skip to main content
10.1145/3616391.3622769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

IHGWO-Based Optimization of IoT Wireless Sensor Networks

Published:30 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a rapidly expanding field, with billions of devices now online. This expansion has increased demand for efficient and dependable wireless sensor connectivity. A new method for reducing wireless sensor connectivity time in IoT systems using the Improved Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimization (IHGWO) strategy is proposed. Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) is a population-based metaheuristic algorithm based on wolf hunting behaviour. It has been demonstrated to be effective in solving a wide range of optimization problems, including wireless sensor network issues. We have used IHGWO in this paper to optimize the placement and connectivity time of wireless sensors in an IoT system. Our method is evaluated in three scenarios: (1) without optimization, (2) with IHGWO and 5G critical and hybrid additions, and (3) with IHGWO and optimized sensor positions determined by the defined algorithm. These results demonstrate the potential of IHGWO as a method for reducing the amount of time wireless sensors require to connect in Internet of Things (IoT) systems. Using IHGWO, we were able to reduce wireless sensor connectivity time significantly.

References

  1. Muhammad Muzamil Aslam, Liping Du, Zahoor Ahmed, Muhammad Nauman Irshad, and Hassan Azeem. 2021. A deep learning-based power control and consensus performance of spectrum sharing in the CR network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2021 (2021), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gökhan Çelik, Massimiliano Delferro, Ali Erdemir, and Amgad Elgowainy. 2021. Catalytic Upcycling of Single-Use Polyolefins into Lubricants: A Path Forward for Circular Economy. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sabrieh Choobkar and Reza Dilmaghani. 2012. Delay analysis in prioritised wireless sensor networks. IEEE wireless communications letters 1, 3 (2012), 169-- 172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Zihan Fang and Yue Gao. 2022. Delay Compensated One-Way Time Synchronization in Distributed Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 11, 10 (2022), 2021--2025.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Leijiao Ge, Jiaheng Liu, Bo Wang, Yue Zhou, Jun Yan, and Ming Wang. 2021. Improved adaptive gray wolf genetic algorithm for photovoltaic intelligent edge terminal optimal configuration. Computers and Electrical Engineering 95 (2021), 107394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shubham Gupta and Kusum Deep. 2019. Anovel random walk greywolf optimizer. Swarm and evolutionary computation 44 (2019), 101--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sayed Mohsen Hashemi, Amir Sahafi, Amir Masoud Rahmani, and Mahdi Bohlouli. 2022. Gwo-sa: Gray wolf optimization algorithm for service activation management in fog computing. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 107846--107863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ali Asghar Heidari and Parham Pahlavani. 2017. An efficient modified grey wolf optimizer with Lévy flight for optimization tasks. Applied Soft Computing 60 (2017), 115--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jaeil Lee, Yongjoon Lee, Donghwan Lee, Hyukjin Kwon, and Dongkyoo Shin. 2021. Classification of attack types and analysis of attack methods for profiling phishing mail attack groups. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 80866--80872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chao Li, Yongju Xu, Chaonong Xu, Zhulin An, Boyu Diao, and Xiaowei Li. 2015. DTMAC: A delay tolerantMAC protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 11 (2015), 4137--4146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wen Long, Shaohong Cai, Jianjun Jiao, and Mingzhu Tang. 2020. An efficient and robust grey wolf optimizer algorithm for large-scale numerical optimization. Soft Computing 24, 2 (2020), 997--1026.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alok Kumar Mishra, Soumya Ranjan Das, Prakash K Ray, Ranjan Kumar Mallick, Asit Mohanty, and Dillip K Mishra. 2020. PSO-GWO optimized fractional order PID based hybrid shunt active power filter for power quality improvements. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 74497--74512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mohammad H Nadimi-Shahraki, Shokooh Taghian, and Seyedali Mirjalili. 2021. An improved grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems. Expert Systems with Applications 166 (2021), 113917.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mohammad H Nadimi-Shahraki, Shokooh Taghian, Seyedali Mirjalili, Hoda Zamani, and Ardeshir Bahreininejad. 2022. GGWO: Gaze cues learning-based grey wolf optimizer and its applications for solving engineering problems. Journal of Computational Science 61 (2022), 101636.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. V Ramkumar, P Jyothi, KV Karthikeyan, V Senthilkumar, Ektha Sudhakar Reddy, and R Thandaiah Prabu. 2023. Efficient Search Strategies in Selecting the Best Cluster Heads with GrayWolf Optimization Based Clustering Technique in WSN. In 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Thanh Sang-To, Hoang Le-Minh, Seyedali Mirjalili, Magd Abdel Wahab, and Thanh Cuong-Le. 2022. A new movement strategy of grey wolf optimizer for optimization problems and structural damage identification. Advances in Engineering Software 173 (2022), 103276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shahrzad Saremi, Seyedeh Zahra Mirjalili, and Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili. 2015. Evolutionary population dynamics and grey wolf optimizer. Neural Computing and Applications 26 (2015), 1257--1263.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Fanrong Shi, Simon X Yang, Xianguo Tuo, Lili Ran, and Yuqing Huang. 2020. A novel rapid-flooding approach with real-time delay compensation for wirelesssensor network time synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 52, 3 (2020), 1415--1428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ankit Thakkar and Ketan Kotecha. 2014. Cluster head election for energy and delay constraint applications of wireless sensor network. IEEE sensors Journal 14, 8 (2014), 2658--2664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V Vanitha, Amit Barve, Arjun Singh, R Javanthi, Rakesh kumar Dwivedi, and NC Ajay Vishwath. 2022. Acoustic Sensor Networks: An Energy Efficient Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm development for underwater networks. In 2022 International Interdisciplinary Humanitarian Conference for Sustainability (IIHC). IEEE, 811--817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Chuanjing Zhang, Huanlao Liu, Qunlong Zhou, and Can Liu. 2023. Improved Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm Based on Dimension Learning-Based Hunting Search Strategy. IEEE Access 11 (2023), 13738--13753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yonghong Zhang and Xiangyu Kong. 2023. A particle swarm optimization algorithm with empirical balance strategy. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: X 10 (2023), 100089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. IHGWO-Based Optimization of IoT Wireless Sensor Networks
                      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

                      Recommendations

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Conferences
                        Q2SWinet '23: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks
                        October 2023
                        121 pages
                        ISBN:9798400703683
                        DOI:10.1145/3616391
                        • General Chair:
                        • Ahmed Mostefaoui,
                        • Program Chair:
                        • Peng Sun

                        Copyright © 2023 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 30 October 2023

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • research-article

                        Acceptance Rates

                        Overall Acceptance Rate46of131submissions,35%
                      • Article Metrics

                        • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
                        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

                        Other Metrics

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader