Zhaolin Lyu
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we present experiences of designing and implementing a series of playable concepts based on gameplay design patterns for goals and goal structures. These playable concepts are coupled with existing gameplay design patterns to enable complementary design knowledge representations, allowing different perspectives for the same phenomenon. Twenty-six playable concepts were created and are available online at itch.io. The paper discusses the details of the design process and reflects on the value of interactive representation of design knowledge and on coupling design knowledge representations. The paper contributes to the ongoing discussions in the game research community concerning documenting and disseminating game design knowledge.
- Nada Aouadi, Philippe Pernelle, Chokri Ben Amar, and Thibault Carron. 2016. MDA Approach for Reusability in Serious Game and E-learning Design. In Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2016 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer International Publishing, Cham, 206–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_23Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Christopher Barney. 2020. Pattern language for game design. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Barwood, Hal, and Noah Falstein. The 400 Project. Retrieved June 14, 2023 from https://www.finitearts.com/Pages/400page.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Staffan Björk, and Jussi Holopainen. 2005. Patterns In Game Design. Charles River Media.Google Scholar
- Rogelio E. Cardona-Rivera, José P. Zagal, and Michael S. Debus. 2020. Gfi: A formal approach to narrative design and game research. In Interactive Storytelling: 13th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2020, Bournemouth, UK, November 3–6, 2020, Proceedings 13, Springer, 133–148.Google Scholar
- Rogelio E. Cardona-Rivera, José P. Zagal, and Michael S. Debus. 2020. Narrative goals in games: A novel nexus of story and gameplay. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, 1–4.Google Scholar
- John C. Jones. 1970. Design Methods; seeds of human futures. The Pitman Press. London.Google Scholar
- Mia Consalvo. 2017. When paratexts become texts: De-centering the game-as-text. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 34, 2 (2017), 177–183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greg Costkyan. 2002. I have no words & I must design: toward a critical vocabulary for games. In Proceedings of the computer games and digital cultures conference, Finland, 9–33.Google Scholar
- Michael S. Debus, José P. Zagal, and Rogelio E. Cardona-Rivera. 2020. A typology of imperative game goals. Unpubl. Manuscr. (2020).Google Scholar
- Joris Dormans. 2012. Engineering emergence: applied theory for game design. (2012).Google Scholar
- George Skaff Elias, Richard Garfield, and K. Robert Gutschera. 2012. Characteristics of games. MIT Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Friedemann Friese and Harald Lieske. 504. Retrieved August 31, 2023 from https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/175878/504/NGoogle Scholar
- Tracy Fullerton. 2014. Game design workshop: a playcentric approach to creating innovative games. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Kathrin M. Gerling, Max Birk, Regan L. Mandryk, and Andre Doucette. 2013. The effects of graphical fidelity on player experience. In Proceedings of international conference on Making Sense of Converging Media, 229–236.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefano Gualeni . Doors (the game). Retrieved from https://doors.gua-le-ni.com/Google Scholar
- Xavier Ho and Martin Tomitsch. 2019. Affordances of brainstorming toolkits and their use in game jams. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on the foundations of digital games, 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jussi Holopainen. 2022. Challenge. Encyclopedia of Ludic Terms. https://eolt.org/ (2022).Google Scholar
- Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. TOCHI 19, 3 (2012), 1–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, San Jose, CA, 1722.Google Scholar
- Ana Illanas Vila, Francisco J. Gallego-Durán, Rosana Satorre Cuerda, and Faraón Llorens Largo. 2008. Conceptual mini-games for learning. (2008).Google Scholar
- Aki Järvinen. 2005. Theory as Game: Designing the Game Game. In DiGRA Conference.Google Scholar
- Aki Järvinen. 2008. Games without frontiers: Theories and methods for game studies and design. Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
- Jesper Juul. 2021. The Game of Video Game Objects: A Minimal Theory of when we see Pixels as Objects rather than Pictures. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 376–381.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andy Keenan and Matt Bouchard. 2015. Root of Play-Game Design for Digital Humanists. Syllabus 4, 1 (2015).Google Scholar
- Hartmut Koenitz and Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari. 2021. The paradigm of game system building. Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc. 5, 3 (2021).Google Scholar
- Bernd Kreimeier. 2002. The Case For Game Design Patterns. Retrieved from https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/the-case-for-game-design-patternsGoogle Scholar
- Annakaisa Kultima and Kati Alha. 2011. Using the VNA Ideation Game at Global Game Jam. In DiGRA Conference, Citeseer.Google Scholar
- Annakaisa Kultima, Christina Lassheikki, Solip Park, and Tomi Kauppinen. 2020. Designing games as playable concepts: five design values for tiny embedded educational games. In Proceedings of the 2020 DiGRA International Conference: Play Everywhere, Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
- Annakaisa Kultima, Johannes Niemelä, Janne Paavilainen, and Hannamari Saarenpää. 2008. Designing game idea generation games. In Proceedings of the 2008 conference on future play: Research, play, share, 137–144.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petri Lankoski. 2012. Computer games and emotions. Philos. Comput. Games (2012), 39–55.Google Scholar
- Bryan Lawson. 2006. How designers think. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Andy Nealen, Adam Saltsman, and Eddy Boxerman. 2011. Towards minimalist game design. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on foundations of digital games, 38–45.Google ScholarDigital Library
- José P. Zagal, Michael Mateas, Clara Fernández-Vara, Brian Hochhalter, and Nolan Lichti. 2005. Towards an Ontological Language for Game Analysis. (2005). Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/06276.09313.pdfGoogle Scholar
- John Rheinfrank and Shelley Evenson. 1996. Design languages. In Bringing design to software. 63–85.Google Scholar
- Doris C. Rusch. 2020. Existential, transformative game design. JGSS 2, (2020), 1–39.Google Scholar
- Michael Sellers. 2017. Advanced game design: a systems approach. Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
- Miguel Sicart. 2008. Defining game mechanics. Game Stud. 8, 2 (2008), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Jaakko Stenros. 2017. The game definition game: A review. Games Cult. 12, 6 (2017), 499–520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernard Suits. 2014. The grasshopper-: games, life and utopia. Broadview Press.Google Scholar
- Steve Swink. 2008. Game feel: a game designer's guide to virtual sensation. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Katie Salen Tekinbas and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emma Westecott. 2020. Game sketching: Exploring approaches to research-creation for games. Virtual Creat. 10, 1 (2020), 11–26.Google ScholarCross Ref
- José P. Zagal, Michael S. Debus, and Rogelio E. Cardona-Rivera. 2019. On the ultimate goals of games: Winning, finishing, and prolonging. In Proceedings of the 13th International Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Robert Zubek. 2020. Elements of game design. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Goal Playable Concepts Coupling Gameplay Design Patterns with Playable Concepts
Recommendations
Exploring aesthetical gameplay design patterns: camaraderie in four games
MindTrek '10: Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media EnvironmentsThis paper explores how a vocabulary supporting design-related discussions of gameplay preferences can be developed. Using the preference of experiencing camaraderie as an example, we have analyzed four games: the board games Space Alert and Battlestar ...
Playable (research) concepts workshop: translating your topics into tiny games
AcademicMindtrek '20: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Academic MindtrekIn this workshop, the participants bring their own research topics and concepts to create small games with the game making tool - Construct 3. We invite the participants of Academic Mindtrek to think about and experiment with how, for instance, figures ...
Strategic games and truly playable effectivity functions
A well-known result in the logical analysis of cooperative games states that the so-called playable effectivity functions exactly correspond to strategic games. More precisely, this result states that for every playable effectivity function E there ...
Comments