skip to main content
10.1145/3615833.3628591acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Q-learning Based Simulation Tool for Studying Effectiveness of Dynamic Application of Fertilizer on Crop Productivity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

As per the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), agricultural productivity needs to be increased by 70% to feed a projected 10 billion people by the year 2050, and fertilizer application plays a key role in achieving this goal. Throughout the world, fertilizer usage has significantly increased to improve crop yields. Unfortunately, several studies have shown that over 65% of the fertilizer is being wasted leading to various environmental problems such as nitrogen runoff into lakes, rivers, and oceans. In addition, the traditional practice of uniform fertilizer application without regard to field and/or crop conditions can result in wasted fertilizer. To address these challenges, we propose a simple Q-learning-based simulation tool for studying the dynamic application of fertilizer. Q-learning is particularly well suited for solving this problem, as the framework allows sensing the environment to characterize the site and crop conditions and determine the amount of fertilizer to apply. We used remote sensing data as a proxy for crop health monitoring. We used reward shaping to determine the optimal amount of fertilizer. We compared our framework with other popular deep-learning approaches Deep Q Network (DQN), Double Deep Q Network (DDQN), and Dueling Network (Due_N). Experimental results show that our approach is computationally efficient while matching or performing better than other approaches.

References

  1. Takuya Akiba, Shotaro Sano, Toshihiko Yanase, Takeru Ohta, and Masanori Koyama. 2019. Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework. In Proceedings of the 25rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Milkha S Aulakh and Sukhdev S Malhi. 2005. Interactions of nitrogen with other nutrients and water: Effect on crop yield and quality, nutrient use efficiency, carbon sequestration, and environmental pollution. Advances in agronomy 86 (2005), 341--409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ATMA Choudhury and IR Kennedy. 2005. Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Communications in soil science and plant analysis 36, 11-12 (2005), 1625--1639.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J Cihlar, L St Laurent, and JA Dyer. 1991. Relation between the normalized difference vegetation index and ecological variables. Remote sensing of Environment 35, 2-3 (1991), 279--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Adrian A Correndo, Nicolas Tremblay, Jeffrey A Coulter, Dorivar Ruiz-Diaz, David Franzen, Emerson Nafziger, Vara Prasad, Luiz H Moro Rosso, Kurt Steinke, Juan Du, et al. 2021. Unraveling uncertainty drivers of the maize yield response to nitrogen: A Bayesian and machine learning approach. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 311 (2021), 108668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Melissa A Cregger, Nate G McDowell, Robert E Pangle, William T Pockman, and Aimée T Classen. 2014. The impact of precipitation change on nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid ecosystem. Functional ecology 28, 6 (2014), 1534--1544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mark Denbaly and Harry Vroomen. 1993. Dynamic fertilizer nutrient demands for corn: A cointegrated and error-correcting system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 1 (1993), 203--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Maarten Elferink and Florian Schierhorn. 2016. Global demand for food is rising. Can we meet it. Harvard Business Review 7, 04 (2016), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Udesh Gunarathna, Renata Borovica-Gajic, Shanika Karunasekera, and Egemen Tanin. 2022. Dynamic graph combinatorial optimization with multi-attention deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. SM Haefele, MCS Wopereis, MK Ndiaye, and MJ Kropff. 2003. A framework to improve fertilizer recommendations for irrigated rice in West Africa. Agricultural systems 76, 1 (2003), 313--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H Insam, CC Mitchell, and JF Dormaar. 1991. Relationship of soil microbial biomass and activity with fertilization practice and crop yield of three ultisols. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 23, 5 (1991), 459--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jie Jiang, Peter M Atkinson, Jiayi Zhang, Ruhua Lu, Youyan Zhou, Qiang Cao, Yongchao Tian, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, and Xiaojun Liu. 2022. Combining fixedwing UAV multispectral imagery and machine learning to diagnose winter wheat nitrogen status at the farm scale. European Journal of Agronomy 138 (2022), 126537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Roger Knowles. 1982. Denitrification. Microbiological reviews 46, 1 (1982), 43--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hao Liang, Songjuan Gao, and Kelin Hu. 2020. Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the dynamic simulation of crop N uptake by using various N dilution curve approaches. European Journal of Agronomy 116 (2020), 126044.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kunpeng Liu, Xiaolin Li, Cliff C Zou, Haibo Huang, and Yanjie Fu. 2020. Ambulance dispatch via deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 123--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bao-Luo Ma and Dilip Kumar Biswas. 2015. Precision nitrogen management for sustainable corn production. In Sustainable agriculture reviews. Springer, 33--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ujjwal Mahajan and Bharat Raj Bundel. 2016. Drones for normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), to estimate crop health for precision agriculture: A cheaper alternative for spatial satellite sensors. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Research in Agriculture, Food Science, Forestry, Horticulture, Aquaculture, Animal Sciences, Biodiversity, Ecological Sciences and Climate Change (AFHABEC-2016), Delhi, India, Vol. 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. German Mandrini, Sotirios V Archontoulis, Cameron M Pittelkow, Taro Mieno, and Nicolas F Martin. 2022. Simulated dataset of corn response to nitrogen over thousands of fields and multiple years in Illinois. Data in Brief 40 (2022), 107753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. German Mandrini, Cameron Mark Pittelkow, Sotirios Archontoulis, David Kanter, and Nicolas F Martin. 