skip to main content
10.1145/3616712.3616725acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Conceptual on the Impact of Digital Competence on Non-academic Staff's Job Performance in the Vietnam Higher Educational Context

Published: 15 December 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Amid a digitally growing world, digital competence has emerged as a critical concept in discussing what kinds of proficiency individuals should have. It is believed that, in addition to professional competence, digital competence is required for the workforce to improve their work results when much of their daily work uses technologies. Nonetheless, a high rate of the Vietnamese force faces a low level of digital competence, which aligns with the global trend. Meanwhile, previous studies have mainly concentrated on developing digital competence frameworks and proposing roadmaps to apply them; this current study may help seek answers to the questions of how the digital competence of the non-academic staff impacts their job performance. This proposed study may use survey quantitative research design to serve descriptive and evaluative research purposes based on the snowball sampling techniques for data collection. This study could be a fitting response to explain to what extent digital competence impact job performance among the non-academic staff in Vietnam universities by surveying full-time members from a private university. In addition, the findings from this study may assist educational organizations in selecting strategies for improving job performance based on a better understanding of the impact of digital competence on it.

References

[1]
Murawski, M., & Bick, M. (2017). Digital competences of the workforce – a research topic? Business Process Management Journal, 23(3), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2016-0126
[2]
Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors, 20(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
[3]
Kane, G. (2019). The Technology Fallacy: People Are the Real Key to Digital Transformation. Research-Technology Management, 62(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1661079
[4]
Anusca Ferrari. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/52966
[5]
British Council Viet Nam. (2022). Readiness of digital transformation in Vietnamese universities. britishcouncil.vn/sites/default/files/report_readiness_of_digital_transformation_in_vietnamese_universities.pdf
[6]
European court of auditors. (2021). EU actions to address low digital skills.
[7]
Trinh. (2022). Phát trien nang luc so cho luc luong lao dong. Nhandan.
[8]
Kundi, Y. M., Aboramadan, M., Elhamalawi, E. M. I., & Shahid, S. (2021). Employee psychological well-being and job performance: Exploring mediating and moderating mechanisms. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(3), 736–754. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2020-2204
[9]
Bolli, T., & Pusterla, F. (2022). Decomposing the effects of digitalization on workers’ job satisfaction. International Review of Economics, 69(2), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00392-6
[10]
Naim, M. F., & Lenka, U. (2017). The impact of social media and collaboration on Gen Y employees’ engagement. International Journal of Development Issues, 16(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-04-2017-0041
[11]
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
[12]
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The Modeling and Assessment of Work Performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
[13]
Bonache, J., & Noethen, D. (2014). The impact of individual performance on organizational success and its implications for the management of expatriates. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(14), 1960–1977. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.870287
[14]
Vosloban, R. I. (2012). The Influence of the Employee's Performance on the Company's Growth—A Managerial Perspective. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00211-0
[15]
Scotter, J. R. V. (2000). Relationships of Task Performance and Contextual Performance with Turnover, Job Satisfaction, and Affective Commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00040-6
[16]
Alexander, N. A., Jang, S. T., & Kankane, S. (2017). The Performance Cycle: The Association between Student Achievement and State Policies Tying Together Teacher Performance, Student Achievement, and Accountability. American Journal of Education, 123(3), 413–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/691229
[17]
European Commission. (2006). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32006H0962&qid=1496720114366
[18]
Anusca Ferrari. (2012). Digital competence in practce: An analysis of frameworks. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/82116
[19]
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay. New York.
[20]
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212
[21]
Stephanie Carretero, Riina Vuorikari, & Yves Punie. (2017). The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens.
[22]
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 1, 2nd ed (pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
[23]
Guzmán-Ortiz, C. V., Navarro-Acosta, N. G., Florez-Garcia, W., & Vicente-Ramos, W. (2020). Impact of digital transformation on the individual job performance of insurance companies in Peru. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2020.9.005
[24]
Roe, R. A. (1999). Work performance: A multiple regulation perspective. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology 1999, Vol. 14 (pp. 231–335). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
[25]
Pandey, J. (2018). Factors affecting job performance: An integrative review of literature. Management Research Review, 42(2), 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0051
[26]
Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2005). Performance Concepts and Performance Theory. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological Management of Individual Performance (pp. 1–25). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013419.ch1
[27]
Al‐Ahmadi, H. (2009). Factors affecting performance of hospital nurses in Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860910927943
[28]
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[29]
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
[30]
Wang, C.-H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779
[31]
Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2010). Judgments of self-perceived academic competence and their differential impact on students’ achievement motivation, learning approach, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0030-9
[32]
Nwosu, J. C., John, H. C., Izang, A. A., & Akorede, O. J. (2018). Assessment of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Competence and Literacy Skills among Undergraduates as a Determinant Factor of Academic Achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(15), 582–589.
[33]
Guo, J., Chen, Z., & Zheng, B. (2021). Postgraduate Competence and Academic Research Performance: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Sustainability, 13(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116469
[34]
Nikou, S., & Aavakare, M. (2021). An assessment of the interplay between literacy and digital Technology in Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3893–3915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10451-0
[35]
Jang, M., Aavakare, M., Nikou, S., & Kim, S. (2021). The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecommunications Policy, 45(7), 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102154
[36]
Rodgers, W. M., Markland, D., Selzler, A.-M., Murray, T. C., & Wilson, P. M. (2014). Distinguishing Perceived Competence and Self-Efficacy: An Example From Exercise. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(4), 527–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.961050
[37]
Galindo-Domínguez, H., & Bezanilla, M.-J. (2021). Promoting Time Management and Self-Efficacy Through Digital Competence in University Students: A Mediational Model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), ep294. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9607
[38]
Alex, D., Varghese, J., & Thomas, M. (2021). Embracing Digitalisation—Exploring the Relationship Between Digital Competence and Self-Efficacy of School Teachers. 7.
[39]
Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the Relationship between Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, their Digital Competence, Strategies to Evaluate Information, and use of ICT at School. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501
[40]
Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X481382
[41]
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.240
[42]
Meske, C., & Junglas, I. (2021). Investigating the elicitation of employees’ support towards digital workplace transformation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(11), 1120–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1742382
[43]
Pacheco, P. O., & Coello-Montecel, D. (2023). Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between digital competencies and job performance? Computers in Human Behavior, 140, 107575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107575
[44]
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers & Education, 82, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
[45]
Mehrvarz, M., Heidari, E., Farrokhnia, M., & Noroozi, O. (2021). The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students’ digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education, 167, 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
[46]
De Vries, H., Mudde, A. N., Dijkstra, A., & Willemsen, M. C. (1998). Differential Beliefs, Perceived Social Influences, and Self-Efficacy Expectations among Smokers in Various Motivational Phases. Preventive Medicine, 27(5), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1998.0344
[47]
Wang, S., & Chuan‐Chuan Lin, J. (2011). The effect of social influence on bloggers’ usage intention. Online Information Review, 35(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113588
[48]
Teo, L. X., Leng, H. K., & Phua, Y. X. P. (2019). Marketing on Instagram: Social influence and image quality on perception of quality and purchase intention. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 20(2), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSMS-04-2018-0028
[49]
Moghavvemi, S. (2015). Impact of Perceived Self-Efficacy and Capability to Use IT Innovation on Individual Use Behaviour. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2561739
[50]
de Veer, A. J. E., Peeters, J. M., Brabers, A. E., Schellevis, F. G., Rademakers, J. J. J., & Francke, A. L. (2015). Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0765-8
[51]
Lee, T. W., & Ko, Y. K. (2010). Effects of self-efficacy, affectivity and collective efficacy on nursing performance of hospital nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(4), 839–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05244.x
[52]
Hayat, A. A., Shateri, K., Amini, M., & Shokrpour, N. (2020). Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: A structural equation model. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9
[53]
Talsma, K., Robertson, K., Thomas, C., & Norris, K. (2021). COVID-19 Beliefs, Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance in First-year University Students: Cohort Comparison and Mediation Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643408
[54]
Marsh, E. (2018). Understanding the Effect of Digital Literacy on Employees’ Digital Workplace Continuance Intentions and Individual Performance: International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 9(2), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDLDC.2018040102
[55]
Maqableh, M., Jaradat, M., & Azzam, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4003–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y
[56]
He, T., & Li, S. (2019). A comparative study of digital informal learning: The effects of digital competence and technology expectancy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1744–1758. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12778
[57]
Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9(3), 71–85. Scopus.
[58]
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed (pp. xxix, 260). Sage Publications, Inc.
[59]
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (Second edition). Anol Bhattacherjee.
[60]
Martzoukou, K., Fulton, C., Kostagiolas, P., & Lavranos, C. (2020). A study of higher education students’ self-perceived digital competences for learning and everyday life online participation. Journal of Documentation, 76(6), 1413–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2020-0041

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEME '23: Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
July 2023
507 pages
ISBN:9798400708022
DOI:10.1145/3616712
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 December 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

ICEME 2023

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 45
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media