skip to main content
10.1145/3617695.3617700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Concept Lattice Factorization in Social Networks

Published:02 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cohesive subgraph is regarded as an important topological structure in social network analysis. It is critical to understand the organization behavior of users and supervise the users work well together in order to achieve goals within a social network. Therefore, cohesive subgraph mining is becoming a critical research issue for social network analysis. However, there exist many challenges for mining cohesive subgraphs from massive social networks due to its large scale property. Aiming to reduce the size of social networks for fast analytic, this paper formulates the problem on concept lattice factorization in a social network and further devises a factorization algorithm. Importantly, an efficient community detection approach based on concept lattice factors is then proposed considering the concept lattice factors can well characterize the topology skeleton of a given social network.

References

  1. Radim Belohlavek and Vilem Vychodil. 2010. Discovery of optimal factors in binary data via a novel method of matrix decomposition. J. Comput. System Sci. 76, 1 (2010), 3–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fei Hao, Geyong Min, Zheng Pei, Doo-Soon Park, and Laurence T Yang. 2017. K -Clique Community Detection in Social Networks Based on Formal Concept Analysis. IEEE Systems Journal 11, 1 (2017), 250–259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Fei Hao, Guangyao Pang, Zheng Pei, Ke Yun Qin, Yu Zhang, and Xiaoming Wang. 2019. Virtual Machines Scheduling in Mobile Edge Computing: A Formal Concept Analysis Approach. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fei Hao, Doo-Soon Park, Geyong Min, Young-Sik Jeong, and Jong-Hyuk Park. 2016. k-Cliques mining in dynamic social networks based on triadic formal concept analysis. Neurocomputing 209 (2016), 57–66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fei Hao, Zheng Pei, Doo-Soon Park, Laurence T Yang, Young-Sik Jeong, and Jong-Hyuk Park. 2017. Iceberg clique queries in large graphs. Neurocomputing 256 (2017), 101–110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fei Hao, Yixuan Yang, Beibei Pang, Neil Y Yen, and Doo-Soon Park. 2019. A fast algorithm on generating concept lattice for symmetry formal context constructed from social networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2019), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mohamed-Hamza Ibrahim, Rokia Missaoui, and Abir Messaoudi. 2018. Detecting communities in social networks using concept interestingness. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering. IBM Corp., 81–90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ales Keprt and Václav Snásel. 2004. Binary Factor Analysis with Help of Formal Concepts.. In CLA, Vol. 110. 90–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Haithem Mezni and Taher Abdeljaoued. 2018. A cloud services recommendation system based on Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis. Data & Knowledge Engineering 116 (2018), 100–123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Václav Snášel, Zdenek Horák, and Ajith Abraham. 2008. Understanding social networks using formal concept analysis. In 2008 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 3. IEEE, 390–393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Yuan Sun, Shiwei Ye, Yi Sun, and Tsunehiko Kameda. 2015. Improved algorithms for exact and approximate Boolean matrix decomposition. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Qiang Wu, Yan Dong, Yu-Xi Wu, and Li-Ping Xie. 2019. Concept lattice factorization based 3D model retrieval of mechanical parts. Acta Automatica Sinica 45, 2 (2019), 407–419.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yingxiu Zhao, Jinhai Li, Wenqi Liu, and Weihua Xu. 2017. Cognitive concept learning from incomplete information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 8, 1 (2017), 159–170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Caifeng Zou, Daqiang Zhang, Jiafu Wan, Mohammad Mehedi Hassan, and Jaime Lloret. 2015. Using concept lattice for personalized recommendation system design. IEEE Systems Journal 11, 1 (2015), 305–314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Concept Lattice Factorization in Social Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BDIOT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things
      August 2023
      232 pages
      ISBN:9798400708015
      DOI:10.1145/3617695

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 November 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format