2022. Exploring Trade-Offs Between Profit, Yield, and the Environmental Footprint of Potential Nitrogen Fertilizer Regulations in the US Midwest. Frontiers in plant science 13 (2022), 852116--852116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. German Mandrini, Cameron M Pittelkow, Sotirios V Archontoulis, Taro Mieno, and Nicolas F Martin. 2021. Understanding differences between static and dynamic nitrogen fertilizer tools using simulation modeling. Agricultural Systems 194 (2021), 103275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. 2015. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature 518, 7540 (2015), 529--533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Emerson Nafziger. 2019. Managing Nitrogen for Corn in 2019. https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/fdd290319.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rasel Parvej. 2021. Corn Nitrogen Management. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/articles/page1616180617871Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nathalie Pettorelli, Jon Olav Vik, Atle Mysterud, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Compton J Tucker, and Nils Chr Stenseth. 2005. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends in ecology & evolution 20, 9 (2005), 503--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanna J Poffenbarger, Daniel W Barker, Matthew J Helmers, Fernando E Miguez, Daniel C Olk, John E Sawyer, Johan Six, and Michael J Castellano. 2017. Maximum soil organic carbon storage in Midwest US cropping systems when crops are optimally nitrogen-fertilized. PLoS One 12, 3 (2017), e0172293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Laila A Puntel, Agustin Pagani, and Sotirios V Archontoulis. 2019. Development of a nitrogen recommendation tool for corn considering static and dynamic variables. European Journal of Agronomy 105 (2019), 189--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Divina Gracia P Rodriguez, David S Bullock, and Maria A Boerngen. 2019. The origins, implications, and consequences of yield-based nitrogen fertilizer management. Agronomy Journal 111, 2 (2019), 725--735.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Yuji Saikai, Vivak Patel, and Paul D Mitchell. 2020. Machine learning for optimizing complex site-specific management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 174 (2020), 105381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sebastian Schmoll and Matthias Schubert. 2018. Vision paper: reinforcement learning in smart spatio-temporal environments. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 81--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shai Sela, Harold Mathijs van Es, Bianca N Moebius-Clune, Rebecca Marjerison, and Greg Kneubuhler. 2018. Dynamic model-based recommendations increase the precision and sustainability of N fertilization in midwestern US maize production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 153 (2018), 256--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Sadao Shoji, AT Gandeza, and K Kimura. 1991. Simulation of crop response to polyolefin-coated urea: II. Nitrogen uptake by corn. Soil Science Society of America Journal 55, 5 (1991), 1468--1473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. George Stanford. 1966. Nitrogen requirements of crops for maximum yield. Agricultural anhydrous ammonia technology and use (1966), 237--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. George Stanford. 1973. Rationale for optimum nitrogen fertilization in corn production. Journal of Environmental Quality 2, 2 (1973), 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. PJ Thorburn, JS Biggs, SJ Attard, and Joseph Kemei. 2011. Environmental impacts of irrigated sugarcane production: nitrogen lost through runoff and leaching. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment 144, 1 (2011), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Sergio Adolfo Uhart and Fernando Héctor Andrade. 1995. Nitrogen defeciency in maize: I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop science 35, 5 (1995), 1376--1383.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Hado Van Hasselt, Arthur Guez, and David Silver. 2016. Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Michael Vogt and Benjamin Rosman. 2022. Analyzing Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Nitrogen Fertilizer Management in Simulated Crop Growth. In Proceedings of 43rd Conference of the South African Insti, Vol. 85. 146--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jordon Wade, Steve W Culman, Jessica AR Logan, Hanna Poffenbarger, M Scott Demyan, John H Grove, Antonio P Mallarino, Joshua M McGrath, Matthew Ruark, and Jaimie R West. 2020. Improved soil biological health increases corn grain yield in N fertilized systems across the Corn Belt. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 3917.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Min Wang, Qingsong Zheng, Qirong Shen, and Shiwei Guo. 2013. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International journal of molecular sciences 14, 4 (2013), 7370--7390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Ruoyu Wang, Keith Cherkauer, and Laura Bowling. 2016. Corn response to climate stress detected with satellite-based NDVI time series. Remote Sensing 8, 4 (2016), 269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Xinbing Wang, Yuxin Miao, Rui Dong, Hainie Zha, Tingting Xia, Zhichao Chen, Krzysztof Kusnierek, Guohua Mi, Hong Sun, and Minzan Li. 2021. Machine learning-based in-season nitrogen status diagnosis and side-dress nitrogen recommendation for corn. European Journal of Agronomy 123 (2021), 126193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Christopher John Cornish Hellaby Watkins. 1989. Learning from delayed rewards. (1989).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Jing Wu, Ran Tao, Pan Zhao, Nicolas F Martin, and Naira Hovakimyan. 2022. Optimizing Nitrogen Management with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Crop Simulations. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1712--1720.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Q-learning Based Simulation Tool for Studying Effectiveness of Dynamic Application of Fertilizer on Crop Productivity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        BigSpatial '23: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Analytics for Big Geospatial Data
        November 2023
        49 pages
        ISBN:9798400703454
        DOI:10.1145/3615833

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 November 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate32of58submissions,55%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)29
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader