effect to sense gestures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 19111914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. [10] Han Ju and Bhanu Bir. 2006. Individual recognition using gait energy image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28, 2 (2006), 316322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. [11] Ives Spencer. 2018. Parks Associates Predicts about 27 Percent of U.S. Households to have Security by 2021. Retrieved March 15, 2019 from http://www.securitysystemsnews.com/article/parks-associates-predicts-about-27-percent-us-households-have-security-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Jenkins Jam and Ellis Carla. 2007. Using ground reaction forces from gait analysis: Body mass as a weak biometric. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, 251267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. [13] Kalgaonkar Kaustubh and Raj Bhiksha. 2007. Acoustic Doppler sonar for gait recogination. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance. IEEE, 2732.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Lawrance A. J. and Lewis P. A. W.. 1977. An exponential moving-average sequence and point process (EMA1). Journal of Applied Probability 14, 1 (1977), 98113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Le Hoang Thanh, Phung Son Lam, and Bouzerdoum Abdesselam. 2018. Human gait recognition with micro-doppler radar and deep autoencoder. In Proceedings of the 2018 24th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’18). IEEE, 33473352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Li Dong, Cao Shirui, Lee Sunghoon Ivan, and Xiong Jie. 2022. Experience: Practical problems for acoustic sensing. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing And Networking. 381390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Li Hong, He Yunhua, Sun Limin, Cheng Xiuzhen, and Yu Jiguo. 2016. Side-channel information leakage of encrypted video stream in video surveillance systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. [18] Li Jinyang, Li Zhenyu, Tyson Gareth, and Xie Gaogang. 2020. Your privilege gives your privacy away: An analysis of a home security camera service. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 387396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Lu Li, Yu Jiadi, Chen Yingying, Liu Hongbo, Zhu Yanmin, Liu Yunfei, and Li Minglu. 2018. Lippass: Lip reading-based user authentication on smartphones leveraging acoustic signals. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 14661474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Ma Yongsen, Zhou Gang, and Wang Shuangquan. 2019. WiFi sensing with channel state information: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 52, 3 (2019), 46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. [21] Mello Roger G. T., Oliveira Liliam F., and Nadal Jurandir. 2007. Digital Butterworth filter for subtracting noise from low magnitude surface electromyogram. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 87, 1 (2007), 2835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Mondal Soumik, Nandy Anup, Chakraborty Pavan, and Nandi G. C.. 2012. Gait-based personal identification system using rotation sensor. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences 3, 2 (2012), 395402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Muro-De-La-Herran Alvaro, Garcia-Zapirain Begonya, and Mendez-Zorrilla Amaia. 2014. Gait analysis methods: An overview of wearable and non-wearable systems, highlighting clinical applications. Sensors 14, 2 (2014), 33623394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Nandakumar Rajalakshmi, Iyer Vikram, Tan Desney, and Gollakota Shyamnath. 2016. Fingerio: Using active sonar for fine-grained finger tracking. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 15151525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. [25] Nandakumar Rajalakshmi, Takakuwa Alex, Kohno Tadayoshi, and Gollakota Shyamnath. 2017. Covertband: Activity information leakage using music. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Ngo Thanh Trung, Makihara Yasushi, Nagahara Hajime, Mukaigawa Yasuhiro, and Yagi Yasushi. 2014. The largest inertial sensor-based gait database and performance evaluation of gait-based personal authentication. Pattern Recognition 47, 1 (2014), 228237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. [27] Nicholas G.. 2010. College Physics: Reasoning and Relationships. Brooks/Cole.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Nixon Mark S. and Carter John N.. 2006. Automatic recognition by gait. Proceedings of the IEEE 94, 11 (2006), 20132024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Oppenheim Alan and Schafer Ronald. 1968. Homomorphic analysis of speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 16, 2 (1968), 221226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. [30] Orr Robert J. and Abowd Gregory D.. 2000. The smart floor: A mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. In Proceedings of the CHI’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 275276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. [31] Pan Shijia, Wang Ningning, Qian Yuqiu, Velibeyoglu Irem, Noh Hae Young, and Zhang Pei. 2015. Indoor person identification through footstep induced structural vibration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, 8186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Ren Yanzhi, Chen Yingying, Chuah Mooi Choo, and Yang Jie. 2013. Smartphone-based user verification leveraging gait recognition for mobile healthcare systems. