skip to main content
10.1145/3616712.3616761acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Environmental Concern and the Intention to Use Eco-friendly Technologies: An Analysis of Battery Electric Vehicles in Macau.

Published:15 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

A growing number of people are becoming aware of the environmental footprint that our actions have on the environment. Research indicates that a key factor leading to the adoption of an electric vehicle is consumers’ high environmental concern. Indeed, the environmental concern (EC) construct is commonly associated with the purchase of sustainable and eco-friendly products in literature. Our study challenges this assumption. We examined how the environmental factor influenced the behavioral intention of Macau residents to adopt battery-electric vehicle (BEV) technology. For this purpose, we conducted a study based on the UTAUT-2 framework and used structural equation modeling (SmartPLS) to analyze the data. As a result, the choice of vehicles did not depend on the consumers’ level of concern. It appeared that consumers strongly perceived the benefits of a cleaner environment, however, when it comes to technology, environmental benefits are nice to have, rather than the primary incentive to purchase BEVs. Researchers should consider the role of environmental concern as a background factor in technology acceptance models, rather than a direct predictor of behavior. It is also recommended that marketers correctly consider this element when developing their product communications strategies, to appeal to the desired segment of customers.

References

  1. René Bohnsack. 2018. Local niches and firm responses in sustainability transitions: The case of low-emission vehicles in China. Technovation 70 (2018), 20–32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Francesca De Canio, Elisa Martinelli, and Emiro Endrighi. 2021. Enhancing consumers’ pro-environmental purchase intentions: the moderating role of environmental concern. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 49, 9 (2021), 1312–1329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Riley E Dunlap and W Michelson. 2002. Handbook of environmental sociology. London, Greenwood Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Edgar Erdfelder, Franz Faul, and Axel Buchner. 1996. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers 28 (1996), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen. 2011. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Uwe Flick. 2009. An introduction to qualitative analysis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Axel Franzen and Dominikus Vogl. 2013. Two decades of measuring environmental attitudes: A comparative analysis of 33 countries. Global Environmental Change 23, 5 (2013), 1001–1008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N Fraser. 2018. Macau poised to become richest place on the planet by 2020. South China Morning Post 8 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G David Garson. 2016. Partial least squares. Regression and structural equation models.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Joe Hair Jr, Joseph F Hair Jr, G Tomas M Hult, Christian M Ringle, and Marko Sarstedt. 2021. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah and Nurul Syafiqah Tanwir. 2021. Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production 279 (2021), 123643.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. IQAir. 2021. World air quality report. Region & City PM2 5 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chunmi Jeon, Jaeheung Yoo, and Mun Kee Choi. 2012. The effect of social influence on consumers’ hybrid electric vehicles adoption in Korea and China. In 2012 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). IEEE, 336–340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. William Kilbourne and Gregory Pickett. 2008. How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research 61, 9 (2008), 885–893.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Maren Ingrid Kropfeld, Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno, and Danilo C Dantas. 2018. The ecological impact of anticonsumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 37, 2 (2018), 245–259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ivan KW Lai, Yide Liu, Xinbo Sun, Hao Zhang, and Weiwei Xu. 2015. Factors influencing the behavioural intention towards full electric vehicles: An empirical study in Macau. Sustainability 7, 9 (2015), 12564–12585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alessandro Lampo. 2022. How is Technology Accepted? Fundamental Works in User Technology Acceptance from Diffusion of Innovations to UTAUT-2. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering. 260–266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Alessandro Lampo and Susana C Silva. 2022. How Social Influence and Image Impact on the Intention to Use a Technology: A Study from the Battery Electric Vehicle Domain. In 2022 13th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics. 142–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alessandro Lampo, Susana C Silva, and Paulo Duarte. 2023. The role of environmental concern and technology show-off on electric vehicles adoption: the case of Macau. International Journal of Emerging Markets (2023).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Q Nielsen. 2018. Global consumers seek companies that care about environmental issues. 09 11 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nielseniq.com/global/en/insights/analysis/2018/global-consumers-seek-companies-that-care-about-environmental-issues/. [Accessed 06 01 2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeinab Rezvani, Johan Jansson, and Jan Bodin. 2015. Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation research part D: transport and environment 34 (2015), 122–136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Divia Riga. 2015. Hybrid electric vehicles: Driving towards sustainability. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Humanities, School of Human and ….Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Christian M Ringle, Sven Wende, and Jan-Michael Becker. 2022. SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek: SmartPLS GmbH. J. Appl. Struct. Equ. Model. (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paschal Sheeran and Thomas L Webb. 2016. The intention–behavior gap. Social and personality psychology compass 10, 9 (2016), 503–518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Susana Silva and Alessandro Lampo. 2021. The influence of society on the behavioral intention to use a technology. EMAC 2021 (2021), 1–2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Susana C Silva, Ana Santos, Paulo Duarte, and Božidar Vlačić. 2021. The role of social embarrassment, sustainability, familiarity and perception of hygiene in second-hand clothing purchase experience. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 49, 6 (2021), 717–734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Virender Singh, Vedant Singh, and S Vaibhav. 2020. A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 86 (2020), 102436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jiyoung Son. 2018. Back translation as a documentation tool. Translation & Interpreting, The 10, 2 (2018), 89–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuttimani Tamilmani, Nripendra P Rana, and Yogesh K Dwivedi. 2021. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: A meta-analytic evaluation of UTAUT2. Information Systems Frontiers 23 (2021), 987–1005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Viswanath Venkatesh. 2022. Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research (2022), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Viswanath Venkatesh, James YL Thong, and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly (2012), 157–178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zikai Zhang, Ni Sheng, Daiqing Zhao, Kaihan Cai, Guiming Yang, and Qingbin Song. 2023. Are residents more willing to buy and pay for electric vehicles under the “carbon neutrality”?Energy Reports 9 (2023), 510–521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jianyu Zhao, XI Xi, QI Na, Shanshan Wang, Seifedine Nimer Kadry, and Priyan Malarvizhi Kumar. 2021. The technological innovation of hybrid and plug-in electric vehicles for environment carbon pollution control. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 86 (2021), 106506.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Environmental Concern and the Intention to Use Eco-friendly Technologies: An Analysis of Battery Electric Vehicles in Macau.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEME '23: Proceedings of the 2023 14th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics
      July 2023
      507 pages
      ISBN:9798400708022
      DOI:10.1145/3616712

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 15 December 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format