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communications and Networking (SECON). IEEE, 149157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Rishi Chandra and Scott Huffman. 2018. How Google Home and the Google Assistant Helped you Get More Done in 2017. Retrieved March 15, 2019 from https://www.blog.google/products/assistant/how-google-home-and-google-assistant-helped-you-get-more-done-in-2017Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. [34] Shannon Claude Elwood. 1998. Communication in the presence of noise. Proceedings of the IEEE 86, 2 (1998), 447457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Sun Ke, Zhao Ting, Wang Wei, and Xie Lei. 2018. Vskin: Sensing touch gestures on surfaces of mobile devices using acoustic signals. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom’18). 591605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. [36] Teixeira Thiago, Jung Deokwoo, Dublon Gershon, and Savvides Andreas. 2009. PEM-ID: Identifying people by gait-matching using cameras and wearable accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 2009 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC). IEEE, 18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] TranSafety Inc. 1997. Study compares older and younger pedestrian walking speeds. Road Management and Engineering Journal (1997). https://web.archive.org/web/20090703084118 http://www.usroads.com/journals/p/rej/9710/re971001.htm. Access date March 15, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Valente Junia, Koneru Keerthi, and Cardenas Alvaro. 2019. Privacy and security in Internet-connected cameras. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT’19). IEEE, 173180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Dorp Ph Van and Groen F. C. A.. 2008. Feature-based human motion parameter estimation with radar. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation 2, 2 (2008), 135145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Waite Ashley D.. 2002. Sonar for Practising Engineers. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Wang Wei, Liu Alex X., and Shahzad Muhammad. 2016. Gait recognition using wifi signals. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 363373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Wang Yingxue, Chen Yanan, Bhuiyan Md Zakirul Alam, Han Yu, Zhao Shenghui, and Li Jianxin. 2018. Gait-based human identification using acoustic sensor and deep neural network. Future Generation Computer Systems 86 (2018), 12281237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. [43] Wold Svante, Esbensen Kim, and Geladi Paul. 1987. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2, 1-3 (1987), 3752.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Wu Dan, Zhang Daqing, Xu Chenren, Wang Hao, and Li Xiang. 2017. Device-free WiFi human sensing: From pattern-based to model-based approaches. IEEE Communications Magazine 55, 10 (2017), 9197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] Xu Wei, Yu ZhiWen, Wang Zhu, Guo Bin, and Han Qi. 2019. Acousticid: Gait-based human identification using acoustic signal. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable, and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 3 (2019), 125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Zeng Yunze, Pathak Parth H., and Mohapatra Prasant. 2016. WiWho: Wifi-based person identification in smart spaces. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Zhang Jin, Wei Bo, Hu Wen, and Kanhere Salil S.. 2016. Wifi-id: Human identification using wifi signal. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS). IEEE, 7582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Zhang Linghan, Tan Sheng, and Yang Jie. 2017. Hearing your voice is not enough: An articulatory gesture-based liveness detection for voice authentication. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, 5771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Zhang Yuting, Pan Gang, Jia Kui, Lu Minlong, Wang Yueming, and Wu Zhaohui. 2015. Accelerometer-based gait recognition by sparse representation of signature points with clusters. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 45, 9 (2015), 18641875.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Zhang Zhaonian, Pouliquen Philippe O., Waxman Allen, and Andreou Andreas G.. 2007. Acoustic micro-Doppler radar for human gait imaging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121, 3 (2007), EL110–EL113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Zhao Peijun, Lu Chris Xiaoxuan, Wang Jianan, Chen Changhao, Wang Wei, Trigoni Niki, and Markham Andrew. 2019. mid: Tracking and identifying people with millimeter wave radar. In Proceedings of the 2019 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS’19). IEEE, 3340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. EchoSensor: Fine-grained Ultrasonic Sensing for Smart Home Intrusion Detection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 20, Issue 1
      January 2024
      717 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/3618078
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 October 2023
      • Online AM: 12 August 2023
      • Accepted: 25 July 2023
      • Revised: 14 January 2023
      • Received: 17 February 2022
      Published in tosn Volume 20, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)258
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text